16 October 2025

Extradition of Australian pilot held without charge to be heard in Federal Court

| By Andrew McLaughlin
Join the conversation
15
Pilot Daniel Duggan

Daniel Duggan flew former military aircraft such as the BAE Strikemaster at air shows and on joy flights after moving to Australia in 2002. Photo: Duggan family.

An Australian pilot held in maximum security prison without charge for three years will soon find out if he is to be extradited to the United States.

Daniel Duggan was arrested by Australian Federal Police, acting on a US request, in Orange on 21 October 2022, and it is claimed he has been held in maximum security at a prison initially in Wellington NSW and then at Sydney’s Silverwater Jail since then, including more than 19 months in solitary confinement. He appeared before the Federal Court on Thursday (16 October) at the start of his appeal.

It has been alleged Mr Duggan – a former US Marines Corps AV-8B Harrier pilot with 13 years’ experience – breached US arms trafficking laws by training Chinese pilots in South Africa in 2012. He has also been accused by the US of money laundering, a charge for which his legal team has claimed there is no evidence.

Mr Duggan moved to Australia when he left the US military in 2002, and became a citizen in 2012. He had flown former military jets on displays and on joy flights in Australia after moving here.

He was subsequently employed by Test Flying Academy of South Africa (TFASA) for a short time in 2012, and it is alleged he was involved in teaching Chinese military pilots how to land on and take off from an aircraft carrier.

The Harrier aircraft which Mr Duggan flew in the Marines Corps conducts rolling vertical take offs and vertical landings on US Navy ships, capabilities which Chinese military aircraft do not possess.

READ ALSO PM’s personal number listed on international website in huge global privacy breach

TFASA advertises itself as the only independent test pilot school outside Europe and the Americas. The organisation’s website says it offers flight test and consultation services, test pilot and flight test engineer training, operational pilot and specialist training, and commercial pilot training.

Mr Duggan subsequently worked in China, and renounced his US citizenship in 2016 – backdated to 2012. He subsequently worked as general manager of a consultancy working with the Chinese aviation industry from 2017 to 2020, and had continued to work in China up until shortly before his arrest.

Mr Duggan had been due to be extradited to the US under the Federal Extradition Act within two months of the request being granted, but this has been on hold pending the finalisation of a judicial review. His legal team has argued that he is not eligible for extradition because it didn’t become illegal for Australians to train foreign military personnel until 2018.

Mr Duggan has been classified as a Extreme High Risk Restricted (EHRR) and Protection Non-Association (PRNA) prisoner, and in February 2023 a clinical psychologist described Mr Duggan’s conditions of detention at Silverwater as “extreme” and “inhumane”.

Pilot Daniel Duggan and family

Mr Duggan became an Australian citizen in 2012, and has an Australian wife and six Australian-born children. Photo: freedanduggan.org.

Former Attorney General Mark Dreyfus was handed an 89-page submission under Section 22 of the Extradition Act from Mr Duggan’s legal team in 2024, but subsequently approved the extradition. He subsequently appealed this decision to the Federal Court. His lawyers say the current Attorney-General Michelle Rowland has not spoken publicly about the case.

Mr Duggan’s wife Saffrine Duggan said she was appealing to the Federal Court to have his extradition approval overturned.

“Unfairly, we don’t have an opportunity in the Australian court system to argue the details of the case – the serious errors of fact,” she said.

“We can only argue about the errors made during the extradition process – and there were a number of serious errors that clearly show that Dan, an Australian citizen – father of our six children – was not treated lawfully.

“Our current Attorney-General could set Dan free at any time,” she added.

“As a nation we need to protect the rights of all Australians – our citizens – from overreach from foreign nations and to bring Dan home.

“My hope for today is that justice and fairness prevail.”

READ ALSO Further investigations underway as UC discloses six years of staff underpayments worth $1.5 million

In a letter to Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, Mrs Duggan appealed to him to intervene in what she described as a “politically motivated case”.

“You and the Attorney-General have the power to bring Dan home to his six children,” she wrote.

