18 December 2025

Developers shying off 'pricey' land releases with too many conditions

| By Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
19

The Whitlam blocks that failed to sell on 10 December. Photo: SLA.

The ACT Government’s land release agency is struggling to sell major blocks, with two sites passed in at auction and now back on the market.

Developers say the Suburban Land Agency is setting prices too high and imposing too many conditions for projects to stack up, prompting the Property Council to call for it to review its approach.

The failure to move such blocks will also delay services to developing communities and impact the government’s ability to meet its housing targets.

The 1.97 hectare Whitlam Local Centre site was passed in at an auction held on 10 December 2025.

Made up of two blocks, the site is being sold under one Crown lease.*

READ ALSO New owner found to take over stalled Sierra development at Narrabundah

The Watson on Aspinall site was passed in at an auction held on 13 August 2025. The 3.759ha RZ4 site has planning approval for 200 medium density homes.

It is understood that there was a buyer for the Watson site but it was handed back to the Suburban Land Agency after the auction because the sale conditions were too onerous.

Any development of the site will be guided by the Place Plan and Development Concept 2021, developed with the local community. The SLA says it aims to maximise urban heat resilience and maintain tree and landscape corridors, to protect vulnerable native species such as the Superb Parrot.

Property Council of Australia ACT & Capital Region Executive Director Ashlee Berry says projects need to stack up. Photo: Property Council.

Developer feedback on the Whitlam site indicated that the SLA wanted too much money for the land and the projects would not be viable.

The SLA says the development will reflect the community’s vision, which was developed through a co-design process, for the Whitlam Local Centre to be a meeting place for the community.

The land is now listed for sale at $11 million, while the Watson site does not have an asking price.

Property Council of Australia ACT & Capital Region Executive Director Ashlee Berry said the outcomes at both Whitlam and Watson meant the SLA must reassess whether they have the right conditions, including price, for these parcels of land.

Ms Berry said members were ready to purchase land and deliver housing and other projects across the Territory but only if the price was right and a project stacked up.

“To deliver more homes and local centres in the ACT, we need the Suburban Land Agency (SLA) to be releasing land that is appropriately priced and free of onerous conditions,” she said.

Ms Berry said developers were also facing an uncertain future in 2026, with significant new requirements including mandatory developer licensing for residential projects from 1 October.

READ ALSO Dead, buried and cremated: A guide to Canberra’s sporting infrastructure that never materialised

“These latest sales outcomes may reflect the growing uncertainty about the impact of developer licensing, particularly on the external assessments required,” she said.

“We encourage the SLA to continue to engage with industry, to make sure the land releases are delivering affordability across Canberra.”

An SLA spokesperson said that there was interest in both sites prior to auction with a number of parties registered to bid on each of the sites.

“In general, sites of this size tend to attract a limited pool of bidders,” the spokesperson said.

The spokesperson said that for all auctions of SLA sites, the reserve price was informed by at least two current valuations provided by independent suitably qualified and experienced property valuers who are members of the Australian Property Institute.

The Whitlam Local Centre was now available for purchase over the counter, while the SLA was considering next steps for the Watson on Aspinall site.

In 2025, SLA offered a range of land from single residential sites to a 40-hectare site in Molonglo Valley.

“The time it takes to sell land varies depending on the size, nature and location of the site,” the spokesperson said.

*It was originally reported that the Whitlam sale included the school site. This was incorrect.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

19
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Ross of Canberra7:36 pm 18 Dec 25

The public wants housing yet the ACT government cannot sell its land to developers. It’s time to rethink the paradigm.

devils_advocate11:30 am 22 Dec 25

Developers aren’t bidding because they are exposed to excessive risk of being undercut by new market entrants.

The government needs to increase all capital, regulatory, taxation and licensing barriers to entry without further delay.

Incidental Tourist5:36 pm 17 Dec 25

The main reason is that investors keep selling more rental properties below replacement costs than the market can absorb. So pushing landlords out costs this government dearly.

