5 September 2025

Can the ACT Government do anything right? The signs aren't good

| By David Murtagh
Join the conversation
270
cabinet members in 2024

Chris Steel, Rachel Stephen-Smith, Andrew Barr and Yvette Berry when the new cabinet was announced in November 2024. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

If ACT Treasurer Chris Steel is indeed Andrew Barr’s protege and his heir apparent, you have to ask what the Boy Wonder did to deserve the ungodly mess that is the Territory Budget, gifted last year by the Chief Minister.

It’s worse than a shambles. It’s a pooh storm of Biblical proportions. The Eleventh Plague.

And he started with such high hopes.

When Barr announced his new Cabinet on 7 November last year, and that he would be relinquishing the Treasury portfolio as many said he should have done years earlier, it was obvious that Steel was Barr’s chosen replacement. And he was full of vim and vigour. Eager for the challenge.

Mr Steel stressed several times that day the importance of responsible budget management, particularly around Labor’s commitments on infrastructure, housing, cost of living, health and jobs. What we might call the ‘bread and butter of government’.

“We’ve got a significant agenda there and responsible management of the budget is critical to enable that to be delivered,” he said.

It didn’t take long for the wheels to wobble. Now they’re falling off.

READ MORE Debt, expenditure transparency concerns: Committee releases its findings for the 2025-26 ACT Budget

First, it was revealed soon after the election that (let’s be frank) we were lied to about the state of the books, especially when it came to the Health portfolio.

On 30 January 2025, Region reported that “An unanticipated surge in demand at the ACT’s hospitals has forced the government to inject an extra $227.3 million to maintain services”.

Less than a month later, the Greens estimated that the health Budget shortfall was actually $332 million, $105 million more than first reported because “[the government] gambled on getting extra money from the Federal Government, and lost”.

They added: “This is no way to manage a health system.”

They’re not wrong.

But it also exposed that it’s no way to run a government, because we later found out that while the blackhole was “unanticipated”, it was not unknown to Health Minister Rachel Stephen-Smith.

She knew the system was running on fumes before we went to the polls, but she maintained she wasn’t obliged to disclose the information.

This is frankly unbelievable and highlights the contempt with which this government treats the ACT public. But we’re so accustomed to it, few batted an eyelid. (Like HL Mencken observed, “Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard” – which we are.)

But it’s not the only mismanagement uncovered this year.

We have the Budget itself.

Remember Mr Fiscally Responsible?

His first Budget in June this year was record-breaking for all the wrong reasons.

For the first – and certainly not the last time – the ACT budget deficit cracked nine figures. He announced a deficit of $1.1 billion in June.

Of course, there are rosy forecasts for the coming years, but the early signs aren’t good, and if past performance is an indicator of future returns, buckle up, boys and girls, the “$250 health levy” isn’t the only hypothecated slug this government will whack on you for their directorate-specific screw-ups.

In late July, just one month after the Budget, we learned that 77 of the ACT’s 92 public schools were already over budget or were expected to overspend this year.

The Australian Education Union’s ACT branch said $43 million will have to be saved.

They also called for Education Minister Yvette Berry to conduct an independent review into school funding before the next school year to assess how much money schools receive, what they are expected to achieve with it, and whether that money is sufficient to achieve what is expected.

Ms Berry rejected an independent review, saying it would “cost thousands”. (Interesting when you see a government suddenly get concerned about pennies when they pee away pounds.)

For the record, less than a week later, she did indeed announce an independent review.

That review is more urgent than ever as it seems the crisis is escalating.

On 3 September, Berry was compelled to guarantee that there will be no cuts to teachers, support staff, or programs in any public school (including casual and temporary staff) for the remainder of this year and next year.

Beyond that, well, it’s anybody’s guess.

Canberra Liberals Education spokesfolk Jeremy Hanson questioned how the budget had been handled, given that such a review was now required.

“For the minister to claim she needs to have an independent review within a month of the budget being handed down is a cause for deep concern,” he said.

He’s not wrong.

But it gets worse, because it seems the government can’t even handle libraries.

READ MORE Canberra Liberals to lobby, ACT Greens to debate ways to get more money into the government’s coffers

In the same week as the education fiasco, it was reported that a review of Libraries ACT has found an underfunded, understaffed and dysfunctional organisation that cannot meet its operating hours and has two branches that are underused and could be relocated.

It seems the government did its darndest to hide the scathing analysis.

The Independent Working Groups report was handed unannounced to City and Government Services Minister Tara Cheyne on 22 July and posted on the Libraries ACT website under Policies. Maybe if City Services went to libraries more often, they’d have a better concept of filing. Just a thought …

And then we have Calvary Hospital.

On 2 September, the same day the libraries problem was reported, we were finally given a figure for the compensation to Calvary for nicking their hospital: $88.2 million.

But one day later, it emerged that that wasn’t the bill. Not even close.

The total cost so far to the ACT of the takeover of Calvary Public Hospital is $150.6 million.

Maybe.

As Ian Bushnell wrote in Region, there were administrative and legal costs still to be calculated, as well as the possibility of a compensation claim not covered by the Deed of Release.

Maybe some boffin at Treasury or Health knows the final figure, but it seems they aren’t telling the minister. She doesn’t know. Or doesn’t want to know.

Remember, the budget was handed down less than three months ago and already it has holes big enough to drive the tram through … the cost of which we still don’t know. But it’s a good bet the government doesn’t know either. Or want to know. And they certainly don’t want you to know.

What does this mean for the ACT?

Well, the budget’s stuffed, debt is going through the roof, and the supposedly most able in the government – Mr Barr, Mr Steel, Ms Stephen-Smith and Ms Berry – have zero clue what the hell is going on in their bread-and-butter portfolios.

Every one of Barr’s likely replacements has an albatross around their necks. And that’s not even going into the fiasco of Steel’s botched and abandoned universal payroll and human resources system for the ACT Public Service that cost taxpayers more than $77 million.

