28 January 2026

Canadian PM Mark Carney to address Parliament during Australian visit in March

| By Andrew McLaughlin
Join the conversation
21
selfie of two smiling men in suits

Prime Ministers Anthony Albanese and Mark Carney at last year’s Papal Inauguration in Rome. Photo: Anthony Albanese Facebook.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced that his Canadian counterpart Mark Carney will visit Australia and address Parliament in March.

Mr Carney is fresh off his powerful speech to the World Economic Forum earlier this month where he denounced unilateralist policies and the use of tariffs as coercion, and called for greater engagement and cooperation between the world’s middle powers.

In a new podcast published on 27 January, the Australia Institute said if the Trump administration had killed off what remained of the postwar international order, Mr Carney’s speech was its “eulogy”.

Despite not mentioning the US or its President Donald Trump in his speech, Mr Carney has been widely applauded for pushing back against Mr Trump’s increasingly belligerent and coercive policies and utterances, and for providing realistic economic and strategic alternatives. As a result, has been riding a wave of domestic and international popularity.

Mr Albanese, speaking on the ABC TV’s Insiders program on Sunday (25 January), reiterated his support for increased multilateralism, and said Australia was engaged with like-minded countries about many issues.

“My friend Mark Carney will visit Australia and give an address to the Parliament in March,” he said.

“We are very much engaged with our partners overseas. And we do have a shift in the way that international politics is being played, with a greater engagement from middle powers.

“That’s something I spoke about when I addressed the UN. We need greater cooperation as we see the world changing in its dynamic.”

READ ALSO Greg Moriarty chosen as Australia’s next Ambassador to Washington

Asked about Mr Carney’s WEF speech, Mr Albanese said he agreed with his key points.

“I agree with him, and it’s consistent with what I said at the United Nations and with our engagement as well with middle powers,” he said.

“That’s why I’ve engaged with the Canadian PM, but others as well in our region, it’s so important.

“Australia can play a really important role given our role as a Commonwealth nation. We’re a member of APEC, we’re a partner with ASEAN, we’re an important leader in the Pacific Island Forum.

“All of this means that when you look at the global architecture, the role that we can play in our own region and around the world is of a stabilising force at a time where, quite frankly, there is a lot of turbulence and turmoil in the world.”

Mr Carney’s international stocks have been further bolstered by Mr Trump’s withdrawal of his invitation to Canada to join his so-called Board of Peace to rebuild Gaza.

“Dear Prime Minister Carney,” Mr Trump wrote on Truth Social. “Please let this Letter serve to represent that the Board of Peace is withdrawing its invitation to you regarding Canada’s joining, what will be, the most prestigious Board of Leaders ever assembled, at any time.”

READ ALSO Gordon de Brouwer resigns as Australian Public Service Commissioner

So far, not one Western liberal democracy has signed up to the Board of Peace, other than the US.

And while Australia has been invited, Mr Albanese has been non-committal.

“It’s unclear what the objectives of this are, which is why we will give it further consideration,” he told Insiders.

“My government is one that always has an orderly, considered approach to all of our policy, including our international engagement.”

While he has been careful to not directly criticise Mr Trump or his policies, Mr Albanese did say the President’s characterisation of the role played by NATO and allied nations in the Global War on Terror following the 2001 9-11 terror attacks on New York City and Washington, DC, was “unacceptable”.

Mr Trump claimed in an interview late last week that NATO had never come to the aid of the US, and he downplayed the contribution allied nations made in the war — despite allies losing nearly 1000 soldiers during the conflict, including 47 Australians — by claiming they mainly served in support roles.

“Those 47 Australian families who will be hurting by these comments, they deserve our absolute respect, our admiration, for the bravery that was shown by 40,000 Australians who served in Afghanistan,” Mr Albanese said.

“They were certainly on the frontlines in order to, along with our other allies, to defend democracy and freedom and to defend our national interests. They deserve our respect.”

When pressed, Mr Albanese said while he wouldn’t “give a running commentary on all of President Trump’s comments”, what the US leader had said was “entirely not appropriate” and “completely unacceptable”.

Original Article published by Andrew McLaughlin on PS News.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

21
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

If Albanese really believes in preventing hate speech, he will uninvite Herzog who has a strong history of violent aggressive hate speech. Whatever possessed him to invite this man? Pressure from certain parts of the public? Or the Opposition? And what possessed him to agree to AUKUS with only 24 hours of consideration? And more fossil fuel mining?

Hopefully Carney can give Albo a lesson on how to introduce sensible immigration, climate and energy policies.

Penfold never passes an Albo story without having a serious whiiiine channeling Susan Ley.

At least Penfold’s approval rating remains higher than hers.

Why thanks franky. But it’s not rocket science – despite being a lefty, Carney has been able to listen to Canadians and put some sensible policies in place.

Albanese is constantly being dragged kicking and screaming to a foreign destination named common sense. 🌏 🛩

Penfold, nice to know you support net zero by 2050, 100% electric vehicle sales by 2035 (60% by 2030), carbon pricing, a specific emissions reduction plan, investing over 100 Billion dollars in clean growth.

You can read about their framework in the Canadian Net-Zero Emissions Accountability Act, or have a look here: https://www.canada.ca/en/services/environment/weather/climatechange/climate-plan/climate-plan-overview/emissions-reduction-2030.html

Thanks Axon, probably took some googling there but your cherry picking has let you down again. Here’s last September’s update:

“Prime Minister Mark Carney has paused a key electric vehicle sales target …. The moves come as Canada’s economy has shown signs of weakening – shedding 66,000 jobs in August and pushing unemployment to 7.1%.”

https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdxqrgze0rno

Another report found “requiring 20 percent of new light-vehicle sales to be electric – faces mounting evidence it was unlikely ever to be met”.

