8 August 2025

Blackouts on the rise as ACT hits record demand for electricity

| By James Coleman
Join the conversation
130
Evoenergy substation

Evoenergy manages the ACT’s electricity network. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

The ACT’s energy provider has said its network remains one of the most reliable in the country even as demand for electricity – and the number of blackouts – soars.

Canberra households shivered through a June with the coldest average overnight temperatures in 41 years (-2.7 degrees Celsius, compared to the long-term average of 1.1 degrees Celsius) – prompting many to ratchet up the heating.

Evoenergy says electricity demand in the ACT rose to record levels in June 2025, and was accompanied by 20 per cent more outages than in June last year.

The provider attributed the added stress to the increased number of households on the network, as well as the number of households that have swapped gas appliances for electric ones.

READ ALSO ‘Not important at all’: Barr rejects cost-benefit analysis for major infrastructure projects

“This increase coincided with colder-than-average minimum temperatures and record electricity demand in the ACT, driven by winter heating, population growth and electrification,” a spokesperson told Region.

Suburbs in Gungahlin and the Molonglo Valley were most affected, being the “fast-growing areas with increasing electricity demand”.

“In some cases, aging assets and the need for additional capacity have also contributed.”

The ACT’s population grew by 6838 residents last year, and the number of residential dwellings by 3900.

Suburban housing

Molonglo Valley was one of the ACT’s districts most affected by the rise in blackouts. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Meanwhile, residential gas connections have been steadily declining since 2021. The latest figures reveal more than 5000 ACT households disconnected their gas in 2023.

According to modelling undertaken by the government in 2022, the ACT will have consumed 2800 gigawatt-hours (GWh) of electricity by the end of this year, but by 2045, annual demand on the grid is expected to have increased by 21 per cent.

The government says this figure represents “reasonably modest growth” given rooftop solar is expected to meet an additional 26 per cent of the ACT’s electricity needs by then.

READ ALSO The fountains at Old Parliament House are being ‘reimagined’ – but what does that mean?

Evoenergy remains upbeat about the future, thanks to the ACT network being “one of the most reliable in the country – in the top two – and overall reliability improved last year”, according to the Australian Energy Regulator’s (AER) Annual Benchmarking Report.

“We have robust maintenance and planning in place, are actively managing the network to meet demand, and are well prepared for the remainder of winter,” the spokesperson said.

Ahead of this year’s winter, Evoenergy installed six temporary batteries in Denman Prospect to improve reliability in the Molonglo Valley, which the provider said “played a key role during the all-time system peak in June” and helped prevent more outages.

Big battery

One of the big batteries in Molonglo Valley. Photo: Evoenergy.

The batteries are also chipping in while a new Molonglo Zone Substation is still under construction, expected to be complete before next winter.

Evoenergy said similar upgrades to the grid in Gungahlin prevented the situation from being worse there, too.

“While June and July saw more outages than usual, Gungahlin experienced a 41 per cent decrease in unplanned outages when comparing the 2023-24 financial year to the 2024-25 financial year, showing the benefits of targeted upgrades and maintenance in the area,” the spokesperson said.

The provider said it will continue to “meet growing demand and maintain reliability” by upgrading network infrastructure in Gungahlin and Molonglo Valley, along with “renewal of aging assets” and “regular scheduled maintenance” across the network.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

130
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

IDK what to laugh at most from the comically clueless right wing who infest this forum…the boneheaded refusal to accept climate change despite the science, the ignorance of the economics of the energy market or even a basic understanding of how the AEM works, let alone the lack of understanding of the spheres of government and business influence….beyond clueless, but I did laugh out loud at the intellectuals in the MOAR gas crowd….given most modern gas appliances require…*checks notes*…electricity.

Capital Retro2:12 pm 12 Aug 25

Q: What did Canberra have before candles?

A: Electricity.

Lol. Even wood fires are now verboten.

Thankfully, Australia has large supplies of gas, and this can save us from increasing blackouts, particularly in high demand periods like winter…..what, the ACT Government is phasing out gas?

Capital Retro2:21 pm 12 Aug 25

Gas is a natural substance so why does everyone hate it?

Who hates it Capital Retro? Can you point to any post by any person saying “I hate gas” or directly equivalent words?

Of course you cannot. You are too busy confusing your visceral opposition to anything new for thought on your part.

A modicum of gas is part of the energy plan, by virtue its ability to switch both on and off very quickly. It is, however, highly polluting so will be used only when necessary for some peaks.

