25 June 2025

'Difficult decisions': Steel prescribes health levy, tax rises to mend Budget

| By Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
64

Finance Minister Rachel Stephen-Smith and Treasurer Chris Steel discuss the 2025-26 ACT Budget. Photos: Ian Bushnell.

Canberrans will be slugged with a new health levy, increases in taxes and charges and general rate rises, including an extra impost for high-end properties, to arrest the ACT’s precarious financial position and bring the Budget back to surplus by 2027-28.

Treasurer Chris Steel’s first Budget mixes fiscal repair with a commitment to maintain services and the Territory’s $8 billion infrastructure pipeline.

Mr Steel said that with the ACT emerging from a cost of living crisis, inflation and interest rates falling and the economy growing, now was the right time to make difficult decisions to rein in the deficit and return the Budget to balance.

“Canberrans repudiated the deep cuts to the Public Service and services that they delivered just last month in the federal election,” he said.

“But as I flagged in Budget Review, there is a need to make difficult decisions in relation to the Budget to get it on a more sustainable footing.

“Our economy is now strong and provides a sound foundation to make sure that we have a more sustainable path for the Budget.”

READ ALSO Govt urged to release childcare incidents, light rail, road project business cases in ‘Transparency Tuesday’

A combination of revenue measures amounting to $722 million over the next four years and public service efficiencies that aim to save $282 million over the same period are designed to return the Budget to a $330.6 million surplus in 2028-29.

The record 2024-25 deficit of $1.1 billion is expected to fall to $425 million in 2025-26, then $103 million in 2026-27, before returning to the black in 2027-28 with a $48 million surplus.

But net debt will continue to rise, reaching $13.6 billion in 2028-29. Borrowings will rise to $22 billion by then, incurring an interest bill of more than $1 billion a year.

To help get back to surplus, a $250 a year levy will be imposed on residential, commercial and rural property owners for four years to pay for a shortfall in health funding. It will show up on your rates bill and is expected to bring in almost $206 million.

Mr Steel said increasing demand in the ACT’s hospitals and less money from the Commonwealth had led to a structural hole in the ACT Budget that would have to be filled eventually by the Commonwealth meeting its agreed target of 45 per cent of the Territory’s health costs over the next decade.

“The Commonwealth contribution rate that they’re providing to the ACT’s hospitals and healthcare system is going backwards and if further action isn’t undertaken in the next five-year national health reform agreement negotiations to arrest that decline, then we could see that decline reach 33 per cent, which would be the lowest Commonwealth contribution rate to a state and territory in the country,” he said.

“So this is going to be an area of intense focus for myself as treasurer and the Minister for Health and the Chief Minister over the coming year to make sure that the Commonwealth recognises the extraordinary pressure on our hospitals, the level of growth and demand in our hospital system.”

Health consumes about a third of the ACT Budget, amounting to almost $3 billion in this Budget, including a record $1.19 billion worth of initiatives.

Treasurer Chris Steel: time is right for Budget repair but services won’t be cut.

The Treasurer has also gone after the wealthy with a new rates threshold for non-unit properties with an average unimproved value (AUV) of $1 million and commercial properties with an AUV of $5 million.

The residential properties will attract a tax rate of 0.5734 per cent, and commercial ones 5.9670 per cent and raise almost $18 million and $5.3 million respectively.

Rates in general will rise on average 3.75 per cent as part of the ongoing tax reform process but that will vary depending on the location. For example, Forrest residents will be hit with an 18 per cent rise, while in Aranda it will be just two per cent on average.

A single set of tax rates will also be restored for commercial properties from 2025-26 after the 2020-21 freeze due to the COVID pandemic.

Buyers of vehicles worth more than $80,000 will be slugged an eight per cent duty. The party may be over for electric vehicle buyers as well, with a cut to duty concessions from 1 September, meaning a minimum 2.5 per cent duty is paid on purchases. Duty paid will increase according to vehicle emissions and value. These measures will raise $100 million over the four years.

Motorists will also face licence fee increases and a six per cent hike in parking fees.

Employers will be hit with extra payroll tax, with a cut to the tax-free threshold from $2 million to $1.75 million and higher tax rates for big national employers from 1 July 2026. This is expected to raise an extra $171 million.

