13 November 2025

Canberra's electric Yutong buses under investigation for hidden 'kill switch'

| By James Coleman
Join the conversation
91
Transport Canberra bus

Transport Canberra currently has 96 Yutong buses in its fleet. Photo: Transport Canberra.

The ACT Government has launched another investigation into its fleet of Chinese-made Yutong electric buses, this time after reports from Europe suggested the vehicles could theoretically be remotely “stopped or rendered inoperable” by the manufacturer.

Transport Canberra confirmed it is working with the local distributor, VDI Australia, and the government’s digital security agency to assess whether recent findings from Norway and Denmark apply to its 96 Yutong buses currently in service.

“Transport Canberra and Digital Canberra have commenced further investigation and are working with the local distributor, VDI Australia, on actively assessing the validity of these reports as it pertains to ACT-owned buses,” an ACT Government spokesperson said.

The ACT Government had to investigate its Yutong buses earlier this year for possible slavery connections. Photo: Transport Canberra.

It’s the second time in less than a year that the ACT Government has had to examine its Yutong buses.

Earlier this year, Transport Canberra began working “closely” with VDI Australia after reports alleged that the batteries used in Yutong’s electric buses could be linked to forced labour in China’s Xinjiang region.

The Yutong E12 buses use batteries made by Contemporary Amperex Technology Co. Limited (CATL) – one of the world’s largest electric vehicle battery suppliers. The company has been accused by a US congressional committee of ties to forced labour in Xinjiang and was later blacklisted by the US Department of Defense over alleged links to the Chinese military.

CATL denied the allegations, calling them “inaccurate and misleading”, saying it had cut ties with the suppliers in question “long ago”.

READ ALSO It’s almost mid-November, so Big Splash should open any day now, right?

Following those claims, Transport Canberra said its executives were “working closely” with VDI Australia but had found no evidence of “any incidences of modern slavery involved in its operations and supply chain”.

An independent audit of VDI in February 2025 also failed to detect any actual or suspected cases of modern slavery.

The latest review follows an investigation in Norway, where Oslo’s public transport agency, Ruter, found that Yutong buses could receive “autonomous software updates”, including to key control systems, via an onboard SIM card.

Yutong has said its Australian buses are not the same as those in Norway. Photo: ACT Government.

Ruter said there was no evidence Yutong had ever attempted to control or disable its vehicles, but warned the capability existed in theory.

“This bus can be stopped or rendered inoperable by the manufacturer,” the agency said in its report.

The agency stated that it would tighten its cybersecurity requirements for future bus purchases, while Denmark’s transport authorities launched their own investigation into the same issue.

In response, Yutong said it “strictly complies with the applicable laws, regulations and industry standards” in all countries where it operates, and later told the ABC the model tested in Norway was “not the same model as the Yutong buses operating in Australia”.

Yutong Australia says it has delivered more than 1500 vehicles locally since 2012, including 133 battery-electric low-floor city buses and about a dozen electric coaches.

Canberra’s fleet is part of a 2023 contract for 90 battery-electric Yutong E12 buses, with the first delivered in May 2024.

Canberra’s buses can only receive software updates at the depot, according to Transport Canberra. Photo: Transport Canberra.

A spokesperson for VDI Australia said software updates on Australian buses are carried out manually, not remotely.

“While Yutong vehicles have ‘over-the-air’ capability, VDI’s practice in Australia is to perform vehicle software updates physically at our authorised service centres, with customer consent – not remotely,” the spokesperson said.

Yutong also stressed its commitment to cybersecurity.

“Yutong always prioritises vehicle data security and the protection of customer privacy, and fulfils its commitments to cybersecurity management for vehicles and data protection with high standards,” a company spokesperson said.

READ ALSO MyWay+ still not working – so now the government isn’t paying either

Over the border, Transport for NSW told Region it was also “aware of media commentary regarding Yutong electric buses” and continues to work with manufacturers to ensure all vehicles comply with strict cybersecurity standards.

There are currently 26 Yutong battery-electric buses operating under Transport for NSW contracts, with another eight in regional trials.

“Safety is our number one priority,” a Transport for NSW spokesperson said.

“All buses purchased by Transport are required to meet strict Australian Design Rules, relevant safety standards, and Transport’s Bus Procurement Panel specification requirements, which include cyber-security provisions.”