“He did not run the school and instructed civilian pilots with open-source information. He is the only person facing any criminal charges.

“My husband has been an Australian permanent resident since 2002 and a sole Australian citizen since 2012,” she added.

“He has an Australian wife, and six Australian children who have been traumatised by a justice system and government whose job it is to protect them.”

Original Article published by Andrew McLaughlin on PS News.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

15
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Looks like we are in the U. S pocket. The issue is the he’s training Chinese forces which the Americans don’t like. The Australian foreign minister could have told the Americans after investigation that there’s no grounds for detention. This is Guantanamo Bay Al over again. Comon Australia stand up for what’s right.

He’s fighting the deportation that’s why it’s taken 3 years. Theirs obviously more to this story we will never know about.

If this man did commit offences then he clearly did so while an Australian citizen, not an American citizen, therefore he should be facing prosecution here under our laws not in America. This a dangerous precedent America is trying to set here by charging a citizen of another country for sonethibg the us says is crime allegedly committed by that person not in america or their home country but in a third country. If we don’t draw the line now then where do we? Next they could decide they want to charge an Australian for breaking american laws while sitting in their local pub!

Heywood Smith12:29 pm 17 Oct 25

There is only one outcome for this crime in the Australia – released on bail, charges will eventually be dropped.

Heywood Smith3:17 pm 17 Oct 25

Hey @Ajay, dont suppose you think these blokes should be tried in Australia too in order to avoid the death penalty, seeing as they too are Aussie citizens?

https://www.news.com.au/travel/travel-updates/incidents/three-australians-to-be-charged-with-premeditated-murder-after-the-bali-killing-of-zivan-radmanovic/news-story/131430b2105f0868b2011c1cb383fbc9

The offence occured while he was an American citizen. He backdated to try and cover those dates but does not void his legal obligation under US military law. Anyone in the US military has to sign an understanding of that law prior and are aware of the punishment.
Think about it, would you like your trained military personnel to train other countries known for breaching human rights to get training on high tech fighter jets? This is the reason those laws are there. To protect people, especially those that don’t realise the danger

Capital Retro4:17 pm 17 Oct 25

I would hardly call an AV-8B Harrier a “high tech fighter jet”, KB.

No because they are being charged by the country in which the alleged offences occurred, that is perfectly reasonable. This man allegedly committed his offe ces against american law in a 3rd party country. Will america extradite its citizens to us if they commit offences under our law in a 3rd party country?

Umm actually considering it was retroactively granted back to before the alleged offences legally he was not an American citizen at the time. It’s an immutable fact. The alleged offences are from 2017 onwards, AFTER his citizen was retroactively rescinded in 2016.

Oh and as the article makes clear china does not possess jump jet launching tech so he could not have been training them in relevant manoeuvres or practices. And his training was provided through a legitimate and fully legal training company meaning his rraining to them was no different to when chinese citizens come here to study, are you saying every one of their teachers should be tried the same way. An dont forget that full records were maintained and no attempt was made to conceal his actions.

Exactly, how to fly a Harrier is not considered confidential secret information; while training is challenging, much of the basic operational knowledge is publicly available through books, websites, and air shows

Exactly, how to fly a Harrier is not considered confidential secret information by any country though training is challenging, much of the basic operational knowledge is publicly available through books, websites, and air shows.

https://youtu.be/yi-Ny9d66SU?si=uJLub0kEew0cTm4m

Hey look, I guess America has to charge this guy as well then, not to mention the makers of countless other videos and instruction books and all the hollywood people that have for years made movies showing manoeuvres and cockpit interiors etc. After all those weren’t just available to a country known for breaching human rights they were available to terrorists, dictators, drug traffickers etc etc lol

3years on remand! What a disgrace.
So much for innocent until proven guilty. Those responsible for having this man on remand for so long, I hope life is unkind to you and deals back the hand you dealt this man.

It’s actually far far worse than that. This man isn’t being held on remand, he is being held in custody pending extradition. If he was on remand he would have far more rights and options of fighting the matter legally available to him but this way he has none of the fundamental protections or rights afforded a person on remand under our laws.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.