15 August 2025

Sydney toll giant 'sincerely apologises' for billing Canberra drivers who never used roads

| By James Coleman
Join the conversation
48
ACT number plate

ACT numberplates aren’t the only ones that start with Y anymore – and it’s causing issues. Photo: James Coleman.

Hundreds of Canberra drivers are being slugged with Sydney tolls for roads they haven’t driven – and the ACT Government wants it stopped, fast.

ACT Minister for Transport Chris Steel has written to the CEO of one of Sydney’s biggest toll operators, Transurban, and asked for “immediate action” on a problem that’s becoming more common.

Since NSW began adopting Y-prefixed numberplates in 2012, more cars over the border share identical alphanumeric combinations to cars in the ACT – tripping up the AI-driven software employed on many of Sydney’s toll roads.

Sydney roads

M2 Hills Motorway is one of Sydney’s many toll roads. Photo: Sardaka.

Back in November 2024, Linda (last name omitted by request) told Region she received a flurry of toll notices from Transurban’s toll provider Linkt for six months – due to the fact her 2010 Hyundai i30 hatchback shared the same numberplate as a Nissan Navara ute in NSW.

“Each toll road in Sydney was managed by a different company, so each time I received a toll notice, I had to contact the company and request they review the footage to confirm if the registration plate was ACT or NSW and what the make and model of the vehicle was,” she said.

“This would often take several days and several phone calls trying to reach someone who understood what I was trying to tell them.”

READ ALSO ‘Overwhelming’ response to petitions on Garema Place dining shelter

Eventually, Linda was able to get each toll company to put an alert on the specific number plate so staff would have to physically review the footage before sending out the bill – but the notices only stopped after her car was written off in an accident.

Numberplates in the ACT have begun with Y since 1948, when the now defunct Australian Transport Advisory Council (ATAC) suggested numberplates starting with letters between XAA and ZZZ be reserved for the Federal Government and the two territories (rumour suggests it may have also had to do with ‘Y’ as the shape of the city layout).

But the prefix isn’t exclusive to the ACT, with NSW now well into the Y run and South Australia and Victoria issuing their own over the years too.

In his letter to Transurban CEO Michelle Jablko, Mr Steel requested “all effort be made to identify ACT motorists wrongly charged and issue refunds as quickly as possible”.

Man speaking to group

ACT Minister for Transport Chris Steel has asked the toll provider to create a “specific contact line and email … for those who may be affected”. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

“I am writing on behalf of ACT motorists to ask you take immediate action to address the unauthorised charging of ACT motor vehicle licence holders,” he wrote.

“I also ask that Transurban urgently meets with Access Canberra … to discuss the actions Transurban intends to take to prevent future unauthorised charging and its plan to compensate ACT motorists that have been affected.”

Mr Steel also criticised the company for the fact “ACT licence holders attempting to contact Transurban to challenge unauthorised transactions have found it difficult”.

“I therefore request that a specific contact line and email is made available for those who may be affected.”

READ ALSO Electric vehicles set to be charged a road-user levy

ACT senator David Pocock has described the errors as an “unacceptable failing”, while federal MPs Alicia Payne, Andrew Leigh and David Smith have signed a joint letter saying they “expect these incorrect toll charges will be resolved by Transurban and the NSW Government”.

Canberra Liberals leader Leanne Castley has gone further, arguing the ACT Government should “undertake an investigation into how this situation has occurred, inform those motorists who have a duplicate NSW plate, and provide a new unique number plate to avoid future issues”.

Transurban has apologised for the errors, saying in a statement it “sincerely apologises” but adding that cases remain “rare”.

“While incorrect charges are rare, we understand the inconvenience this causes and are actively working to improve our systems and processes to minimise these occurrences,” it said in a statement.

woman looking at computer screen

Adjudicators manually checking each instance of illegal mobile phone use in the ACT. Photo: Claire Fenwicke.

Transport NSW, which operates its own government tolls on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, has also said the mistake is a “very rare occurrence in a system that processes millions of journeys every month”.

“E-Toll, the NSW Government-owned toll road provider, is aware of one ACT-registered vehicle being misidentified as a NSW-registered vehicle by its cameras,” a spokesperson told Region.

“When this does happen, E-Toll acts to resolve issues promptly and provides refunds where appropriate.”

The NSW Government is attempting to make it easier for motorists to dispute incorrect toll notices by recruiting a “customer advocate responsible for making the system more motorist-oriented in areas including complaints and administration”.

The spokesperson also said an industry-wide ‘Independent Tolling Ombudsman’ had been established in legislation and “Transport for NSW is working with industry to stand it up”.

Transurban said any motorists who believed they had been incorrectly charged should contact Linkt “so we can resolve the matter promptly”.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

48
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

I was recently charged the commercial vehicle rate to my Linkt account for my M5 travel. My ACT registered vehicle is in the “Car” class and is under the dimensions of the “Commercial” class. Despite never being charged the higher rate before, and being charged correctly for the M8 section of the same journey, my case needed to be referred to a higher level and I would need to wait “up to 10 days for a response” Still waiting after 8 days. I wonder how many other account holders get incorrectly charged and never notice.

Another victim of this linkt fraud scheme here. Continually charged by them for trips I never make, and I have to spend ages getting them to reverse it each time. Ridiculous.

