28 March 2025

After seven years of rental reform, what else needs to be done in the ACT?

| Joel Dignam
Join the conversation
24
Rows of high density housing

The ACT has led the way on rental laws, says Joe Dignam. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Seven years ago in Canberra I founded Better Renting, a renter justice organisation. I’m soon to leave Better Renting, so I thought I’d take this chance to look at how renting has changed in the ACT over the past years and what the future might hold.

Since 2018, ACT rental laws have changed in many ways, resulting in what are now the strongest rental laws in the country. A key change was strengthening protections around rent increases.

While the ACT had protections prior, in early 2019 the system was changed so that a rent increase above a certain threshold wouldn’t take effect unless the tenant agreed or the landlord got tribunal approval. Previously, the effect would take place automatically unless the renter applied to ACAT, a high barrier that few renters would bother with.

This change seemed small at the time, but we saw how important it was around 2023 when renters across the country faced skyrocketing rents. While renters in the ACT were not immune to this – advertised rents could still be very high, and lease renewals gave lessors a way to increase rents dramatically – a survey we conducted in 2024 found that the ACT had seen fewer and smaller rent increases than any other jurisdiction in Australia. That’s a win for rental reform!

But for a renter to feel comfortable rejecting an excessive rent increase, they can’t also be at risk of a retaliatory eviction. Here, too, the ACT has led. The ACT was the first jurisdiction to abolish no-grounds evictions, basically saying that ending a tenancy is a big deal, and you should need to provide a reason to do it. A change like this means that renters can feel much more secure in their home.

Since the ACT made this change, three other jurisdictions have followed suit – a great example of the ACT leading the country.

And then we have the ceiling insulation standard. When I began Better Renting I was living in a frigid ex-govie in Watson where I recorded an indoor temperature of 11 degrees Celsius. I remember trying to work from home at a kitchen table, wearing gloves, a beanie, and a bulky puffer jacket. That property had abysmal ceiling insulation.

READ ALSO More ‘adverse’ findings against former CIT executive flagged in draft report

Now, under new ACT regulations, all rentals must have ceiling insulation that meets a minimum standard. This measure will reduce renters’ heating and cooling costs and help to make homes actually liveable in summer and winter.

Great progress has been made in the ACT. That said, there is more work to do, and I will be watching with interest to see how Labor’s Tara Cheyne makes her mark on her new portfolio.

She could consider expanding the ceiling insulation standard. Late in 2024, the ACT Government began a consultation on options such as requiring efficient heating and cooling and facilitating electrification of rental homes. I’m keen to see renters being able to benefit from all-electric homes that they can heat and cool at lower cost.

Another small but emerging issue is renters being charged fees to pay rent, often through third-party apps. This practice has been getting more scrutiny, and NSW and Victoria have been acting to limit it. The ACT should nip this issue in the bud, setting clear laws that require renters to have a simple, convenient, fee-free way to pay rent, and that prohibit mandating that renters must use an app to engage with their tenancy.

READ ALSO Canberra jokes a thing of the past as Sydney’s decline makes us the nation’s premier city

But over seven years, I’ve also seen the limits of regulation. What we also need to see is an improved rental supply (which has been going well in the ACT) and improved compliance with existing rental laws. Here, the proposed role of a rental ombudsman could have value.

Renters need an option to enforce rental laws that doesn’t require them to individually navigate the tribunal system and learn the Residential Tenancies Act inside out. An ombudsman can help with enforcing rental laws, but also with supporting the industry to establish a culture of compliance, as well as tracking data and emerging trends in the sector.

Over recent years, renters in the ACT have benefited from stronger legal protections. Going forward, the ACT Government should build on this legacy by strengthening existing protections, increasing the supply of rental housing, and supporting improved compliance and enforcement.

With more people renting and renting for longer, this is essential to ensure that the growing population of renters can enjoy stable, affordable, and healthy homes.

Joel Dignam is the outgoing Executive Director of Better Renting, a renter justice organisation that he founded in Canberra in 2018.

Join the conversation

24
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

I had 7 investment properties once but have sold all now. The rates & land tax have made it unprofitable for long term investments when compared to other investments. The changes in the rules just made compliance harder. Most investors were happy to look after their properties and tenants. That’s how you get long term tenants and can charge good rents. From the owners perspective, you are only providing accommodation as an investment for your own future, not making up shortfalls of accommodation for the Government.

Fees for payment are a form of drip pricing. Final price must be advertised with the means of paying the final price clear and simple, discounted methods optionally available.

I see the “it’s unfair that people are not allowed be chimney sweeps living in doss-houses any more” brigade are out again.