On that occasion, Chris Steel vowed to do better.

He hasn’t. But he has company.

He might still be Barr’s replacement should that day ever come, but the way things are going, Labor would do well to run lame and let the Canberra Liberals deal with the mess in 2028.

Oh, God. The Canberra Liberals …

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

270
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

4 years of libs. Would be a good investment to clean out labor ranks and expose all the nasties under the bed. Imagine all the stuff we don’t know about yet.

Rafael Calcetines12:52 pm 14 Sep 25

The common catch phrase when people complain about the ACT Government is: “Well everyone keeps voting Labor back in.”
The fact is that although labor received the most votes at the last election, it was still only 34% of the votes. So that’s 66% of the voting community who didn’t vote Labor back in.

Rafael, 66% is still less than who don’t want the dysfunctional Liberals back in. Until we get a proper opposition (ie without the grey men in grey suits lurking in the background and refusing to listen to the electorate) then nothing is going to change. Most of us are frustrated with the same old, same old from Labor, but it is a better option than what the Libs have offered for the last couple of decades. What we have is a lazy opposition who have been assuming they don’t have to do any real work or put up any real alternatives because they will just eventually slink back into power.

You think labor listens to the electorate?

Without claiming the improvements in certain private sector areas like malls, pubs or live music festivals (eg innovation by those who take risks without government intervention), does anyone really believe we are better off? Barr and his team are great at turning up at venues to claim credit for bright, shiny things, yet we should look at what they are actually responsible for.

If all these tax increases over this time had led to an ACT Budget in the black, one might argue the tax was worth it (although it would not be a unanimous view). But to have the largest deficit in our history, and a fair chunk of our rates paying off a huge interest bill (which now costs more, because our credit rating has fallen twice), shows that the current prioritisation and corrupted decision-making is not the right path.

Barr lies. He even falsely claims to have delivered a surplus! Enough said.

Our rates / taxes are sky high, our electricity prices are sky high, government charges are bounding upwards. And for what? Reduced services and a tram to Woden replacing perfectly good buses which will take longer than those buses!

The Canberra Liberals are still chock full of climate change deniers, religious ideologues and culture warriors…their policy platform at the last election was essentially TBA…it’s about time they got their act together or got out of the way, in the meantime I’ll keep voting for moderate, sensible independents.

Incidental Tourist8:57 am 06 Sep 25

Barr’s “progressive” tax reform from 2012 was characterised by a relentless increase of taxes, fees, and charges. Despite this, disproportional tax burden is still unable to plug the black hole of waste. Furthermore, the red tape across every aspect of life – from bans on outdoor cats to restrictions on gas in homes – seems more like it belongs in psychiatry than common sense.

no they can’t.

HiddenDragon8:57 pm 05 Sep 25

The current model of ACT self government is a failing, fiscally unsustainable, experiment – that much has been apparent for quite some time to anyone not blinded by ideology and/or self-interest.

Part of the problem is to do with the sorts of individuals who are drawn to and who prosper in ACT politics and the upper levels of the ACT public sector, but the problems go well beyond that and are ultimately systemic and structural – similar issues can be seen in other sub-national jurisdictions, particularly the smaller ones, but seem most acute here.

The sad fiasco will roll on for some time yet, but ultimately will have to come to an end when, one way or another, the money runs out and the federal government of the day can no longer look the other way and keep pretending that the seat of national government is at least tolerably, if not well, managed.

A long overdue review of Australia’s wastefully dysfunctional federation would be the most logical vehicle for dealing with many of the issues which need fixing. Revised arrangements which emerged from such a review would almost certainly suffer from being run by much the same sorts of people as at present, but desirably on a shorter leash.

I am not sure the federation is dysfunctional – I think the evidence points to a very functional federation. The states are aligned in most matters, to the extent that Australia is easily viewed as one country, rather than a federation of states.
Having said that, the discussion on whether Australia should remain a federal system (6 states and two main territories) or whether Australia should become a single country (1 state with many local counties) would be an interesting one. Probably a discussion without a clear winner for many years to come!

ACT Local Government was a failure from the start. The referendums for self government failed both times. We the people said we didn’t want it. Yet the Federal Overlords said “tough, you are having it anyway”. The “Ken Berians” didn’t take Local Government seriously, the parliamentarians just see it as an opening to he federal job. Local functions take a demotion to the more sexy state functions, and we wonder why we are over governed and over legislated, but systems are failing from the budgets down.

“The current model of ACT self government is a failing, fiscally unsustainable, experiment”…the masquerade of concerned citizen doesn’t cover this completely partisan drivel. What’s failing is the Liberal Party’s ability to form a credible and representative opposition and so their boosters want to throw the whole system out. Can’t win change the game.

And only three years to go but I believe Barr will be gone before that.

Barry McKenzie4:07 pm 05 Sep 25

The Greens were absolutely correct to abandon this fiasco after unwisely hitching their wagons to Labor in the last term.

And …. ‘show me your budget and I’ll tell you your values’. Libraries need to close and schools need to cut back, but remarkably there is tens of millions available to hand over to the spivs in the racing industry to keep that odious business afloat!!

How does the Treasurer and his team justify that? And who has been sacked for the MyWay+ rollout, including the cynical ‘fare free’ period during the election campaign?

And another credit rating downgrade from S&P just in today to add to their mediocre fiscal management record.

I am pleased to see David Murtagh back, raging as he does at the Labor government for their socialist policies. Spending money in building a more just and equitable society; reducing inequality, developing our health system, advancing education and all of those other little goodies we lefties love so much. These policies are even more important now as our federal and state governments continue to rebuild their social and economic bases after 10 years of neglect from a penny pinching and corrupt LNP government. Mr Murtagh is on the Liberal conservative side of politics whereby reducing spending, cutting public services and giving tax breaks is a priority. He has many grievances and should run as a candidate for the Canberra Liberals, ACT voters couldn’t do worse!

