30 October 2025

Steel 'accepts responsibility' for flawed MyWay+ rollout but won't apologise

| By Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
20

Transport Chris Steel: “I accept responsibility for the issues … and also the fixes.” Photo: Ian Bushnell.

ACT Transport Minister Chris Steel has refused to apologise for the bungled MyWay+ rollout after being censured in the Legislative Assembly over a damning committee report tabled today (30 October).

The Greens moved the censure motion, which was supported by the Canberra Liberals and the two Independents.

The report of the inquiry into the procurement and delivery of MyWay+ found that the public transport digital ticketing project was not ready to roll out on 27 November a year ago, was too large and complex, and highlighted poor risk management and project management practices.

It said the community testing was so rushed and haphazard as to be meaningless, and the ACT Government and Transport Canberra officials ignored multiple warnings that the new system was not ready.

“The decision to launch anyway on that date was clearly flawed,” the report said, saying the government had broken the trust of public transport users.

READ ALSO Labor in revolt over Pocock’s move to improve government integrity

It found that an inability to meet legal requirements for accessibility also meant the launch should not have proceeded, and MyWay+ had failed people living with disabilities.

The inquiry found there was a “failure of management” and that there were heavy political undertones in persisting with the launch date.

The report said MyWay+ was marked by a lack of appropriate risk and project management, which continued a pattern seen in large ACT Government digital projects.

It recommended a review of risk management practices within the MyWay+ project and that the government launch an urgent program of project management reform across directorates.

Ticket scanner on bus

The MyWay+ rollout was plagued with bugs. Photo: PTCBR.

Mr Steel acknowledged that the new system’s bugs and lack of promised features had impacted passengers’ experience of public transport, but he would not apologise nor would he contemplate resigning.

“I accept responsibility for the issues experienced with the MyWay+ system since its launch, and also the fixes that have been put in place to address the issues immediately after launch and the continued improvements that we’ve been making with the contractor NEC to make sure the system provides a better user experience,” he said.

Mr Steel said a longer period of user testing before the launch might have prevented some of the issues, but other problems could only have become apparent post-launch.

He insisted that most issues had been resolved quickly, that the system was functional, particularly for payment by credit and debit cards, and that it would be continuously improved and updated over the course of the $64 million, 10-year contract.

“It’s unfortunate that the contractor took so long to deliver some of those accessibility improvements, but they are being made, and with those improvements and some of the other feedback, we think we will have a system that will operate effectively for Canberra’s public transport network,” Mr Steel said.

He said the government could pursue damages under the NEC contract if necessary, but was committed to working with the company to deliver what was expected.

The report also found insufficient transparency into the cost of MyWay+, including the revenue lost due to ongoing problems.

Mr Steel said the government would continue to monitor fare revenue, but there were a number of buses due to be retired soon that were not fitted with the system hardware and were not collecting fares.

He indicated the troublesome QR code was on borrowed time, with alternatives being looked at, such as digital tokens, in effect a digital version of the MyWay+ card to be used on passenger apps.

On whether the public service had the capacity to manage such a project, Mr Steel said the new digital agency, Digital Canberra, would support directorates in delivering complex ICT projects in the future.

“A range of recommendations have been made about project management and risk management by the committee, and those will be taken into account and also implemented by the new digital agency,” he said.

“It makes sense to have a centralised capability that can bring the expertise together and support directorates with what they need in terms of that digital capability.”

Asked whether there had been a shake-up at Transport Canberra since the rollout, Mr Steel said he would not blame public servants for their role in delivering the project.

Leanne Castley, MLA

Opposition Leader Leanne Castley: No consequence for the minister. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Opposition Leader Leanne Castley, who moved the original motion to set up the inquiry, said Mr Steel was not being held to account for his failures.

“There have been failures every step of the way and one man is ultimately responsible: the Minister for Transport,” Ms Castley said.

“Has there been any internal accountability of the minister by the government? Has the minister been subject to any form of adverse action by the Chief Minister or his colleagues? Remarkably, it seems the answer is no.”

Ms Castley also criticised Chief Minister Andrew Barr for his failure to hold to account a minister now responsible for three high-profile, high-cost scandals: the $77 million HRIMS failure, the CIT corruption scandal, and the MyWay+ fiasco.

ACT Greens transport spokesperson Andrew Braddock, who moved the censure motion, said the buck should stop with Mr Steel.

“While the report speaks to failures at many levels, it is clear that these issues were raised with the minister on multiple occasions, and he failed to address them appropriately,” he said.

READ ALSO Changes to BoM website cause grief for storm victims and weather nerds alike

Independent Thomas Emerson said the report was unusually strong for a multi-party committee inquiry, and Mr Steel needed to be held accountable.

“While public servants are tasked with implementing government policy and providing advice to the Executive, the ultimate responsibility for the MyWay+ failures lies with the minister,” he said.

Mr Emerson said that earlier this year, the ACT Government chose not to accept a committee recommendation to “strengthen and clarify the Ministerial Code of Conduct to ensure that ministers actively seek to prevent, and are held accountable for, any significant mismanagement within their portfolio”.

“It’s time for the government to reconsider that position,” he said.

Public Transport Association of Canberra chair Amy Jelacic called on the government to commit to implementing the report’s recommendations in full.

This included a call for project management reform focused on accessibility compliance and on restoring key features, such as showing a passenger’s card balance on the validator screen.

