30 April 2026

Berry urges inner Canberra residents to be more open to public housing

| By Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
104

Housing and New Suburbs Minister Yvette Berry and Planning Minister Chris Steel walk the former Minimbah Court public housing site in Yarralumla. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

Canberrans have been urged to be more accepting of public housing projects, particularly in the inner south and north.

Housing and New Suburbs Minister Yvette Berry made the appeal on the site of the former Minimbah Court public housing complex in Yarralumla, which is about to be torn down and replaced with 30 new dwellings, up from the original 12.

The $19.33 million project in Schlich Street was delayed for almost two years due to the approval being challenged in the ACT Civil and Administrative Tribunal, contributing to the ACT Government’s decision to, in effect, ban third-party appeals for public and social housing projects.

Two residents, Les Landau and John Hutchison, had sought a review of the August 2024 approval of the project, in a bid to reduce the number of units and include a basement car park to preserve more green space. But ACAT upheld the approval in April last year.

In nearby Curtin, a five-storey, 58-unit social housing project has been proposed near Holy Trinity Catholic School but has attracted a petition from some residents complaining about its size and potential overshadowing of the school.

READ ALSO Want public housing to be more accepted? Manage it and tenants better

Ms Berry was asked what her message would be to those opposing the project.

She said the housing crisis was not going to go away and was likely to get worse.

“We’re asking Canberrans to share some of their space for people who are particularly vulnerable and don’t have the same kinds of choices as the rest of us,” she said.

“We simply need to build more homes and we need to build more public housing and community housing and we need to build it as quickly as we can.”

Ms Berry said there was an unfair perception around public housing and the people who lived in it, and she urged people to be open-minded.

“We’ve seen suburbs and all parts of Canberra who live very harmoniously together and people don’t even know whether they’re private or public dwellings, so I think it’s just a perception that people have and they need to give it a chance and meet their neighbors, welcome them into their community.”

Planning Minister Chris Steel said 95 per cent of the appeals against public housing projects to ACCAT were occurring in the inner south and inner north and the government didn’t accept the proposition that there shouldn’t be new public housing built there.

“It’s really important that we make sure that we are building new housing and renewing public housing and community housing in those really well-located areas and not selling off all of the sites to then build new housing on the fringes of our city, where people aren’t necessarily as close to services or the communities that they have connections to,” he said.

But the Curtin DA was submitted before legislation passed preventing appeals to ACAT and could still end up there if it is approved.

Mr Steel could no longer step in because the legislation also took away the Minister’s call-in powers, which are now in the hands of the Chief Planner.

An artist’s impression of the Minimbah Court public housing project, which will deliver 30 modern homes. Image: Collins Pennington.

He said the time taken to get the Yarralumla project under way had been far too long and had left many vulnerable families on the public housing waiting list without shelter.

“That is unacceptable and the government has now clearly legislated to make sure that that doesn’t happen again for future projects and we’ve been clear with the community about our expectations,” Mr Steel said.

The Yarralumla project will deliver a mix of 18 one, 10 two and two three-bedroom homes across three two-storey buildings and was expected to be ready for people to move in by the end of next year.

The verge trees and many of the mature trees on the site will be retained and a further 150 planted.

Mr Steel said the buildings would fit in well with the suburb and the canopy cover on site would be greater than before.

The project is part of 85 homes the government is delivering with support from Housing Australia’s Future Fund Facility Round 2.

It is also part of the ACT Government’s commitment to enable 30,000 more homes, including delivering 5000 additional public, community and affordable rental dwellings, in Canberra by the end of 2030.

READ ALSO No more appeals: New laws put public and community housing on faster track

Master Builders ACT has questioned whether the government would be able to meet these targets given the international situation, but Ms Berry said the government was doing everything that it could.

“Housing ACT worked very closely with our building partners during the previous conflicts when there were shortages in supplies and builders used a range of different innovative methods when they were building homes so that we could get them almost finished,” she said.

“If there is a long tail to the conflict [which] means that there will be delays in supplies, I’m confident that the building sector will be able to work through a range of different ways to get these buildings constructed.”

Monarch Building Solutions has been awarded the demolition and construction contract.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

104
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Sounds like people in these communities concerned about hight and density of proper developments rather than it including public housing.
Be mindful of the real target of your concern…
If the ACT government is so concerned about public housing in areas close to amenities, why didn’t it keep public housing developments at Manuka and Red Hill next to the shops.
The reality is that the ACT govt. has, or is selling, 100,000 public housing dwellings and aim to build 120,000. So that is only an increase of 20,000 dwellings, which is not enough for the growing need. And these new dwellings are in less desirable or convenient areas than the public housing sold off.

30 modern UNITS.

There would be a more welcoming environment for social housing if residents were more respectful of the public asset they were living in and the community in which the housing is located. I visit an elderly friend who lives in a street with many older long term residents. The pride in their homes and gardens is abundantly obvious. And there, in the midst of it all, is a “govie” which looks like a transplant from the old Revolve compound. Despite representations and complaints, the government is unable or unwilling to do anything about it. It’s those sorts of experiences which creates the stigma and hostility towards social housing.

Marcin Lazarowicz3:36 pm 30 Apr 26

The best policy to get rid with social housing problems is to stop prosecuting petty crimes. In ACT it is done not by changing legislation but by cutting funds for police. No crimes, no probs and all should be happy. Long live ACT govt!