In his long rant Mr Murtagh’s final paragraphs says it all “let the Canberra Liberals deal with the mess in 2028”. It was only this week in assembly sittings we learnt that the party’s leader, Leanne Castley who also doubles as the party’s treasury spokesperson has a poor grasp of maths and made an utter and complete fool of herself in her opposition to the Calvary acquisition while Jeremy Hanson, the party’s invisible deputy leader and education spokesperson, after asking a few questions of the education minister at Tuesday’s sittings then went on leave for the rest of the week!
Yes indeed David, “Oh, God. The Canberra Liberals …”

Labor have no answers on how to fix the badly broken budget, so Jack points and shouts “look at the Liberals”.

Gregg Heldon2:42 pm 05 Sep 25

So Jack, you’re 100% satisfied with the way that Andrew Barr has led this Government and with the performance of all ministers, past and present?
It’s a simple yes or no answer Jack. I bet I don’t get one though.

Explain how the budget is broken nobody? The latest July Commsec State-of the State report tells me that the ACT is performing quite soundly against the larger states. The stats do bounce around and there is room for improvement but our city leads the way in wage growth, and in the March quarter was on top with economic activity at 7.8 per cent above its long-term average level of output. Our city is in the top four for population growth and equipment investment. These stats don’t fall out of the sky and those we fall back on are expected to improve.

And why shouldn’t I challenge the Canberra Liberals’ credentials and their lack of political clout after nearly 30 years in opposition? The party’s leader Leanne Castley has been doing the media rounds this week and was on ABC radio yesterday with another excruciating interview after her party’s disappointing showing in assembly sittings this week. Rabbiting on about Labor but silent on what she has to offer in the unlikely event her party wins government.

What a joke!

unfortunately they do have an answer and that is to take an ever larger of your households disposable income.

Thanks for that Matt! The ACT tax reforms are fairer and provide a less complex system of taxation. Our government has been praised by federal and state Liberal government’s for these reforms. They remove unnecessary taxes, reduce stamp duty costs and make it easier for younger first home buyers to enter the housing market, so I won’t get into an argument with you there!

nobody has no idea how to construct an argument of his own so he falls back on media reporting of the committee report into the budget. An inquiry which is a standard legislative requirement and a committee whose chair and deputy chair are from opposing Labor parties. A committee report which the government has not responded to and is currently being debated in the assembly!

Labor is dazed and confused, so Jack is just taking a swing at anyone.

Dazed and confused? I doubt it!

Jack D. Whilst you may not like David Murtagh’s rant, was there anything that he said that wasn’t correct?

However, it’s not just Mr Murtagh who thinks the ACT Government is in a financial mess. Credit Rating S&P agree, and their decision comes with higher interest rates on ACT debts.

Jack they’ve completely botched tax reform. Stamp duty on residential property transactions for example is multiples of what it was pre reform in dollar terms using average or median prices – that is duplicity from ACT labour when your rates have tripled or much worse and are ratcheting up relentlessly every year at a faster pace than wage growth. The impost and distortionary effect of residential stamp duty has never been higher. There was a time when i would have supported this reform, but Barr and co have not kept their end of the bargain…. they have double dipped on the tax take (using bracket creep primary) and because they have shown no discipline or capacity to restrain expenditure, rates will now have to rise by so much more than anyone expects. It is no surprise to me that Barr has presided over yet another credit rating downgrade to the ACT just yesterday. Forever Government’s can get away with lazy…on their record they don’t deserve to be in power.

Tax reforms have not been completely botched nor have rates tripled as you claim. We have a reformed revenue collection process which has been in progress for over a decade. You are simply rehashing the same tired old lies that the Canberra Liberals have been pushing (unsuccessfully) for the past four elections. Thankfully Canberrans are more switched on than the party gives them credit for with voters repeatedly rejecting their deceits. The ACT’s tax reforms raise revenue to fund quality public services which Canberrans demand. The reforms abolish inefficient and volatile taxes including stamp duty and insurance making it easier for younger and low-income families to enter the housing market.

The ABS’s latest national revenue statistics (released April 2025) show that every year since these reforms commenced Canberrans have paid less in local taxes per capita than most other Australians. Only twice during this period, in 2019/20 and 2022/23 have ACT residents paid more than NSW.

Despite your put downs, the ACT remains one of the most attractive places to live and do business. We have one of the fastest growing populations in the country and lead the way in wage growth and economic activity. Yes our city has seen a downgrade by S&P due to increased health and infrastructure costs as well as COVID. Victoria has also seen a downgrade and NSW, QLD, TAS and NT are expected to follow. This will give the opposition even more ammunition to undermine and delay government business by obstructing any plans to restore the budget and support our growing community!

No Colin Wood I am more than happy to see Mr Murtagh’s return. I just disagree with his opinions and suggested he join the Canberra Liberals where he would fit in and find an outlet for all his fury. Goodness knows they need all the help they can get!

Hoot! Hoot!

Nice spin Jack. Anyway my quarterly bill from Barr is what i used to pay annually pre reform. If i wanted to move house somewhere else in the ACT, courtesy of Barrs broken bargain on tax reform, there is a crippling bill to pay. What he has given back in stamp duty relief, he has taken it all back and much much more by stealth through conveyance bracket creep. That is duplicitous. Don’t get too dizzy there Jack spinning for Australia’s most fiscally lazy government.

It is you doing the spinning Matt!

