7 July 2025

'Significant' impacts on fauna, heritage locations laid bare in light rail stage 2B draft EIS

| By Claire Fenwicke
Join the conversation
76
map of indicative construction compound locations for stage 2B

Indicative construction compounds and their potential environmental impacts were considered as part of the draft EIS process. Image: ACT Government.

Light rail stage 2B’s environmental impacts on the Golden Sun Moth, Superb Parrot and Gang-gang cockatoo would be “significant” no matter which route is chosen, according to the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS).

The document outlines the potential environmental impact of both the ACT Government’s preferred State Circle East alignment and the alternative so-called dog-leg through the National Triangle and Barton.

Its release is a major milestone in the project’s progression and will help decide the final alignment, alongside costing results.

The draft EIS found anticipated biodiversity losses would include some “unavoidable clearing” of native vegetation and habitat and directly impact on some listed historic heritage places.

When examining potential biodiversity impacts, most would be concentrated in the Parliament House and Yarra Glen precincts.

“[This includes] potential habitat for several threatened species, including the Golden Sun Moth, Superb Parrot, Gang-gang Cockatoo and Diamond Firetail,” the report noted.

“Losses would include five to six hectares of native vegetation and between 116 and 126 mature native trees (noting 15 to 19 of those trees are hollow-bearing).”

The surveys did not find any listed threatened flora species or endangered ecological communities in the proposed construction areas.

Efforts have already been made to avoid and minimise impacts on native species, including the avoidance of around eight hectares of Golden Sun Moth habitat and 15 ha of Gang-gang Cockatoo and Superb Parrot foraging habitat.

The vulnerable-listed Golden Sun Moth would see 9.88 ha or 9.60 ha of habitat (for the State Circle East and National Triangle-Barton alignment options respectively) impacted.

“Assuming that all potential habitat is occupied by the species, it is likely that the project would adversely affect habitat critical to the survival of the Golden Sun Moth, resulting in a significant impact to the species,” the report noted.

The project would also impact 5.64 ha or 5.06 ha of suitable Gang-gang Cockatoo and Superb Parrot habitat (for the State Circle East and National Triangle-Barton alignment options respectively).

“The project would also impact six or five suitable Gang-gang Cockatoo breeding trees, that occur in the State Circle East and National Triangle-Barton alignment options, respectively,” the report noted.

“Removal of this habitat would interfere with the recovery of the species and would result in a significant impact on the Gang-gang Cockatoo … [and] may therefore interfere with the recovery of the [Superb Parrot].”

Field surveys determined Perunga Grasshopper and Striped Legless Lizard habitats aren’t in the project’s clearance footprint.

More than 3000 trees were assessed for the report, which found the State Circle East alignment option may see about 700 trees removed. The alternative route could result in a higher number being removed.

The project plans to follow a minimum two-for-one replacement strategy for any removed trees.

READ ALSO Is Canberra’s reputation as a government city changing?

Potentially significant adverse heritage impacts for Albert Hall and Hotel Kurrajong were also identified.

The State Circle East alignment option would see moderate to significant impacts (during both construction and operation) to Albert Hall, with historic trees on the Commonwealth Avenue median to be removed.

“[The proposed] Albert Hall stop would alter historic views from Albert Hall to Commonwealth Avenue and obscure the historical significance of Albert Hall as an early landmark building of Canberra,” the report noted.

The National Triangle-Barton alignment would see similar impacts to Albert Hall but only during the construction phase.

However, this route would deliver significant impacts for Hotel Kurrajong during both construction and operation, with historical trees removed along the northern and western edges of the Hotel Kurrajong Garden City block.

“During operation the historic road geometry and grassed settings of Hotel Kurrajong’s north-western corner would change,” the report noted.

“The Bligh Street stop would be partially within the boundary of the heritage place, within the verge area to be converted to hard surface, which would adversely impact the expression of the heritage values of the Hotel Kurrajong as demonstrated via its landscaped garden setting.”

READ ALSO Mixed-use Woden Centre on the market

The draft EIS is on public exhibition until 5 September.

Public Transport Canberra chair Amy Jelacic urged everyone to engage with the project, ask questions and give feedback.

“PTCBR is thrilled to see Stage 2B finally reach this point after significant setbacks and holdups. This is a major opportunity for the general public to get into the details and see what is being proposed to take light rail to Woden,” she said.

“Light rail was supposed to be over the lake and well and truly on its way to Woden by now. It’s frustrating that the ACT Government’s initial dates for this project weren’t met.

“We do understand that this is a complex project and we are excited to finally see it moving forward.”

All submissions will be considered and responded to by Infrastructure Canberra as part of the revised, final EIS.

There will be several public drop-in information sessions:

  • Monday, 21 July, 10 am to 2 pm: ACT Government Office, 220 London Circuit, Canberra
  • Tuesday, 22 July, 1 pm to 4 pm: Woden Library
  • Wednesday, 23 July, 2:30 pm to 6:30 pm: Albert Hall
  • Thursday, 24 July, 4 pm to 7 pm: Presbyterian Church of Saint Andrew
  • Saturday, 26 July, 11 am to 3 pm: Canberra Bridge Club
  • Monday, 11 August, 2:30 pm to 6:30 pm: ACT Government Office
  • Tuesday, 12 August, 10 am to 2 pm: Albert Hall
  • Wednesday, 13 August, 2:30 pm to 6:30 pm: Canberra Bridge Club
  • Thursday, 14 August, 3 pm to 7 pm: Woden Library
  • Sunday, 17 August, 11 am to 2 pm: Presbyterian Church of Saint Andrew.

