20 June 2025

Government says it's ready to deal with increase in age of criminal responsibility, despite concerns

| By Albert McKnight
Join the conversation
37

Chief Police Officer Scott Lee is concerned about the upcoming increase in the age of criminal responsibility. Photo: Albert McKnight.

While Canberra’s top cop and the peak body representing its police officers have expressed concerns around the upcoming increase in the age of criminal responsibility, the ACT Government has reassured the community that support services will be ready to handle the change.

The ACT will officially raise the age of criminal responsibility to 14 on 1 July.

This means children under this age cannot be held criminally responsible for their actions in the Territory, except for 12- and 13-year-olds who commit extremely serious offences. Instead, they will be referred to support services to address their behaviour.

Data from ACT Policing shows there were 153 apprehensions of children aged 12 to 13 in 2023, which resulted in 254 charges being laid.

READ ALSO Army crew’s failure to report Orroral Valley Fire an ‘error of judgement’, coroner finds

In 2024, police made 123 apprehensions of children in this age range, resulting in 238 charges.

An ACT Policing spokesperson said the most common crime type for this cohort included assault, theft, property damage and breach of bail/breach of court orders.

“What will change are the options available to police when a person aged under 14 is found to have been involved in an incident and our engagement with services to divert children and young people away from the criminal justice system,” the spokesperson said.

In some cases a responsible adult for a young person couldn’t be easily located, the spokesperson said, which then required government and other support agencies to provide the role.

“What is important is ensuring that those support services are in place and available to police when needed, including after hours and on weekends and public holidays,” the spokesperson said.

Australian Federal Police Association’s Alex Caruana said the change risked placing additional pressures on police. Photo: Albert McKnight.

While Australian Federal Police Association president Alex Caruana said his organisation supported the principle behind this reform, it believed it risked placing additional pressure on police without knowing if adequate support systems and networks were in place.

He said police were not equipped to be social workers or youth care providers.

“They don’t have the time or resources to supervise or babysit young people taken into care or custody by police, who ideally, need to be under the care of specialist services such as the Safer Youth Response Service or the ACT’s Community Services Directorate,” Mr Caruana said.

“Substantial investment in alternative programs and services to address harmful behaviour by young people aged 10 to 13 must be made for this reform to succeed.

“Without these, ACT Policing’s ability to manage youth offending and ensure community safety could be compromised, particularly for serious offences where exceptions apply for 12- and 13-year-olds.”

Woman speaking into microphone

Police Minister Marisa Paterson said police have been training for the upcoming changes. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

On Wednesday (18 June), Police Minister Marisa Paterson said she believed the services were in place.

“We have the Safer Youth Service which [is] just transitioning to a 24-hour service that will be able to respond to police when they do have a young person that comes into their contact,” she said.

She also said the Therapeutic Support Panel had been in place for the last year. Police had undertaken significant training over the last month on the changes, she said.

Earlier this week, ACT Chief Police Officer Scott Lee told ABC Canberra he was concerned the support services would not be fully in place.

He said although it was a positive development that the Safer Youth Service would be available 24/7 with permanent staff in place or on call, he still had concerns.

“We still need to work closely with other parts of government to ensure that those services meet the needs of MACR [the minimum age of criminal responsibility], and I think we’re going to need to stay agile to ensure that they are in place and they are available, particularly to my police officers where they need them 24/7,” he said.

READ ALSO Weapon-wielding youths allegedly inflict ‘ultra violence’ during alleged home invasion

Attorney-General Tara Cheyne accepted Mr Lee had concerns, but she was confident the change would take place smoothly.

“The more that you have contact with the justice system at a young age, the more likely you are to continue to have contact with it. So that costs everybody, and every person in the community, when that occurs,” she said.

But Shadow Police and Community Safety Minister Deborah Morris of the Canberra Liberals was concerned at the speed the government was implementing the change.

“I fear that this will make children in Canberra less safe and it will also put police in a very difficult position of not knowing how to do their job,” she said.

“From what we’ve heard, the therapeutic diversionary services are not ready for this transition and this is going to be a significant transition.