Gregg Heldon11:17 am 08 Sep 25

Jack, how is it easier for first home buyers to enter the housing market, when the average property price in the ACT is now at the million dollar mark? And if they want to do a house and land package, blocks of land are starting at the $600k mark. And then all the red tape and building the house? And all the regulations too. It’s not sustainable and not right. Plus, land supply is strangled, so young families HAVE to look at flats or townhouses or inefficient older homes. Social engineering at it’s worse. Because, on top of all that, in the suburbs, sporting ovals are not being built. Green corridors are not being built/created.
Why?
Probably because we are so broke that we need all the rates/stamp duty/sales we can get for the Grubbyment coffers. Can’t afford a sporting oval. Maybe a small playground for the pre schoolers.
Where does all of our money go? I consider my rates notice a work of fiction. Where does it go?
Just a thought too, I bet that Trade Union club development goes through without a quibble. Because, you know, that special relationship that the CMFEU and ACT Labor have.

Jack, conveyance duty on the median house sale pre reform was circa 15K. It is now circa 35K. To phase out this distortionary tax, our rates will need to rise by so much more than was envisaged when tax reform was fist sold to us by ACT Labour. Where’s the neutrality in the reform because that is how it was sold to the electorate all those years ago. I’ve just had a gutfull of being Barrs cash cow.

I am not sure whether Gregg Heldon has read my comments above, is ignoring them or does not comprehend. I suspect I know but I will explain again for his benefit. We have a reformed revenue collection process which has been in progress in this city for over a decade. The reforms are revenue neutral and abolish inefficient and volatile taxes including stamp duty and insurance charges, taxes which have previously prevented younger and low-income families from entering the housing market. The reforms also help those experiencing change of life circumstances wanting to upsize or downsize their properties.

During the reform process the ACT has seen significant growth in population (+21%), GDP (+48%) and housing (+45%) which has boosted taxation revenue. The reforms are independently monitored and have been lauded by both political parties. Independent analysis (there have been a few) back these changes as a fairer and simpler way to collect tax. Buyers will continue to buy properties either close to the city or out in the suburbs to suit their budgets and circumstances.

The blatant distorting of facts put forward by respondents like matt, mattwatts and Gregg Heldon are the same tired old arguments we have heard from the Canberra Liberals and their regularly changing leadership during the past four elections and throughout the 13-year reform process. Canberrans have rejected these lies and will continue to do so into the future!

The Canberra Liberals refuse to explain whether they will reverse these reforms and need to explain to ACT voters how they will generate revenue to fund our most essential services including health, education, housing, transport, infrastructure and emergency services?

Gregg Heldon8:38 am 09 Sep 25

You mean ignoring you like you ignored my original comment Jack? You didn’t respond because, like most politicians, you refuse to answer in simple yes or no answers. You hope your waffle will either confuse or bore people. It does neither to me, it amuses me.
Also Jack, how is pointing out that property prices are now a million dollar average, a distortion of facts. It’s not. It was in the media last week. Even the left leaning ones so people like you can read it. It’s a sad turn of events, don’t you think? Young families with a couple of kids, wanting a house, not a flat or townhouse, and the can’t afford one. I would be gutted. I also note on Allhomes, that some townhouses in various suburbs here are fetching above $2million. Including in new suburbs. Just ridiculous.
These are genuine criticisms Jack. The Government of the day shouldn’t be above criticism, either by opponents or it’s supporters. And yet, here you are. You can’t even answer a simple yes or no question. Are you 100% satisfied with this Governments performance and of its ministers, past and present? Of here’s a different question, if you could replace any current ACT Labor minister, who would it be?

Jack, explain the revenue neutrality in having more than doubled the stamp duty impost on home buyers (on the median house purchase) since tax reform started while simultaneously and massively increasing everyone’s rates bill?

Well Matt I have explained it. You can continue to spin all you like and push the same tired lies that the Canberra Liberals have been spouting since the ACT’s taxation reforms began. A party that wants to reduce taxation by trashing essential services and sacking public servants because that is what the Liberal party stands for.

As to me, I will continue to rely on dependable and accurate information from reliable sources!

Oh for goodness sake, Gregg Heldon out of sorts and in another rant because he is being ignored! Well Gregg, I chose not to respond to your comment and couldn’t be bothered reading through it because it didn’t make sense!

The only suburbs with house prices at a million-dollar average are those in inner established and sought after suburbs. The further out you move the more affordable house prices become. That is the way it is not only in Canberra but throughout Australia and doesn’t take a rocket scientist to work out!

I have done a simple search of Allhomes to see 2 and 3 bedroom houses for sale in Gungahlin, particularly Palmerston, Ngunnawal, Casey and Franklin. There are a number of suitably priced properties valued between $500,000 and $700,000 for those entering the housing market for current income levels in the ACt. There are also a number of others in Tuggeranong.

I am sure though that Gregg will find something more to complain about, whining on as he usually does!

Jack – show me the lie in the statement that “ACT Labour have more than doubled the stamp duty bill on the median house price since tax reform started” If that statement isn’t accurate refer me to your so called reliable sources!

Gregg Heldon12:26 pm 10 Sep 25

I noticed that you said properties and not houses Jack. I mentioned houses. So, I guess you don’t really read or understand the simplistic things that I did write. Maybe I could type it in crayon for you next time?
How would you know if it made sense, unless you did read it through?
I didn’t realise that Whitlam was now considered an inner suburb, Jack. Or half the suburbs in Woden. They are in towards Civic compared to some but they’re not inner suburbs, are they?
If you think that $700k is actually an affordable price for a 2 bed townhouse in an outer suburb, then you are really out of touch with the realities of what working class and young families and couples, and older battlers face in life.
I’m not whining or whinging. This is reality for many people that Governments are failing to address and you don’t seem to give a crap. Shameful really.

“As to me, I will continue to rely on dependable and accurate information from reliable sources”

But if you did that Jack, you’d have to change your position on most of your unhinged and partisan rants here.

ALP press releases arent “reliable sources”.

It’s too funny when even irrefutable evidence of the failings of the current government are presented, Hack still tries to make it about the opposition.

Next up for Jack, telling us why the credit downgrade and a billion dollar deficit are actually good things.

