2 July 2025

Review could force gas companies to redirect supplies to the domestic market

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
35

Energy Minister Chris Bowen, addressing the National Press Club last year, has launched a review into Australia’s gas market regulations. Photo: Region.

The Federal Government has launched a review into gas market regulations, suggesting gas companies could be forced to redirect future supplies from international markets to the domestic one.

Energy Minister Chris Bowen said the government was acting to ensure Australia’s long-term access to affordable gas alongside renewables.

At the same time, Australia’s reputation as a “solid and reliable export partner” supporting the region’s energy security must be maintained.

“Gas has an important role to play in our energy system as we transition towards 82 per cent renewables,” Mr Bowen said.

“Unlike coal, gas power generators can be turned on and off in a couple of minutes, providing the ultimate backstop in our energy grid.

“It’s critical that we use this review to get the settings right in our gas market, ensuring we are securing affordable Australian gas for Australian use, while remaining a reliable energy exporter and delivering lasting energy security in our region.”

READ ALSO ACCC wants tougher laws to crack down on unfair online trading practices

The review comes as the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC) flags a potentially grim outlook for east coast gas supplies.

The ACCC’s latest Gas Inquiry report, says while short term gas supply is sufficient, there is a need for further investment in the longer term.

“An efficient and well-functioning east coast gas market is critical to support Australia’s long-term energy security and an orderly transition to net zero,” the report states.

“It will be best achieved where there is sufficient and competitive supply underpinned by market depth and transparency.

“The east coast has sufficient gas reserves and resources to meet projected domestic demand for at least the next decade.

“However, a combination of policy, technical and commercial factors over the past 15 years has impeded their development.

“Gas production is not being brought online fast enough to meet demand and we now expect ongoing shortfalls in southern states as local reserves reach the end of their economic life.

“The market is now in the position of having to rely on uncontracted gas from Queensland and transporting it large distances across the east coast.”

The report notes how the 2022 energy crisis highlighted the increasing interrelationship and susceptibility of the domestic gas market to volatile international and electricity market conditions.

“It has demonstrated that to support energy reliability and affordability and an orderly transition to a lower emissions environment, the gas market needs to be well supplied,” it says.

The government will now take a “comprehensive and methodical look” at key measures introduced by successive governments which have safeguarded Australia’s energy supplies and prices.

The Minister said the review would also help deliver on Labor’s Future Gas Strategy, released in 2024, which spelt out the role gas would play alongside renewables, batteries and pumped hydro in securing Australia’s energy future.

“Using this review, we’re working towards ensuring our gas market and the regulations which govern it are fit for purpose and deliver in the national interest,” Mr Bowen said.

The government will consult with industry, stakeholders and the public on the Australian Domestic Gas Security Mechanism, the Gas Market Code and the Heads of Agreement with major east coast gas exporters.

READ ALSO Quotas for women? That’s not how democracy works, says Angus Taylor

“As is good policy practice and a requirement of the regulations, the government is examining whether these instruments can be improved and strengthened to ensure sufficient affordable gas supply in the longer term,” Mr Bowen said.

“A key objective will be to consolidate and streamline these instruments and create a long-term stable regulatory environment while supporting domestic energy security and affordability.

“We will also consider the role of the various market bodies and how best to encourage sustainable investment that improves the supply outlook and puts downwards pressure on prices.”

Resources Minister Madeleine King said the review would also examine potential ways to attract more sustainable investment into the Australian industry to support jobs and the nation’s economic wellbeing.

“Our gas market settings have evolved over time and in response to a crisis of supply or price, or both, so the intent of this review is to carefully examine how our gas policies work for our economy as part of our energy transition,” she said.

“The Gas Market Review aligns with implementation of the Future Gas Strategy and underpins the government’s commitment to ensure householders and businesses can continue to have access to adequate supplies of affordable energy.

“At the same time, Australia has an important reputation as a global supplier of energy and a key partner in ensuring energy security in our region, helping our trading partners to achieve their net zero commitments.”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

35
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Its good to see the government looking at addressing one of the key drivers of our high energy prices.
We have huge gas supplies, the local market should benefit from this in the interim as the transition to cheaper renewables progresses.