Yutong bus

Transport for NSW is trialling eight Yutong buses in regional areas. Photo: Yutong Australia.

Founded in 1963 as the Zhengzhou Bus Repair Factory in China’s Henan province, Yutong has grown into one of the world’s largest bus makers, exporting nearly 110,000 vehicles to more than 100 countries.

For now, Transport Canberra maintains that its fleet remains safe to operate and that all due diligence was completed before it went into operation.

“The ACT Government has mature vulnerability management processes in place across our technology platforms,” its spokesperson said.

“We’re working to ensure the highest possible level of security for our buses and the Canberra community.”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

91
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

The only kill switch we need is for the useless Barr vanity tram! Now we wait for years of Commonwealth bridge refurbishment before our hapless ‘I’ve got my big boy pants on’ ACT leader closes the bridge again for his choo choo set. E-buses from anywhere made and still make a better business case – and if you believe there’s a kill switch issue, there’s plenty of tech out there to find e-sims. And as for “all due diligence…” Do some Penetration Testing, it’s IT 101

Imagine if Canberra had the guts to make a bus. We could call it a Canbus

Capital Retro5:24 pm 16 Nov 25

Zero net emissions will eventually lead to zero net passengers.

Capital Retro1:39 pm 15 Nov 25

When the EMR bombs start going off all over the Western World everything reliant on a computer will be turned off, permanently.

There goes the refrigerator.

On the other hand, you will not be able to write to Region Canberra any more.

Swings and roundabouts.

Capital Retro6:30 pm 16 Nov 25

Swings an roundbouts should still be OK for you, Axon.

I probably shouldn’t say anything considering most of the goods I buy are made in China but….considering the political climate, I’m surprised Australia would buy something like a Bus from China. Why not Japan or South Korea?

China is Australia’s major trading partner. Why would we not consider Chinese made buses? Because of culture wars? And where do you draw that line on Chinese goods? You’re talking about a massive shift in the Australian economy, virtually overnight on the basis of not much.

Why not Australia? Keep as many of our hard earned dollars here whenever possible.

If it was me making the decisions I’d be happy to do that but Is there a competitive Australian alternative? I highly doubt there is.

There eas a group of hackers that hacked trains.

The builder of the trains forced the trains to shutdown if there were maintained in competitors yards.

The hackers discovered this and the geolocation, as well as dozens of fake issues set to go off after certain events met.

The bus manufacture could update firmware to make the buses need expensive repairs that only work if its them repairing, just months out of any warranty period.

A quick Google reveals that the was a claim of train hacking in Poland but it remains unproven. The rest of your comment is speculation (at best)

I have noticed that Henry is pretty big on conspiracist rumours.

Yes he is, and he’s not the only one. It’s quite the alternative universe…must be fun to be able make any story fit into predetermined beliefs and biases.

Unfortunately the real world is not a “Choose Your Own Adventure”.

Conspiracies do exist. Stop drinking all the coolaid

You mean like John Deere, or Tesla, or phone companies charging to unlock phones 20 years ago, or the whole problem of right to repair. These are not exactly big conspiracies Henry. A predilection for the idea can lead you down rabbit-holes.

Henry suing an entity is not proof of anything. There’s still the burden of proof.

“Conspiracies do exist. Stop drinking all the coolaid”…you’ve used and spelled that idiom incorrectly. Drinking the Kool-Aid is about blind acceptance….it’s the exact opposite of not accepting things without solid proof.

Yes conspiracies very, very rarely are correct. But the extremely rare occurrence that one may be correct does not in any way impact whether another is correct….that is the gambler’s logical fallacy. I’d also suggest you look up confirmation bias, ie. the tendency to look for, favour and believe things that confirm your beliefs and values.

This makes me think we rely on the internet waaaaaaay too much for nearly everything.

Give me some proof that they are very very rarely correct then.

I have no idea how what you are going off about on tangents is useful to the topic being discussed as per usual.
When you are proven wrong you sidetrack

“Give me some proof that they are very very rarely correct then.”

It is not incumbent on anyone else to prove a negative. If you assert them, show them.

Thanks Axon.

Henry complaining about tangents is assuming, he seems to have gotten it was his assertion in the first place that “Conspiracies do exist”.

