3 August 2025

Why not take the plunge on Geocon's all-year public pool?

| By Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
37
Save Phillip Pool protesters with Fiona Carrick

Independent Murrumbidgee MLA Fiona Carrick and Save Phillip Pool protesters out the front of the Legislative Assembly. Photo: Supplied.

In a perfect world, the ACT Government would have acquired the Phillip pool and ice rink site instead of Geocon, and developed a new aquatic centre and ice sports centre for Woden, possibly with private partners.

Alas, that multi-million dollar dream was not to be. And many ratepayers will be happy about that.

It is easy to sympathise with the Save Phillip Pool movement. Independent MLA Fiona Carrick has for years been battling the ACT Government over the high-rise development boom in Woden, a seeming lack of planning strategy for the town centre and shrinking community facilities, particularly in sports and recreation. It’s one reason she is now in the Legislative Assembly.

READ ALSO Year 6 artist unveils Canberra’s newest reconciliation mural

The Phillip pool has become symbolic of this struggle, and its demise will mark the divide between old and new Woden.

But the decline of Phillip pool has been long in the making, through a combination of neglect, undercapitalisation and falling patronage.

The sad fact is that the day of the outdoor summer pool is long over, and Phillip pool in particular is just not as popular as it once may have been. The Phillip pool petitioners may be able to gather thousands of signatures, but how many of them would be found poolside over summer?

It is also not a viable business proposition to open a pool for four or five months a year. Business and government can’t base decisions on nostalgia.

There are only two other outdoor pools in Canberra – Dickson and Manuka. The rest are indoor pools that operate all year round and it is still difficult to make money. Ask the YMCA, which pulled out of managing Canberra’s five government pools in 2023.

Once Geocon bought the privately held site, the outdoor pool and the ice rink’s fate was sealed.

But under the lease it must provide a public pool, and its plans for the site, again put on hold over its apartment proposals, include an aquatic centre with an eight-lane 25-metre pool, splash pad, learn-to-swim area, toddlers’ swimming area, leisure swimming area, “program pool with relaxation area”, a steam and sauna room, café, and an outdoor water play/splash pad and entertainment area.

That’s not such a bad result. The sticking point is that there is no 50-metre pool. But if you swim at the other aquatic centres, the 50-metre pool is often cut in half for lap swimmers anyway.

The loss of green space is also a problem, and of course, there are those towers and all those apartments, also known as homes.

Geocon is committed to keeping Phillip pool open until it starts developing that section. Photo: Geocon.

There have been calls for the government to consider building a new aquatic centre somewhere else in Woden, such as Eddison Park, and the Chief Minister, Andrew Barr, flirted briefly with the idea during the election.

But why would the government spend millions on a public facility when Geocon will do it for you? And of course, having two in Woden would not make sense. The other point is that many new tower developments have their own pools, such as Geocon’s WOVA across the road.

The only aquatic centre that Mr Barr will be building will be the one in Commonwealth Park, which will enable the Convention and Entertainment Centre Precinct to be developed on the Civic pool site.

Save Phillip Pool petitioners may call on the government to intervene, but having stayed out of the market, and after a legitimate sales process and development application, it is now up to the independent Planning Authority to do its job.

The petition asked the government to “retain and upgrade the existing Phillip Swimming & Ice-Skating Centre until a new ice rink is built and a 50-metre pool and associated aquatic and green spaces are available in the Woden Town Centre”.

But Minister for Planning Chris Steel responded that Geocon’s plans met the site’s “recreational” lease requirements, and it would be up to the Planning Authority to sign off on the DA or not.

“There is currently no legislative avenue for the Authority to require the proponent to retain the existing 50-metre pool or ice-skating rink or require the development to pause until a new facility is available in the Woden Town Centre,” he wrote.

The site is also Geocon’s property, and it can do with it what it likes, subject to the lease and planning requirements.

Save Phillip Pool may not like it, but Mr Steel is right.

READ ALSO Steady as she goes for this potential buyer as house prices continue climb

Of course, Save Phillip Pool and the Planning Authority could make life so uncomfortable that Geocon decides to cut its losses and offload the site.

If that happens, don’t expect the government to enter the market; a new owner will likely have similar development ideas.

Perhaps the best outcome would be for the Planning Authority and Geocon to sort out the issues it has with the DA, and Save Phillip Pool and the Planning Authority work to secure the best possible aquatic centre that can be delivered, so at least the Woden Valley has public swimming facilities that can be used during all of Canberra’s four seasons.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

37
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

For “Plunge” why not read “Monumental Gamble”? The proposed plans for the site are a travesty for the local residents and future tenants.