The outages are getting more noticeable. Luckily we still has gas so can boil water on the flame. Not so great if you believed the government hype to switch to only electricity and are now paying through the nose for it if it works at all

How can that be though, in the era of “global boiling” where “fruit and vegetables will become a once-a-year treat” that we’ve had the coldest June in 41 years ?

Do the climate “experts” have it all wrong 🤔 ? They told us the science is settled and was not questionable. How has it all gone do wrong ?

@Penfold
Still trotting out that old favourite chestnut of the denialists, Penfold 🤥 – “how can there be a global warming issue when it’s so cold? 🥶”

It’s risible that you deride others, for the occasional mathematical faux pas, when you can’t understand a basci mathematical concept of averages – as in ‘an increase in the average global temperature’. You do know that the northern hemisphere has been experiencing record high temperatures don’t you?

So no, Penfold 🤥, the experts do not “have it all wrong”. It’s the cherry pickers, like you, who use a few cold mornings (who would have thought it would be cold here in winter??), as your ‘scientific proof’ that the evidence is wrong.

Don’t just think about temperature there JS. How quickly some forget – there was never going to be another ski season in Australia, crops would fail, Warragamba would never fill. Antarctic would melt, the oceans would rise up, countries would be “wiped off the map” (June 26 1989, United Nations prediction).

So let me ask you this – have these “experts” actually got anything right ?

“July was earth’s third-hottest on record:”

https://www.canberratimes.com.au/story/9035454/july-was-earths-third-hottest-on-record-eu-scientists/

“How has it all gone do(sic) wrong ?”

That’s what everyone thinks about our education system every time you post.

Well one thing the experts did get right is “Blackouts on the rise”. And of course this was all entirely predictable. 2016, South Australia when those renewables tripped the entire network. So much so ….

“As part of its regulatory response, in August 2019, the Australian Energy Regulator (AER ) commenced proceedings in the Federal Court against four wind farm operators for alleged breaches of the National Electricity Rules (NER ) during the blackout.”

https://www.gtlaw.com.au/insights/the-black-system-event-6-years-on#:~:text=On%2028%20September%202016%2C%20a,to%20the%20state%2Dwide%20blackout.

CaptainSpiff7:20 pm 11 Aug 25

@JS Funny because when the cultists go on about a 40+ summer day, I bet you dont think about averages or cherry picking then, right?

CaptainSpiff7:21 pm 11 Aug 25

@chewy Let us know how much the climate has warmed in the last 150 years please. Seems like it would be a relevant data point.

@Penfold
Again you go back to your old chestnut of quoting hyperbole from administrators and public figures, Penfold 🤥

It is a shame that these people have made such over the top predictions, when the science itself and factual modelling are dire enough, without the need for exaggeration.

No scientific research has made such predictions … though the scientific research has shown:
– “Australia’s ski industry is at risk of major disruptions and shorter seasons if the current level of climate pollution continues”
https://www.anu.edu.au/news/all-news/climate-crisis-puts-australias-ski-industry-on-slippery-slope-but-not-all-hope-is-lost
– “Climate change is leading to a higher frequency and severity of extreme weather events that put supply chains at risk.”
https://farmersforclimateaction.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2022/03/Fork-in-the-Road_V5.pdf
– “Global average sea level has risen 8–9 inches (21–24 centimeters) since 1880.”
https://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-global-sea-level

So, no those “experts” have not got it right. But the real experts, those who aer undertaking the research and actually investigating the impacts of climate change have got it right.

@Captain Spiff
Perhaps google the difference between temperature and climate, Captain Spiff, then come back when you have something cogent to contribute.

Well JS if nothing you are consistent, take it as a compliment, sort of.

Once again you’re providing us the doomsday future predictions of the experts who, just last year, told us the ski season is doomed. Here’s a couple of fact-based reports on the past 12 months. They’re also known as observations, not predictions.

https://japanskiexperience.com/news-and-articles/record-season-wraps-up-in-japan/

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-11/australian-alps-businesses-make-major-investments-in-ski-fields/105623872

So perhaps you should pivot your commentary to what’s actually happened, not what some gloomy ANU person thinks might happen.

CaptainSpiff – you should ask them a real tough question like mathematically how does CO2 impact temperature. The response would be hilarious, especially as climate scientists and the IPCC can’t even tell us.

https://www.csiro.au/en/news/All/Articles/2024/June/snow-trends-Australia

Why would we look at 12 months when we have a consistent trend of lower snow depth over decades?

