Alleged Braddon child smutmonger arrested

beyondthelaw said :

Wait till he is convicted, The Frots? The police gained a search warrant, entered the house and seized child pornography, obviously consisting of this rock spider filming the innocent subjects as well as being involved in sex acts which he filmed. The Frots, your comment concerns me and usually people who make these type of comments condone this type of sick behaviour and maybe involved in this type of peadophillia

You were there were you? No?
Then what make you think that you know anything about it?

beyondthelaw said :

Wait till he is convicted, The Frots? The police gained a search warrant, entered the house and seized child pornography, obviously consisting of this rock spider filming the innocent subjects as well as being involved in sex acts which he filmed. The Frots, your comment concerns me and usually people who make these type of comments condone this type of sick behaviour and maybe involved in this type of peadophillia

What an outrageous statement. You clearly have no understanding of the Australian legal system.

Wait till he is convicted, The Frots? The police gained a search warrant, entered the house and seized child pornography, obviously consisting of this rock spider filming the innocent subjects as well as being involved in sex acts which he filmed. The Frots, your comment concerns me and usually people who make these type of comments condone this type of sick behaviour and maybe involved in this type of peadophillia

georgesgenitals said :

colourful sydney racing identity said :

JessP said :

Sorry guys but this low life has been charged with having sex with a person under 16 AND having and PRODUCING child pornography! Why is anyone defending this low life????????

I am not sure that people are defending him – I think they are defending the law, whis presumes innocence, remember, he has been charged but not yett convicted.

Wait until he’s convicted – we can lynch him online later.

And y’all will.

georgesgenitals said :

colourful sydney racing identity said :

JessP said :

Sorry guys but this low life has been charged with having sex with a person under 16 AND having and PRODUCING child pornography! Why is anyone defending this low life????????

I am not sure that people are defending him – I think they are defending the law, whis presumes innocence, remember, he has been charged but not yett convicted.

Wait until he’s convicted – we can lynch him online later.

Agreed!

colourful sydney racing identity said :

JessP said :

Sorry guys but this low life has been charged with having sex with a person under 16 AND having and PRODUCING child pornography! Why is anyone defending this low life????????

I am not sure that people are defending him – I think they are defending the law, whis presumes innocence, remember, he has been charged but not yett convicted.

Wait until he’s convicted – we can lynch him online later.

JessP said :

Sorry guys but this low life has been charged with having sex with a person under 16 AND having and PRODUCING child pornography! Why is anyone defending this low life????????

I am not sure that people are defending him – I think they are defending the law, whis presumes innocence, remember, he has been charged but not yett convicted.

JessP said :

Sorry guys but this low life has been charged with having sex with a person under 16 AND having and PRODUCING child pornography! Why is anyone defending this low life????????

No one is defending anyone, the reason being that he has been charged and not even tried yet. Have you considered just the one scenario here? People don’t generally defend those behaviors on the whole. It’s over reactions like this that get people annoyed. Let the process happen and think of all the possibilities, I ‘m sure you have heard of cases put forward by prosecutors with circumstantial evidence and been laughed out of the building and and made pay heavy compensation for the privilege. Look up Andrew Mallard or Graham Stafford. It does happen.

JessP this is also one of the nuances of the reporting that takes place to ensure that the accused is not prejudiced if the matter goes to trial. For all we know he may have been previously convicted and is on the sex offenders register but it can’t be mentioned in this press release.

In terms of libel I do not think this would be the case SupamanDatHo if the Police had a warrant I think that they must have some fairly substantial evidence and given the apparent result of the raid it would seem to have been accurate.

I think creatures like this once convicted should be covered in tar and feathers and clearly labeled as a rock spider low life piece of scum degenerate

JessP said :

Sorry guys but this low life has been charged with having sex with a person under 16 AND having and PRODUCING child pornography! Why is anyone defending this low life????????

Whilst I do hate rockspiders and think they should be neutered …….. our legal system does work around the basis of “innocent until proven guilty” This alleged rockspider has not been proven as yet.

If and/or when they are found guilty, then let the public neutering begin 🙂