The Ambulance Levy, tobacco licensing fees, occupation licence fees and the Working With Vulnerable People registration fee will also go up.

READ ALSO ACT Budget: Steel opens floodgates to build 26,000 homes in five years, lifts stamp duty threshold

Accompanying these revenue measures will be government directorates and agencies reining in their spending by restraining growth in non-employee expenses from 2.5 per cent to 1.25 per cent per annum over the four years of the forward estimates.

Directorates will be asked to identify savings, such as reduced use of consultants and less travel and in low priority areas.

Employee expenses will be held back except for health and school staff.

But the hiring freeze will be lifted from 1 July.

Mr Steel said it meant working smartly to use the resources the government already had.

He defended the general increase in government spending over the four years, saying services and infrastructure had to keep pace with population growth, now at two per cent.

“We’ve made the decision not to, not only not to make deep cuts to the services that government provides, but we’re also not cancelling infrastructure programs that are critical to support economic growth in the future and to support that growing population,” he said.

Finance Minister Rachel Stephen-Smith said the government had managed a really good balance of delivering on election commitments and doing some fiscal repair at the same time.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

64
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
differing perspective2:30 pm 26 Jun 25

So, the ACT provides health services to surrounding areas of NSW. This has been the case, rightly so, for many yrs and will continue to be the case into the future to ensure delivery of appropriate health care to people in rural NSW. This is how it should be. But….how do we then reconcile the imposition of a levy on ACT property owners when it is not apparent how a similar levy might be, equitably, levelled on those in NSW who also need to access the same ACT health services. Asking for a friend

Capital Retro12:40 pm 26 Jun 25

Before the ACT government spends another cent on the tram sham they should read Global Construction Success by Australian born engineer and author Charles O’Neil.

Charles has built infrastructure all over the world and currently lives in Germany.

He manufactured and installed a lot of the steel support beams in the Belconnen Mall. One of the pedestrian bridges he fabricated and installed on that project was later salvaged and used to replace a collapsed section of the bicycle path near Duntroon.

He has drawn a lot of experience from analysing the failure of the Clem Jones road tunnel in Brisbane https://www.afr.com/politics/federal/doubt-over-brisbane-tunnels-20110228-ikfzv

There are some disturbing similarities with the Clem Jones disaster and the Canberra Light Rail. The ACT Government should abandon any further extension of it immediately.

imagine going in to speak to your boss and saying my budget at home has blown out, ill need you to cover the balance thanks.

Capital Retro9:48 am 26 Jun 25

The backdoor $250 health levy is tantamount to Joe Hockey’s attempt to introduce a Medicare co-payment about 10 years ago.

It was howled down by every pensioner and his dog as well as the Labor supporters.

I am listening for the same response from the same people but all I am hearing is chirp, chirp, chirp……

While there is no-one on the left evidently attacking it, I think the difference is that neither is anyone here defending it whereas absurdities of the right are defended regardless.

I dislike it directly, think it a bad precedent, and that it will hardly place the ACT in a good position for negotiations with the Federal government on health.

Typical incompetent and unaccountable government. Rather than find internal savings they’ll just grab more from the burdened taxpayer. Steele already blew over 72 million on a failed HR system and then.became Treasurer. You’ve got to be kidding. Has zero management or financial skills. I’m.sick to the back teeth of this incompetence. Try doing the same in business and see how you go.

There is no indication that the ACT government is managing the budget, or even comprehends any need to do so. They continue to spend on their “pet” project and expect the captive residents to pay for their uneconomic notions – and all we get are weekly garbage collections. So, 24 + years and nothing to show for it except a budget black hole and a decaying city. Is the Health levy (which is double taxation) going to be paid into consolidated revenue (like the Domestic Violence levy was?).

Where is the shared pain for the pollies and the public service head-honchos in all of this? As usual, the punters are the ones who have to cop their bad management. And if we complain, we are told it is the fault of the Liberals, or that it would be worse under the Libs.

Not a fan of the Libs, but I’d love it if one of our Labor MLA’s took responsibility for once instead of blaming everyone else. Tara Cheyne seems to be the closest of all of them in trying to be genuine and not spinning everything.

