26 May 2025

Canberra's first 'mixed-use' EV charger opens in Turner

| By James Coleman
Join the conversation
39
EV charger

Multi-use EV charging station in Turner. Photo: ActewAGL.

The inner north suburb of Turner has welcomed what’s being described as the ACT’s first “mixed-use” electric-vehicle charger.

And no, before you ask, that doesn’t mean internal-combustion-powered cars can use it too.

ActewAGL, the provider, says the new charging station on Watson Street is designed to “meet the growing demand for accessible and flexible charging across the region” – particularly for apartment dwellers who don’t have anywhere else to plug in.

Much like other fast charging stations, it features two dual-port 75kW DC fast charging plugs, enough to fully charge an EV in about an hour.

But it also adds two dual-port, slower 22 kW AC options, which are more like what you would get by plugging your car into three-phase power at home, and takes between four and seven hours (depending on the car).

READ ALSO A slice of Canberra’s history is up for sale

ActewAGL says the site can service “any one of the 11,000-plus EVs on Canberra roads”, thanks to three different plug types – three CCS, one CHAdeMo, and four Type-2.

It’s also “conveniently located” close to the city centre, Braddon, the Australian National University (ANU), and the Elouera Street light-rail stop.

“We know drivers often face the pressure of moving their vehicle the moment charging finishes, especially with fast chargers,” ActewAGL Retail General Manager Rachael Turner said.

“By providing a range of charging speeds, we’re easing this stress and giving drivers the flexibility to choose a charging speed that matches their plans.”

EV charger

The EV charging station is provided by EVIE Networks. Photo: ActewAGL.

ActewAGL expects the AC chargers to become popular for visitors to the Turner Parklands as well as residents of nearby apartment complexes “who may not have access to private charging facilities”.

The charger brings the total number of ActewAGL charging facilities up to 40 charging points across 12 locations, all delivered through EVIE Networks.

It was funded under the first round of the ACT Government’s “Public EV Charging Infrastructure Fund”, designed to help reach the government’s now-achieved goal of 180 public chargers across the territory by 2025.

“The Turner hub marks a major step forward in our mission to make EV charging simple, reliable and convenient for everyone in our region,” Ms Turner said.

READ ALSO BMW’s new hatch has big shoes to fill

In its first audit of the ACT’s public EV charging facilities in early April, ACT AEVA awarded the territory an “A-minus”.

Members checked a total of 102 plugs across 26 sites, and assessed the physical condition of the charger and cable, whether it was in service, and whether charging apps, such as PlugShare, were giving correct information about each one.

Five plugs were found to be out of service, but there were always other plugs available, so no site was completely unusable.

AEVA ACT spokesperson Dr Peter Campbell told Region “things are going pretty well”.

“We did find a couple of dead plugs, and signage could be a little better in places to make it a bit easier to find as you turn into a car park, but generally, the situation’s pretty good.”

“Things are going pretty well” when it comes to EV chargers in the ACT, AEVA ACT says. Photo: James Coleman.

However, he also noted there was a lack of options for people who didn’t want to – or need to – pay for fast charges.

“DC fast chargers are really expensive, and not every location needs that level of charging – you’re paying for speed you don’t necessarily need,” he said.

“For similar money, you could put in many tens of slower AC chargers down one line of a car park, so that, if you’re in a nearby apartment, you could just leave your car to trickle charge all night, or alternatively, if it’s a park-and-ride site, you could leave your car to trickle charge all day while you’re at work.”

To celebrate the launch of the ACT’s first mixed-use EV charging hub, ActewAGL is giving away five $100 Evie charging vouchers (available for use at any EVIE charging station across Australia).

Customers currently on ActewAGL’s evEnergy Saver Plan, as well as those who sign up prior to 30 June 2025, will automatically be entered into the draw to win one of the five vouchers.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

39
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

So they’ve made it so you can charge slowly? Isn’t the problem they’re too slow now? So we are going to have people use these as a parking spot with slow charge while others forced to wait. It doesn’t make sense. Another reason not to buy an EV.

PC__LoadLetter11:43 pm 29 May 25

There’s no shortage of expensive rapid chargers. But we need more slower chargers that cost nothing to install (by comparison) and which open up cool possibilities. Like daytime trickle charging at early bird parking lots. You’re there all day, why not charge on solar?

The Evie chargers are great – much better and easier to use than the NRMA ones.

I agree this seems to be “virtue signalling” but not in the way most people might suspect.

“75kW DC fast charging”.

75kW is terribly slow.

I usually won’t go to a charging point if it is slower than 150kW and look for the 350kW ones.

Installing a new, almost obsolete charging point does seem like virtue signalling.

PC__LoadLetter11:45 pm 29 May 25

350kW is massive overkill. Most of the time your car can’t handle much more than 160kW and then only when the battery is between 10% and 30%. 75kW is plenty for shopping centres. 3kW to 7kW is plenty for early bird parking lots where you’re parked all day anyway.