Common Sense9:12 am 17 Dec 25

To add to the list of reasons why Developers are shying away from ACT Government land releases, these Whitlam blocks were put to the market via a 2 stage Tender process with developers participated in this process in good faith with the Government including providing designs and IP, only for the Government to cease the Tender process, after missing every one of the precribed dates in the Tender documents, and run an Auction of the blocks where whom ever had the biggest wallet would win. Seems fair doesn’t it!

devils_advocate9:47 pm 16 Dec 25

Regulatory barriers to entry into the supply side must be raised higher in order to protect consumers and prevent new “cowboy” developers from entering the market and competing away economic profits. Specifically:

1. Fees taxes charges and levies must be raised. Current Lease Variation Charges are manifestly inadequate and have only so far achieved a halving of revenue.

2. Excess regulatory burden and regulatory delays are not enough to keep new entrants out of the market. Increasing regulation and extending merit track processes would help address this.

3. As noted above, developer licensing laws must be leveraged to further raise capital requirements over and above the commercial risk assessment undertaken by lenders, or any equity model from investors, in addition to imposing personal liability on directors that’s survives the corporate shield.

Only if these things are done can we prevent new “cowboy” competitors from entering the market, ensure incumbents are able to retain market share and ensure that additional insurance costs and consumer protections are appropriately priced into transactions.

No, no, no, we need to let the market rip.

1. Remove all taxes and fees on developments so Developers can use their obvious philanthropy to reduce costs to consumers. The thought of them pocketing windfall gains and expanded profit margins is not even a consideration.

2. Bring in automatic approvals for any development proposal. The development industry is totally in tune with what the community want and should be allowed to use their land as they wish.

3. Remove all licensing and regulatory oversight on developments, absolving them from any personal responsibility for the quality of their work. And its only right that they should be able to Phoenix their companies if something goes wrong.

Only if these things are done can we truly fix land supply and deliver affordable housing that people want. Developers are providing an essential public service and would never take advantage of reducing red tape, they only have the community’s needs at heart. Its the only way.

devils_advocate2:25 pm 17 Dec 25

“Letting the market rip” runs directly counter to the ACT government’s stated policy objectives.

““Letting the market rip” runs directly counter to the ACT government’s stated policy objectives.”

The irony.

devils_advocate7:20 pm 17 Dec 25

Where is the irony?

Entirely consistent with my post:

“Minister for Sustainable Building and Construction Rebecca Vassarotti said the proposed [developer licensing] scheme would tackle the problems of defects and compliance failures in residential property developments that appear before, during, and after construction.”

The fact that you don’t want to see the irony in your posts and think that statement actually backs the contents of those comments up makes it even funnier.

Almost like regulation doesn’t have to be all or nothing.

But of course you don’t really care about what the government does.

So much so, that you need to cut and paste the exact same thing every time a remotely related article is posted.

devils_advocate12:32 pm 18 Dec 25

At least I’m being consistent. You just flip and flop depending on who you want to disagree with on any given day.

Except you aren’t remotely consistent. Particularly for those of us who’ve been around for a longer time and can remember the more nuanced debate on these types of planning and developer related issues.

My postion is totally consistent however, you of all people should recognise the use of sarcasm to highlight hypocrisy.

Or maybe not.

Ross of Canberra7:34 pm 18 Dec 25

Thank you, chewy14, I understood and enjoyed your ironic responses. I noticed zero flipping and zero flopping. Yes, it became more funny.

devils_advocate9:51 pm 18 Dec 25

Everything I’ve written is consistent with the stated policy position of the ACT government. If you don’t like it, seethe harder.

There’s lots of seething going on alright, although none of it from me.

Land agency has long been greedy. They sold the first release molonglo blocks for signifantly more than their value, giving them the mandate to continue, not to mention kicking people out of their homes for cents on the dollar under mr fluffy. Tackling housing affordability one overpriced block at a time.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.