5 November 2025

Free daytime energy proposed, but ACT not in first rollout of federal scheme

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
54

Energy Minister Chris Bowen explains how the new Solar Sharer Offer will work. Photo: Region.

Energy retailers will have to offer households up to three hours of free daytime electricity every day under new measures the Federal Government is introducing.

However, while New South Wales, South Australia, and South-East Queensland will be the first to benefit from the rollout next year, Canberrans will have to wait at least another year to access free power.

The aim is to enable more Australians to benefit from solar power when excess energy is fed into the grid, without requiring them to have solar panels.

It will simply require energy retailers to offer free electricity to homes for at least three hours in the middle of the day when solar generation is at its peak.

Known as the Solar Sharer Offer, customers will be able to sign up to the scheme through their energy retailers.

However, they will need to have a smart meter and be able to shift their energy use into periods when electricity is free to achieve the bill savings.

If they choose to take up the offer, they will be able to use appliances, run air conditioners or swimming pool cleaners and charge their electric vehicles and home batteries at home during the day for free.

READ ALSO Nationals quit net zero, placing pressure on Libs to follow suit

The offer will initially be available to all households in Default Market Offer (DMO) states (NSW, SA and Queensland) from July next year, with consultations planned to potentially extend the offer to other jurisdictions, including the ACT, by 2027.

The Australian Energy Regulator will regulate the Solar Sharer Offer to ensure customers also get a fair deal outside of the free power period.

Climate Change and Energy Minister Chris Bowen said the offer was uniquely Australian and is a world-leading initiative.

“People who are able to move electricity use into the zero-cost power period will benefit directly, whether they have solar panels or not and whether they own or rent,” he said.

“And the more people take up the offer and move their use, the greater the system benefits that lower costs for all electricity users will be.

“Free daytime power for families across Australia is proof that what’s good for the planet is good for your pocket.

“Australians deserve a fairer go when it comes to their energy bills. In our second term, we’re getting on with delivering reform to ensure that no household or business pays more than they should.

“Reform to the DMO will strip out unnecessary costs and expand protections to all standing offer customers and small customers in embedded networks, including renters and apartment dwellers.”

In addition to reducing power bills for customers who can shift their electricity use, the goal is for Solar Sharer to lower costs for the system as a whole by reducing peak demand in the evenings.

READ ALSO Ten points of failure led to Optus triple-zero deaths, Senate told

A lower evening peak has flow-on effects throughout the system, minimising expensive peak electricity prices and reducing the need for costly network upgrades and interventions to ensure grid stability.

Consultation on the Solar Sharer Offer has opened and submissions are invited, but the Australian Energy Council says there have been no discussions yet with energy retailers.

The council’s chief executive officer, Louisa Kinnear, said the AEC was disappointed that the Government didn’t consult with the energy industry before making its Solar Sharer announcement.

“Today’s announcement of a new regulated Solar Sharer Offer was a surprise to the industry and did not form part of the DMO Review consultation process,” she said.

“This lack of consultation risks damaging industry confidence, as well as creating the potential for unintended consequences.”

Mr Bowen subsequently said he made no apology for putting Australian energy consumers “first, second and third”.

He has acknowledged that the offer is not a “silver bullet” and is optional for consumers.

However, retailers will be required to comply with a range of upcoming changes introduced through the government’s retail energy market reforms.

“There’s a number of changes that we’ve announced today. I began this consultation in June, and the conclusion is today,” the Minister said.

“Changes to ensure that consumers are put first, that we have the most efficient Default Market Offer.”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

54
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
HiddenDragon9:23 pm 06 Nov 25

Looks like another con job from the same bull artists who promised $275 power bill reductions (which this effort might eventually be re-spun as) and are now trying to pretend that they didn’t, or that even if they (sort of) did, the ungrateful proles should just shut up and get with the program.

As others have noted, the real issue here is “smart” meters –

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-08-15/calls-to-end-power-bill-shocks-and-convoluted-prices/104113386

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-04-07/nsw-energy-ombudsman-sounds-alarm-at-smart-meter-rollout/105140486

Capital Retro8:33 am 06 Nov 25

When do we get the free set of steak knives?

What happens on the many days the sun isn’t shining or hail storms take out the solar panels?

Same as happens when coal-fired generators collapse for days, weeks or months. That is why supply is being diversified,

No steak knives for you though, they require mature handling.

Coal is grandfathered. Why are we going to secure something with long term fixes when it might be switched off tomorrow.

Do you also ask people on death row what they are going to do when they retire?

What did that mean Henry?

The term “grandfathered” normally means “not subject to changes being made for new events”, typically of taxes or regulations. Perhaps you meant “nearly dead”. Who is switching what off, other than expensive coal stations of declining reliability?

Our coal fleet is out the end of its serviceable life….so by grandfathered I guess you meant needs a lot of expensive maintenance and downtime.

Yes Axon, energy from fossil fuels In Austala is in such mortal danger it’s plummeted to supplying 91% of our energy. Life support levels.

https://www.energy.gov.au/energy-data/australian-energy-statistics/energy-consumption

seano pay particular attention to the use of the term energy 🤣

“seano pay particular attention to the use of the term energy”

Yes….I understand that….you…think that’s a clever point. It doesn’t cut much ice with reasonable people…or *checks notes*…voters.