Just reading the idiocy of the LNP policy position. They’re not leaving the Paris accord which requires governments to set emissions reduction targets whilst having no emission reduction targets.

This will bring Australia into line with two other countries which have no emissions reduction targets….Egypt and Iran. Lol.

The LNP couldn’t give Labor, the Greens and the teals a bigger gift than this incoherent mess, the sound bites are going to be great defending a policy platform that could have been crafted in Tehran.

This article is about Chinese buses. Net zero reading clearly.

Yes posted in the wrong thread, so?

How sad has your attention seeking gotten to? Nothing to say on topic at all. Just desperately seeking attention..

The point stands, the LNP Net Zero position is idiotic, Australia cannot be in the Paris Accord which requires emission reduction targets and not have emission reduction targets. It’s a solution that fools or pleases no one. They will lose the sensible people in the middle and are now doomed to irrelevancy. Enjoy.

It’s indicative of the zealotry around net zero seano. Nothing else matters. Article on the Chinese government’s devious kill swith strategies ? Net zero.

Here’s a thought – try reading the article first !

“Article on the Chinese government’s devious kill swith strategies ?”

The article does not say that at all Penfold. There’s no evidence of a “kill switch” only an allegation which has been denied by the company and is being investigated. Indeed the article doesn’t mention the Chinese government all.

This is another example of Penfold posting a bad faith personalised attack in lieu of and actual point and it blowing up in his face having not read the actual article himself.

IDK why you think that constantly beclowning yourself is a good idea Penfold but I’d suggest it’s not.

You have to watch out for those swithes; very devious.

Good to remind yourself you should read an article before commenting, Penfold. It is one of your obvious failings, given how often you trumpet an article which on inspection proves you wrong.

Paul Holbrook3:03 pm 13 Nov 25

Remember the Hezbollah pagers?

What’s your point?

You do realise this happened because the Hezbollah distrusted cell phones and started importing pages from a company controlled by the Mossad which implanted explosives in them?

Genius! It was like something out of a Spy v Spy cartoon. But not relevant to the electric bus we brought from China.

Paul Holbrook2:59 pm 13 Nov 25

None so blind as those that shall not see

None so deaf as those that shall not listen.

I see the usual culture wars conspiracy theorists are at it…if they had the courage of the convictions and believed the nonsense they post they’d dump all electronic goods made in or containing components made in China immediately….which would be great news for the rest of us because that would be the end of their posts.

No chinese junk here. Lots of Korean and Taiwanese quality product.

But your use of fossil fuel powered electricity to post those razor-sharp comments is noted. Electrons 🙂

“No chinese junk here. Lots of Korean and Taiwanese quality product.” add international supply chains to the long list of topics about which Penfold is clueless.

“But your use of fossil fuel…” no fossil fuels here, the ACT contributes 100% renewable electricity to the Australia electricity market. Put if you want waste your time pretending that tracing individual electrons is some how meaningful good luck with that…better start with blocking the electrons from renewable sources helping you post puerile/meaningless arguments.

Isn’t is odd that Penfold never comments on his own use of solar, wind and hydro power for his posts?

Though it would not be odd if he were just an ideologically-driven drone.

seano hasn’t worked out where electricity comes from on windless nights. And it’s not batteries.

When was the last windless night across wind farms in Australia, Penfold? Did dams empty at sunset?

Any conversation is more difficult though, when you do not even understand the electricity market, and do not want to, or are too young to know much. The childishness evident in many of your comments could imply you are a wet-behind-the-ears passionate young LNP acolyte. Who knows, it matters not whether you are young or antique when you are near infallibly wrong.

Batteries do supply power to the grid after sunset. You will have used it yourself if you want to imagine electrons flowing, though you do not understand that either.

Isn’t is odd that Penfold never comments on his own use of solar, wind and hydro power for his posts? Looks like my earlier comment on this is correct.

Penfold once again demonstrates that he doesn’t understand how our energy market works let alone that it’s based on a distributed grid.

As it’s been pointed out to him a number of times by people other than myself, if quite possible that he does understand and is just an attention seeking troll….which is just sad.

They just plug the batteries into other batteries to charge them

See, Henry? You are off again with no understanding.

Anything made with software implanted can have a back entrance for future use. Doesn’t have to be made in China either!

Do you use an abacus, and tins connected by string?

No I use an iPhone for the security features it offers knowing the US software inside if switched on to see what I’m up to will show how boring my life and conversations are.

