22 October 2025

Weaponising religion for the sake of politics is a bad move for everyone

| By Genevieve Jacobs
Join the conversation
20

The Abrahamic Family House in Abu Dhabi brings together the “religions of the book” in the Middle East. Photo: Supplied.

A few weeks ago, I had the privilege of visiting the Abrahamic Family House in Abu Dhabi.

It’s a remarkable and very beautiful building housing a mosque, a Catholic church and a synagogue. Each has a distinctive modern design by distinguished British architect Sir David Adjaye. Clean lines predominate, and the spaces are meditative and calm.

Between the three houses of faith, there’s a museum and a forum for discussion and debate. Each space is well used: an Italian priest with a PhD in inter-religious dialogue says Mass each day in St Francis Church. While we visited, an Orthodox Jewish man with a kippah and a tallit came in to pray in the synagogue.

The late Pope Francis and the Grand Imam of Al-Azhar, Ahmed El-Tayeb, dedicated the Abrahamic Family House. In 2019, they signed a declaration calling for peace among all people in the world and the creation of a culture of dialogue, mutual respect and collaboration between faiths.

They’re sentiments the late and much-loved Bishop Pat Power would have endorsed wholeheartedly. He didn’t much care whether you were of any faith or none – he simply saw human beings who deserved love, whether they lived in the Causeway or Red Hill.

READ ALSO Mental Health Week Awards honour champions of change

We are in the midst of an epidemic of weaponised religion. And when I say “we”, I mean everyone. Religious radicalism, and with it a hatred for other people’s religious beliefs, has spread like wildfire.

When religion lines up with politics, it gets really ugly, whether it’s state-sponsored Islamic terror, anti-Semitism or white power bolstered with a bizarre mishmash of Rapture fever and Biblical redemption.

In the United States, a bargain has been struck between religious conservative voters and the Trump presidency. In return for limiting abortion rights, many voters with Christian values are content for the administration to eradicate others’ rights to live with dignity, rather than being carted off to immigration detention.

When American-born Pope Leo noted recently that the right to life was somewhat inconsistent with the death penalty, those same voters were up in arms.

Have we not learned our lessons about basing nation-states on religion? Nations can’t privilege one person’s beliefs above another’s because then we’re not equal citizens before the law. The nation becomes a theocracy, not a democracy.

READ ALSO No choice’: A mum’s story of 1960s-era adoption in Australia

I’m not sure why Christian churches haven’t tried harder to reinforce the message that Jesus was a working-class Jewish man who hung out with the downtrodden and turned over the tables in the temple.

He reached out to the Samaritans and other outcasts, describing those who valued their own religious image above their actions as “whitened sepulchres”—shiny and clean on the outside, dead and rotting within.

His clearly articulated message was that human beings are all equal in the sight of God. He valued women and uplifted those judged harshly by others. “Let he who is without sin cast the first stone” should be a sobering message for anyone with the insight to assess their own actions.

These are risky times for democracy, for people of faith and of no faith alike. Amidst the turmoil, a little respect and tolerance for others’ beliefs would go a long way.

Those who shout loudly about the threat to Christianity from other faiths might consider how inclusive and welcoming that message really was from the man himself. And anyone who uses their religion as a reason to hate others needs a good, hard look at themselves.

Genevieve Jacobs is the CEO of Hands Across Canberra, the ACT’s community foundation.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

20
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

A one world totalitarian government needs a one world totalitarian religion.

The book Changing Images of Man outlines this very well, albeit in more sympathetic (and deceptive) tones.

And this whole idea of needing to blend all religions for the purpose of peace is too simplistic. For instance, the perfect Christian – a saint – isn’t a real problem to anyone, and so neither is Christianity. The problem must therefore lie elsewhere.

What’s required now is a knowledgeable discussion on ethics, comparative religion and human behaviour, which is so much more than the eat, love, pray rom-com here today

This is great and is heartwarming to read BUT unfortunately Religion has turned into an ugly word. These days the word Religion seems to automatically mean fundamentalism. I have a Christian friend who goes to church every Sunday, he’s very open minded and philosophical but he points out “when you say you’re Christian people think that you’re Ned Flanders from The Simpsons.” I can’t stand prejudice of any kind, including Religion but sadly even I catch myself thinking this way.