Genius stuff as always Penfold.

Just wanted to spare you more embarrassment. You’re welcome 😊

What embarrassment, it’s not my fault you lose energy debates and have to resort to disingenuous tactics and emojis.

When someone doesn’t understand the difference between electricity and energy, it’s a little unfair to confused party to describe it as a debate. But hey, as you’ve described coal as “nearly dead”, you might be shocked at the 25 year trend graph the IEA have here.

On current trends the funeral will be sometime next century. Maybe 2250 or thereabouts.

https://www.iea.org/countries/australia/electricity

The article speaks specifically about electricity, yet Penfold diverted to energy with not a shred of relevance to the article. Now that’s true zealotry.

36% of electricity generation in Australia in 2024 was supplied by renewables, 42% today, and still climbing because they are proven to be cheaper.

“Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery”

Oscar Wilde (allegedly)

“When someone doesn’t understand the difference between electricity and energy”….you’ve literally done this yourself and no one pretended you didn’t understand the difference.

The deliberate disingenuity of your comment shows how little you have to contribute to the the debate…it sits well with some who will call out grammar errors as if it’s a meaningful point whilst using the incorrect “your”, but then there’s always a new low isn’t there?…for example this:

‘But hey, as you’ve described coal as “nearly dead”,’… this is an outright lie. I have never, not once, typed those words anywhere ever. I defy you to produce a link to where I have….you won’t because you can’t. You should retract and apologise but given form you won’t do that eitehr, you’ll run away as you always do.

You expect to be taken seriously on a platform of disingenuousness and when that’s not working, out right porkies. Laughable.

Renewable are currently 36% of our electricity generation…. and…

“Australia is expected to add around 52.2GW of new capacity between 2024-30”.

https://www.argusmedia.com/en/news-and-insights/latest-market-news/2616293-iea-raises-australian-renewable-power-capacity-forecast

Which must be galling for someone who doesn’t care about energy security, prices or emissions only trying to, and failing to score points in the culture wars. Enjoy.

“The article speaks specifically about electricity, yet Penfold diverted to energy with not a shred of relevance to the article. Now that’s true zealotry.:”

He’ll then pretend that any interchanging of the terms is sign of not understanding the topic even when the usage is correct and even though he does it deliberately to try to derail debate.

Contemptible, desperate tactics but unsurprising given the facts are not on his side.

“When someone doesn’t understand the difference between electricity and energy, it’s a little unfair to confused party to describe it as a debate”

Thanks for admitting you’re confused and this isnt a debate.

Probably the only true thing you’ve ever said on this website.

😂😂😂👨‍🦯👨‍🦯👨‍🦯

Penfold, more relevant is Shakespeare, “hoist with his own petard”, and nothing tragic about it.

Funny to see the usual suspects not understanding the benefits of proposing more efficiency in the grid.

Apparently they are against subsidies unless it’s them getting subsidised by other customers.

Capital Retro8:36 am 06 Nov 25

Appears only people with above average intellect can see any benefit from this proposal.

Don’t think you need ever average level intellect to see benefits in promoting more efficiency in the grid through incentives and variable pricing.

Strange that you’ve never previously complained about peak and off peak electricity pricing options aimed at minimising operational issues for coal fired power plants.

What exactly do you not like with this proposal?

Be specific.

Has Mr Bowen spent too much time in the sun?

The government has been encouraging people to spend their hard earnt putting panels on their roof, partly as a means of reducing their their energy costs.

Feed-in tariffs are now so low, that to achieve energy bill relief, he wants us to once again spend our hard earnt on batteries. Effectively, we are prepaying our energy bills, but let’s say that at some stage it breaks even.

So now, courtesy of those who spent their hard earnt, others will be able to get 3 hours a day of free electricity. There is nothing as grand as socialism.

Of course Mr Bowen claims it’ll be great for renters, the catch is that the property needs to have a “smart” meter, and I very much doubt that many rental properties have one of those!

Just wait. It won’t be long before the Greens are lobbying for landlords to upgrade their electricity meters, so that tenants can enjoy the same benefits, as those who use “free” electricity to clean their swimming pools!

Like many people our solar panels have already passed their pay back period, they’re essentially generating free energy now…more free energy just makes the calculation on the payback period for a battery shorter.

More efficient energy use leads to cheaper energy which is better for renters.

Judging from your made nonsense at the end what your complaint here is really about is that it’s uncomfortable seeing a government you don’t support actually doing things that benefit the community…and it doesn’t look like we’re heading back to a Coalition government about nothing any time soon.

Chris – a little selective quoting here. What Bowen said was “I fully expected this not to be universally welcomed, but I make no apologies for putting the best interest of Australian consumers first, second and third,”

The reason for the non-universal unwelcoming is simple – those lunchtime consumers he’s putting “first, second and third,” means putting dinnertime consumers seventh, eighth and ninth. And that means retailers will charge higher power prices at night. Yet another Bowen thought-free brain snap.

Bowen loves his slogans so here’s one for him – there’s no such thing as a free lunch.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.