Margaret Freemantle3:34 pm 30 Apr 26

Would be helpful if the government also made an effort to look like they cared too!!!

Are the houses going next door to her’s? Or is she not THAT welcoming?

There’s no such objections when Gungahlin was filled with Public Housing at much higher numbers than other suburbs. Good to see it being shared around in new builds in posher suburbs.

It tends to be inner suburbs with the highest proportions according to the figures I can find.

Suburbs by Public Housing Concentration (Percentage of Stock)
Ainslie: Highest concentration (approx. 14.6%).
Charnwood: High density, around 14%.
Reid: Around 13.8%, located in the Inner North.
Florey: Approx. 12.9%.
Rivett: Approx. 12.3%.
Richardson: Around 12.1%.
Oaks Estate: Approx. 11.3%.

Other Areas with Significant Public Housing Units (Raw Numbers)
Kambah: High total, ~651 units.
Narrabundah: High total, ~431 units.
Turner: ~332 units.
Lyneham: ~331 units.

This is from AI. I tried to copy similar data from an actual site, but was blocked from coping.

Then I found this, but a few years out of date.
https://www.communityservices.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/1361161/FOI-Table-of-Contents-1-List-of-Housing-stock-numbers-by-suburb_protected.pdf

Elf: This is a few years out of date, but gives an idea where public housing is. Inner suburbs, that aren’t Forrest, tend to get the highest %.

https://www.communityservices.act.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0019/1361161/FOI-Table-of-Contents-1-List-of-Housing-stock-numbers-by-suburb_protected.pdf

Marcin Lazarowicz2:36 pm 30 Apr 26

Where is MS Berry living? Is it in the area where problems ( drugs, unemployment, alcohol, petty crimes) connected with social housing are present or the one where residents are aware of such a problems from SBS only? How is possible to be so far from public emotions?

Tuija Canciani9:14 am 30 Apr 26

I grew up in Canberra in an era where public servants and workers lived in public housing, it was rare to see people trash housing, and rare to see piles of rubbish, there was not such a ‘them and us’ attitude, many people purchased the public housing properties after living in them for several years. Some of those old houses have better bones than new high rise apartments that start falling apart after several years. Exactly where are people supposed to live when the rental/private housing market is unattainable? There are people working 7 days a week who still don’t meet the expectations for rental, anybody know how to fix this?

Setting the record straight8:48 am 30 Apr 26

There is a lot of context missing from this article. Firstly, a similar community housing proposal has recently been approved just down the road in Curtin, with minimal opposition.
The current objection is NOT about NIMBYism. It is about advocating for children as young as preschool age, who will have to contend with a protracted construction site and then a huge building right in their learning and playing space. The development would cause significant shading over the school and playground which is also generously shared with the public outside of school hours.
There is currently a single dwelling on the development site and the proposed development is hugely disproportionate to the small site.
It is very important to note that allowing this development to proceed could easily set a precedent for similar developments to encroach on other schools and it would be wise to sign the petition if you are concerned about this.

Last time I checked, Australia was a democracy. ACT residents should have a right to voice support or objections with any development application. Insinuating every objection is “NIMBY” without evidence shuts down genuine debate on the merits of the development.

I think you’ll find most objections are related to poor design and outcomes, and not keeping people out of the area. Many developments, lack sufficient parking, are too tall, are outside planning rules and guidelines, remove community space or facilities amongst others. Most people just want a good outcome for the community, and not just those with political or financial interests in the project.

Well put. People in social housing deserve to live in accommodation that meets the planning rules everyone must comply with. Surely that’s a human right?

Why cant we put all the public housing in one spot? Oh high crime… Fancy that

Please sign the petition via this link: https://epetitions.parliament.act.gov.au/details/e-pet-038-26 already 293 signatures

To suggest the Curtin development is about public vs private and nimbyism is disingenuous and frankly absurd.
The issue is a five story building being build on the boundary of a primary school, creating significant overlooking, overshadowing and safety issues. Surprise surpise, the school was left off the original shadowing drawings.
A “traffic assessment” being done on a Sunday in the middle of school holidays stinks of opportunism.
The risks and disruption to children during the construction phase have also been completely ignored.
Ms Berry knows exactly what she is doing. Dressing up a government cutting deals for someone else to solve their affordable housing issue as class warfare.
Spare me.

This Bqrr government blames all their failures to deliver on local residents, never taking responsibility for its poor planning and decision-making, let alone the lack of action on serving community needs.

To be clear, the Curtin development isn’t public housing. It’s affordable housing, being managed by Marymead. And the residents who are opposed, are opposed because the 5 storey building is right on the border of the school. It will shade the entire outdoor learning and play area, until after 2pm in Winter. Nowhere in the Curtin development objection mentions being against affordable housing.

Bit rich for MLAs to complain about objections delaying public housing builds, when they have plenty of empty properties because they’re dragging their heels getting repairs done.
https://region.com.au/hundreds-of-act-public-housing-properties-sit-vacant-while-thousands-wait-for-homes/956495/

‘Living harmoniously’ like the long suffering residents of Watson, Hackett and Downer, who have had to put up with a significant spike in theft and anti social behaviour since the govt dispersed more public housing tenants into their communities?
Yeah, a massive success 🤦

The government’s complaint about external delays to the project would be much more legitimate if it hadn’t then taken them another 12 months to submit their Development Application.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.