25 October 2024

Conservative think tanks says most Aussies stand against proposed misinformation laws

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
30
front of bill

Limiting the spread of misinformation online is becoming a battle for the Federal Government. Image: IPA.

Most Australians are concerned proposed new misinformation laws will be used against them for political gain, according to new polling commissioned by conservative think tank, the Institute of Public Affairs (IPA).

Recently introduced to parliament, the Communications Legislation Amendment (Combatting Misinformation and Disinformation) Bill 2024 aims to reduce the spread of seriously harmful misinformation and disinformation on digital communications platforms.

It introduces transparency requirements for certain digital communications platforms, including obligations to publish information on risk management actions, media literacy plans and complaints processes.

But according to the Parliamentary Business website, “it is unclear if the bill will operate in a manner compatible with Australia’s international human rights obligations related to freedom of expression.

“The definitions of misinformation and disinformation create some uncertainty as to the breadth of content captured,” the website states.

The legislation also gives the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) bolstered powers to create digital platform rules requiring platforms to “report and keep records on certain matters” related to misinformation and disinformation.

IPA deputy executive director Daniel Wild said Australians had an issue with the proposed new laws, with polling data from independent marketing research firm Dynata indicating most Aussies believed they were an assault on freedom of speech.

“Australians are clear eyed about the censorship threat the Federal Government’s proposed misinformation laws pose, with two-thirds concerned it will be used for political purposes to silence the opinion of mainstream Australians,” Mr Wild said.

“The Federal Government’s misinformation laws are the biggest assault on freedom of speech in Australia’s peacetime history and are designed specifically to shut down debate online.

“The revised legislation represents a chilling assault on every Australian’s right to free speech. The new bill broadens provisions to censor speech, which even the government’s fatally flawed first draft did not include.”

READ ALSO I love public servants but I’m mean to them over Robodebt, says Canberra Writers Festival guest author

The research found:

  • 65 per cent of Australians said they were concerned misinformation laws would be used by government officials for political purposes;
  • 69 per cent of Australians said they were concerned misinformation laws would be used by social media companies for political purposes;
  • 45 per cent believed free speech should be protected, even if this meant wrong, inaccurate, or false information was published;
  • Young Australians were most opposed to the government’s proposed online censorship laws, with the majority of Australians aged 18-34 believing freedom of speech should be protected online.

The survey also established that while Australians believed misinformation was a problem, 53 per cent believed censorship would cause more problems than it solved, while 17 per cent wanted more censorship.

The legislation provides ACMA with a graduated set of powers to develop and register enforceable industry misinformation codes and standards.

The bill has been referred to the Senate Environment and Communications Legislation Committee for inquiry with a reporting date of 25 November 2024.

The Senate Scrutiny of Bills Committee and Parliamentary Joint Committee on Human Rights have raised concerns with the legislation.

READ ALSO What’s the deal with this Assistant Minister and his transcripts?

When introducing the bill to Federal Parliament, Communications Minister Michell Rowland said it was a Labor priority to act on keeping Australians safe from the harms of misinformation.

“Misinformation and disinformation pose a serious threat to the safety and wellbeing of Australians, as well as to our democracy, society and economy. Doing nothing and allowing this problem to fester is not an option,” Ms Rowland said.

“The government is committed to keeping Australians safe online, and that includes ensuring the ACMA has the powers it needs to hold digital platforms to account for misinformation and disinformation on their services.

“Following public consultation on the draft bill last year, revisions have been made that carefully balance the public interest in combatting seriously harmful misinformation and disinformation with the freedom of expression that is so fundamental to our democracy.

“These revisions reflect that feedback and I look forward to seeing the bill become law as we combat the threat of misinformation and disinformation.”

The Federal Government revved up its action to combat online disinformation following the dissemination of false information during recent by-elections and the Indigenous Voice to Parliament referendum.

Join the conversation

30
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

The Ministry of Truth…ha, ha, trust us, we will decide for you what is misinformation and disinformation. We should all be worried. We do not live in China or North Korea…well, we never used to.

So what exactly is misinformation and disinformation, anything the Labor Government disagrees with? And of course, the biggest source of misinformation and disinformation is the Albanese Labor government which is exempt from this bill. Absolute hypocrites this Labor Government is.

The proposed bill threatens the human rights of Australians, including freedom of expression, privacy and due process.

The broad definitions and sweeping powers granted to the minister and the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) could result in overreach, undermining democratic principles and leading to arbitrary enforcement

Granting government authorities and digital platforms the power to control the flow of information is a step towards authoritarianism. Australians should be trusted to decide what is true or false, without interference from the state.

