13 August 2025

Coalition would revoke Palestinian recognition, says Ley

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
63
Leader of the Australian Liberal Party, Sussan Ley MP

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley says Palestine shouldn’t be recognised without a proper peace process in place. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

The Coalition has clearly stated its opposition to Anthony Albanese’s plan for Australia to recognise Palestine, saying the Prime Minister is out of his depth on the issue.

Mr Albanese has vowed to have Australia recognise Palestinian statehood when the United Nations General Assembly meets next month, bringing it in line with the UK, France and Canada, who will be doing the same.

The PM says the recognition is conditional on the terrorist group Hamas having no role to play in the governance of Palestine, which he says was agreed to by the Palestinian Authority.

But Opposition Leader Sussan Ley insists that recognition of Palestine without a proper peace plan in place for the Middle East is folly.

Her shadow cabinet resolved on Tuesday (12 August) to oppose the government’s decision to unilaterally recognise a Palestinian state outside of such a process.

“The Coalition wants Israeli hostages to be released, Gazans to be fed and for the war to end,” Ms Ley said.

“The Albanese Government’s decision to recognise a Palestinian state outside of a proper peace and two-state process will not deliver that outcome.

“The decision does not make the world a safer place, expedite the end of the conflict, deliver a two-state solution, see the free flow of aid, support the release of hostages, nor put an end to the terrorist group Hamas.”

The shadow cabinet also resolved that a future Coalition government would revoke recognition of Palestine.

READ ALSO Australia to recognise Palestinian state

“The Coalition would have never made this call and we do not agree with it,” Ms Ley said in a joint statement with shadow foreign minister Michaelia Cash.

“A Coalition government would only recognise a Palestinian state at the conclusion of a proper peace process.

“Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australian recognition is predicated on there being no role for Hamas; the demilitarisation of Palestine; an acknowledgment of Israel’s right to exist; free and fair elections in Palestine; and, reform of governance, financial transparency and the education system, including international oversight to guard against the incitement of violence and hatred.

“Unfortunately, the Albanese Government has made it clear that they will still recognise a Palestinian state, regardless of whether or not their own conditions are met.

“The reality is the conditions the Prime Minister himself claims to be necessary for recognition are not being met and are pushed further away by recognising a Palestinian state outside of a proper peace and two-state process.”

Ms Ley added that Labor had broken with longstanding bipartisan foreign policy with its Palestine decision.

“The Prime Minister has also failed to explain what happens to Australia’s recognition if Hamas stays in power or another terrorist group takes their place after the UN General Assembly Meeting in September,” she said.

“Recognising a Palestinian state while there are hostages in tunnels and terrorists in control of the Gaza Strip is not the right decision.”

Treasurer Jim Chalmers said it was obvious the Coalition did not want to be a part of the global momentum to recognise a Palestinian state.

“It is disappointing but not especially surprising to see that they’re [Coalition] not prepared to play that constructive role,” he said.

“The two-state solution is the best way to break this endless cycle of violence that we’re seeing in that part of the world, and recognition is an important step in that direction.”

READ ALSO Social cohesion is more important than free speech, says visa-denying Minister

The Prime Minister said he did not decide to recognise Palestinian statehood lightly.

A number of factors lined up before he could agree to the move, including the commitments from the Palestinians and the actions of other nations.

Israel’s actions in Gaza were also a strong motivation.

“The commitments from the Palestinian Authority have been important,” Mr Albanese said.

“The declarations by other countries mean that there is momentum towards a two-state solution and towards the international community making that position clear.

“The other thing that is occurring is, of course, the decision by the Israeli government to double down on its military solution without a political solution being advanced or forwarded by the Netanyahu government, with the decision that they’ve made to go in and to occupy Gaza City.”

Australia Palestine Advocacy Network president Nasser Mashni acknowledged the Prime Minister’s gesture, but added that the Australian Government hadn’t been listening to what protestors had been calling for.

“What we need to realise is that 147 countries already recognise Palestine,” he said.