But if I hear one of the others say “we made the difficult decisions” or “promised and delivering” one more time, I’m going to be sick. I really don’t know how Labor MLAs see these thoughtless slogans as anything different to Sco-Mo’s hollow catchphrases like “you need to have a go, to get a go” and “governing for the quiet Australians.”

When are we going to see more than just rehearsed excuses and empty propaganda? It’s all very depressing.

From last year
Barr’s balancing act as slowdown keeps Budget in red
https://region.com.au/barrs-balancing-act-as-slowdown-keeps-budget-in-red/781926/

Taxing the motorist and homeowner. One day the ACT government might use their brains to think up a less predictable & more creative way to gain extra revenue.

Leon Arundell2:20 pm 25 Jun 25

An easier decision would be to increase town centre parking fees by a third, to create a budget-neutral fund to subsidise Canberra’s bicycle owners to equip and maintain their bicycles to a standard that would make them viable alternatives to car travel. That would improve health, reduce health system costs and reduce traffic congestion (as the Australian Government did when it introduced pay parking in the Parliamentary Triangle), and be a better investment than the government’s $80+ million per year subsidy to its polluting public transport system.

Oh dear, but this is what happens when a far left Socialist ACT Government runs out of other people’s money to spend. To prove the point where else in Australia would sensible voters elect a Communist Greens/ ALP coalition government? Only the ACT.

ACT BUDGET – When your asset rich but pocket poor and a self-funded retiree that does not qualify for the aged pension and all of its perks. Every ACT budget hurts the pocket. All gov revenue raising including rates and Rego etc..’ should not be allowed to increase by more than the CPI. Afterall that’s what my income increases by. My disposable income becomes less and less each year.

Well why don’t you sell down some of your assets or borrow against them? It isn’t the government’s job to pay an inheritance to your children. That’s just selfishness on your part.

Once again when find ourselves paying for 25 plus years of Labor mismanagement.
Yes we expect rate rises at a CPI level but for some , 18% Mr Barr are you kidding,
I have no doubt you have factored a payrise for our great local politicians, in next couple of months into the equation somewhere.

Pay rise is inevitable, the one time all politicians agree, perhaps it’s time to tattoo on their foreheads for the stupids out there that don’t realise their earnings, sorry income.

Schadenfreude. Where are all those people that voted for this Clown Show now? Most of us could see this coming. However the political talent pool on both sides is more like a puddle. A lot of people will ride this out but there are those that will start to hurt.

Every ACT budget for the last decade or more has forecast a surplus in the forward estimates. None have eventuated. This one won’t be any different. Tough decisions means pulling back on government spending and finding savings. They’ve taken the easy road of just slugging us with more taxes to pay for their waste over many years.

Unfortunately they further demonstrate gross incompetency. (no slight on ACT employees) There are numerous examples to prove this assertion. However as always, local governments make the resident carry their stupidty. Nothing new about this. These people are professional liars. They carefully chose words to smooth over their piracy. I am sure many people will make all the same foolish extreme left wing arguments because their brains tell them they have to attack logic.

What this means is the average family that are not composed of 2 public servants will have to tighten their belts and this I GUARENTEE will affect local struggling businesses. Less disposable income means less spending and less income for this impotent government leading to more tax. So on and so forth.

Despite the bluster of making “difficult decisions”, once again there is nothing in the budget around reducing the truly unsustainable spending and continued waste. They’re just tinkering around the edges and raising taxes.

And the claims of being back in surplus in 3 years time are truly heroic with a forecast increase in taxation revenue of near 20% to achieve that feat. So either the taxation burden will be significantly ramped up or the structural deficit will remain.

Neither is good policy.

hey Jack D and Seano lets here your take on the budget. can you spin a positive light on the new levies being introduced by your bestie AB?

Now that would be interesting reading. Haven’t had a good dose of lefty hyperbole for a while so come on guys amuse us.