Capital Retro5:30 pm 26 May 25

The image at the beginning shows a Tesla apparently owned/operated by actewAGL.

Why do they need the most expensive EV for their virtue signaling?

Lol CR showing yet again zero actual understanding of the market if he thinks Tesla’s are the ‘most expensive EV’…..

PC__LoadLetter12:28 am 31 May 25

Teslas aren’t expensive. $55-56k is about normal for a decent sedan or SUV nowadays. BMW and Porsche are way more expensive. You can get bogus Chinese brands for about $10k less, sure, but you’ll lose that in the first few years on nonsense scheduled servicing And they’re FWD. And once you’re out of town, nothing beats the Tesla Supercharger network, or even comes close. And the others use more power per km (way less aero).

Hopefully you can pay with any credit or debit card just like at petrol stations.
A lot of charges make you download their specific App before you can use it which is most vexing.

PC__LoadLetter11:48 pm 29 May 25

Most Evie chargers support plug and charge. The charger reads your car’s MAC address, links it to your account, and immediately starts charging.

Why are they called chargers when they are coal powered election vendors. Yes providing DC means it’s doing something but AC is merely grid voltage / frequency?

Did they check the cooling? The power through the cables is lowered if the liquid cooling is broken in some models resulting is horrible charge rates.

“Why are they called chargers when they are coal powered election vendors”… they’re called chargers because they charge batteries. The ACT is powered the 100% renewable energy we contribute to the pool. No rational person monitors were individual electrons come from.

Capital Retro5:31 pm 26 May 25

No rational person claims renewables are the cheapest energy, either.

I look forward to your paper refuting the Gencost report,
https://www.csiro.au/en/news/all/news/2024/may/csiro-releases-2023-24-gencost-report

Until then you’re only embarrassing yourself…again.

@Capital Retro
LOL … one of RiotACT’s long serving denialists, is now making judgments on rationality 🤣

Capital Retro9:25 am 27 May 25

Only the paranoid survive, JS.
The gullible expire first.

You do realise something that charges something else is generally called a charger.

Why is the dialogue at the level of about a 4 year old on here now.

Only an irrational person would claim otherwise from what the overwhelming evidence suggests. But some had their brain fried long ago, given the absolute guff they post on here.

Capital Retro10:21 am 27 May 25

The overwhelming evidence? Don’t you get power bills?

I’d rather have my brain fried than washed.

“The overwhelming evidence? Don’t you get power bills?” ….that’s not evidence of your claims, that’s evidence of your confirmation bias.

Capital Retro12:17 pm 27 May 25

“confirmation bias”?

Is that something to do with lawn bowls?

“Is that something to do with lawn bowls?”…well you could break the cycle of posting while uniformed and look it up; or go play lawn bowls because that’s essentially going for a walk outside. And certainly both would be a positive development.

“Why are they called chargers when they are coal powered election vendors.”

What do you call the thing that puts electricity back into your phone battery, or any batteries you have for cordless devices such as a drill?

Do you call them “chargers” or are you one of those muppets who use a made up name and confuse retail staff when you try to buy a “Fritzenbargen” because that’s what you call those chargers?

PC__LoadLetter12:34 am 31 May 25

While you’re technically correct (the best kind of correct) about these new AC chargers not really being chargers (they’re an EVSE, the actual charger is built into the car), meh. EVSE is such a wonky term.

As for coal, again, meh. It’s still more efficient than petroleum exploration, drilling, pumping, transport, refining, shipping, trucking, pumping, to eventually get a product that your car will mostly waste generating heat and noise. I’d rather the coal, thanks. Local jobs.

The car charges the batteries, your ‘charger’ doesn’t even know of the existance of the battery let alone charging it.

The charger is a glorified contactor, or EV supply equipment. When the car is there, the contactor contacts the cables together (rather quickly) to avoid a spark when the user does it. It also disconnects when the car tells it that its done. Its total purpose is to avoid electric shock and has nothing to do with the charging of batteries which is the job of the onboard Battery management system.

The prices for these units assumes that its doing something rather techncial to charge the battery, which is paid by those who call them ‘chargers’. Seems more like a tax on the uneducated.

PC__LoadLetter3:13 pm 31 May 25

Indeed. An AC EVSE is a trivial piece of hardware. It should cost a few hundred bucks to mass-produce. They’re overpaying because they’re buying them in pathetic small volumes. Though there’s something to be said for outdoor resiliency costing a little more. But most of these should be in big city car parks like Wilson’s and CCCP. Not a handful with special parking restrictions & garish paint, but thousands, at every car space. Buy in bulk. And offer two payment options – full price for the full 7kW, discounted for slower variable rate charging (trickle during cloudy lulls, full speed when sunny or windy).

If cheap AC charging was ubiquitous, even apartment dwellers would buy EVs.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.