“That hasn’t stopped Israel from starving women to the point where they’re not lactating and children are dying on their mother’s breasts.

“We need to address the genocide that’s happening today and recognition is not going to do that.”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

63
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Overturn what exactly?

There is no Palestinian recognition while ever Hamas is involved….so if the Palestinian people expel Hamas from power, gain international recognition not just from Australia and Ley, Cash and the LNP seek to overturn that recognition what does that say about them and their commitment to peace?

Albo didn’t say that. They said they are going to commit to it in September then try and get Hamas out.

However, if an election is called Hamas is likely to get voted in.

What’s your solution as your leader has none?

Read the article for once champ.

““Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australian recognition is predicated on there being no role for Hamas; the demilitarisation of Palestine; an acknowledgment of Israel’s right to exist; free and fair elections in Palestine; and, reform of governance, financial transparency and the education system, including international oversight to guard against the incitement of violence and hatred.”

Before Albanese, has any previous Australian Prime Minister ever been praised by a terrorist group ?

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-08-13/coalition-hamas-praise-embolden-terror-recognise-palestine/105649068

Look at Penfold echoing the propaganda talking points of a terrorist group. The is no Palestinian recognition whilst Hamas is involved.

Surprised you’re helping Hamas push this propaganda Penfold (not really).

Capital Retro10:40 am 14 Aug 25

I doubt it.

Looks like Bin Al Bo is the first.

@Capital Retro
I am surprised your Islamic bigotry made it past the moderator … I wonder if calling you out, will also be allowed

Should anti-semitic views be treated likewise JS ?

Penfold, I’m surprised you’re concerned about antisemitism after pushing the lies and talking points of terrorist group like Hamas.

And Palestine is where?

Ask the Israelis. They appear to be bombing some of it.

Near Jordan, who doesn’t want them. And Egypt, who won’t let them in. And Lebanon, who can’t stand them. And the whole Middle East, who refuse to take any refugees from Palestine.

But there’s an embassy planned for them here in Canberra. Perhaps the ditched Russian embassy site on State Circle next to the Commonwealth Club would suit them. They could cozy up to the UK and Canada High Commissions too, their new besties.

Capital Retro3:44 pm 13 Aug 25

Better still, ask the Israeli hostages who under the bombing.

Thanks for answering 32roadster’s question, Capital Retro, and in the process negating his weakly attempted point.

Penfold, why should it be the problem for other Arabic countries to solve Israel’s civic and diplomatic failures? Of course they are refusing.

And the Coalition is who?

They’ve refused for 70 years Axon. Jordan let a few in a few decades back and immediately regretted it. Can’t imagine why, such wonderful people.

Hey do you reckon Wong will accompany Albo over there to get them to like Abbas ? They’d love her, wouldn’t they ?

Who could forget JS, she was too cowardly to visit the sites where hundreds of Israelis fell.

And how about the press release …. I …. I …. I …. I … My … I ….

@Penfold
Hmmm the Australian Minister for Foreign Affairs, issues a press release about her upcoming visit to the Middle East, and incurs Penfold🤥’s ire, by using the nominative singular pronoun to detail what she will be doing during the visit.

Perhaps you would have preferred she use the royal ‘we’, Penfold🤥

Oh and about Wong, being “too cowardly to visit the sites where hundreds of Israelis fell”, perhaps she felt meeting with survivors of the attacks and people who have had their family members kidnapped was more appropriate:
https://www.news.com.au/finance/work/leaders/foreign-minister-penny-wong-holds-emotional-meetings-with-families-of-hostages-being-held-in-gaza/news-story/ea99b94f30942d16c49e1d82c8bcf723
Your capacity for jaundiced (ii-informed) ideological grandstanding, never ceases to disappoint, Penfold🤥

LOL The answer is…..Palestine is all over the news!

JS you never struck me as a monarchist, now there’s a surprise 😮 👑

Hey have you read the front page of today’s newspapers ? Albo’s an international joke. 🤣

Capital Retro1:36 pm 13 Aug 25

In recent times I have read diaries of relatives who served in the Australian Military Forces in both world wars in the Middle East theatre of war.