The final EIS will be assessed by the Department of Climate Change, Energy, the Environment and Water and the Territory Planning Authority.

An outcome is expected in 2026.

Printed copies of the draft EIS can be found at the Gungahlin, Dickson, Civic, Woden and Tuggeranong libraries.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

76
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Gang-gangs are not uncommon around Parliamentary Triangle, and I’ve seen Superb Parrots near Old Parlt House.

I’ve been working in the Barton area for over 20 years and never once have I ever seen a Gang-gang or a Superb Parrot anywhere in the area – and I am an avid bird observer. From what I can see by the proposed routes there is absolutely zero impact on what little native habitat remains (the grounds surrounding APH) including what little heritage buildings in the area.
One can be forgiven for thinking that opponents of the LR are clutching at straws to tell whatever furphies necessary to derail the light rail.

You do realise that this report has been written by the proponents of the project right?

One can be forgiven for thinking you should probably read it first.

Canberra Engineer1:07 pm 09 Jul 25

Both species are visible most days throughout Barton and Forrest. Need to get out more and enjoy the wonderful birds. They’re wonderful for workers in the area. This will be a sad loss.

How about this for “clutching at straws”.
It will follow the exact same route as the White Rapid but will take 25% longer to complete the journey.
How is that a better service?

Gregg Heldon3:50 pm 10 Jul 25

Worked at EBB for about 10 years. Saw an amazing amount of native animals in that time. Including Kangaroos on Kings Avenue and bats on Macquarie St.

Back to Terms of Reference on this one! – the improvements in Battery-powered buses are all we need and we could save mega-dollars, avoid years of construction and hectares of destruction, and have machinery that doesn’t need it’s own railroad, usable ‘anywhere’. In 2025, light rail is a flawed concept. The only advantage is ‘it gets more use than buses’ – but that can change if we get more useful buses!

You forgot the only positive for rail. It’s nice and red and shiney

This is a major step in the light rail project and I am pleased that we have reached this stage. This is one of the most comprehensive reports I have seen into the project and goes to show just how complex it is.

I am sure there are those out there who have the brains and capacity to contribute positively to this massive effort.

I am looking forward to the final outcome.

I would hope it’s one of the ‘most Comprehensive reports into the project you’ve seen’, because AECOM’s current design contract with the ACT Government for this work is now at $119 million dollars, way above the original amount when they first entered into the contract. Contract Number 2021.58205.CA.001

This is why consultants think the ACT government is easy game and money for jam.

The odds of Jack D actually having read the few thousand pages of this report

=

Zero.

Oh sorry, he did just say that he’s “seen” it. Carry on.

What no leg less lizards?

I applied to the Govt to remove a tree in my backyard (one tree) and was refused permission.
I should have said it was because I was installing a rail line.
Silly me.

They are hypocrites

Reading the first few paragraphs of this and I don’t understand what the fuss is about. It’s a no brainer that to build anything will involve some level of destruction to nature, that’s just a part of the life cycle. What one needs to consider is how bad is it? From my POV something like a road or railway line is a narrow strip of land so I don’t feel it’s that bad, is it?

Oh more traffic lights, great just what’s needed in Woden, do we really need information days you will do what you want anyway

From a lifetime of observation, most people are stupid and are going to do stupid things. So more traffic lights are needed when so many stupid people are driving vehicles and the extra information is there to keep companies covered in case there is an incident. They can say “well, we did warn you…”

Maybe time to relocate Canberra seems this the case no matter where development occurs

Relocate Canberra?

The welfare of the Gang-gang has blocked the development proposal at Federal Golf Club. If there’s any consistency in this government, then the Gang-gang’s welfare should block stage 2B of light rail.

Besides which, didn’t we read a few days ago they’re tendering for someone to develop the business case for stage 2B. Given that, how have we now got detailed plans for billions of dollars in spending without so much as a business case ?

I understand what you mean but a Light Rail would take priority over a Golf Course. It’s possible this decision was made because a Light Rail would be less damaging towards the Gang Gan compared to a Golf Course maybe?

The tram has a much larger environmental footprint, but point taken Karl.

No mention here of the Aboriginal scarred trees between National Circ and State Circ. The area is shows as a permanent tram use area.

I know Ancient Germanic tribes had sacred Groves and Trees but is that a thing with the Ngunnawal people?

Hey Karl. Check your spelling. Sacred “groves and trees” (whatever they are?) have no relation to scarred trees.
Different spelling and different meaning. Or are you just ignorant of indiginous history?

Hey Grosby, maybe it is you that is ignorant of Indigenous history. There are a number of “scar” trees throughout Australia and a few I have seen in Canberra. There is a eucalypt believed by some to be a scarred tree at the University of Canberra.

Scarring is the cultural practice of using a living tree to provide an artefact by cutting into the bark and removing what is needed.

These trees have significant value to Canberra’s Indigenous community and many have been “wrongly” cut down in the past.

Probably because they don’t exist, if they do, why are they not mentioned anywhere in ACT Gov?

I’m agreeing wih you Jack! You can’t spell either.
Sacred
Scarred
Two different words with two different meanings. I’m all for protecting scar trees but have no idea what sacred groves are (see………different spelling again)
Scar.
Sacred

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.