25 July 2025

'Pretty regressive': ACT Government admits EV incentives favoured the rich

| By James Coleman
Join the conversation
77

An EV charging bay in Hobart Place, Civic. Photo: James Coleman.

The ACT Government has acknowledged that its early EV incentives – which are now being phased out – were “actually pretty regressive” and “largely went to the wealthiest households”.

“To balance the budget to the best we can and get it back to a sustainable level, this is a tax concession that largely went to the wealthiest households that could afford to buy a new EV,” Minister for Finance Rachel Stephen-Smith told Budget Estimate hearings this week.

“We now have a more balanced system where we’re still providing an incentive, but we’re moving away from what was actually a pretty regressive tax concession, which was there for a reason, to bolster the EV market.

“It succeeded in doing that, and now we’re providing a lesser incentive but still an incentive to move in that direction.”

READ ALSO New Cotter traffic study aims to fix bottlenecks

Zero-emission vehicles in the ACT have been exempt from stamp duty since August 2022, and buyers of some second-hand hybrids and plug-in hybrid electric vehicles (PHEVs) have been exempt since July 2023.

But from 1 September 2025, all new EVs in the ACT will be lumped with a 2.5 per cent duty charge, while buyers of all vehicles over $80,000 will be charged an 8 per cent rate.

This compares to the 3 to 4.5 per cent charged to all other vehicles under $45,000, and 5 to 7.8 per cent to vehicles over $45,000 (on top of a flat fee ranging from $1350 to $2038).

Chris Steel, MLA

The Greens have accused Treasurer Chris Steel (pictured) of reneging on the government’s commitment to zero-emission vehicles. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

“We’ve now made the decision, given the state of the EV market – with a larger number of models available, and a large number of more affordable models available – that that concession is still going to be provided, but just not a 100 per cent remission of a motor vehicle duty,” Treasurer Chris Steel said.

“It’s quite a significant incentive for people to still purchase an electric vehicle.”

However, the ACT Greens have accused the government of reneging on its commitment to phase out the sale of new internal combustion engine (ICE) cars by 2030.

Greens leader Shane Rattenbury also pointed out a “bizarre outcome” in the budget, which means Canberrans are about to pay more stamp duty for used hybrids than for many new ICE cars.

The 2025 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV is about to get more expensive. Photo: James Coleman.

The party ran the figures and found that buyers of a 2025 petrol-powered Mazda CX-5 are about to pay $100 less in stamp duty than is due on a 2023 Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV or a 2023 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid.

The ACT’s stamp duty scheme is based on emissions, with EVs in the ‘AAA’ category charged the least and high-emitting ICE cars in the ‘D’ category charged the most.

However, according to manufacturer claims, the RAV4 Hybrid emits 109 grams of CO2 per 100 km, while the Outlander PHEV emits 35 g/CO2, and the CX-5 emits 172 g/CO2.

READ ALSO Illegal turns ‘an accident waiting to happen’ in Phillip

“This change in regulation will mean that someone looking to do their bit in reducing emissions by buying a second-hand hybrid RAV4 will now pay more in stamp duty than if they were to buy a higher emissions new Mazda CX-5,” Mr Rattenbury said.

“Labor needs to explain how this happened and fix it. Canberrans shouldn’t be penalised for choosing cleaner, lower-emission vehicles and doing their bit to tackle the climate crisis. This is an opportunity for them to act.”

Stamp duty table

The ACT Greens figures on stamp duty payments. Photo: Screenshot.

Mr Steel took the question on notice and said the government would look into it.

“I suspect it’s because of a combination of factors around emissions, weight and value, but we will take that on notice and check the instrument,” he told the hearing.

The government’s move has been backed by the ACT Branch of the Australian Electric Vehicle Association (AEVA ACT), which told Region the current EV incentives “couldn’t last forever”, but criticised by the Electric Vehicle Council whose spokesperson said it “risks slamming on the brakes on the progress the ACT is making in EV uptake”.

The ACT Budget 2025-26 will be debated in the ACT Legislative Assembly during the September sitting week.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

77
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Favouring the rich? well, yes, EVs are just expensive toys with no real use apart from posing. Some of them might be useful if you never venture outside an urban landscape. If you want to pull a horse float or haul a trailer or do any significant heavy work, diesel is king and always will be.

It’s also time to stop the charade about them being “zero-emissions vehicles” – at best they’re “remote-emissions vehicles”

All vehicles include remote emissions, or embodied energy. EVs have very low operating emissions (mostly from tyres) giving them a lower life-cycle emission value.

If you dont include the energy costs to build them…..

And the emissions from electricity generated to charge them. Just how many of them do you think are being charged from solar while parked at home overnight?

Because you’re really going to avert a “climate crisis” by buying a RAV4 at 109g CO2 /100km instead of a CX-5 at 172 g CO2/100km … while China and India each build more coal-fired power plants every month than Australia has in total.

For a moment there Bill, I was sure you were going to mention that in the last year China installed more renewable capacity, primarily solar and wind, than the rest of the world put together.

Would you also like to mention that despite some new smaller coal plants previously approved, they are burning less coal than previously (more efficient and less demand), and will phase out such developments by 2030?

The world has changed. Your ilk are doing their best to hand it all to China on a plate. I would like a future for this country.

The ACT also changed it’s car registration costs away from weight-based to emissions based. The reason of course was to make EVs (which on general weigh more) to be cheaper to register.

The stupidity of this is that emissions based registration fees are that true emissions are dependent on the kilometres driven. A NVES compliant car may very well create more (post manufacturing) emissions, than an ICE that sits in the garage, rarely driven.

Even a 2-day old puppy knows that reducing duty and rego for EV favours the rich at the time given how expensive these cars were. So, one would assume that labour-green politicians and their friends who are sufficiently well-off to afford EVs were the earliest beneficiaries of the policy. As EVs now get cheaper and within reach of common people, the incentive is being withdrawn. Smart, very smart move indeed. All animals are equal but some are more equal than others.

Labor and fat cats. Who’d have thought

Oh, oh dear the ACT Government favouring the rich. An instance where Socialist doctrine was overlooked in favour of equally stupid virtue signalling and leftist elitism. For shame!

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.