13 November 2025

It's true - Big Splash's owners are looking at other options. But what will the government say?

| By James Coleman
Join the conversation
45
Big Splash Waterpark

Big Splash Waterpark last week. Photo: James Coleman.

The ACT Government has confirmed it received a proposal to redevelop Belconnen’s Big Splash site “six to eight weeks ago” – but it’s unlikely to grant approval.

The news came to light this week during a committee hearing with officials from the government’s City and Environment Directorate. It immediately drew ire from newly minted opposition leader Mark Parton.

He and fellow Canberra Liberals MLA Peter Cain argued it could pave the way for residential or commercial redevelopment of the site.

They also said it seemed to contradict the government’s previously stated plans to take “regulatory action” against the waterpark’s owners for, so far at least, failing to open for a second season.

“It’s deeply concerning that the government has been aware of redevelopment plans for weeks without telling the community,” Mr Parton said.

Mark Parton MLA

Mark Parton was named Canberra Liberals leader this week. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

An executive responded, saying the proposal was part of an “initial discussion with the planning advisors representing Big Splash about what potentially could occur on the site, but without any specific details”.

“It was an early meeting to understand what the current status was. We haven’t seen a formal proposal come forward.”

Planning Minister Chris Steel added that the conversation was part of a normal process for property owners seeking advice from the Territory Planning Authority.

“The Territory Planning Authority treats proponents fairly if they come forward to seek information,” Mr Steel said.

“They will be provided with information about process and guidance about how they can potentially do a range of things under the Planning Act. Whether they would be supported is a different question.”

READ ALSO Canberra’s electric Yutong buses under investigation for hidden ‘kill switch’

Mr Steel said that process would involve multiple steps, including public consultation and Assembly scrutiny.

“The committee would have an opportunity to make recommendations about any change to zoning. Then it would come to me for a decision, then it would go to the Assembly for the ultimate decision.”

But the minister stressed that the government itself “is not proposing any major plan amendment to change the zoning from PRZ2”, which currently restricts the site to recreational purposes.

Big Splash Waterpark

Constriction fences have gone up at the Big Splash site, but that’s it so far. Photo: James Coleman.

An ACT Government spokesperson later confirmed with Region “we have no plans to rezone the land at Big Splash”.

“Residential development is also prohibited on the site. The government is regularly approached by proponents about proposals – that does not mean we endorse them.”

At the same time, the government is preparing to take action against the owners of Big Splash, Translink Management Group, which bought the site in 2021 for $7.5 million.

The company previously informed the government in October that it planned to reopen the park in mid-November following maintenance work, but little progress has been made.

Dripping tap? Burst pipe? Find Canberra’s top plumbers in seconds. Click here.

“We’re obviously rapidly approaching mid-November, and I know community consternation is growing, especially given what seems to be a lack of activity or improvement at the site,” Attorney-General and Ginninderra MLA Tara Cheyne wrote in a Facebook post.

“If Big Splash does not reopen in a reasonable period around the date they advised the government, the regulatory actions Access Canberra may pursue include potential controlled activity orders or, in extreme circumstances, termination of the lease.”

Big Splash Waterpark

The water slides likely need to be demolished and rebuilt. Photo: James Coleman.

Under current lease conditions, the site must be used as “an aquatic and indoor sports and recreation centre and an unlicensed family restaurant.”

Earlier this year, the Assembly also voted, following a Greens-led petition, that the site should be “kept as a pool.”

Mr Steel added that any plan to change that is unlikely to reach a different result.

“I’m sure members change their minds between decisions, but I’m sure many of them won’t.”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

45
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

The BEST case scenario, Big Splash will be demolished and rebuilt as a public pool. Otherwise, according to subliminal Canberra Rules will just become another overpriced apartment complex, because Canberra’s not allowed to be exciting.

No more of this corrupt rubbish. Take out a lease for a pool, run a pool. Don’t want to do that? Easy, give back the lease and pay the gap until someone else takes it over. Shady deals for developers have to end – look at Phillip; it’s well on its way to being a magnificent future slum. No more.

We are not mugs so stop treating us as if we are, tell us what is really happening Tara Cheyne!

Site of the new North Canberra Hospital

Due to not looking to open we now drive up and spend a day and money at Raging waters in Sydney.

Peter Graves5:52 pm 13 Nov 25

Mmm – just now, over at the Canberra Times is this:
‘We can categorically rule that out’: Barr says Big Splash site won’t be rezoned
The Big Splash owner, meanwhile, won’t meet his “mid-November” deadline to re-open the Macquarie water park.

Fond memories of taking some young fellers there in the school holidays, and sitting under the trees reading the papers while they had a great old time in the pool.

With ice creams afterwards.

Well, well, well, and what will the ACT Government do? What they did they would and resume the lease? Or bow and let foreign nationals residing overseas do what they please and basically say stuff the Canberra public and do away with a previously working and functional swimming facility. Can we seek to have. New ACT Election process run as clearly the public don’t count when they should and elected officials not doing what the public wants and that is a swimming recreation facility. No disclosure to the public for weeks and only when pressured when everyone was watching and waiting for something at Big Splash to happen but nothing clearly has. Last year there was something from the ‘owner’ about problems but nothing mentioned when supposed to be reopening mid November. The ‘owner’ has his house in Nicholls up for auction this weekend so maybe confused things concerning reopening the pool (clearly that wasn’t on the plans).

They leased a water park. They should run a water park or surrender the lease if they are unable to run the water park that they leased.

They leased a block of dirt.

I can see this going the same way as the Phillip pool. Some Bozo in the public service deciding that a 25m pool is just as good as a 50m pool and the rest is deveoped to make a fortune delivering residential apartments that in all likihood won’t be up to scratch. The script just writes itself.

Yet another public pool privatised, run into the ground and then the people responsible rewarded by giving them redevelopment rights.

Reminds me of power, airports, roads, child care, aged care, employment services, TAFE, etc.

When will we get government who represents the citizenry, and not a few greedy rent seekers?

Who could have possibly seen this coming? Shocked I tells ya.

rezone it and build government houses. There is a need in canberra. It takes nearly 5 years to get a government house in canberra.

So the truth is coming out! Let’s see the Government’s regularity action.

Fridge Magnet1:04 pm 13 Nov 25

The purchaser clearly had no intentions of running the facility as intended. Who buys at the worst time to operate an aquatic centre (COVID)? Who then runs it into the ground right after? Someone intent on property development…

It is a shame that there is absolutely no consistent government approach to breaches of lease. No wonder there are so many rumours in this town…

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.