My point was everything constructed with software has the potential to have a back door. All countries spy on each other, all countries would be doing this if they have the capability. Remember all the Chinese cctv cameras replaced in government building a few years ago. This didn’t happen on a whim but after the back door was or the possibility of was exposed. Ironically, Vietnamese cameras are still used in some Government buildings.

If your life is sufficiently boring then why should the Chinese care? Never mind.

My point was that the fact you describe answers no useful question. Of course you use technologies, and some of them will be from countries whose interest in spying on us is similar to ours in spying on them. Your answer is not to avoid technologies but to select least harm then to take other precautions.

Tom Worthington11:02 am 13 Nov 25

Many expensive gadgets now come with remote monitoring (your car for example). If worried, the ACT Government could have a team of tech students from CIT, or a uni check it. The students could divert the remote monitoring to a Canberra based maintenance center.

One of the renewable energy companies routinely installs a device on solar panel controllers to stop data and remote control of the panels getting back to China. They aren’t doing this to prevent sabotage, just the loss of commercial information.

Steele again and look below at all the related articles and this clown. He needs to be investigated by a independent 3rd party with no Gov ties.

What are you talking about? We have what looks to be another spurious report but being sensible cautious the government is checking. I fail to see the problem unless you have an agenda.

Capital Retro8:40 am 13 Nov 25

At least 25 years ago Defence would not allow procurement of office machines that had electronic monitoring and alert systems reporting to remote sites.

In fact, all new machines had to be checked by signals directorate to ensure they were incapable of emitting any information.

Instead, the suppliers had to have security cleared service people on site at most high use areas where their modified (no transmitting software) machines (photocopiers) were located.

The fear was that anything copied could be sent elsewhere.

All photocopiers used in the Top Secret realm and no doubt lower security levels have the remote reporting disabled so manual reports on usage need to be provided to get manufacturer toner etc. Likewise it is common for Computer equipment to have WiFi and Bluetooth disabled on high security assets.

The same applies to any Chinese electric vehicle. Wouldn’t go anywhere near them.

Just the Chinese ones? I suspect most current cars are so ‘connected’ they could be remotely ‘switched off’ – even your home air-conditioner can be switched off remotely.

Switched off remotely and manufacturer (read CCCP government) “kill switch” are very different things Bill.

The now defunct union of Soviet Socialist Republics, now Russia, makes electric busses and cars sold today in Australia, do they Penfold?

You might also care to explain your understanding of the critical difference between switching off and, switching off which is what a “kill switch” does. Try not to invent a conspiracy along the way.

You’ve nailed me there Axon, CCP was the reference.

And if you need an explanation on the difference between turning off my car or having a government in Peking turn it off, best do your own research. Silly comment. 🤕

Bill wrote, “I suspect most current cars are so ‘connected’ they could be remotely ‘switched off’ “

Penfold, having tried to claim a difference between being remotely switched off and being remotely switched off, is now trying to pretend he meant turning off his own car.

Even if that were what he meant, it would simply demonstrate how he could not come up with a relevant comment so spouted off nonsense as usual.

Penfold: switched off remotely and manufacturer kill switch are only different so far as who can get access to the switch (or whoever issues orders to those who can get access to the switch).
And my reference to your air-conditioner being switched off remotely was not referring to you using your own remote control. Do you understand what DRED is? If your device is ‘DRED enabled’, the electricity grid operator can remotely switch off your a/c anytime they decide that demand on the grid is too high – which is probably a stinking hot day when you most want to use your a/c.

Bill that is 100% correct, it’s all about who can turn devices off. When driving a car the thought that some AI bot in Beijing could turn off my can isn’t a plesant one. Much better i do it myself.

Thanks for the DRED reference, even had to look it up so have learned something new. How sad things have reached the point in Australia that someone else can turn off the aircon on a boiling day because of our shambolic energy policies. Frankly that could be life threatening for older Australians. Does the same apply to heating on cold days ?

The point I was trying to make is that just because your car isn’t a particular brand or country of origin, doesn’t mean that someone else can never hack into it (or provide a directive to those who already have access ie. the manufacturer) – and if it can be switched off remotely by ‘authorised’ people, and can be hacked, then that may not necessarily exclude AI bots in Beijing (for example).

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.