We know you like cherry picking and don’t know the difference between weather and the climate but you shouldn’t shoot yourself in the foot so thoroughly Penzero.

So perhaps you should pivot your commentary to what’s actually happened…..But we all know you won’t

Lol chewy, if you’d even spent a nanosecond analysing that link you’d see none of them are ski fields and are likely cherry picked.

Though well done for actually trying to mount and argument, pardon the pun. Next you could move on to applying a little cognitive rigour. 🤔

And there we have it, another perfect example of what I’ve referenced below:

“We’ve already been over that I’m not playing your little disingenuous game because you flat out ignore any actual evidence posted to attempt to change topic or bring up completely irrational and cherry picked points.”

“herp derp, we had a cold June and some snow, climate change isn’t real”

*Penzero proceeds to ignore decades of data at multiple sites showing the trend of reduced snowpack because it doesn’t support his juvenile position*

Well done.

Hey chewy, perhaps you should try to read the title of this article.

It starts with “Blackouts on the rise”.

Please feel free to dispute this but do try to provide some evidence.

chewybabble just doesn’t cut it.

Left with nothing to argue after fully embarrassing himself again, Penzero scampers away 👨‍🦯

Silly me. I have a mixture of gas and electricity. Have had for 33 years (back in the day when ALL the experts recommended gas). Stayed warm and even boiled water for a coffee.
What’s the problem again?

High demand through winter after pushing out gas, encouraging EVs, and population growth? Entirely predictable.

Anyone who reckons “baseload power” is an old, irrelevant concept doesn’t know the topic.

You’ve got to laugh at people who dont know the difference between energy and electricity commenting on articles like this.

Particularly when the ACT electricity network is actually far more reliable than most other areas of Australia, despite their ridiculous claims.

Just too funny at this stage.

You have to laugh at people who don’t know the difference between increasing power bills and cost of living. Who’d have thought

“Who’d have thought”

Not you obviously.

Capital Retro9:05 am 11 Aug 25

Chewy, you can’t go on defending the indefensible forever.

Sadly you can CR, if you’ve never been taught anything different.

Maybe schools need to start teaching the history of Australia’s economic growth.

And how there’s not a single country on Earth which has developed using solar and wind.

Capital Retro, you can’t go on not knowing what you are talking about fore… oh, wait…

Penfold advocates people learning history, yet he has never heard of windmills, solar ovens, focussed mirrors, or thermally sound construction.

Too silly.

He would also argue on his principle that no new technology could ever be implemented because no-one else had it beforehand.

Too silly.

Axon presumably that means you don’t advocate people learning history.

That does sound a little silly. There’s so much to learn from history, especially how Australia’s standard of living grew for decades before Albo’s renewables turned up.

Even Hawkie told us we’d never had it so good.

“solar ovens, focussed mirrors” – I’ll cut a hole in my roof and set up mirrors so I can fry an egg at exactly 12:05PM on a sunny day. Shouldn’t be too expensive, maybe $30k. Hope those eggs are worth it. Not for inside? Oh, a camp kitchen in the back yard. OK then

Capital Retro12:02 pm 11 Aug 25

Axon, read Blainey’s The Tyranny of Distance and some of his other accounts of how Australia became a great industrial country.

There weren’t any windmills, solar ovens, focused mirrors, or thermally sound construction involved either, just thermal power from (renewable) wood and later abundant, cheap coal.

They have probably not taught you this at school so I will forgive you for your ignorance of the facts.

Futureproof, you have lost the plot. We have always used wind, sun and water in different ways for various purposes. This is just another one.

Quite the contrary Penfold, you have ignored history with your very silly claims, as you do. Anyone unsure about the fact you have just tried to avoid the subject can read my prior post again, especially how Australia’s standard of living grew for decades before we had electricity, or gas, at all.

“We have always used wind, sun and water” Except it is now so expensive. Glad you can afford it

Axon I must have missed that post. You did mention something about windmills and solar ovens but it begs the question on whether you’ve heard of the industrial revolution and the great post-WW2 boom.

I did have to look up this “focussed mirror” and discovered “They are often found in photography studios, where they are used to help photographers achieve the perfect lighting for their shots. Focusing mirrors can also be found in other places, such as beauty salons and science labs.”

Btw if you look at the history of humanity the greatest growth on standards of living have been in the past 100 years where coincidentally we’ve had an abundance of energy driven by coal, gas and petrol.