Losing a beautiful 50m pool into the bargain – its lose/lose. Further reduces livability in the Woden Valley. And only serves GEOCONs interests.

My son lives in an apartment complex that has an outdoor pool. It’s heated….well, the chill is taken off the water temp in summer. It’s not heated in winter, due to the cost, and needless to say, the pool isn’t used by the residents.

I can’t see the point in an outdoor public pool in Canberra. We live in a town with bitterly cold winters.
Covered and heated pools, maybe? In the meantime, with the number of apartments being built, many of them with pools, I expect the demand for public pools isn’t what it used to be. If any of our family is visiting us in Canberra during summer, they go to my son’s complex, as his guest, and use his complexes pool. I can’t see either myself or wife ever going to a public pool, when we can dip in the apartment pool.

Deborah Johns2:09 pm 04 Aug 25

What an apallingly uninformed commentary by Ian Bushnell. He opens his article stating “In a perfect world, the ACT Government would have acquired the Phillip pool and ice rink site instead of Geocon.” Firstly, it was the ACT government that sold Phillip Pool (in 2008 to Glencora on a 99-year lease). They try to argue that because it is now owned by Geocon there “no legislative basis” to fix the mess that they created. Ian Bushnel is clearly not a swimmer. Twenty-five metre pools do not cut-it for serious swimmers. Suggesting at GeoCon will allow the public to use their facility is utter nonsense. We have seen promises about other public swimming facilities that the ACT sold, be allowed to deteriorate to such an extent they became health and safety dangers. As for outdoor pools being past their use by date, Ian Bushnell should do some more research – throughout the world outdoor pools are being embraced. I suggest he research the resurgence of Lidos in the United Kingdom for starters. As a Canberran who was born here I have been increasingly dismayed by how the argument that public facilities need to be sold off because they don’t make profits is rolled out to justify questionable decisions by the ACT government. Maybe Ian Bushnell should research what public facilities in Canberra actually make profits. I trained in the Phillip Pool throughout the winter of 2016 for my English Channel swim. And finally, my father Bob Johns, was instrumental in getting approval for the Dickson swimming pool. In those days the Dickson Amateur Swimming Club ran ‘Learn to Swim Free’ clases. Yes, free! No profit-making swim teaching – just community-m8ndrd people who wanted to share their love of swimming with others in the Community. Something that the ACT doesn’t seem to understand or care about.

Trish O'Connor2:38 pm 04 Aug 25

you are spot on Deborah and Ian Bushnell needs to do some solid reseach.

Deborah Johns5:32 pm 04 Aug 25

Unfortunately its the way of journalism these days. And politics.

Barr obviously doesn’t swim!

Louise Watson11:09 am 04 Aug 25

If “the day of the outdoor summer pool is long over”, why did Dickson Outdoor Pool need to enforce a “one-out, one-in” entrance rule to manage public demand for outdoor swimming on successive hot days last summer?

For sure, “it’s not a viable business proposition to open a pool for four or five months a year”, but it’s prudent public policy to provide safe and supervised aquatic facilities over summer to alleviate heat stress and minimise the risk drowning (in the rivers and streams that people will seek out if there’s no alternative).

It’s clear why this article is an “opinion”, rather than journalism, but even as an “opinion”, it’s spectacularly ill-informed.

Deborah Johns2:28 pm 04 Aug 25

Because opponents of the way things are progressing in Canberra don’t care about the facts – they just make broad statements with no facts to back up those statements.

Gregg Heldon11:08 am 04 Aug 25

Well Ian, I’d prefer to stay myself than give Geocon a single cent of my money, so I won’t be going to their Temu swimming pool.
Thankfully, we still live in a consumer centric democracy so I can choose which swimming pool I go to. Or, if I want, I can go swim in a river.
This isn’t an opinion piece. It’s a thinly veiled advert for Geocon. And an apology statement about Chris Steele’s shrugging shoulders.

I understand why they’re doing this because if we’re going to have such a population, the people that make up that population need to live somewhere. But still, it’s a terrible shame to see a much loved facility go. It’s almost as if there’s a secret rule that Canberra is limited to how interesting/fun it can be. Note: the closure of Big Splash.

A huge number of existing units in Woden aren’t occupied. The lights aren’t on and nobody is home.

Scott Meikle9:56 am 04 Aug 25

Geocon receives a lot of flack, but this a great happy medium! I believe they are driving and enhancing the Canberra landscape + the housing crisis issues, profit sure, do the MLA’s work for free?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.