Andrew Bacic9:03 am 22 Oct 25

What a strange article?
If you’re worried about the erosion of women’s rights, or lack of, tell us about the union of religion and politics in Iran, or Syria. How about Saudi Arabia? How about Somalia? What about Afghanistan? Tell us how women, and for that mater non-believers in Yemen and Libya are treated.
Three religions have been named in you’re article, but you’re concern is with a contemporarily benign one?
Is it because you only care about the anglosphere?
Tell us about the grooming gang scandal in the UK, and how the union of religion and political power has sought to dismiss and diminish the scale of abuse.
Your attempt draw a parallel between Islamic terror, and political issues (enforcement of borders and abortion rights)is absurd. Border enforcement is not a religious issue, and many faiths are against abortion (its banned completely by the Taliban FYI).
Please, spare as your faux concern. This article is a cynical attempt to admonish Christians, dressed up as a care package.
Perhaps those shouting, are shouting about the threat to Western Values built on Christian foundations, and you’ve misheard them.

It’s only a “strange article” because it begins with the idea of three religions in the Middle East (a place well known for fundamentalism) sharing a space. Also, your final sentence makes me think of the qoute “it’s important in the fight against monsters that we don’t become those monsters.” – Nietsch. I can admit, Christianity isn’t as aggressively fundamentalistic as Islam but still it’s also an area of concern.

Andrew Bacic11:34 am 22 Oct 25

Haha Karl, I like your first line!
Nietzsche spent significant effort pondering the decline of Christianity, one of his great concerns was the rise of nihilism, as a replacement for Christianity. ‘God is dead’-but what will be the replacement? Nietzsche wasn’t a proponent of rationalism, or secular religion as a replacement. He viewed Christianity as a necessary phase, to be surpassed. I’m not sure we’ve passed the necessary stage.
I agree in relation to your comment about vigilance and corruption. I also feel vigilance is required to ensure Western Christian values aren’t replaced by lesser value systems.

I’m not sure why you didn’t include atheism in your article as a religious like belief system. The anti-religion religion if you will. Some of it’s followers are just as aggressive as followers of religions. Living in Canberra I’ve seen many more aggressive social media comments about sky fairies and invisible friends than I’ve seen posts extolling religious values.

Then there’s also all the voters who seem to be irrationally scared of the local Libs because some of them are religious – even though they could never pass anything through the assembly given the cross bench and Liberal conscience votes. People voting for a government that’s continually increasing taxes above inflation, increasing debt at an astronomical rate and delivering some of the worst health services in the country because the opposition are too socially conservative is the epitome of a damaging religious type zeal.

“I’m not sure why you didn’t include atheism in your article as a religious like belief system”…what an absurd comment, atheism is a religion like not collecting stamps is a hobby.

Too true, I’ve met Athiests who are religiously fanatical about being Athiest. It reminds me of the Nietsch quote I previously mentioned. But then again, I haven’t heard about Athiets hijacking a plane and crashing it into a building or suicide bombing a place of worship.

“Too true, I’ve met Athiests who are religiously fanatical about being Athiest. “…no you haven’t.

It’s nonsensical to suggest that of all the thousands of deities that mankind has created which the vast majority don’t or no longer believe in, not believing in one more is an act of religious faith.

Atheists are no more “religiously fantastical” about not believing in God than they are are about not believing in the tooth fairy.

Some atheists may not be diplomatic in accepting the beliefs of others but that doesn’t make atheist just a different form of religious belief. This whole line of attack on atheists is about the pretence that everyone is actually “religious” and that’s just not true.

If you give me (and the majority of atheists I’d suggest) categorical proof of the existence of God we’d likely accept it.

Poor Garfield maybe you should understand what atheism is. I’m sure you are an atheist about every God claim except the one you believe in.

BTW Garfield if you’re wondering why Canberrans are concerned about the religious right being in charge, pretending they’re a reasonable alternative while they hold views that are completely out of step with the majority community probably isn’t helping.

In Canberra that likely means the end of action on climate & the environment, public transport abandoned and more cars on our roads, women’s rights & access to healthcare under threat, the end of diversity & inclusion, VAD and the right to die with dignity would almost certainly be ended and I would not put it past them to have a go at SSM (I doubt many who voted “Yes” will forget Zed promising to vote with the electorate on SSM and then abstaining and offering craven excuses afterwards)…not to mention the general incompetence that comes when putting the fringe in charge of anything.

Hard pass.

franky is climate change evangelism considered a religion ?

There seems to be much in common – worship, fear, church, bible.

You’re welcome to post your peer-reviewed research disproving climate change Penfold.

Every major scientific body in the world is not wrong on climate change.

Once upon a time science and religion were in conflict.

These days they’re together as one 🫂

Oh yes that’s the other attribute – a complete inability to accept anything that doesn’t conform with the teachings of the religion.

No they’re not. How silly.

“Oh yes that’s the other attribute – a complete inability to accept anything that doesn’t conform with the teachings of the religion.”

Penfoldian nonsense descends into the realms of conspiracy.

But as always, you’re welcome to present your peer-reviewed research or show where the current peer-reviewed research proving climate change is wrong. Science is self correcting.

Thanks for playing.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.