This bloke Matt is someone who just doesn’t comprehend or he just chooses not to. Or, like his Liberal mates he just likes to treat voters as mugs. But we know the Canberra Liberals are the most unsuccessful division of the party in Australia spinning lies and in opposition for nearly three decades!

But I think you should come clean Matt, what you are arguing for is to keep taxes at pre-reform levels. And why shouldn’t taxes increase to fund our essential services in-line with economic growth? During the ACT’s 13-year taxation reform program, government revenue has increased as one would expect. These increases are in-line with population growth (+21%), wage increases (+36%), GDP (+48%), housing builds (+45%) and property values (+48%). I am sure there are a few others in there but it is too late in the night to look. The Canberra Liberals pretend that they are the party of lower taxes but what they need to explain is whether these reforms will be reversed should the party win government, what public service jobs will be cut and how the party will generate revenue to fund our most essential services including health, education, housing, transport, infrastructure and emergency services to name a few?

The ABS’s latest national revenue statistics (released April 2025) show that every year since these reforms commenced Canberrans have paid less in local taxes per capita than most other Australians. Only twice during the reform period, in 2019/20 and 2022/23 have ACT residents paid more than NSW.

This information is freely available online on the ABS, AIHW, ACT Revenue and Commsec websites.

What does one say and where does one start with poor old sorry sack Gregg? Whingeing and whining and never moving on, at pains in his attempts to raise an argument over the words “house” and “property” to score a point.

Well Gregg I don’t think I am out of touch with the economic realities of what working class families, young families or older battlers are experiencing today. I have even assisted and volunteered my time to help some of those in need. I bought my first house at a time of similar economic circumstances as those experienced today. Mine was a 2-beddie out in the burbs. Like most people I know, I saved to get the deposit together and set myself up and didn’t rely on government handouts or the bank of mum and dad, nor did I expect to. I We sold and upgraded as our family expanded (there was also a few homeless chooks, a cat and a dog) and we downsized when our children moved out. That is what one does when starting out!

Unhinged? That’s quite an accusation coming from the likes of chewy “don’t mention the tram” 14!

chewy14 is a regular and long-term contributor to this site and rabid opponent of the LR project and any other developments in Canberra. chewy changes his position on issues regularly and displays a disturbing rage towards those he disagrees with, snickering at their opinions and twisting their words to align with his worldviews. chewy believes that anyone supporting LR must support any development in Canberra and those who don’t agree with him, including me he demeans and accuses of double standards.

chewy’s fickleness is there for all to see. Raging against the government for its planning and development proposals while uncritically and vehemently supporting our city’s clubs (and churches) as they sell and develop their expansive landholdings. Lands gifted to them decades ago by conservative Liberal governments. Selling at exorbitant profits these clubs (one established by the church) sit on some of our city’s most lucrative estates and rely on gambling revenues, taxpayer’s dollars and tax breaks to survive.

The word hypocrite comes to mind!

Gregg Heldon8:54 am 11 Sep 25

When you first bought a house, when I first bought a house to now, when other people are buying their first houses, are two very different times. All you demonstrated in your analogy there, was a complete lack of empathy Jack. People nowadays do have to rely on Governments schemes (handout is condescending and, again, shows a lack of empathy), and the bank of Mum and Dad. Different times, even a generation ago.
Glad you think that I scored a point. Thank you for conceding that.
I am a sad sack Jack. I’ve had Major Depressive Disorder for around a dozen years. Along with PTSD. Got them whilst working in Child Protection, Victim ID. And, whilst I have volunteered my time (just like yourself) with various organisations over the last 40 years, I’ve also saved children’s lives. Both in a real way, as well as from a life of misery.
I grew up in a single parent govvie house without much money and left school at the end of year 10 to help support my Mum. Having the two human basics of food in the stomach and a roof over one’s head are things I hold dear to my heart. Whilst they’re not alone in this, the ACT Government is failing it’s most vulnerable citizens and it’s young families with one of these basic human rights. Housing. Less and less govvie housing and less affordable housing. And you can bleat on about tax reform all you like Jack, but housing is less affordable now in real and basic terms than what it was 5, 10, 20 years ago.
Your little story of you buying a house so your okay and so should others, makes you out of touch, lacking empathy and very Josephine (let them eat cake) and hypocritical. Labor is supposed to look after the young and vulnerable.
The above isn’t a whing. It’s a fact, Jack. And a rant. But a rant is different to a whinge.

“During the ACT’s 13-year taxation reform program, government revenue has increased as one would expect.”

Another blatant lie from Hack D as he rants about the Liberals to avoid having to discuss the obvious failures of the current government.

I support the tax reform move to land tax, but the increase in revenue the government has received is far above what anyone would expect, well above inflation, population growth, wages etc.

Because they’ve been massively increasing revenue through taxation to fuel their unsustainable spending. And yet, still deliver a billion dollar deficit and 2 recent credit rating downgrades.

Only Hack D could then go off defending the indefensible and making up arguments that no one has ever said, truly no idea what his latest unhinged rant is about because it has nothing to do with my position.

No wonder Jack supports the unsustainable and unaffordable light rail project, he doesnt remotely understand good economic management.

His hypocrisy knows no bounds.

Just to put actual numbers to point out the reality to Jack because he’s allergic to facts and evidence, the total ACT government revenue since 2014 has gone from:

2014: $4.2B
2025 budget: $8.93B.

Over double the total revenue, with own source taxation nearly 2.5 times the amount.

The forward estimates in the budget have projected an additional 15% revenue and over 20% own source taxation in a few years.

In that time the population has grown 25%.

Combined inflation over the period about 32%.

Jack’s hypocrisy once again laughable so partisan and devoid of logic are his comments.

what a vaccuos response Jack. I have no affiliation or association with Canberra liberals..zero..and they are irrelevant to this discussion and you are the only one talking about them.