Take 2 perhaps ?

Penfold speaks of cherry picking then carefully ignores 80% of the described elements of Canadian action, while making a failing point about the remaining one he cherry-picked.

“paused”
Penfold has no idea what that means.

Meanwhile, Penfold has never heard of a a target not being met, while apparently believing that means an intention vanishes. He never creeps outside his little political bubble where he receives his talking points.

Your original comment was pretty dim-witted Penfold, because you raced for assumptions in ignorance or avoidance of facts. We could call it Albanese Derangement Syndrome, although the Albanese part may not be the most relevant.

Thanks Axon, are you talking to myself or someone else ? Hard to work out. The good news though is that around all this climate stuff the word we seem to hear the most is indeed “paused”.

The second most heard word is “unachievable”. Feel free to discuss your syndromes with Chris Bowen.

Penfold has about a dozen Albo whinges ready to fire off whenever Region runs an article on the PM.

As you can see its mainly cut & paste & whine but Albo Derangement Syndrome is definitely in play.

Well franky Albo does provide plenty of ammunition. You should have seen how cranky he was at the Lodge on Sunday to people who publicly criticised him. Tanties indeed.

Penfold shooting himself in the foot again arguing against his own previous comments without realising it 😂😂👨‍🦯

Another day ending in why?

Keep struggling Penfold. You may even understand some purposes behind language use one day.

In further exemplary Canadian climate news, to which Penfold is so pleased to draw people’s attention, their renewable proportion of electricity generation stands around two-thirds. Given their latitude and geography it is no surprise this is dominantly hydro, both conventional dam-based and run-of-river.

Australia itself in the last three months of 2025 provided over 50% of electricity generation (amid a surge in demand in the NEM) from renewable sources, in our case principally solar as makes sense here. This has driven down wholesale prices even while the unwinding of State subsidies created a bump in the current retail CPI component. As Penfold knows to his chagrin, renewables are cheaper.

Penfold could be delighted he has highlighted the progress.

Stephen Saunders6:34 am 28 Jan 26

Mr Carney presides over a historic pause of mass-migration, which has finally given Canadians some overdue relief, from severe rental and housing un-affordability.

It is a safe bet, that this topic will be off the agenda, during his Australian visit. Our Press Gallery never challenges mass-migration, not even after Bondi.

What mass migration? Oh, does not exist, been declining steadily and way below historic proportions from decades ago.

Canada’s permanent migration target in 2025 was about 385,000 where Australia was 306,000. Their population is 41 million to our 27-28 million. Very similar proportions.

Mass migration? In the “marches” there are those of a racist persuasion making that claim. The numbers fail them.

Capital Retro4:41 pm 28 Jan 26

I don’t think the official migration figures include the temporary visa holders which are now almost 3 million!

Most are aspiring (conspiring?) to stay permanently in Australia.

That’s mass migration Axon.

locus pershing1:24 am 29 Jan 26

“The arrival will be counted as an overseas migrant arrival if they reside in Australia for a period of 12 months or more over a 16-month period after arriving. By the same method, a departing person changing their country of residence from Australia to another country is removed from the ERP and counts as an overseas migrant departure. “

The figures are at 2,859,016 temporary visa holders in Australia for the 30/11/2025 which was a slight decrease over the figures in 31/12/2024 of 2,862,058 and an increase of of 400k from 2,402,440 31/12/2019 pre-COVID and rose from 1,810,762 on 31/12/2013.

And if you look at Student, Temp Grad, Temp Resident, Temp Protection, Working Holiday the figure from 2019 has only gone up approx. 300k and stayed steady since 2023.

Capital Retro7:29 pm 29 Jan 26

Like the NDIS, immigration has become an industry delivering the wrong outcomes.

Aspiration, meet Quota and bureaucratic Process.

That is reality, Capital Retro.

Eventually, migration is permanent residents not transients. In filling that permanent quota, Capital Retro, do you have something against applications from skilled workers, or education visa holders, motivated to stay? You dislike skilled or educated people who might improve productivity and wealth, or just pick your strawberries for you?

Capital Retro5:04 pm 30 Jan 26

Thank you for confirming what I said namely immigration policy is delivering the wrong outcomes.

Your attempt to smear me about my likes and dislikes of certain people was expected. I doubt if the people claiming the occupations you mentioned have improved productivity for Australia but they have certainly improved their wealth.

And I don’t know where you get the idea from that I am a primary producer growing strawberries. At various times I have picked fruit including strawberries and I was rewarded handsomely for the hard work and commitment involved.

Maybe you and your “skilled education” mates should try it for a change. Then you would get a new perspective on what productivity means.

locus pershing6:53 pm 30 Jan 26

Nothing wrong with people coming to the country, the issue is instead with how fast existing systems can keep up.

Its not a coincidence that health, transport and housing infrastructure are such popular topics so to speak in current year.

I think making everything out to be a us vs them topic is harmful to what the real discussion should be, are the current levels sustainable? As it stands, I don’t think so.

I may not agree with everything you comment CR, but I agree its delivering the wrong outcomes right now for the country.

Capital Retro, I did not confirm your claim in any respect. Did you really get that reading education you claimed elsewhere?

So you say you do have something against applications from skilled workers or education visa holders who might be motivated to stay. You doubt that such migrants who are accepted might have improved productivity, on the basis that you picked some strawberries therefore, er, what??

Given this display of prejudice in your comments, how could I be smearing you? You publish the comments so live with them, or if you are sensitive enough to notice they might be prejudicial, change your views and stop blaming others for your expression of them.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.