14 October 2025

An IT HR project was once called the 'biggest failure of governance' ever. DHR's expected to take that title

| By Claire Fenwicke
Join the conversation
8
digital health record machine

The Auditor-General’s office is now looking into the implementation and the benefits realisations of the Digital Health Record. Photo: Claire Fenwicke.

The ACT Auditor-General has predicted the Territory’s Digital Health Record will soon take the crown for demonstrating the “biggest failure of governance” he’s ever seen.

Michael Harris had previously used that language to describe the now-abandoned Human Resources Information Management System (HRIMS) in an audit report raising serious questions about the management, capability and accountability of government ICT projects.

During public hearings for the inquiry into his office’s scathing report into how well ACT Health had managed contract payments to private company NTT Australia to host the Digital Health Record (DHR) on Monday (13 October), Mr Harris said what he’d been seeing with the project followed “fairly closely on the heels” of HRIMS.

“I had described [the HRIMS process] as the biggest failure of governance I’d ever seen,” he said.

“My suspicion is that that record will be overtaken by [the DHR] project.”

(There had been concerns that the government had paid NTT for services not delivered. An internal review found this did not occur.)

When asked if he felt the lessons learned from the DHR audit report were being seen across all health projects, Mr Harris wasn’t optimistic.

“I wish I could answer that question positively,” he responded.

“Government actions taken to date have gone a long way towards addressing the issues in this report [and] as time goes on, other issues are being resolved.

“What’s in [this report] should not have occurred … this is a bit like a canary in a coal mine.”

READ ALSO More Northbourne closures, carpark gone as infrastructure projects ramp up

Significant failures identified in the report included that invoices were paid more than three months after work had been completed (even though there was a contract clause that stipulated there was no obligation for the government to pay if invoices were that late) and that the finance team was forecasting budget overruns while the project management team was forecasting balanced books.

“Whenever there was an increase in budget, there was an automatic increase in the benefits that were supposedly to be derived in order to keep the budget balanced,” Mr Harris said.

He couldn’t say whether there had been scope creep on the project, but pointed out the NTT contract alone had gone from its original expected cost of $66 million in 2020 to $110 million. The contract will end on 22 December 2026.

“We do know enough … to be able to say that the budgeting arrangements were poor at best,” Mr Harris said.

During a later hearing, Health Minister Rachel Stephen-Smith explained the Digital Solutions Division had been managing its own invoicing, procurement and financial processes when DHR was being developed (under the former ACT Health directorate).

And the COVID-19 pandemic meant everyone’s attention was elsewhere.

“There wasn’t a strong focus on financial management in that period,” she said.

KPMG was procured to look into DSD’s financial challenges in early 2023 after it was realised the division’s issues were “deeper than just a pandemic impact”.

“I think a lot of the issues initially were unclear because there was a pandemic impact on the operation of the Digital Solutions Division, as well as trying to implement this major health record system,” Ms Stephen-Smith said.

READ ALSO Multi-use precinct proposed to give growing Gungahlin a beating heart

Chief financial officer Muku Ganeshalingam told the inquiry that extra safeguards had since been put in place to ensure invoices couldn’t be processed for payment without being “triple checked”.

There are about 100 contracts in DSD (now under the Digital Canberra directorate), and most are related to DHR.

Another investigation is currently underway into DHR – focusing on its implementation and its benefits – but how many reports that generates remains to be seen.

But Mr Harris did have this to say: “I have no confidence you will find any good news in any of those reports.”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

8
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Leon Arundell4:14 pm 14 Oct 25

How does this failure of governance compare with Chris Steel’s signing of a $577 million contract, without a tender process, for a part of a project that the government estimated would be worth only $150 million?

It certainly says something about ACT Governments Health Record application if the Auditor General thinks it is worse than My Way+ and the completely failed HR system.

I can imagine Minister Steven Smith claiming her medieval torture device was better than the other because it was ergonomically designed for the patient.

Max_Rockatansky11:23 am 14 Oct 25

Why do we have 2 seperate digital health records, the Federal system called My Health Record and the Territory system called Digital Health Record? Isn’t this duplication the bigger waste of limited resources? Why don’t politicians ever try to sort out the duplications and incompatibilities between most Federal and State/Territory departments?

A friend reckons the different system for the ACT is to comparatively hide our ACT poor health performance data. Make it harder to compare data by ensuring you provide Oranges while everyone else has Apples.

Local labor didnt want to work with Liberal feds?
Labor = spending more of your money..

Understand that DHR in the ACT is primarily a records-keeping system for the two ACT Hospitals. While it was ‘sold’ to the public as an individual’s health record (as a precursor to the Calvary takeover), such an outcome is a limited by-product of the DHR’s primary purpose ( to digitise and consolidate hospital medical records). Much of a patient’s DHR data is of lower granularity than could be justified by being located in the mis-named ‘My Health Record’.

Max_Rockatansky3:37 pm 14 Oct 25

So, if someone got a blood test while in an ACT hospital the results would be uploaded into the Territory DHR, and if that person got a later blood test via a GP in the ACT the results would be uploaded into the Federal MHR. Similarly, if someone was dispensed medication while in an ACT hospital the details would be in the Territory DHR, and if that same person was later given a prescription from a GP in the ACT those details would be in the Federal MHR. Is that right?

Crime n Punishment10:21 am 14 Oct 25

Lets not all squeal about cost overruns or badly managed budgets.

This is the ACT where no executive is held to account and no minister voted out.

The public service serves the public just how the head of service sets the standard; with hollow words and platitudes aplenty.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.