The recent eight drops in Australia’s standard of living have been during the expansion of wind and solar, but that must just be a coincidence.

“Chewy, you can’t go on defending the indefensible forever.”

You and the others can’t go on pretending you know the slightest thing about the topic with the repeated ignorance being shown all over this thread.

The article talks about a slight increase in localised network failures, with higher rates in newer areas that still have infrastructure under construction.

Have a think about why that may be. Hint, it has very little to do with “renewables” or anything else you and Zero want to instinctively blame it on.

Particularly when the same figures actually show that the ACT network is one of the most reliable in the country, which you conveniently ignore as usual.

You’ve fallen for the rage bait as expected.

Of course you missed it Penfold. That is what you do: miss everything that matters, seeking to mislead with misinformation.

Thanks for confirming you haven’t a clue about the history you thought you should recommend to others.

The subject here is infrastructure. Of course, you missed that.

Capital Retro, history started earlier than the British colonisation of Australia, but thanks for confirming that new technologies arise and are used, just like we are today.

@Penfold
Yes of course, history has well documented the Industrial Revolution, which the scientific evidence shows has given us the current climate crisis. Even you have acknowledged you understand the issue of carbon emissions – it’s just that you hypocritically don’t acknowledge we need to do something about it.

Axon – the subject is “infrastructure” ?

Thanks for the clarification, here I was thinking that – like the article discusses – it is about blackouts, record cold snaps and the continual failure of renewables.

Even chewy has finally cottoned on. But unlike his attempt at comedy – “slight increase in localised network failures” – the article states …. “the number of blackouts – soars.” That maths thing again.

But we should all thanks and acknowledge the RiotAct for highlighting this issue. The future looks pretty grim unless we start acting. Bring back gas, find more reliable and baseload energy sources and hope that global warming eventually turns up so we turn the heaters off.

JS – you’re quite right, we desperately do need to do something about it. Get the gas back on, get baseload happening again. Oh, and stop the hysteria too. Are you up for it ? 😉

@Penfold
So, Penfold 🤥, your solution to the emissions crisis is to ramp up emissions … that’s rich, even for a hypocrite.

Yes, Penfold, you avoid the actual topic which is infrastructure, which is far more reliable in the ACT than in most of Australia, despite additional Winter stresses discussed.

From there, you try to turn it into your usual losing culture war
which you lose, as usual.

At least you have told us something extra, that you have not a clue about history as well as about mathematics, statistics, energy, electricity, pretty much any “nail” you try to whack at blindly with your child’s hammer.

Dribble dribble dribble. Just another Monday’s operations for the Penfold denialist drivel making machine.

Axon if you think the main topic here is infrastructure, perhaps you haven’t read the article.

But in that context those comments about hammers and nails are noted. 🔨

Btw were wind, sun and water part of the infrastructure to which you referred ? 💨 🌞 💧

Pengold,
You still haven’t worked out the difference between electricity and energy yet and last week you didnt even know what a Watt is.

Your ignorance has been embarrassingly on show every thread you’ve attempted on this topic.

” the article states …. “the number of blackouts – soars.” That maths thing again.”

Yes, there is your lack of mathematical ability again, thanks for raising it.

The ACT has one of the most reliable networks in Australia and despite the article’s hyperbole, it’s actually gotten more reliable in the last few decades due to significant infrastructure investment. All at the same time that renewables have massively expanded, completely defeating your poor attempt at correlation.

So yeah, you’ve just made a fool of yourself again.

It seems to be a constant theme.

Yes chewy, obviously a konstant theme. I’d have to admit to being in awe of your supreme intelligence. Such regular klever comments about how smart you are and how unintelligent the rest of us are. It must be such rarefied air that you occupy, surely you must be Secretary of a government department, CEO of Mensa or a major corporation.

Having said that i was looking at the Dux Board at CGS a little while back and Whitlam appears three times, yet there didn’t appear to be any chewy. Surely that’s a mistake, or a typo.

Yet that inability to ever try to refute people’s arguments with something rational suggests you weren’t captain of the State debating team. Surely that was an oversight too, unappreciated talent.

Or perhaps there’s another explanation …. 🙂

Penwatt,
There’s that comprehension issue again. Your “points” have been rationally refuted multiple times.

We’ve already been over that I’m not playing your little disingenuous game because you flat out ignore any actual evidence posted to attempt to change topic or bring up completely irrational and cherry picked points.