“I’m also concerned that vulnerable young children will be targeted by organised crime because they know that a child who’s under the age of criminal responsibility will encounter less resistance from authorities.”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

37
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Many youth crimes went unreported. And for those reported ones, the police were reluctant to pursue as they knew there wasn’t much they could do for the thugs would just go in and out the court in no time. Many victims very often were not even given a case number.

The youth criminals work in groups. They pick on the most vulnerable of the community, e.g. the newly arrived overseas students, particularly female ones. When they attack, they descend upon the victim, each assuming a role in holding down the victim’s limbs, others focusing on punching and kicking.

Absolutely disgusting.

“Many youth crimes went unreported.” based on what.

The police association says they support the reform but that it needs to be backed up with social and youth workers. Seems reasonable to me.

Whilst you seem to know a lot about how this minority group operate, you seem to forget that the majority of young people are not violent thugs. Some kids make silly mistakes due to peer pressure, boredom, frustration, insufficient supervision and the lack of fully developed brains to make wise decisions. They need education, supervision and re-direction so they mature safely to contribute to our society in a positive way.

Those young people who are incarcerated are severely damaged by the experience even though many of them have not convicted of a crime. We need youth clubs with engaging and exciting activities plus support for kids, as many are left to their own devices with both parents working to pay for rent and food.

We are talking about youth who committed crimes here, and many are repeat offenders. They are untouchable in the streets, and anyone trying to teach them a lesson gets locked up themselves. Just ridiculous. There are reports of such crimes by the victims themselves on social media.

Kids should get their education, supervision, etc from their parents and schools, not clubs. And the first thing they should learn is discipline, but schools are afraid of these kids – and even their parents.

You’re making it up.

Do you even live in Canberra?

The worst crimes occur in other states, but that’s no reason to lower responsibility age here in Canberra.

The police association supports the change with it comes with appropriate social support.

You’re making stuff up and can be dismissed.

Whatever you say, no youth club that wastes tax payers money.

How is keep kids productively occupied a waste of taxpayers’ money? Please explain it to me.

The truly important question, is society ready for this ‘experiment’?
Let us have Castle Doctrine and then we can talk.

There are slight various of the law across the states and territories but generally you’re allowed to use force to protect yourself in Australia. But the force has to be commensurate with the threat. There is no need for “Castle Doctrine”.

As they say, in Queensland, “To the Adult’s Crimes, To the Adult’s Times!” – and they put that into law there. The young criminals know what they are doing and know they can get away with it.

Youth crime is now getting out of hand everywhere, and this is not the time for appeasement, not the time for increasing age of responsibility.

The government here is out of touch.

Youth crime is falling across the board and has been for a long time including the ACT and including before recent moves in QLD to treat young offenders like adults.

https://youthlaw.asn.au/what-is-really-going-on-with-youth-crime/

Your whole argument is therefore “out of touch”.

It seems you’ve swallowed the right wing propaganda designed to make people angry and encourage increased punishment and revenge against kids, few of whom commit crimes at all, let alone with any intent of harming others. Those who commit violent crimes inevitably come from violent homes and need to learn of alternative ways of living, via appropriate support and supervision, but not imprisonment if we want positive outcomes.

No, I can spot propaganda when I see it. This is the reality.

“Positive outcomes” means nothing. We want effective outcomes.

“No, I can spot propaganda when I see it. This is the reality.” you mean you’ll reject objective evidence when it doesn’t agree with your opinions.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Confirmation_bias

“We want effective outcomes”….what’s more effective than the empirical fact that youth crime has been falling for decades?

Huh statistics. If the police are unwilling to give the victim a case/report number, then the crime did not happen. If the police say to the victim “Oh they are just kids”, “we’re off for holidays in a couple of weeks”, “Just be careful next time”, then there’s no crime going in the stats.

You’re making stuff up. It’s as tedious as it is irrelevant.

“What can be asserted without evidence can also be dismissed without evidence.” Christopher Hitchens.

A policy based on false evidence can only make things worse.

Prove the evidence is false. Good luck with that.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.