8 April 2025

Bulk-billing practice with 5000 patients in voluntary administration

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
29

The Interchange Health Cooperative practice in South.Point, Tuggeranong closed on Monday. Photo: Facebook.

Canberra’s bulk-billing crisis has worsened with the closure of the Interchange Health Cooperative (IHCO) practice in Tuggeranong, which had almost 5000 patients on its books.

The six-year-old 100 per cent bulk-billed general practice and allied health service at South.Point called in administrators from RSM Australia on Monday (7 April).

The move comes after the Albanese Government promised in February to spend $8.5 billion over four years to triple the incentive for GPs to provide almost universal bulk-billing services, although doubts remain that the goal of nine in 10 visits be free of out of pocket expenses can be achieved in the ACT, which has the lowest bulk-billing rate in the country.

READ ALSO Pocock joins battle for Burrangiri, calls for Commonwealth funding

In a statement, IHCO said its current business model was no longer sustainable, and it had become increasingly difficult to recruit doctors to the practice.

“This was a deeply difficult and disappointing decision given the significant transformation work we’ve undertaken to create a sustainable medical practice,” IHCO said.

“However, in the face of financial challenges, this was the only responsible choice, ensuring that IHCO can be independently assessed by administrators with a view to review all available options and recommend a forward plan.”

IHCO said it had been heavily reliant on Medicare rebates, a small number of government project grants, and membership fees to sustain its services, and it had been extremely challenging to raise sufficient income to cover true operational costs.

IHCO received $500,000 from the ACT Government’s Bulk Billing General Practices Grant Fund in 2018.

“Despite an intensive recruitment program over several months to fill GP vacancies and increase our overall GP numbers, our 100 per cent bulk-billed business model is no longer able to meet current market rates and conditions to attract much-needed doctors into our practice, putting our services under intense pressure,” it said.

IHCO provided services to some of Canberra’s most vulnerable community members.

It said the organisation had already reached out to the ACT Government to transition the most vulnerable patients to public health and other service providers.

“The board, key administrative, clinical and medical staff will continue to work closely with the administrators and the ACT Government to support the seamless transition of our patients – especially those with complex health issues,” IHCO said.

Rachel Stephen-Smith speaking to a crowd

Rachel Stephen-Smith speaking at the opening of IHCO in Tuggeranong on 28 August 2019. Photo: AHCO Facebook.

Administrators will work with the ACT Government to assist with the transition of IHCO patients.

An ACT Government spokesperson said the government would work closely with IHCO, the administrator and the Capital Health Network to ensure its patients were safely transitioned to other services.

The ACT Government provided more than $1.4 million in funding to IHCO since its inception in 2018, including more than $350,000 in this financial year to support the delivery of care to some of Canberra’s most vulnerable community members.

“The ACT Government continues to advocate for increased funding for primary care services across Canberra with the Australian Government,” the spokesperson said.

RSM Australia Partner Jonathon Colbran and Director Adam Cormack were appointed joint and several voluntary administrators of the IHCO at a board meeting on Monday.

Mr Colbran said the IHCO’s voluntary board had advised administrators that it had implemented a range of initiatives to address challenges in the organisation and ensure it could continue to serve the community, but ultimately was no longer able to meet its operational costs and provide services.

“Unfortunately, we are seeing many entities, including in the health sector, turning towards expert assistance to help them navigate financial challenges as a result of increasing business pressures,” he said.

“Our preliminary review of the IHCO’s financial statements and records indicate the business lacks the sufficient funding to continue its operations.

“As a result, the responsible decision has been made to cease providing all medical care immediately while all options are explored to either recapitalise the business and recommence services or, if necessary, wind up the organisation.”

READ ALSO Federal Labor promises to pay for Margaret Timpson Park upgrade in Belconnen

Mr Colbran said a decision on the future of the IHCO would be made in about five weeks’ time at a second meeting of creditors.

“Prior to our appointment, the organisation was providing services to some 4900 patients with a significant number of these requiring care for complex health issues,” Mr Colbran said.

“The board, together with key administrative, clinical and medical staff will work closely with administrators in conjunction with ACT Health to transition existing patients to other service providers, ensuring patients experience as little disruption as possible.”

Administrators will write to members and creditors this week to advise them of their appointment and outline the rights of creditors and the steps involved in a voluntary administration.

Creditors impacted by the administration should contact RSM via email – IHCOCreditors@rsm.com.au – or phone 03 9286 8230.

Patients who may have questions about the administration process can contact RSM via email – IHCOPatients@rsm.com.au or phone 03 9286 8020.

Join the conversation

29
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Laurence De B. Anderson1:30 pm 10 Apr 25

So.. where did all the money go? lol. It’s not as if GP is a low cash-flow business.