As you’ve done once again here repeatedly.

You arent interested in rational debate, you even fail at trolling. “Raise the bar”.

“The ACT has one of the most reliable networks in Australia and despite the article’s hyperbole, it’s actually gotten more reliable in the last few decades due to significant infrastructure investment. All at the same time that renewables have massively expanded, completely defeating your poor attempt at correlation.”

Almost like your simplistic commentary doesn’t recognise the complexity of the issue and underlying causes for localised infrastructure capacity constraints.

Of course you can’t respond because you dont actually have the slightest idea what you’re talking about.

Scamper time for Penwatt. 👨‍🦯

Hey chewy, we know you’re the expert at calling out what you describe as “cherry picking”. But how’s this one for a classic. The first sentence of the article:

Chewy’s comment: “The ACT has one of the most reliable networks in Australia”

Actual report: The ACT’s energy provider has said its network remains one of the most reliable in the country even as demand for electricity – and the number of blackouts – soars.

Care to address “the number of blackouts – soars.”

That’s some amazing cherry picking, Mensa level even. 🍒🧑‍🎓

“the number of blackouts – soars”

Easy, the number hasn’t “soared”, which is commented on above. Perhaps you should read before mashing keys again? There were 20% more outages in one month. It’s written in the article, did you read it?

Hilariously, you’ve once again just provided even more evidence of how weak your attempted cherry farming is by trying to rely on one word written by a journalist over what the actual numbers and evidence say.

The actual report:

“thanks to the ACT network being “one of the most reliable in the country – in the top two – and overall reliability improved last year”, according to the Australian Energy Regulator’s (AER) Annual Benchmarking Report.”

By your logic, more renewables has led to better reliability.

Although that’s not even starting on the types of localised failures and their causes which have zero to do with what Penwatt is railing against.

This is the intellectual brilliance I’m so jealous of.

ACT energy market operator wrong.

chewy right.

“ACT energy market operator wrong”

ACT energy market operator?

Bahahahahahahaha, you can’t even get your failed talking points right when mashing the keys. Even a cursory bit of research would see a normal person not make such simplistic mistakes.

Thanks for showing us once again you have zero knowledge on the topic Penwatt, no one is going to accuse you of any form of brilliance when you consistently out your own ignorance with every keystroke.

Yep, you’ve got me on a technicality there chewy.

So now perhaps you’d like to move to explaining, with evidence, how you are right and Evoenergy are wrong.

Happy to wait, I suspect it will be a while ….

You really should stop dribbling on sometimes Penfold, when you clearly have no idea what you are talking about…. leave it to those that can read and comprehend and do basic calculations.

A+ for trying however, but it is all just a bit sad by now.

Capital Retro2:20 pm 12 Aug 25

Ha ha, JS9.

The only people who can read and comprehend and do basic calculations are those educated before the lefty neo-Marxixts took over the education system 20 years ago.

I don’t think you are in that group.

Penzero,
It’s not a technicality that you constantly out your lack of knowledge on the topic.

As for Evoenergy, read the article.

“Evoenergy remains upbeat about the future, thanks to the ACT network being “one of the most reliable in the country – in the top two – and overall reliability improved last year”, according to the Australian Energy Regulator’s (AER) Annual Benchmarking Report”.

The only thing we’ll be waiting a while for is you making an informed comment.

Professor chewy …. you can say it ….. don’t be afraid, it’s the real world ….

“number of blackouts – soars” ….

“households shiver” ….

Welcome to the real world 🌎 🤣

Penfold please quote where Evoenergy said the number of blackouts soars.

Evoenergy noted the increase in demand, an increase in the number of blackouts, yet that their network remains one of the most reliable in the country. Unquoted words by a reporter writing clickbait are not a statement by Evoenergy. Check the text in quotation marks above or Evoenergy’s web site.

Evoenergy also said: “Evoenergy is proud to have one of the most reliable electricity networks in the country”. Their reliability improved in the past year, according to the Australian Energy Regulator (AER) Annual Benchmarking Report.

These are the facts around the ACT energy infrastructure, and nothing to do with generation despite your desperation to make it what it is not.

I would welcome you to the real world if ever you were to stop shivering in your cave, fighting shadows on the wall, though I am not expecting that to change.

If there’s one place you dont live Penwatt, its the “real world”.

Enjoy the high reliability of your electricity network as confirmed by the “ACT Energy Market Operator” bahahahahaha.