Let me make this really simple, this is a genuine question – through the period of tax reform why has ACT Labour increased the burden of what we all agree is a very bad tax, namely stamp duty (more than doubling it on the median house sale) when the tax switch was sold to us as being neutral? I call this hypocrisy and given how ineffective the opposition is, someone has to call ACT Labour out and hold them to account for the gulf between what was promised and what has been delivered. This isn’t spin or point scoring, i am a pissed off rate payer fatigued and poorer for ACT Labours management of the Budget. So give me a genuine answer rather than the political spin and talking points you keep on delivering.

As expected Hack goes missing once his talking points fall flat.

Ha! Ha! going missing and falling flat, I doubt it! I couldn’t be bothered wasting my time!

In his regular rants to this site, chewy displays an unhinged and rabid opposition to those he disagrees with and an hypocrisy that is there for all to see!

Don’t get me started on Sorry Sack Gregg!

And as for Matt’s comments, who would bother! Matt regularly espouses the very same spiels under his different guises and he can’t even spell “Labor” correctly!

Labour has been Labor for 118 years!

Hack once again completely ignores the actual budget and economic figures which destroy his claims.

His partisan and unhinged rants have no basis in reality, no wonder he cant respond with any substantive points except whataboutism about the Liberals.

L

What a contemptible response Jack. You say “Matt regularly espouses the same spiels under different guises….” I have one profile only, i am not a political hack and have nothing to do with any political party…and ive almost never commented on this site…wrong read yet again champ. So try something different and answer a legitimate and very simple question , why has ‘LABOR’ increased the burden of stamp duty (again i reference the median house sale) on home buyers when the tax switch was supposed to be neutral. Just a suggestion honesty over spin leads to respect, even if we ultimately disagree, give it a go.

No Matt you are wrong again, Labor has not “increased the burden of stamp duty” on homebuyers! You can twist words all you like but stamp duty has not increased. Just to explain again, overall per capita stamp duty has continued to fall since reforms commenced in 2012 in favour of land taxes, despite specific concessions expanding. House prices have continued to increase throughout this period as one would expect which has impacted total revenue collected, meaning that the total amount of stamp duty collected per capita remains significant.

Yes, the government can be criticised for the length of time this reform process has taken to complete but not for the reforms themselves. You can continue to push the same tired Liberal lies that they have been peddling throughout this 13-year reform process but are quiet on what alternatives the party offers Canberrans for a fairer taxation system!

Gregg Heldon12:04 pm 15 Sep 25

Jack, I may be a sad sack (which I’m okay with), but at least I know how to answer questions, I don’t deflect and I’m not a hypocrite.
I may have mental health issues, but I’d rather be me, than you.

Jack was literally provided with the budget revenue and taxation figures above but continues to studiously ignore the overall taxation position because it makes his arguments look completely foolish.

His latest effort is that “per capita” stamp duties have slightly dropped as if thats evidence of something.

Stamp duty has dropped a few percentage points per capita since the reform began but is still up 20% overall since the reform to remove them began.

However, once again, since the tax reforms began:

Population up 25%
Inflation up 35%

Government revenue more than doubled.

Own source taxation nearly 2.5 times higher.

Plus a billion dollar deficit and 2 recent credit rating downgrades.

The government estimates for coming years also contain heroic revenue assumptions that can only be achieved through massive further increases in taxation.

The facts are all you need to point out the government’s complete failure of economic management but we all know Jack is unable to deal in facts, so ridiculous is his partisan hypocrisy.

The whataboutism about the Liberals doesnt cut it Hack.

Well what would one expect, chewy displaying his total hypocrisy yet again. After years spent defending the government’s tax reforms in these very columns he is now vehemently opposed!

Good one chewy “flip flop”!!

As expected, Hack D is unable to read and comprehend basic facts and arguments as he tries to continually spin his partisan talking points.

No one is buying it Hack, your credibility holds no weight with your constant hypocrisy.

The move towards broad based land taxes is economically more efficient than relying on stamp duties and other inefficient taxes.

As I have consistently argued always and never opposed once despite your blatant lies.

Using those reforms as an excuse for massively increasing the overall taxation burden is however not justified, particularly when the money is increasingly being wasted or used for ideologically based projects that do not provide a positive economic return or create justifiably positive social outcomes.

The budgets over the last decade speak for themselves as to the poor economic management of the government and their unwillingness to make the hard decisions around spending priorities.

The worth of the taxation reforms are completely separate from the overall spending and revenue decisions of the government, despite Hack’s attempts to spin them as one and the same.

Once again, unlike Jack’s partisan hypocrisy, my positions are consisent.

chewy has a bit of a fickle history in these columns chopping and changing his position as he displays his partisan hypocrisy. Regularly raging against the government for its planning and development proposals accusing them of stealing public land while uncritically supporting our city’s clubs (and churches) as they sell off and develop their expansive landholdings. Public lands stolen and gifted to them by previous conservative governments. Now he has done a backflip rivaling Nadia Comăneci!

One would think chewy would keep his head down now that he has been caught out yet again flip flopping around on another issue!

No Jack you are wrong. If the Government has more than doubled the stamp duty it sucks in on just the median house sale since tax reform started, do you seriously contend that the burden of that tax as paid by the ACT family having to borrow an extra 20k has not increased?

CMon Jack, just try and be honest and see it from the perspective of someone buying a property. Has the stamp that they will have to cough up, on just a median priced sale, more than doubled since tax reform started? Yes/No ? If no, tell me how much you think it had changed.

And again you talk about the CBR Liberals who are irrelevant to this discussion. Every time you do that you lose the argument. This is your accountability. If you (i am assuming you are a party staffer or member to write so much utter nonsense and spin) had stuck to the neutrality principle than id say fair play, good reform. You haven’t.

Once again Hack D cant deal with debates when facts are presented and his to spin mystery strawmen as the argument is lost for him.

He cant provide one single quote or reference to back up his blatant lies, so captured it he by partisan hypocrisy.

