18 September 2025

Aussies too dependent on government handouts, says Ley

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
18
Leader of the Australian Liberal Party, Sussan Ley MP

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley says government handouts are out of control. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Australians have become too dependent on welfare and handouts, according to Sussan Ley, who says Labor is being less than responsible with taxpayers’ money.

In her first major economic speech as Opposition Leader, Ms Ley pushed the Coalition’s conservative economic values, stressing that government subsidies were out of control and becoming a threat to future generations.

Addressing the Committee for Economic Development of Australia (CEDA) on Wednesday (17 September), Ms Ley suggested the Federal Government should discourage an attitude of dependency and entitlement.

“By dependency, I mean the growing expectation that government will provide for every need and solve every problem by spending more,” she said.

“My message is that we must put guard rails around government spending, not as an end in itself, but so that we can strengthen our economy, preserve our capacity to help those truly in need, and ensure that the next generation inherits opportunity, not debt, because debt is an issue of intergenerational fairness.

“Many governments have become reluctant to wind back programs because it’s not popular to take something away from voters. But ultimately, the fiscal reality of paying for it must be confronted.”

Ms Ley said governments should encourage ‘empowerment’ over ‘dependency’, but Labor has fostered a growing reliance on handouts and universal government subsidies.

READ ALSO Social media platforms won’t be forced to age-check all their users when under-16s ban kicks in

Empowerment is about restoring the right balance between what citizens provide for themselves and what taxpayers provide as a safety net, she said.

And it’s about reaffirming that while government can do a lot of good, it cannot and should not do everything.

Citing research from the Centre for Independent Studies, the Opposition Leader said more than half of adults rely on the government for most of their income, while just 10 per cent of taxpayers pay two-thirds of all income tax.

In the last two years, 80 per cent of new employment has been in the non-market sector, which accounts for just 30 per cent of employment.

“If we stay on this path, it will mean fewer opportunities for young Australians to buy a home, a weaker safety net, and a diminished capacity to respond when the next crisis hits,” she said.

“Now, none of this is about blaming individuals for taking up government programs that are offered.

“But the time of reflexively looking to Canberra to solve every problem with a blank cheque must give way to a time of empowerment, personal responsibility, and fiscal commonsense.”

Ms Ley said a fundamental Liberal value is that people’s hard work and enterprise should be rewarded, not penalised.

She said government policies need to incentivise Australians, which means winding back disincentives to work and save.

It also means targeting welfare to those who truly need it, while encouraging those who are able to work or study to do so.

A government’s goal should be to help people off welfare and into self-reliance, not to add more people onto government support unnecessarily.

READ ALSO Bold climate and energy policies needed urgently, just look at the science

Australia is a compassionate nation, she said, but if the safety net is to remain strong, the government must ensure it is financially sustainable and targeted to genuine need.

Trying to give everyone a slice of the government pie, regardless of need, is a recipe for fiscal failure, she said, adding that while “universal free everything” might sound nice, in reality, it drains resources from those who need help most.

Government support should be a safety net, not a hammock.

“Unfortunately, in the past few years, the pendulum has swung too far towards dependency,” Ms Ley said.

“It has become almost taboo in politics to suggest that not everyone is entitled to a government benefit.

“But I ask: is it fair to pile up debts that our children will have to pay off?

“Ultimately, the best form of welfare is a job and a thriving private economy.

“We must never lose sight of that.”

Asked to comment on Ms Ley’s speech, Finance Minister Katy Gallagher said it sounded like the “same old Liberal Party” with the same failed approach it took to this year’s federal election.

Senator Gallagher said Labor had cleaned up the waste and rorts from the former Coalition government.

She said she and Treasurer Jim Chalmers have implemented strong fiscal guardrails and have made savings in each federal budget.

“The budget has to serve a purpose, but certainly the approach Jim and I have taken is one of very tight budget responsibility.”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

18
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

I can sort of see what she’s trying to do, a bit of tough love to try to boost productivity from the bottom up. If anyone in government wants to get serious about the productivity and economic issues, they should start by instead looking at it from a top down approach. Too many loopholes and structures in place that insentivise businesses to boost their numbers via tax avoidance, wage theft and diminishing workers rights. When the corporate world has less lazy options to generate profit, we might see real innovation and productivity again.

I would suggest that she really doesn’t have any ideas at all, and has put out this statement trying to get a bit of traction in the conservative media. It hasn’t worked, they have ignored it. Australians don’t really like the suggestion that they will lose their free stuff. The Labor Party always has an easy task of running scare campaigns at election time because the Liberals are so vulnerable on that front. Tony Abbott the day before the 2013 election said that there would be no cutbacks to the pension or to ABC funding and he broke those promises with the 2014 budget. It led to his downfall as PM, and the Treasurer Joe Hockey actually had to leave the country because the backlash was so great.

Ley is completely out of her depth. The best the Liberals can do is to leave her in the job until it is closer to the election, and then they can do a Bob Hawke style leadership change before the election which is their only hope. If an election is held now, it will be a complete rout for the Liberals and Ley would probably lose her own seat

“do a Bob Hawke style leadership change before the election” To do that, they need to first find someone with a brain who is capable of filling that role! Looking at the Liberals, There’s not a single person on the front seats capable of doing it!

No surprises here – the communist Labor party is pursuing a communist agenda: everyone relying on the government to own everything and provide everything (until it inevitably runs out of everything, because it has systematically disincentivised anyone producing anything), and in turn the government gets to control everything – it’s not surprising why it’s popular among bureaucrats and politicians (and people who ignore the lessons of history vote for it because they are lured by the promise of “free stuff” – the same way you catch rats).

“No surprises here – the communist Labor party is pursuing a communist agenda”…not even close to a realistic, let alone rational argument, I honestly don’t know why you bother when every you’ve got to say can be summed up by your cooked opening statement…no one sensible is going to take what follows seriously. May as well go and yell nonsense on a street corner.

Spot on Bill.

Hey Bill, I’ve never seen anyone from Labor come straight out and say in public that they’re pursuing a communist (or at least a neo-communist) agenda, even if only incrementally, such as is the known tactic of the Fabian Socialists, who demonstrably favour infiltrating and then co-opting capitalist systems, and who have a long and known history with the Labor Party. So, if nobody’s come straight out and said that, you are just flat out wrong.

Apparently Ley is not right wing enough for some….ooookay.

Stop giving tax cuts to the wealth and our resources away for next to nothing….problem solved. Ah but we’re not going to do that when we can kick poor people while they’re down and distract people with nonsense about immigration.

The Liberals need to stop alienating voters and learn from what Labor does to win elections, tell lies, political spin, make empty promises and hand out money like there’s no tomorrow.

Where you in a coma by any chance during the Abbott/Turnbull/Morrison government?

Politicians on the public teat shouldn’t be talking about the average punter on the public teat

When the government’s paymasters – the unions – contribution to the productivity debate is a 4 day working week, the welfare and laziness mentality is well and truly entrenched.

Totally agree, I reckon we start with the $15bn we are giving to fossil fuel producers this year. What do you think?

That statement is bizarre on a couple of levels. Firstly, what is this supposed $15 billion ?

Secondly what has that got to do with lazy unions ?

Spot on Penfold

oh, you mentioned a laziness mentality. I assumed you mean the 10’s of billions that Australian taxpayers subsidise the mining industry. So the $9bn plus in the fuel tax credit scheme and the remainder in hands outs to cover the other costs of their operation.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.