14 April 2025

Campaign launches put housing at the centre of the election fight

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
35
Hon Anthony Albanese MP

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has made housing affordability an election priority. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Housing access and affordability have taken centre stage in the federal election, with both major parties using their official campaign launches to offer competing policies aimed at getting more people into their own homes.

Labor will spend $10 billion to build 100,000 new homes across Australia, specifically for first home buyers.

It will also introduce a plan to allow all first home buyers to buy with just a 5 per cent deposit.

The plan would help first-time home buyers avoid lender’s mortgage insurance, which the government says adds about $23,000 to an average first home buyer’s mortgage.

The Coalition’s big housing announcement is to allow first-time buyers who buy newly built homes to deduct mortgage payments from their income taxes.

The offer would only apply to newly built homes and would be available to first-time buyers earning less than $175,000 a year for an individual or $250,000 for a couple.

The Opposition’s scheme would apply to the first $650,000 and first five years of a mortgage, with no limit on the purchase price of the house or size of the mortgage.

The Coalition says its policy would save a first home buyer with a $650,000 mortgage and taxable income of $120,000 about $12,000 a year.

Both parties launched their campaigns on Sunday (13 April): Labor in Perth and the Coalition in Sydney.

READ ALSO Dutton to dump ‘tax on families’ over utes and 4WDs that don’t meet fuel-efficiency standards

Anthony Albanese offered a $1000 instant tax deduction for work-at-home expenses.

“No paperwork, no box of receipts, no scrolling through your online banking – just tick the box and your return is ready,” the Prime Minister said.

“Every year, millions of people who work part time, or work from home, or don’t have an accountant to navigate the tax system for them miss out on claiming deductions they are entitled to and pay more tax than they should.

“This reform fixes that, and it fixes it forever. It takes away the hassle of tracking your expenses, especially if you work from home.

“And it gives you back more of your own money, faster.”

It was Labor’s housing policy, however, that the PM spent the most time spruiking, saying his party was “backing the great Australian dream”.

He said buying a first home has never been easy, but for the current generation, it has never felt further out of reach.

“At the moment, if you can’t get that 20 per cent deposit, the only other option is to pay $20,000 or more in mortgage insurance,” Mr Albanese said.

“The only thing that buys you is higher repayments down the track. That is no kind of choice at all.

“Our Labor government is going to fix it.

“Today I announce that under a Labor government, you will be able to buy your first home with just a 5 per cent deposit.

“Our Five Per Cent Deposit Plan will be open to every Australian looking to buy their first home.

“It will be available for homes valued all the way up to the average price in every city and region.

“And you won’t have to pay a single dollar for mortgage insurance; our government will cover it.

“If you’re looking to buy your first home, Labor’s got your back.”

Peter Dutton

Opposition Leader Peter Dutton says he will be a PM who restores the dream of home ownership. Photo: Peter Dutton Facebook.

During the Coalition’s campaign launch, Peter Dutton said he won’t accept a situation in Australia where the only people who can buy a home are those who can rely on the “bank of mum and dad”.

The Opposition Leader said if elected, he would be a prime minister who restores the dream of home ownership.

A Coalition government would ease demand on housing by banning foreign investors and temporary residents from purchasing existing homes for two years.

It would also lower the permanent migration program by 25 per cent for two years and bring down the number of new foreign students commencing in higher education by 30,000 each year.

READ ALSO Labor will have to ‘learn to play well with others’ in minority government, says Greens leader

“We will allow Australians to access up to $50,000 of their super towards a deposit for their first home,” Mr Dutton said.

“Your super is your money – not the government’s.

“We will also work with the prudential regulator to ease rigid and overly-strict lending criteria, and that will result in tens of thousands more Australians being able to get a home loan.

“Today, I announce a new policy for first home buyers who purchase a newly built property to live in.

“A Coalition government will allow you to deduct interest payments on the first $650,000 of a mortgage against your taxable income.

“We will allow these deductions for five years, provided you continue to live in that home for that period.

“This policy will be available to individuals with a taxable income of $175,000 or less – and joint applicants earning a combined income of $250,000 or less.”

Greens leader Adam Bandt has already launched his party’s policy to build more public housing, cap rent increases, and to limit negative gearing and the capital gains tax discounts to one property.

Combined, these policies from across the parties are ensuring housing is very much a federal election main game.

Join the conversation

35
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
HiddenDragon10:07 pm 14 Apr 25

Both major parties have reconfirmed that they want to see the cost of already ridiculously expensive housing continue to rise, in spite of (or more truthfully, because of) the debt-funded bribes offered yesterday – which means that those bribes are, to quote one of the Liberals’ campaign cliches, “Band-Aids on bullet wounds”.

Policies which produced gently falling (i.e. without threatening the stability of the banking system) or at least stable home prices for several years would be positive for equity between generations and socio-economic classes and would also help to re-balance the Australian economy away from its short-sighted, inward-looking focus on the property and related sectors.

A perusal of the register of politicians’ financial interests and reflection on the major sources of funding for political parties suggests that such policies are highly unlikely to be pursued or even considered – so the Australian property Ponzi scheme will lurch on, doing ever more damage, until it meets its inevitable fate. That will not be a happy time for the nation or for our political class.

None of them give two hoots about intergenerational equity, and frankly these policies as you outline are a kick in the butt for future generations coming through.