He thinks juvenile attempts to smear those he disagrees with with cover for the paucity of his argument, when they are as obvious and baseless as the rest of his talking points.

Next he’ll probably go back to his “what about the Liberals” ranting, so thoroughly has his hypocritical arguments failed.

One would think Jack would keep his head down after being thoroughly embarrassed with the actual budget figures showing his claims to be arrant, hypocritical nonsense.

Liberals irrelevant Matt? Maybe you should just stop parroting the same tired Liberal lies!

“Next he’ll probably go back to his “what about the Liberals” ranting, so thoroughly has his hypocritical arguments failed.”

As expected, Hackbot has limited settings.

Reverts to default so easily when asked to provide supporting evidence.

It’s chewy14 again splaying around, flip flopping and changing his position on issues displaying the same bombastic contempt he always does towards those he disagrees with. Snickering and misrepresenting their words to make a point and claim a bit of one-upmanship.

I wonder what kind of life exists beyond the confines of RiotAct for people like chewy!

Hackbot is back,
But once again only with snide remarks and an inability to provide any supporting evidence to back up his rabid, partisan rants.

Once again his baseless ad hominems dont substitute for an argument but he thinks they can mask the paucity of his position and hypocrisy.

*hint* they dont.

One doesnt need to guess what exists outside of this website for those like Hack. The Legislative Assembly, rehearsing ALP talking points and party business obviously take up a lot of time.

Jack – I’ve asked you a simple question multiple times. Has stamp duty more than doubled on the median priced house sale since tax reform started? Yes/No. If no, tell me how much you think it has changed.

I explained it to you in a short but detailed response above Matt. I set it out in simple form and what I thought, easy to understand.

I don’t know whether you are trying to make me look foolish by repeating it again or you just have a comprehension problem.

Keep skewing and peddling the same lies Matt!

Jack my research shows stamp duty on the median priced house sale in the ACT was circa 15k pre tax reform and has grown to circa 35k now. Are those numbers wrong? If they are wrong ill put my hand up and own it. You have at no stage addressed the question I’ve put to you multiple times now. You make yourself look foolish by continually ducking the simple question.

Matt,
you’re just experiencing the standard Jack D comments.

He’s never interested in facts, numbers or evidence, he solely relies on his ALP talking points which are almost always lacking.

Chewy14, Jack represents everything i despise in the ruling political class in the ACT. Unaccountable and just never ending spin. Jack prefers to play the man not the ball resorting to slandering for having the temerity of asking a simple question where the answer (which of course he has no intention of providing) won’t fit neatly with the carefully crafted narrative on tax reform.

So ACT labor has dramatically increased the tax take (more than doubled by my cals) on a median priced house sale since tax reform started. Jack has presented absolutely nothing to contradict this. There is nothing neutral about the tax switch that we are a decade plus into.

I can’t help it if you can’t comprehend my simple answer to your question Matt!

Well Matt you can continue to despise the ruling political class all you like but you sound to me like one of those frightful young Liberals that accost electors at shopping centres at each election, misrepresenting and spinning the same tired lies from the party we have come to expect. Generating fake news and driving around with their mobile billboards from a joke of a party that has been in opposition in the ACT for nearly three decades.

But I will make it easier for you!

A simple search on the ACT Revenue website reveals that stamp duty on a home in 2012 worth $500,000 has fallen from $18,050 to $11,400 in 2025.
https://www.revenue.act.gov.au/home-buyer-assistance/home-buyer-concession-scheme

There are also those first home ownership schemes that this nasty Labor government has been offering first homebuyers throughout this reform process which has made it easier for young people wanting to enter the housing market and those wanting to downsize.

As I stated above but you fail to grasp, “house prices have continued to increase throughout this period as one would expect which has impacted total revenue collected, meaning the total amount of stamp duty collected per capita remains significant”.

There are plenty of reports out there including this from the Grattan Institute supporting these reforms:
https://grattan.edu.au/news/following-the-act-land-tax-approach-boosts-growth-and-state-budgets/#:~:text=In%202012%20the%20ACT%20government,%243000%20just%20four%20years%20later.

You can continue peddling the same tired Liberal lies Matt and I am sure you will but maybe you can answer the question I have been asking but you refuse to answer.

What alternative taxation system do you recommend that is able to generate revenue to fund our most essential services including health, education, housing, transport, infrastructure and emergency services while making it easier for young homebuyers and provides an avenue for them to buy their first homes? Or do you recommend reversing these reforms?

Jack, the tax switch is good policy, as I’ve stated previously. Stamp duty is a terrible tax that adds tens of thousands to mortgages and is a huge barrier for to moving house. The problem is that contrary to the principle of neutrality, you have made that barrier and distortion in the market ever bigger throughout the reform process. What you have given back in stamp duty relief, you have taken back (and much more) by skewing the thresholds in the Government’s favour to boost the revenue take. Its the stamp duty equivalent of bracket creep and it is plain wrong and hypocrisy to say that your reforms have provided any relief in this space. That 500K house in 2012 is selling for north of a million now, and you’ll clip your ticket for about twice what you did in 2012. No lies there Jack, thats just facts and a deliberate choice of your government.

There is, as you well know, no unscrambling the fiscal omelette, every dollar in extra revenue you’ve raised is spent and locked in. A full transparent line by line commission of audit across all expenditure lines would be a great place to start and is something you would do if you were serious about expenditure restraint and fiscal sustainability.

I have no affiliation or anything to do with the CBR Liberals as ive stated before. Never driven around with a billboard either and at 50 not sure i qualify as young anymore either – but keep playing the man not the ball, thats your style. Decades of weak opposition has been incredibly detrimental to the ACT, so i guess i should be blaming them in a way but excuse me for wanting greater integrity and accountability for your decision making. We deserve better.