Ross of Canberra7:52 pm 14 Aug 25

Years ago, entering Sydney via the M7 to turn north on West Pennant Hills Road via a brief 1km on the M2 I told the woman at the toll-booth, “I decline to pay.” Ha, what a day. My passengers were amazed.
My bravado was well based with no sign or notice to exit the M7 i advance of being swallowed by the M2 for a mere km or two with an additional hefty toll.
Oftentimes it was impossible to pay-in-a timely-manner for a toll but rather needing to wait for the demand plus administration fees.
Fact: I refused to pay administration fees for 20 years, always offering in-a-timely-manner to pay said toll without extra fees and then taking a reference number.
Once they asked me for $780 but dropped it when I placed all the evidence before them.
When in doubt, don’t be shy to say, ‘No’.

Ross of Canberra7:25 pm 14 Aug 25

Thank you, Chris Steele, for your support: you are elevated in my respect.
To this matter: individuals cannot rely upon any government entity to protect themselves from unpaid wasted time spent in defending what is corporate fraud.
I recommend you write once announcing i. the expected dropping of the false charge while announcing ii. your hourly rate and iii. your imminent expectation at law should your further response be required. They’ll not pay but they will make it their business to fix what s their own problem.

It’s not just toll road charges, I was charged for parking in a Park and Ride carpark (and a toll on the same day) a couple of months ago.

Can we charge the toll company an ‘administration’ fee to resolve the issue. Toll companies slug you $14 plus if you don’t have a tag just to post you a notice. I think $50 would cover my admin expenses.

Ross of Canberra6:34 pm 14 Aug 25

Yes, you can. Ask them to waive the notice and/or the admin fee. If the answer is ‘No’, ask for a reference (record it) and move on with your evidence that you attempted to pay.

Roads and licensing are run by each state. You can blame federation for this problem. Plates starting with Y are not exclusive to the ACT. Never have been and never will be. Certain 6 character plate numbers starting with Y are used exclusively for trucks and heavy trailers and they are regulated between the states. Because of each state generating loads of money from personalised plates, nothing will be done to stop someone from each state getting the same content. Basically you can have something like YXX99X existing in all state state and territory. That is up to 8 vehicle driving around with the same plate.

@james smith
ACT YXX99X is not the same as SA YXX99X, WA YXX99X, NT YXX99X … and so on.
Every Australian state and territory includes its name or abbreviation on standard vehicle registration plates – so no two vehicles should be travelling with the same number plate.

Merlin Johnson2:55 pm 13 Aug 25

This is more than just incompetent governments. There are some serious issue’s with the whole system. A friend of mine just got a toll notice yesterday for (apparently) riding a NSW registered bike on the M7 without a Tag. Only problem is neither he nor his bike have been to Sydney for the last 5 years. He now has two options- pay $13.50 to make it go away…….or spend the hours and hours dealing with the idiots who built and run the system to save $13.50.

Capital Retro1:26 pm 13 Aug 25

So much for Barr’s much hyped MOU with NSW.

To be fair, lack of mutual recognition between states and territories has dogged progress in Australia since colonial days.

I had a colleague who was contracted by the Feds 20 years ago to try and sort it out but he gave up because of lack of co-operation from the states and territories even though he told them it was not about change simply it was a study as to why there was no commitment to change.

Is this an ACT Labor government refusing to work with NSW gov?

Average punter wouldn’t believe number plates were duplicated.
This fails the pub test. What’s next duplicated social security numbers?

sportz fotos1:24 pm 13 Aug 25

as an “average punter” Henry, I found a duplicate NSW rego vehicle via the NSW vehicle rego check page – https://www.service.nsw.gov.au/transaction/check-a-vehicle-registration – and there it was, a duplicate.
by the way, that same NSW vehicle has been racking up tolls for which I do have the notices.

@Henry
Given the ACT began exclusively issuing Y-prefixed number plates in 1968, I don’t believe any reasonable “average punter” would lay the blame, for this fiasco, on the ACT government.

No, no, no, Minister Steel, don’t blame the toll companies, duplicated number plates are issued by governments.

The ABS says there were over 20 million registered motor vehicles in 2021, so this will be a couple million more by now.
The number of different numberplate combinations with 3 letters followed by 3 numbers is about 17.5 million, clearly not enough, but the different numberplate combinations with 3 letters followed by 3 letters is well over 300 million.

There should be no duplicated numberplate combinations in Australia, so why have governments issued duplicates?

If the numbers ran out, add another one. Did it with phone numbers

While the states haven’t helped matters, it is the toll companies who are at fault. It’s their software that cannot correctly identify the state on the plate. The problem is not confined to ACT/NSW either; I’ve heard of similar cases involving NSW/VIC and VIC/SA.

David, there is no need for the states-territories to duplicated plates, and there would be no problem if they were able to coordinate between themselves so this did not happen. No duplications would mean far fewer problems.

On the other hand the cameras and software need to identify plates in a wide variety of conditions, good light, bad light, artificial light, rain, fog, smoke, clean plates, dirty plates, worn-out plates, plus a wide range of personalised plates in a glorious range of colours. Evidently their systems sometimes struggle with the colour identification.

Ah it’s the toll companies fault. You can’t blame steel for something the NSW gov. did and for the lack of human intervention and/or checks in the process by the toll companies which should have at least flagged duplicate notices automatically as being a problem.

“David, there is no need for the states-territories to duplicated plates”…bs. And even if this were true (it’s not) how does the ACT stop NSW doing it anyway. More magical thinking?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.