“PTCBR commends the authors of the report on a thorough document that sets out a complex issue in a fair and impactful way – and sets a clear path for positive change to ensure the ACT Government can successfully deliver major projects in the future,” Dr Jelacic said.

“PTCBR will be watching closely to ensure this report leads to timely further improvements to the MyWay+ system, and more broadly, that it leads to meaningful change at Transport Canberra.”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

20
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

I wonder who pushed for the system to be launched when it was not ready?

Trish O'Connor4:01 pm 31 Oct 25

i suspect the man himself !

The biggest asset of Transport Canberra is the bus drivers who focus on their customers, unlike those supposedly in charge. A great pity that Transport Canberra didn’t consult bus drivers about how commuters use the buses before changing bus routes and bringing in My Way+. Talking to those who do the job daily would have given those making the changes a better understanding of what was needed, what would work and what would not.

Leon Arundell1:56 pm 31 Oct 25

Who remembers that Chris Steel signed a $577 million contract, without going to tender, for a project that the government estimated would be worth only $150 million?

The old My Way was brilliant in comparison to this one, especially the tracking of buses so that you knew which bus was coming to your stop and when. Now, we have no idea if it’s come early so has been and gone, or is still on its way as it’s running late and whether there are other buses that will fill the gap so your frozen food doesn’t thaw out or whether you need to call a taxi or uber to prevent that happening. Not customer focussed at all.

Steel has proven himself to be incompetent, self-centred and arrogant, a perfect match for Andrew Barr who exhibits similar characteristics. It’s no wonder he appointed Steel as treasurer, as he wouldn’t want anyone who would do the job any less disastrously than he did. When will the majority of Canberrans wake up to the cost of these morons and stop voting for them.

Has any politician ever apologised for any wrongdoing? It isn’t in their vocabulary. Minister Steel lacks forsight and depth of vision for projects. But is that really a surprise when you look at how close together his eyes are, it is obvious the man has no stereovision. Unlike fellow eyes-too-close-together minister Barr, whose head is so big it detracts from peripheral vision. Steel should still be able to see the world around him and act accordingly.

“Has any politician ever apologised for any wrongdoing?”

I was thinking this too. IDK why politicians don’t just own mistakes, sincerely apologise and move on. People don’t expect infallibility and the opposition is going to whinge relentlessly anyway.

Myway seems to be in the main working now so an apology and move would have been the sensible approach.

These idiots are terrible at their jobs and it is their responsibility to do better or get better people, whilst their looks are of less importance, so let’s focus on what matters.

Exactly, seano. If you can accept responsibility, how hard is an additional “sorry”?
Yes, they are dirty remarks about appearance. But psycho, I use it metaphorically speaking also.

Most users don’t pay for fares. Those that are paying are opting into a tax.

Buses are useless for me, i’m happy for others to ride for free. Seems like a better use of time, reduces stress and improves mental wellbeing.

Would have been cheaper to make buses free.

“Most users don’t pay for fares. Those that are paying are opting into a tax.”

I literally just caught buses into town for month and didn’t see one person not tap on. Your first premise once again fails and therefore so does you whole argument.

A couple of years ago TC ran a survey and got “An overall fare
evasion percentage
of 5.3% was
recorded across the
weekday surveys”

Some peak periods were as much as 50%

This was before the new ticket ‘system’.

You catch the bus every day. Ask the driver if he/she wants you to pay or doesn’t care.

Also i only posted this yesterday. Did you seriously predict i’d ask this and watch for fare evasion?

If you want to argue the point lets start with TCs own statements and figures rather than relying on anecdotal evidence.

You said “Most users don’t pay for fares”….like most of your comments this is demonstrably nonsense.

How has he not been sacked. Another failed project under his watch. Was only last year he apologised for the failed HR system for the ACT public service that cost $77M and in 2022 survived a vote of no-confidence following the $8M worth of contracts for mentoring the CEO of the CIT. Truly disgraceful

He hasn’t been sacked and won’t apologise because he doesn’t have to. See the current clownish activities of the ACT Liberals if you want to understand why.

Better question is why the public servants responsible for these disasters did not get terminated.

HR system provided only one usable module out of that $77 mil and the individual responsible for that is still knocking around.

Can’t imagine the “owner” of the MyWay+ debacle will receive anything other than a light whipping with soggy celery.

There are still accessibility issues. Want to plan a journey of only one stop? It tells you, “Walk.” Refuses to show any appropriate buses. I sent feedback. Woman first insisted that stop did not exist. When we got past that, she insisted on knowing, why did I want to go only one stop? Why was I going there, because I don’t live there? I asked to speak to a supervisor, she refused. Infuriating. Eventually senior person understood, sent feedback to the system. It hasn’t been fixed yet.

The myway+ app is trash. The tracking is terrible, often claiming a bus is “on time, 1 min away” when it hasn’t left the terminus and is at least 5 mins away, or reverting to saying “on time” when the bus has been early and has already gone past the stop.
The map on the app keeps changing the zoom for no reason.
There has also been cases where they just random disabled the auto top up of the myway account and you end up with no balance with no warning.

What happened to the $9 million of credit left in the old MyWay cards? There was originally $10 million on those old cards, and only $1.2 million had been claimed at last report in March this year. Is it still sitting at $9 million? The NSW government recently took the balances from Opal cards not used in the past 5 years and collected a cool $70 million.
https://region.com.au/myways-millions-steel-urges-canberrans-to-register-cards-for-balance-transfers-to-new-system/797966/

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.