Both made very favourable comments about the local people in every country they had to traverse or fight in against the Turks, Italians of the Germans, the exemption being the people of Palestine.

I can’t recall any noteable contribution from Palestine or its people to in making the world a better place.

And before the usual pile-on team start accusing me of hate-speech note that I didn’t make the judgments that were quoted from experiences nearly 100 years ago, they were made by people who were there.

Well there’s a sensible, detailed scientific analysis of the situation.
Lets base our foreign policy decisions on what random people wrote in their diaries 100 years ago.
Anyone got diaries from Ukraine ?

Well franky that would be a better approach than basing it on those who take the most hostages and refuse to release them.

How would you prefer to decide ?

Capital Retro3:43 pm 13 Aug 25

You are talking about random people who fought for the right of grubs like you to mock those values.

Well said CR. Probably marched last Sunday, blissfully ignorant of how his forebears delivered the right to protest.

Maybe a trip to the Australian War Memorial could knock some sense in, especially the WW1 Palestine collection. 🪖🎖

https://www.awm.gov.au/collection/E84576

@Penfold
Sad when you have to resort to jingoism because you actually lack a cogent argument.

It’s hardly a surprise JS that you confuse patriotism with …. what did you call it …. jingoism. Presumably you’d need to google the former.

@Penfold
I’m not at all confused, Penfold🤥 … I know what patriotism is, and I’m definitely not buying it from the likes of you.

Patriotism to Palestine is a little different to patriotism to the country of one’s nationality.

Glad you’re not buying because i’m not selling out 🙂

@Penfold
Hmmmm … one of us can see fault on both sides, and one of us is an Israeli sycophant who likes to lecture others on patriotism to the country of one’s nationality.

Hypocrisy, thy name is Penfold🤥

The Liberal Party taking directions from Benjamin Netanyahu’s office as usual.

Capital Retro4:56 pm 13 Aug 25

As Albozo and the Labor Party take directions from the Palestinian Authority.

Good to see Sussan taking a stand here. Albanese has become a national embarrassment on international issues. Wong too.

Even their own like Mike Kelly are calling them out.

Nah, mate. I think it’s been pointed out to you more than once on a previous article. I think you got the wrong end of the pineapple on this once.

A pineapple 🍍 Karl ?

Something really stinks here and it sure doesn’t smell like pineapple 🤔

@Penfold
Apart from your usual opionated tripe, which you think makes it fact, Penfold🤥, you may not want to present Mike Kelly, as someone to rely on for an assessment of the decision to recognise Palestine.

His objectivity can definitely be seen as questionnable:
https://www.australianjewishnews.com/mike-kelly-israel-is-very-close-to-my-heart/

Well JS how shameful of Kelly to support the only democracy in the Middle East. Sure sounds like you don’t.

Here’s another Labor chap’s view too. Perhaps this should also be discounted.

https://www.jwire.com.au/bob-hawke/

JustSaying, not sure that article paints Kelly as unreasonable:

“Kelly condemned the Palestinians’ “systematic torture” of their people in the West Bank and Gaza, arguing as “a progressive, social democratic party”, the ALP “can’t have any part of backing an organisation like Hamas which routinely executes gay and lesbian men and women”.

Recognising Palestine off the back of Hamas prolonging the conflict through their refusal to surrender their weapons and the remaining hostages, using Gazans as human shields and then their deaths as propaganda is rewarding Hamas’ terror tactics. Even if Hamas is officially disbanded at some stage, those in leadership positions within it can point to their success in the future when it comes to “free and fair elections”.

@Garfield
Firstly, I did not make any judgement of Kelly, I simply stated that as a devoted friend of Israel, his perspective (on recognition of Palestine) may not be totally objective. You see it differently, which is fine, but I stand by my position.

