2 July 2025

The glass cliff, Hillary Clinton and Julia Gillard in one unmissable summit

| By Dione David
Join the conversation
15
Professor Michelle Ryan on stage

Professor Michelle Ryan, who co-coined the “glass cliff” theory, is on a mission to make the invisible visible and help women leaders rewrite the narrative at the Women UNLIMITED Leadership Summit. Photo: The Hatchery.

When Michelle Ryan spotted a bold claim in Britain’s leading newspaper The Times – that companies with more women on their boards performed worse – she didn’t buy it.

“It was basically saying women were coming in and wreaking havoc,” she says.

But as the now world-renowned gender equality expert and ANU academic dug into the data with fellow academic Alex Haslam, the story flipped.

The issue wasn’t women causing the downfall – it was women being handed the wheel after the crash.

In other words, women were more likely to be appointed to leadership roles during periods of crisis. Michelle and Alex dubbed the phenomenon “the glass cliff”.

The idea went global. In 2008, The New York Times listed it among the top 100 ideas that shaped the year. In 2016, the Oxford English Dictionary shortlisted it for Word of the Year.

It’s a phenomenon still playing out today. Prominent examples include Theresa May, who dealt with the chaos of Brexit before being pushed out by Boris Johnson. Closer to home, Sussan Ley stepped up as Liberal Party leader following a crushing federal election defeat.

READ ALSO What changed my mind about women-only networking

It’s why Michelle is set to interrogate it further at the Women UNLIMITED Leadership Summit – a premium event for current and emerging women leaders across Australia.

In her address, Michelle hopes to help women spot the glass – cliff, ceiling or otherwise – and inject it with opacity, so they’re not set up to fail.

“Part of the reason we choose glass in these metaphors is because of its subtlety – it’s not always seen,” she says.

“Visibility comes with options. It might be that women want to avoid those positions. It might be that with the context of a glass cliff, women who step up to these positions can be evaluated more fairly. Or it might be a question of asking for the right support.

“It’s much harder to lead in times of crisis than when things are going well and that should be acknowledged. But failure is not inevitable. Our research shows that in a glass cliff position, if you have the right resources – board support, managerial support, money, enough time to turn things around – you have a better chance at success. That’s easier to ask for if you know you’re into a glass cliff scenario.”

Michelle, also the inaugural director of the Global Institute for Women’s Leadership – a multi-disciplinary research institute founded and chaired by former Australian prime minister Julia Gillard AC – will join the most senior lineup of speakers the annual Women UNLIMITED Leadership Summit has seen so far.

READ ALSO Urgent funds needed to meet rising demand for domestic violence legal services

Across seven events, in excess of 3000 attendees will hear from more than 200 speakers challenging limits and refining what’s possible for women leaders.

In Canberra, this will include former US secretary of state, Hillary Rodham Clinton in the flesh and Ms Gillard speaking via hologram – a technology used for the first time in the Australian event.

“I have been involved with this event in different formats across the last few years and it’s always terrific. I am very excited about this year’s event,” Michelle says.

The Canberra Women UNLIMITED Leadership Summit takes place on Monday 29 and Tuesday 30 September at the National Convention Centre Canberra. Discounts apply for early bookings – book now.

Join the conversation

15
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

and as everyone has their eyes on the bottomless depths of tender loving support for women, the entire western world is positively falling to bits, including for most women who are meant to be the ones being supported.

can’t afford a house, or to pay for your energy or rent, or put healthy food on the table, or clothes on your back, or maintain good mental health, or keep a relationship, or find job satisfaction? No worries. Here’s a little thing by Gillard and Clinton.

I reckon this whole tender loving support thing for women is just a scam

I reckon that’s a lot of words to say nothing much.

At $3000+ a ticket for the 2 days, I’m predicting a crowd of female SES officers.

Usually you only change leadership when things aren’t going well. Men or women

Stephen Saunders8:35 am 03 Jul 25

These two are topical ads for gender equity, which is improving, but not for social mobility and equality generally, which are going backwards.

Speaking of glass cliffs hopefully Gillard or Clinton don’t discuss winning national elections, because neither one has.

Capital Retro8:10 am 03 Jul 25

Can you remind me Penfold of which one referred to people as “deplorables” and who said “we are us”?

Which one advocated for women, but destroyed the reputation of any that attracted the wandering eyes of Bill

Hard to remember CR, though one of them had a problem with men in blue ties with watches yet defended Peter Slipper.

@Capital Retro
You do know that Hilary Clinton, a few days later, publicly apologised for her generalisation about Trump’s supporters? As you would know, not all of his supporters are the deplorables to which she referred – ie racists, sexists, homophobics, xenophobics and/or Islamophobics.

Nevertheless, perhaps Penfold can also remind us, of when Trump issued an apology for, more recently, falsely accusing, on at least two occasions, Haitian immigrants, in Ohio, of abducting and eating pets.

Capital Retro1:20 pm 03 Jul 25

That would be the one that lived in a high dungeon at the hyperbowl.

Penfold, are you sure you are not trying to re-write history? Did Gillard actually defend Slipper or was it a case of her not joining in the attack when Abbott tried to use Slipper in his political games?

Hi Megsy

No rewriting of history, here’s the Wikipedia reference to that speech.

“In moving the no-confidence motion, Abbott stated that Slipper’s texts were sexist and misogynistic and rendered him unfit to serve as speaker, and implied that Gillard was hypocritical in defending Slipper’s continuation as speaker. He stated that her government was “only too ready to detect sexism – to detect misogyny, no less – until they find it in one of their own supporters, until they find it in someone upon whom this Prime Minister relies to survive in her job”. Abbott stated that every day Gillard supported Slipper was “another day of shame for a government which should already have died of shame”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Julia_Gillard%27s_misogyny_speech

Asked to provide evidence of Gillard supporting Peter Slipper, Pengold provides a Wikipedia link quoting Tony Abbott.

Make it stop, bahahahahaha, Pengold at it again.

Sounds like it went straight over your head chewy.

You probably weren’t around at the time, but the misogyny speech was probably the second lowest moment of Gillard’s career. To be fair she’s rebuilt her dignity since leaving politics unlike people like Turnbull and Rudd, and will always be known as Australia’s first female PM. But this was not a great look defending Slipper. Several months later she was removed by her own party.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.