Welcome to the club, you’ve finally deduced that more gas will help reduce power prices.

But sadly you’re still bogged down in the fallacy that more renewables means cheaper power. 20 years of experience demonstrates otherwise.

🎣 😂

“Welcome to the club, you’ve finally deduced that more gas will help reduce power prices.”

Not what I said Pengold, but you’d know that if you paid attention to the actual causes of high power prices.

Capital Retro5:14 pm 02 Jul 25

I’m glad we are eventually going to get the “cheaper” renewables Mister chewy because the ones we have now are too bloody expensive.

Having lived though the glorious Howard years and more recent one, the reasons for high power prices are very obvious. Back then power prices were very low. You must be a Gen Zeder chewy, or Gen Y at a stretch.

Now you’ll need some Excel skills to be able to understand the numbers, so i’m not holding out much hope chewy, but here’s the proof:

https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/economy/price-indexes-and-inflation/consumer-price-index-australia/latest-release

640107, data 6, column AD. You’re brilliant analytical skills should be able to work it out. You’re welcome.

Pengold : “Here’s proof”

Narrator: “Pengold proceeds to provide zero “proof” as per the norm”.

“Professor Pengold PhD, no job he cant mess up, no correlation too irrelevant. Expert in meaningless anecdotes, this kid can do it all.”

https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/industry/mining/mineral-and-petroleum-exploration-australia/mar-2025

Perhaps you should look into mining exploration?

Is it a coincidence that exploration and mining production has increased at the same time as electricity prices have gone up? Only Pengold PhD can truly make the link.

chewy – i’m delighted that petrol exploration is rising but fail to see your point. Those numbers are about exploration, not production. The clue is in the URL which mentions “exploration”. Companies sell produced products, not exploration.

Did you get a chance to read that link before you posted it ? Have ever you worked in the private sector ? Just curious.

Professor Pengold,
“Did you get a chance to read that link before you posted it ?”

Yes, that is the question that obviously comes to mind from the link you posted, thanks for pre-empting it.

I was just giving you some more correlated metrics to investigate as you seem so keen on “research” although clearly haven’t worked through to the causation section yet.

Not sure why you’re worried about the actual metric though, it didn’t stop you above or indeed, ever. If you’ve shown as anything, correlated metrics is all that matters in Pengold’s laboratory.

And we know you haven’t worked in private industry, you’ve been too busy conducting “scientific observations” at Pengold University.

Pengold University, how very kind of you to elevate my intellect to that level chewy. Mind you this university, which is happy to provide mathematic, Excel and even Power BI lessons, is unaware what these “correlated metrics” are.

Though having now investigated, the correlated metric between the share of renewables and skyrocketing power prices is unmistakeable. Thanks for the link.

Thanks for admitting that Pengold University hasn’t quite got to adding causation to their “research” catalogue yet Professor.

Ive also had feedback from past students that the mathematics and statistics classes weren’t up to scratch with the latest survey showing a 569% increase in misunderstanding percentage calculations.

You might want to look into that.

Thanks also for agreeing to look into the correlation between the increase in mining exploration and energy prices. Only you have the power to truly deduce their obvious linkages from simple ABS data sets.

Although as a big government agency, can you really trust the ABS if they produce data that you dont like?

Every time the Liberals break John Howard out of the cryofreeze so they can trot him around during election campaigns as their last “successful” Prime Minister, someone should ask him why he gave our resources away for next to nothing.

Are we all out of resources ? Wow, the mining industry thinks otherwise.

Oh, and Prime Ministers don’t set prices in commodity markets.

Btw JWH was the last great Prime Minister. Elected four times as PM and elected 13 times in Bennelong. You can call him Sir.

Why do you even bother with this lame drivel? I’m certainly not going to respond to dopey nonsense attacking things I didn’t say whilst ignoring things I did.