@Laurence De B. Anderson
I’m not familiar with the practice, but I’d hazard a guess that “100 per cent bulk-billed” means they had no cash flow, as their revenue was post-appointment claimed from Medicare.

Laurence De B. Anderson2:18 pm 10 Apr 25

I’m speaking idiomatically, of course. As a GP for nearly 34 years including having run my own entirely BB’ed practice for seven years, I can assure you there’s reasonable ‘cash flow.’

I am so sad about this, this is the practice that I have attended for the last six years and it was fantastic, the doctors were amongst the best I have ever seen and all the staff were kind, caring and always put the patients first.
As a 73 year old pensioner with complex chronic health conditions including diabetes, I don’t know where I will find another doctor, it’s just too depressing to even start looking for one.
So I’m a diabetic without a doctor, I don’t have a specialist (endocrinologist) because I can’t afford one, however, the ACT Govt allocates me 15 minutes a year to see and endo at the Canberra Hospital, so I will get to see her in about 10 months.
Oh and in case you’re wondering, as there’s a lot of political comments on this page – after being a lifelong Labor supporter, last year I voted Greens in the ACT Election.

The question that really jumps out at me here is this:
Does the government need to review how much it’s paying per Bulk-Bill ticket if a practice cannot survive on that alone?

(Of course, there remains the possibility that the organisation was top-heavy, or mis-managed or over-spending somewhere else, and I can’t suggest that’s the case without having some sort of inside information, so that’s just a hypothetical.)

But you would assume that if we’re going to have a system where the government covers the cost of a trip to the GPs, then the GPs practice should probably be able to keep it’s head above water.

1967 – Doctors get $42.85 BB for a short consult and 82.70 for a half hour consult. This is why it is not viable to BB.

Laurence De B. Anderson2:28 pm 10 Apr 25

Actually, ‘short consult’ less than 5 mins is $19.60. The ‘standard consult 5-20mins is $42 as you say.

It’s very expensive to run a business in Canberra, with high rents, high wages and other overheads. Medical practices require a lot of administration staff as well as doctors and nurses, medical equipment and resources along with a decent sized area in which to work. With property rates so high in Canberra (even worse than residential rates) the rents are set high to cover landlord costs. Almost everything in Canberra is more expensive than in other capital cities, including the rates of pay which organisations must pay to hire qualified staff. That’s why our doctors and dentists are so expensive.

Capital Retro8:41 am 09 Apr 25

If you think getting a medical appointment is hard, try getting a vet to see your ailing pet.
I tried 4 this morning without an offer of an appointment until next week.
It’s easier to get a plumber, and cheaper!

Heywood Smith10:10 am 09 Apr 25

If Hollywood movies have taught me anything, its that vets make great doctors, especially if you’re into organised crime and going to the hospital isnt an option! 🙂

Funny how the ACT has a local council government and it is also the seat of the federal government and that it has the worst health outcomes contrary to published party policies in Australia. ‘Which Party is that’ you ask?

Laurence De B. Anderson2:42 pm 10 Apr 25

Tasmania has worse health outcomes than the ACT on almost every metric. Some of the ACT’s bad stats (arthritis, for example) reflect the older demographic in the ACT.

Quote from news.com.au:
For Mr Albanese, there has barely been a press stop this campaign without the “green and gold” – Australia’s Medicare card. The PM has flashed the card every other day, having pitched the election as a make or break moment for Medicare.

On Tuesday, he spruiked a $1bn pledge on mental health and in Brisbane, on the first day of the campaign, championed Medicare Urgent Care Clinics and bulk billing.
…………………
Really?? Maybe the question should be asked of both the Chief Minister and the Prime Minister, how did we get to this medical facility closing in Canberra?

Both are oblivious to what’s happening in the real world to the real people and only pay ‘loose’ attention when it is their respective election times.

Capital Retro8:55 pm 08 Apr 25

I never knew this place existed. I also note it is “An ACT Government Funded Initiative”.

Laurence De B. Anderson2:21 pm 10 Apr 25

yes indeed. Hmm…

“An ACT government funded initiative”

It would be nice to know if the GPs from there will be working at other clinics in the meantime. I’m happy to pay full fees to continue to see the GP that I have built rapport with.

GrumpyGrandpa3:56 pm 08 Apr 25

With the lowest bulk billing on the country, it’s surprising that this bulk billing practice has survived as long as it has. Even with its annual fee contribution from its patients to partially offset the practice costs, GPs can simply earn more elsewhere.

The ACT Government payroll tax law changes probably haven’t helped. (My GP’s practice levies all patients $7 to offset these costs).

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.