4 October 2026

Are Walk-in Centres value for money? We're going to find out

| By Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
20

Walk-in Centres are now an accepted part of the ACT health landscape. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

An independent review of the ACT nurse-led Walk-in Centre model is underway, with the ACT Government seeking a consultant to do the work.

The tender comes seven months after the Legislative Assembly passed a motion from Canberra Liberals leader Mark Parton calling for a comprehensive evaluation of the service.

The Opposition and the Australian Medical Association have previously criticised the model as an inefficient and expensive way to provide primary health care and divert patients from struggling emergency departments.

READ ALSO Did you spot Joe Rider? If not, you missed a vulnerable road user

The Opposition has now accepted the role of Walk-in Centres but remains concerned about whether it is delivering value for money.

“The review’s not about shutting centres down, it’s just about ensuring that they deliver the best outcomes for patients and the data that we were receiving up until this point was not really sufficient to make that assessment,” Mr Parton told ABC radio on Tuesday.

There are now five centres operating across Canberra – in Belconnen, Dickson, Weston Creek, Tuggeranong and Gungahlin. They’re open seven days a week from 7:30 am to 10 pm.

An independent evaluation of the Walk-in Centre model has not been done since 2011, a year after the first centre opened.

The tender document says the review must consider the role of WiCs within the broader urgent and primary care landscape, including how it relates to general practice, after-hours services, community health services and the Woden Medicare Urgent Care Clinic.

It stresses that the government wants an objective assessment and has no predetermined outcome.

The review will look at the effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability of the WiC model; clinical outcomes, patient safety and experience; value for money; workforce sustainability and service capability; and its integration and impact within the broader ACT health system.

The review will cover the safety, quality and appropriateness of clinical care and how serious and urgent cases are managed.

It will include operating hours, presentation rates, patient outcomes and the number of cases that would have otherwise gone to EDs.

READ ALSO Audit report finds holes in government's road resurfacing strategy

When assessing cost-effectiveness, the review must compare cost per episode of care with ED presentations, after-hours general practice, and Medicare Urgent Care Clinics.

It will look at whether WiCs are taking pressure off EDs and recommend ways to make the service more efficient.

The review will examine the WiCs’ relationship with general practice, including service overlap, impacts on continuity of care for patients and the number of GP patients, referrals and ways to strengthen communication and coordination of care between providers.

It will assess the potential benefits, risks, costs and feasibility of expanding the scope of services delivered through WiCs.

The consultant will consult widely with stakeholders – including GPs, nurses, professional bodies, agencies and service providers – and the community.

The tender says the consultant must deliver interim findings by 2 February 2027 and a final report by 28 June, 2027.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

20
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Incidental Tourist3:02 pm 05 Oct 26

The comparison between the ACT’s Walk-in Centres (WICs) and Victoria’s Urgent Care Clinics (UCCs) is quite revealing.

Victoria’s model is GP-led, with doctors and nurses providing more comprehensive urgent care seven days a week across 38 clinics. The ACT’s five WICs are nurse-led, with no doctors on site more focused on triage before seeing GPs.

The difference is not merely staffing. Victoria’s UCCs are better equipped with imaging machines and labs allowing them to take blood tests and images. ACT WICs have a more limited diagnostic capability: nurses can order only a restricted range of limb X-rays, while broader imaging and blood tests require referral elsewhere.

As Victoria’s UCCs have GPs they can prescribe medications. ACT’s WICs generally cannot except for treating patients with some very limited range.

The cost figures are also interesting. Victoria’s 2026–27 Budget provides $20.9 million to maintain nine state-funded UCCs — about $2.3 million per clinic. ACT Government is more coy as to revealing costs and it does not publish an equivalent simple per-WIC operating budget. Based on its reported 2024–25 activity and direct cost, however, the ACT WIC network works out at roughly $3.1 million direct cost per centre, or around $4.7 million when the Government’s estimated indirect costs are included. These are not perfectly comparable accounting measures, however it appears that ACT WIC are more costly while providing less care comparing to Victoria’s UCCs.

The health service ration is also different. Each ACT WIC handles roughly 27,000 presentations a year, compared with roughly 10,000 per Victorian UCC. This is not surprising, those who lived in Melbourne and ACT know that waiting time at Victorian UCC is often much less and the patients are seen much sooner.

This suggests two quite different models. The ACT WIC is essentially a high-volume, nurse-led triage and community-care service, designed to deal with straightforward conditions and redirect patients to GPs or Hospitals rather than provide required health service at presentation. Hence ACT WIC are more focused on cost reduction than by providing limited health service. But somehow ACT Government turns limited service WIC to be more costly than UCC.

Victoria’s UCC model is more focused on completing a broader range of urgent-care services at the point of presentation free to patients. UCC is therefore far more efficient and effective model focused on patients.

The only data I’ve seen about the value of these walk in centres suggested they were costing twice as much per patient as a GP visit and providing lesser services because of Labor’s flawed ideology of creating a nurse only service.

Probable best thing to do is tender out the running of them to a not for profit GP service that would use a mix of nurses and doctors in the centres to expand the service offering, keep the walk in structure and expanded hours, and do so at less cost to the ACT taxpayer.

It is good to see there will be an independent review of our nurse led walk in centres. I am looking forward to the findings and the Canberra Liberals coming clean and revealing their intentions for the future of WIC’s rather than their constant sniping. A party that has never supported nurse led health clinics or public and universal health care, always undermining our city’s health services with their plans to shut these clinics down if they ever win government.

A party with some of the most conservative MLA’s ever elected to our assembly and a leader and his deputy both holding senior shadow health portfolio roles including women’s health. The party’s health care proposals put forward at the last election were widely criticised for undermining longstanding efforts to attract and retain doctors in the ACT and reducing health services so that they are only available to those who can afford it.

A party that has been fanatical in its opposition to drug and other health reforms and just recently joined in a coalition with the Greens to thwart the government’s attempts to relocate the drug and treatment centre Arcadia house in Belconnen. Both parties cringingly effusive in their praise for each other in achieving this outcome in speeches at the last assembly sitting, refusing to rule out a power sharing deal in the future.

I will be watching the outcome and responses to this review closely.

Way to keep up the ALP spin Jack. I take it you’ll be keeping an eye on the review from a Labor MLA’s office, or maybe ACT Labor’s party office?

Who would want to work in the assembly Garfield being paid next to nothing with the many opportunities being offered elsewhere?

That is unless you are in the opposition being paid a motsza for doing nothing.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.