Former ALP Chief Minister Stanhope has been warning us for years about mismanagement of the ACT economy under Barr. But dismissive ALP cadres ridiculed these warnings and blinkered Canberrans kept on voting for budget and economic negligence, wilfully ignorant of consequences, treating the ACT Government as a benign and ever indulgent skywhale of financial extravagance.
We get the government we deserve and now we are to all be punished and shafted with massive increases in taxes, charges and rates to cover ACT Government deficit and debt blow-outs.
Rates will increase depending on average land values, some to be hit with an 18% rise. Rates and land taxes flow through to higher rents.
The true losers: young people, particularly young homebuyers, couples, families, low income earners, high income earners, the elderly, car owners, home owners, renters, businesses…

Capital Retro7:09 am 26 Jun 25

Jon Stanhope should know mismanagement when he sees it.

After all, he is the one that set-up Rhodium Asset Solutions and look what happened to it:

https://region.com.au/the-rhodium-scandal/3229/

My guess is that pet The National Arboretum and the Glassworks are going the same way but there is no access to any financial information on them.

Then we had ActewAGL losing over $60 million on the failure of TransACT and more millions on A Better Place.

People are still compelled vote for this cavalier style of government so nothing will change.

So because my mortgage payments have dropped in recent months, Minister Steel thinks he has the right to take the savings and tax me more. All because this Govt has no clue about economic management.

What a joke.

So because we no idea how to manage anything lets just charge more for everything ,”health levy “ oh please lets just call it an extra tax, how much more do you want the average house hod to keep paying

HiddenDragon10:57 pm 24 Jun 25

“……to arrest the ACT’s precarious financial position and bring the Budget back to surplus by 2027-28”

Dream on – like every previous unfulfilled promise to return the ACT Budget to surplus, this latest will vanish in the usual cloud of “the dog ate my homework” excuses.

The Budget papers which were released today show the following increases over the last ten years – 96% for employee expenses, 67% for superannuation-related expenses, 208% for interest payments (which are forecast to rise to 9.5% of total spending in 2028/29), 100% for Health, 81% for Education and 86% for total spending – and yet we are to believe that total spending will increase by less than 2.3% per year over the next three years.

The health levy will almost certainly become permanent (and will eventually, of course, have to be indexed), and probably won’t be the last levy which effectively asks Canberrans to pay twice to fund core functions of government. In a similar vein, increasing numbers of home owners in middling suburbs will find they have magically become “wealthy” when their patch of land is conveniently found to qualify for the new top rates threshold.

The assembly should refuse to pass this budget.

It’s not the surplus that was tended at the election.

No confidence in the CM and trigger an election.

The only thing I’ve got no confidence in is your analysis of the situation.

Well, Blind Freddie could have seen this one coming from the current government and the inept Mr Steel.
So just as we are supposedly coming out of a cost of living crisis and interest rates are falling and people can start to breath again, BAM! let’s hit the poor suckers in the ACT electorate with increases across the board.
The fantasy numbers of being in surplus is a joke, right? I should find a bookie and see what odds they give for that.
The kicker is net debt rising from $13.8b to $22b in just 4 years shows the ALP haven’t understood the basics of accounting and mathematics.
We need the “Razor Gang” from Malcom Fraser’s era to enact serious budget cuts.

No worries mr Steel, Canberra is happy to pay for your failed projects.

We don’t expect cuts to spending!

Please don’t change the 8 billion dollar inner north spend-a-thon.

Forever Government facing no political pressure to perform keeps not performing and slugging its cash cow to pay for its forever lazy approach to budget management. Nothing changes.

Every time I am in the hospital more than half the other patients are from NSW – who pays for them?

The NSW Govt pays for them, just like the ACT Govt pays for Canberrans that need to go to NSW for treatment. From what I remember it was about $120m that NSW pays to ACT and ACT pays about $25m the other way.

Difficult decisions? The only reason we are here in such deficit is because of a lack of making difficult decisions.

There’s a chance that the federal gov will remove LCT because of the possible trade agreement with the EU. But now the ACT will slug a new LCT on cars instead. It will also be interesting to see what the increase of UCV value will be this year and the impact for rates as result for this year and the next 5 yrs. Well done. This is going to be painful for everyone.

Bennett Bennett6:23 pm 24 Jun 25

This is what I always wanted. To fork out more money for incompetence. Forget about making Canberra a place to invest in, just tax the rate payment residents, rack up more debt, increase taxes whilst inflicting your ideological beliefs on me.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.