Scamper time for Penzero 👨‍🦯

No cave here Axon, nice warm house with gas-heated water. We even had solar panels for years but they, well, broke.

If you took some time to read the article unlike your buddies you might have read this:

“Evoenergy says electricity demand in the ACT rose to record levels in June 2025, and was accompanied by 20 per cent more outages than in June last year.”

Now we’ve discussed maths quite often, you’ve even demonstrated your amazing prowess. 20% more outages, well that’s a clear definition of soaring. If you disagree, consider what you’d be telling us if that applied to, say, temperatures.

And in the context of “one of the most reliable electricity networks in the country”, that’s quite concerning.

Wonder how badly some of the others are doing. South Australia, for example. Or Victoria. Oh wait …. look what i stumbled on ….

Carlton: 1035 customers affected, estimated restoration at 8:00 PM on August 9, 2025.
Carlton North: 701 customers affected, estimated restoration at 8:00 PM on August 9, 2025.
Geelong West: 1 customer affected, estimated restoration at 10:00 PM on August 9, 2025.
Middle Park: 86 customers affected, estimated restoration at 7:30 PM on August 9, 2025.

Sorry to tell you guys, that’s the real world. Just when mums and dads are trying to cook the kids dinner and get them bathed.

Bahahahaha,

Penzero using his famed percentage increase calculation skills again, not even recognising the obvious flaws in his argument.

If a normal person’s IQ was increased by 20% that would be a significant increase based on the recognised distribution of IQ amongst the population.

However if we increased Penzero’s IQ by 20% it really wouldn’t make a material difference to his intelligence.

Real world, LOL.

I am sorry to hear you are paying too much for hot water Penfold. Heat pump hot water is far more efficient, and stores its energy. You also appear to have made poor choices with solar panels. Too bad, and so what? We already know you make bad choices.

Yes, 20% more outages yet still one of the most reliable infrastructure networks in the country and better than the previous year. Given it was already good, the clear implication is that 20% was on a low base (i.e. not a lot) but we know from previous experience that understanding bases and proportions is way beyond Pencherry’s wit.

Pencherry goes on to try to prove that other jurisdictions are less reliable. Congratulations on agreeing ACT’s network is more reliable, as also observed by the Australian Energy Regulator.

Didn’t find anything in South Australia? One single customer in Geelong West? You are so desperate. Speak to the infrastructure suppliers there. I am sure they will listen to you, or maybe you are why they have music on hold.

chewy that’s a very confused post.

Now i’m thinking back to our Whitlam CGS Dux board and Mensa discussion yesterday and how amazingly impressive your level of intellect is.

But you’re now saying that a “20% IQ increase” can be both “significant” and at the same time “wouldn’t make a material difference”.

How’s that work ?

“How’s that work ?”

Thanks for confirming Pengold, QED. 😂😂😂

differing perspective9:07 pm 10 Aug 25

Surprise, surprise, surprise! Let’s not do any new gas connections. Let’s plan to get rid of gas. Let’s encourage, indeed incentivise people to change from gas heating/cooking/hot water to electricity. What could possibly go wrong? 🤦‍♂️

Another outage in Molonglo valley and part of Weston Creek last Friday morning, 8 August. The third outage in a month. It’s surprising that ageing infrastructure only disproportionately affects newer suburbs despite these suburbs being the greenest. Are these blackouts a subtle ploy to set the stage for surcharges when you send excess power from your solar panels to the grid?

Reading this article makes me realize we need more variety of energy sources.

So to summarise, in the past several weeks we’ve had:

* Record cold temperatures
* Higher demand for electricity
* Less gas
* More renewables
* More blackouts
* Higher prices

Gee, there seems to be a theme here. And a very easy solution.

Careful – the CFMEU and Labor evangelists will come for you. You know, the usual suspects

Capital Retro2:50 pm 10 Aug 25

Would the solution have something to do with that thing called Net Zero?

Too many dot points perhaps CR, too many moving parts.

But in all seriousness this is exactly what’s been predicted for years and here we are. Even the warning in South Australia in 2016 was ignored.

Possibly Futureproof, but they never seem to come armed with anything of substance. Just vitriol.

Capital Retro9:07 am 11 Aug 25

Right on Penfold, but I miss Sean Zero’s usual response: “all the above in untrue”.

To be fair CR it might be assembly or playground time.

Besides which sadly all of the above is true, reported in this and other RiotAct articles.

Perhaps it’s time to start reconnecting the gas.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.