Secondly, you cite Kelly as stating: “the ALP can’t have any part of backing an organisation like Hamas”. Well that’s a fair comment – except, as I and many others have stated on numerous ovcasions, Albanese has put a condition on the recognition – that “the terrorist group Hamas having no role to play in the governance of Palestine”. What is so difficult about that statement for you (and others) to comprehend?

Well JS by that logic as you like Palestine you aren’t objective either.

What would the great Hawke be thinking right now about the party he was once proud of ?

@Penfold
Well, Penfold🤥, given, unlike you, I acknowledge faults on both sides, I submit I am at least more objective than you.

And, I expect Hawke would be absolutely aghast, to see the trauma and suffering of civilians, especially children (who he did not want to see living in poverty), and as such, he might support his party’s decision on this. We’ll never know – so perhaps uninformed speculation is wasted.

Glenn Goldensack4:43 pm 13 Aug 25

You know, pencold.. you’re talking to yourself. There aren’t many left in the room buying it. It’s you and your compatriots and a few who have been bought/blackmailed.
When 10% of Canberra turns up for a march and the ABC doesn’t mention it, you know the tide has turned.

Capital Retro4:57 pm 13 Aug 25

What march was that, Glenn.

The ABC is no longer the impartial source of news. Too many people like Speers, from the commercial stable. Also, I’ve been told, a more prosaic reason. The ABC rarely sends out reporters on the weekend

JS any student of Australian politics would know exactly where Bob Hawke would stand on this issue. He used to love his tennis games with Sir Zelman.

@Penfold
Really, Penfold🤥 … I’ll consult my political science friend and get back to you.

Mind you, even non students of politics can google that Hawke, with the backing of the Howard government, met with both Israeli Deputy Prime Minister Ehud Olmert and Palestinian President Yasser Arafat in 2003 in a new peace initiative in the Middle East:
https://www.theage.com.au/national/hawke-met-arafat-israelis-in-peace-push-20031022-gdwla2.html

The article does not mention whether or not they also played tennis.

No chance of tennis there, Arafat’s sport involved Israeli athletes.

@Penfold
I’ll take that non-sequitur as your admission that you have no idea where Bob Hawke would stand on this initiative.

@JS I take it you saw the reports about Hamas congratulating Albanese for supporting them. They certainly see it as a win. Have you thought about how excluding Hamas, or former Hamas, members from running in free and fair elections actually works?

The only chance of excluding them from free and fair elections is if the IDF controls Gaza, because nobody else will send peacekeepers. I’ll also note that very exclusion would make such elections by definition not free and fair. Yet the same people wanting to recognise Palestine are criticising the Israeli decision for full occupation. One positive of that decision is that Israel will have full and unequivocal responsibility for food distribution. There won’t be any questionable claims of Hamas squirreling food away to feed their fighters rather than feeding the populace.

I don’t have much time for anyone in the Trump administration, but I suspect Rubio got it right when he said it’s a meaningless commitment to appease domestic critics of Israel. All we’ve done is give Hamas a domestic PR win and the ability to claim their tactics, which have contributed to the deaths of tens of thousands of their own civilians, have been justified.

And @JS, check out this polling in Palestine:
https://www.pcpsr.org/en/node/997

It shows the fundamental problem of trying to establish a lasting peace in the region.

Immediately after the October 2023 attack, 82% of West Bank Palestinians supported the attack vs only 12% believing it was wrong. Even after the misery heaped on Gaza up to May 2025 those numbers were still at 59-29%. Overall, there is still more support (50%) than opposition (40%) for Hamas’ course of action in combined polling across Gaza and the West Bank.

87% of respondents did not believe that Hamas committed atrocities against civilians in the attack vs only 9% that did.

Support for the concept of a 2 state solution stood at 40% in May vs 57% opposed. Recognising Palestine when the majority of Palestinians would rather someone keep fighting Israel than establish a peaceful 2 state solution is folly.

Garfield some good observations there. It’s quite astonishing that people who claim to be Australians can only see things through the prism of pro-Palestinian and anti-Israeli lenses. Perhaps they’ve pushed the horrors of October 7 back to the deepest depths of their minds. Or just choose to ignore them.