“As I stated above but you fail to grasp, “house prices have continued to increase throughout this period as one would expect which has impacted total revenue collected, meaning the total amount of stamp duty collected per capita remains significant”.”

This is a meaningless point Jack, as I’ve shown you above the overall revenue received by government has significantly expanded well beyond inflation or population growth since the reform began. The numbers arent up for debate despite your attempts to spin them because of your partisan leanings.

The stability of revenue provided by land taxes being one of its main selling points which is why the reform should have happened faster.

Whereas what we’ve seen is the government wanting to have its cake and eat it too, by absorbing the boom revenues created by high house price growth into every day spending decisions as if they were normal. House price growth through this period has not remotely been what “one would expect” and neither is revenue and spending growth.

If they had used that additional revenue to fund economically sound long term infrastructure or other investments, you could perhaps justify the additional taxation on those grounds.

But as the budget figures and the most recent credit downgrades show, that isn’t what has happened, many of their current proposals have no solid economic basis for public investment at all and won’t provide a return.

You may be OK with that because of your political leanings but those of us who can view things objectively see it as the poor economic management it is.

“But, but, but the Liberals” has absolutely zero to do with it.

Well Matt these reforms are complex and involve shifting our tax base which will remove inefficient taxes to eventually phase out stamp duty. Of course there have been criticisms over this long reform process and many of them are justified, there always will be for such a bold endeavour. However, your previous comments that tax reform has been botched and that the burden of stamp duty to more than double on a median house sale, with rates tripling from 15K to now 35K are misrepresentative of the reforms and untrue.

Maybe you should be directing your anger at the government for a process that is taking too long to implement and ask the more relevant question on whether stamp duty will ever be abolished!

Ha! ha! chewy claiming he views things objectively?

After years spent in these pages supporting the ACT’s tax reforms, chewy has changed his position and is continuing to flip flop around!

Once again Jack can’t respond to the points raised and the actual budget figures, so goes straight to weak and false ad hominems.

He thinks misdirection and personal attacks will cover for the constant lies and hypocrisy he promotes.

I repeat (again) the challenge to provide a shred of evidence that I’ve changed my position on any issue. Direct quotes please.

But we both know that you won’t be doing that because as usual you’re just making things up.

Is it any wonder that the general populace despise partisan and hypocritical Hacks?

Jack, I did not say rates have have tripled “from 15k to now 35k”. My own rates have however more than tripled from around 1500 in 2011-12 to 5600 this fiscal year, that is from a combination of tax reform and the silent hit from threshold bracket creep and of course all the other extra charges that have crept in over time. When i say reform has been botched it is precisely because stamp duty remains, after 12 years of reform, such a significant revenue line. What that means is that rates are going to have to do much more heavy lifting then was ever intended to eliminate the bad tax. There is nothing political or controversial in that statement….just a reality. Finally my statement that the burden of stamp duty has more than doubled on the median house sale is reality…the buyer will have to cough up circa 35k today on the same median house that required less than half of this pre reform. You can’t seriously claim that isn’t true.

The average Canberran proves they are of either below average intelligence, or above average tolerance of incompetence, every time they vote back in a proven incompetent ACT Labor government.
Everthing in this, and many other reports, over many years, of financial maladministration is correct. The real problem is the deliberate failure and unwillingness of Canberrans to vote out this government. Who is of greater fault, an incompetent government, or a docile incompetent electorate?

Or they are in on it.

davidmaywald9:39 am 05 Sep 25

Follow the money. This isn’t just a story of incompetence, there have been lots of financial winners from this terrible government… Who are the groups/individuals/organisations that have benefited the most from Labor remaining in government? The main beneficiaries are: the Labor MLAs themselves (plus their associates); unions who are closely associated with the ACT Labor Party, and their members (in construction, education, health, transport, and public sector); developers, builders, and other business suppliers (who deliver the projects that Labor promotes); plus large parts of the ACT Public Service itself…

While there are reputational stakes and other qualitative factors at play, the main lens to use is identifying the material financial benefits… There are tens of thousands of jobs and appointments on the line (which come with generous salaries and benefits), plus the granting of lucrative multi-million dollar contracts (that potentially result in large profits as well as strategic options)… Suspicions should always be raised when these groups and individuals champion the case for Labor to remain in power. We should always ask how these people and their associates stand to benefit from the cause that they are promoting… What are the conflicts, interests, and rewards that they stand to gain?

Amateur Town Planner Chris Steel was allowed to fail upwards with no discernible skills – having only ever been a Labor shill – and we wonder?

If he’s the best, wow!

Let’s not forget the misleading statements made regarding the changes to the territory plan (see Phillip Pool). And Dickson – who lives there, I wonder? – being treated like the favoured child.

Crime n Punishment8:30 am 05 Sep 25

Come on Canberra.
We’re a two-bit town run by a council of comfy incompetent people.

They in turn empower very average executive to run directorates. Budgets are just numbers.

Poorly managed directorates swap their executive around. No one actual gets disciplined.

CIT, CHS etc – no-one held to account.

Selling off our land to developers has brought zero benefits.

The truth has stopped mattering.
The ACTPS Head of Service just restarted another round of musical chairs for zero benefits.

Our government is good at zero emissions; nothing good has come out of them in years.

If only we saw more of these types of articles in the local media, rather than the regular copy pasting of government press releases….

Gregg Heldon8:02 am 05 Sep 25

Finally, some balanced reporting here, even if it’s an opinion piece.

We keep electing clowns so expect to keep getting comedy and court jesters.

Not matter how bad the Liberals might be, they’re never going to be this bad, especially 27 years down the track.

What was the Talking Heads song …. “we’re on a tram to nowhere ….”

Economically illiterate, bereft of ideas and arrogant are the hallmarks of this ACT government. A bloated public service that has been indoctrinated by the left and a voting public blind to the damage caused by all this makes a mess of gargantuan proportions.

They are full of ideas, however most of them lead balloons

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.