Btw JWH whose only real achievement despite plenty of opportunity was gun control, was voted out of his own seat, which is fast becoming a tradition amongst Liberal Party candidates for PM.

Yeah, JWH was also dumped by Bennelong.

No we arent out of resources, but we are out of patience that we are giving away our resources for v.limited return.

JWH Great? That’s really dating your age/self interest.

Most Australians remember the glory JWH years. How good would it be to have to have growth, surpluses, strong borders, fiscal responsibility, cheap energy and honest government again.

You mean when they wasted the resources boom and did not one thing for the long term good of the country? Yes I’m sure a lot of people remember it. Funny how the Libs are not in power now.

lol Penfold not a genius.

Glorious boondoggles in foreign climes, Glorious acceleration of the gap between the wealthy and the poor, Glorious gifting our natural resources to foreign companies, Glorious.

We know you’re a young inexperienced chap seano, but before making such silly comments maybe look up these things:

* budget surpluses
* the $300 billion Future Fund
* gun control
* mining boom

I’d ask you to explain what you even mean by wasting the resources boom, where state governments have as much of a say as the feds, but we both know you couldn’t answer with anything comprehendible.

MC the ABS measure equality of income using something called the Gini Coefficient. Feel free to look it up but it will show your comment is simply false.

https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/measuring-what-matters/measuring-what-matters-themes-and-indicators/prosperous/income-and-wealth-inequality

“JWH whose only real achievement…was gun control” lol. Elected democratically four times by the Australian public, cheaper electricity, a united country, strong and safe borders, got us out of labor’s debt under Keating and put us in surplus. Something labor could only dream of.
Funny how when labor got it the borders opened, electricity prices increased and we were back in debt.
Yep I remember that.

“* mining boom”….what exactly did Howard have to do with creating the mining boom?….lol talk about pad your homework. lmao.

And I already gave you gun control…lol

Budget surpluses funded which by cuts to services for the poor and the future fund…Costello sold our gold at the bottom of the market and he and Howard set up the system that has allowed foreign owned multinationals pull billions upon billions in resources out of Australia for a pittance. Compared to what those two clowns gave away the future fund is a set of magic beans.

Comical…even for you.

Well seano once again it’s hard to understand your point. Unlike that brilliant Swannie, who tried to punish the mining industry for success, the great Howard (and Costello) stood back and let the mining industry thrive. That’s how industries succeed – less red tape, less taxes, more investment, more employment.

Yogie – don’t set the bar too high. Seano thinks a $307 billion national asset is “magic beans”. Most public servants are grateful their superannuation is secure and funded. One suspects seano is amongst them.

He seems very down on little Johnny, maybe you remind him how the cryogenic Keating trashed our local car manufacturing by removing tariffs on overseas vehicles even when his own party advised him not to or the Rudd/Gillard six year fiasco that let in 50,000 illegal immigrants only for Abbott to stop them in his first year.

That wasn’t my point Penfold, thanks for playing.

“Not what I said Pengold, but you’d know that if you paid attention to the actual causes of high power prices.”

Penfold has given up debating people and losing based on what they’ve said and has moved on to posting replies to things they didn’t say…and he’s still losing.

Yogie, champ….where exactly did I post anything in defence (or at all) about Keating?

What you’re doing is “Whataboutism” (look it up) and it’s tedious.

If you want to debate me, try debating the points I’ve made. Like Penfold you’ll lose but good luck with that.

“50,000 illegal immigrants “….yeah who knew you’d be one of those….besides everybody. You can stop lecturing people on morals now, also tedious.

Seano…have a look at what you said, you keep telling everyone you’re winning the debate, you might be in your own deluded mind, but not others. You keep tying yourself in knots and want others to spell it out for you. Here’s a few more you

https://www.liberal.org.au/achievements-in-government

Yogie… good to know you’re the self appointed spokesperson for everyone…tbh I’m not sure I’m the deluded one.

As for proof, you’ve literally posted party propaganda…most of which is not backed by data or evidence and are merely the opinions of the author….thanks for the laugh.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.