In a society, improved living standards are not and can never be the sole preserve of the wealthy. Get used to it and be more intelligent investors, get out of a market if you cannot afford it. There is nothing special about private landlords that they deserve preservation.

devils_advocate12:55 pm 02 Apr 25

Why are the minimum standards only for rental houses, then, and not owner-occupiers?

Does this not create a two-class system?

Incidental Tourist7:22 am 02 Apr 25

When rental advocates like Dingham started renting his ex-govie oldie house in Watson wearing jacket inside he was expected to pay just above $300 p.w. He could rent almost brand new property in Gunghalin at $350-$400 with all bells and whistles but he concisely choose not to.
Fast forward to now, cheapest ex-govie house in Watson is rented today at double that thanks to his “rent cap and red tapes”. But the funny thing is that rental advocates like Dingham would still be wearing jackets inside because the same people forced the power bill up more than minimum standards could ever save.
Today public housing queue is out of control. ACT Budget is dog’s breakfast. Housing market is in stagflation when cost of new builds is growing rapidly and ex-rental houses are sold below replacement value. New rental supply remains at a record low falling far behind 30,000 target by 2030. Growing tenant population is forced to tiny apartments or shared accommodation. Rental supply is “going well” when you count the same house as many times as there are shared bedrooms in it.
There is no free lunch Dingham. You solved a smaller problem by creating bigger one. Good bye.

Better Renting and Dingham are just your normal left-wing activists running an agenda with zero idea of how long-term consequences work and affect people. Sucks to be a low-income renter in Canberra as no cheap rentals around anymore.

devils_advocate8:17 pm 01 Apr 25

lol

This is what happens when you have people dictating policy who have no idea how markets work

For example, dictating minimum standards simply means that houses that don’t meet the standards are either demolished, or taken off the market for renovation then re-listed at a higher price. Nobody is going to sink tens of thousands of dollars into capital upgrades and then charge the same rent. So you’ve just screwed the bottom of the market who would have preferred a draughty house that no-one else wants, than none at all.

Similarly with rent caps – if someone’s rent is falling behind market, they’ll cite on of the officially sanctioned “causes” to end a lease, and just re-list it at market price. The tenant gets booted without a chance to negotiate (you can’t offer a higher rent because if the tenant doesn’t agree, any action to end the lease will be “retaliatory”)

The author couldn’t have screwed renters harder if he tried

In summary: LOL @ OP

I have said it before and will say it again – You have to have rocks in your head if you wish to invest in the Canberra property market.

You admit to investing incompetence.

Or greed.

Ideological nonsense!

Maybe you could explain to me why it’s worth investing in the Canberra property market and i prefer the word ENVY than greed.

Return on investment exceeding the hurdle rate, and I am sorry to hear you are envious.

Are you one of those Socialists who hangs out on the main walk into ANU and accosts students saying “do you hate rich people!” ?

devils_advocate9:08 am 02 Apr 25

“You have to have rocks in your head if you wish to invest in the Canberra property market.”

Depends what you mean by “invest”

Long-term buy and hold with traditional residential tenancy in place? I’d tend to agree, not worth itz

Short-term re-development with short-term letting arrangement just long enough to realise a discounted capital gain? Possibly still ok.

I feel your money would be better spend in other asset classes or other states than in the Canberra rental market, good luck to all those that stick it out and do invest here.

True, Coffee-Time. A mix of markets, risk and returns works better than desperately clinging to over-geared “safe” real estate while pleading for more payoffs.

devils_advocate1:22 pm 02 Apr 25

Leveraging is the only way to achieve reasonable returns though (through capital gains, not rental income, though – which is fundamentally asset price speculation but anyway)

Per capita, there will not be more supply. All the regulations, plus the taxes and rates, interest rates, and also cost of construction driven by the unions – means there will be less supply and the supply you get will be more expensive. It’s an objective fact. I rented a 1 bedroom (very basic and would have had 0 star energy rating) in Lyneham with a nice leafy outlook, near Tilleys for $90 per week. Adjusted for inflation it’s $160 per week. Now it’s $500 per week. Astronomical difference – the world is now a very different and more difficult place for young people thanks to these great laws to protect young people – all they do is enslave them to work.

So we should return to the 1920s then, where you just get a broken down, run down hovel to “live in” then…..

Such an extremist response. My apartment was fine. I bought a bar heater from Big W for $50 and was ok. And I only had to work two nights a week to pay ALL my bills. Now young people are enslaved – working non stop to get nowhere. But keep thinking on the line you are.

No matter what anyone else thinks, you’ll keep on dribbling tired old cliches, that show little to zero understanding of younger generations at all.

But hey, you clearly know better – an attitude that permeates strongly within certain demographics.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.