But as you say – the pollies well and truly have their fingers deep in the pie, their snouts in the trough.

GrumpyGrandpa5:21 pm 14 Apr 25

We go through the same rubbish every election cycle, both locally and Federally. Politicians from both sides committing to spend more of our money, to secure our votes.
Both fools have housing policies that will create demand and push up housing prices, making it even harder for our kids to buy a home.

Its Dumb & Dumber as the housing policies of both parties will only push up house prices.

Stupid selfish short-sighted politicians don’t care that these policies will increase prices of houses. We need more public and social housing, not higher prices housing and more debt for those who’ve purchased it.

Accessing super is a poor policy, resulting in people retiring with less money. Not just the loss of the amount they withdraw now, but the loss of compound interest.. whoever’s in power down the track, are they willing to pay for more full or part pensions? Super is meant for your retirement. So shortsighted.

Users of superannuation under this scheme at some stage have to pay that money back into their Super. So they lose a little in compound interest….big deal! They have a house because of the scheme and under the ALP they have NO house and are permanently a renter. Better the users money (& it is their money) gets them into the housing market at an earlier stage of life and gets their Super working for them. Whereas right now their Super money is controlled by the Unions. That’s the only reason the ALP are against the scheme as well.

That is all rubbish, Rob. If they could put the money back into Super later, why not into a house?

Both parties’ handouts on the demand side are a payout to house owners (not least many MPs) at the expense of hopeful buyers. The Libs one is worse because it further impoverishes the buyers beyond the effect of driving up house prices.

The bit about union control is kook-level.

It is dreadful policy. All it will do is add 50K to prices at the end of day. Another brain dead, demand enhancing, problem worsening policy. Both sides are a disgrace in this space – but fiddling with super is a dreadful idea for the fact it will also significantly impact on the ability of people to be well prepared to fund their retirements.

You can’t eat bricks after all.

Looks like both parties are throwing money around willy nilly at the demand side of housing. But Albo’s problem is his track record.

Miles behind his promised 1.2 million new houses, 40% higher building costs under his watch and refuses to let tradies come to Australia to help with the housing shortage.

It’s hard to believe a word he says.

Bit like your posts then Penfold, which have been shown time and time again to be evidence free zones. Egregious is your middle name.

The intellectual depth and rigour was the highlight of your post JS9.

@Penfold
“It’s hard to believe a word he says.”
… and of course you believe every word Dutton says, because he tells you what you want to hear.

Dutton doesn’t have a track record of lying JS. Albanese does.

$275 energy bills, stage 3 tax cuts, no cuts to superannuation, not falling off a stage, mediscare, uniting Australians, it just doesn’t stop.

@Penfold
“Dutton doesn’t have a track record of lying”
Really? This 2023 article from Crikey (https://www.crikey.com.au/2023/09/25/peter-dutton-believes-his-own-untruths/) has the quite a chronicle of untruths.

He also got caught out in Feb this year by Amnesty International (https://www.amnesty.org.au/duttons-lie-on-fast-tracked-citizenship-for-palestinians-recklessly-irresponsible/)

So, perhaps neither Albo nor Dutts can be trusted to tell the truth?

Crikey and the Guardian …. are there any references from believable news outlets ?

As for Amnesty, the Palestinians were “fast tracked” and barely had any security checks. I wouldn’t believe a word out of them or the UN on Gaza. Both are Anti-semitic.

@Penfold
Yes, as expected, you can’t dispute the content therefore you denigrate the delivery medium.

Perhaps this excerpt (https://www.smh.com.au/politics/federal/dutton-wrongly-says-labor-is-fast-tracking-citizenship-for-gazans-to-win-votes-20250220-p5ldv2.html) from the SMH, generally seen to be a centrist news outlet, calling out Dutton’s “lie” and this fact check (https://www.aap.com.au/factcheck/false-claims-swirl-over-aussie-citizenships-from-gaza/) from AAP, which disproves in general fast tracking of Palestinians to citizenship, will satisfy you.

If these don’t suffice, unfortunately I can’t help you, as I don’t have a Telegram account, which is obviously your preferred source of news.

Well JS the stats are far more illustratory than left leaning media’s take on things. We let in almost 3,000 refugees in the time the USA let in 17 and the UK 68. Many didn’t even have identity documents. If that’s not fast tracking, what is ?

Penfold should once again take advice off this other poster:

Penfold 29th March:
“when you choose to attack the journalist and not the substance of the issue then the white flag has come out.”

Didn’t attack the journalist chewy, attacked the journal.

Btw what’s Telegram ?

@Penfold
What stats? Do you actually read your comments before posting or do you hope to get away, unchallenged, with nonsense.

I have not denied that Palestinians, wanting to escape the horrors of Gaza, were given visas to come to Australia. The issue is that Dutton stated in a Sky News forum, that these Palestinians were fast-tracked to citizenship – I imagine the inference being, so they could vote Labor at the election. A piece of factual misinformation (or to call it what it is: “a lie”) that has been refuted in the many articles to which I, and JS9, have provided links.

So unless you can prove that Dutton didn’t lie in stating that these Palestinians were fast tracked to citizenship – you know some kind of factual evidence to refute the articles, thyen it’s settled that neither Albo or Dutts can be trusted or to follow on from the concept pioneered by one J.W. Howard … core and non-core promises.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.