Master_Bates8:42 pm 28 Oct 24

So…. in a world where politicians are on the record discussing the differences between Core promisses and Non Core promisses, as well as declining to pass truth in electoral advertising laws, how would these be applied…..

It’s all well and good to discuss misinformation, but what happens when it’s from the lips of our own PM?

Misinformation laws would be applied selectively. To some, who share the fashionable correct-think views, such a two-tier approach to banning political discourse is most welcome, because it’s a way to cancel all viewpoints except for their own.

The dopes that support this kind of thing lack the forethought to consider that the government may not always be of the side they like. Are they going to be so supportive when Dutton becomes PM with a majority government behind him and declares “more than two genders” misinformation? Or “climate change” misinformation? You’d have to be an idiot not to see the danger in this.

Brian Edwards3:30 pm 28 Oct 24

The IPA, hahahaha. The source of misinformation itself. As credible as a 3 dollar note. Nothing to see here.

correct speech first, then free speech, to whatever extent correct speech allows for it. Anything else would have free speech as a mere unjustified assertion.
Given that correct speech must belong to realm of absolute truths – anything else being a contradiction of itself – and given that it’s the right that should be interested in conserving these truths, correct speech simply has no business being determined by the admittedly progressive and inherently relativistic left (which can in some instances include the liberal right), making Labor’s attempt to do so a complete inversion of reality. A more damning indictment against Labor’s censorship plans does not exist. And I haven’t forgotten that it was Morrison and Littleproud who got the ball rolling (without any knowledge of or any intention to protect actual correct speech)

“correct” in the eyes of whom, Vasily M? What authority will you cite?

The government repeatedly shows itself to be the biggest source of misinformation and no one ever gets held accountable for being wrong. When was the last time a minister was forced to resign due to violating the ministerial code of conduct?

HiddenDragon8:07 pm 27 Oct 24

This looks like yet another half-smart effort from a government which has been misreading its mandate since election night in 2022.

It follows the long-established formula of creating and empowering an ostensibly impartial public interest bureaucracy which actually serves a partisan purpose and is staffed accordingly.

That strategy normally flies below the political radar of most voters, but this one won’t, and has the prospect of driving a wedge between authoritarian and libertarian progressives – which would not be helpful for a government already on the slide.

It’s probably just as well that this is unlikely to become law before 20 January 2025 – dumping it or watering it down to the point that it would be tolerable to Elon Musk could be a handy bargaining chip/concession for Albanese in a first uncomfortable conversation with the individual who is looking more likely than not to be the next occupant of the Oval Office.

Only a totalitarian government would come up with this. Wait ….

The questions betray the bias involved in this survey.

If you are a political lobby group (like the IPA) always design the questions for the answers you want. This is it:
https://ipa.org.au/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/IPA-Poll-Attitudes-towards-the-federal-governments-proposed-misinformation-laws-October-2024.pdf

Consider how those questions might have been asked from an opposite bias, e.g. imagine a poll designed by the Greens to ask renters their opinion on a rent freeze. Would it be neutral? The one presented by the IPA is a travesty more generally known as push-polling.

“…think tank” …yes it is, for the LNP. They are running scared because they will have to tell the truth as well!

Obviously the IPA numbers are the result of a survey that pushed respondents towards particular answers by the way they were framed and the context they were put in. Also it unlikely to be at all representative of wider public opinion as it is more likely that majority of Australians don’t car or know about the issue, let alone know of the existence of the ACMA.

The IPA, a 100% Liberal RW “think tank”, funded by billionaires like Gina Rinehart who also funds Advance Australia, one of the biggest sources of misinformation about the Voice Referendum. I’m fairly certain that, any polling done for them is just as biased, by being targeted to achieve the wanted results. They’re also the primary source of what passes as policies for the Liberal Party, all of which were evident in the previous government.

It would be safe to say that, this “poll” is as accurate about what Australians think, as Sky After Dark’s reporting in a fair and balanced manner.

Phil O'Brien11:30 am 26 Oct 24

Of course the IPA would say that. Their whole business is about spreading misinformation.

People are against it because having the government decide what “misinformation and disinformation” is, only happens in authoritarian dictatorships. The bill is an actual danger to a democratic and free society.

If Trump wins the White house it will be in no small part due to his biblical use of lies and mis-information. Unfortunately there are many people out there who fall prey to these lies and deliberate use of mis-information. Outright lies have no place in politics or religion.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.