Albanese seems to have become a defacto leader of Palestinians. Perhaps he may appoint a Minister for Palestine, though Wong effectively is that now. The language of a supposedly Australian government in the past almost two years has been so appalling they’ve tacitly sat by while synagogues have been bombed and Jewish Australians targeted on the streets of Rose Bay and in our universities.

And all the while our partner in the ANZUS alliance is stepping further and further away. There seems little comprehension that Trump won’t be around in four years time yet the damage Albanese is doing will last well beyond that. China must be licking its lips.

@Garfield
Yes – I have seen those reports to which you refer. I have also heard the press conference in which Albo unequivocally condemned Hamas and reiterated that the international community is seeking to isolate the terrorist organisation.

No doubt there were many detractors in the UK, when the government decided to negotiate a peace settlement with Sinn Fein, the political arm of the IRA. Sinn Fein is now the democratically elected ruling party in Northern Ireland. So, removing the combatant aspect of the Northern Ireland conflict has achieved a positive outcome there.

@Penfold
While you might like to twist the truth to suit your own jaundiced perspective, Penfold🤥, your veiled assertion that I “only see things through the prism of pro-Palestinian and anti-Israeli lenses” is a bold faced lie. I have never said I am anti-Israel, or for that matter pro-Palestinian – despite you obfuscation of the facts, I have simply stated, on numerous occasions, that both sides are at fault, because I am on the side of those innocent civilians who are suffering – which, as it currently happens, are mostly Palestinians.

As for the rest of your hyperbole laden diatribe – not worth the time needed to further correct your jaundiced perspective.

Capital Retro10:44 am 14 Aug 25

That was brutal but we need to be reminded of it, often.

This is useful but limited.

Hamas does have support among Palestinians but that is a reasonably recent development (in historical terms). The current levels of support shouldn’t be treated fix/enduring or unchangeable.

Hamas gained support, and was able to replace the Palestinian Authority politically, due to the failure of PA to meet the needs of Palestinians. As more cracks appeared in PA services etc. more opportunities were created for Hamas to meet basic needs and gain the peoples support.

Now here’s the rub – and before you rush to flame me please read this carefully – one of the reasons (only one of many, but a very important one) why the Palestinian Authority failed, providing the environment for Hamas to flourish, was the exerted effort of the Israeli Government to cripple the ability of the PA to operate as a legitimate government and service provider for Gaza and the West Bank.

JS you’d probably help your cause somewhat by expressing some sympathy for the people of Israel and by recognising the international stupidity of the Albanese government on this issue.

That you can do neither suggests quite strongly 💪 that the prism is real.

CR not sure if you’ve ever been to some of the WW2 camps but I visited Dachau some years back and it’s not something that can be unseen. Perhaps JS might form a better perspective if he visited.

The more you type, the more you dribble. This is just embarrassing nonsense.

@Penfold
The fact that you are incapable of reading and comprehending does not give you licence to fabricate facts, Penfold🤥. Again on many occasions I have denounced as horrendous the actions of Hamas – perhaps I should have added “towards innocent Israeli civilians” … would that appease you?

As for Dachau? Yes I have been there and was horrified when faced with the visual reality of the holicaust. However, I did not then immediately condemn or accuse every German I subsequently met. Though, goven you are very good at tarnishing the masses for the actions of the minority, I imagine you would have ‘found every German guilty’

@Penfold
“And all the while our partner in the ANZUS alliance is stepping further and further away”
Hmmm … funny that 2 out of 3 members of that partnership are, or are considering, recognition of Palestine. Not to mention the majority of memebers of the AUKUS partnership. No surprise that your are always in the minority, Penfold🤥

Speaking of minorities JS, have you seen the praise Hamas has given Albo ? Apparently our Prime Minister went ballistic this morning when he found out.

Albo himself must lack self-awareness but haven’t his advisors provided any, well, advice ?

The DailyMail described a PM with egg all over his face.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.