11 April 2025

Harden up, conservatives: Satire can be offensive, but it’s never a crime

| Oliver Jacques
Join the conversation
80

Michael McCormack reported this mural in Wagga to the police. Photo: Michael McCormack/Facebook.

When I was growing up, conservatives were people who railed against the Russian empire, big government and high taxes.

Nowadays, Tories seem obsessed with vaccines, satire and gender-neutral bathrooms (and for some reason, they like Russia).

The sad decline of the right was exemplified by the outrage they displayed against an artist parody based on the 1960s comedy Hogan’s Heroes in Wagga last week.

Graphic design studio Advision put up a mural depicting former deputy prime minister Michael McCormack alongside Clive Palmer, Gina Rinehart and Peter Dutton, each wearing World War II German military uniforms used in the TV show.

READ ALSO Interstate police chase ends with suspect jumping into Lake Burley Griffin

Mr McCormack reported this to the police, a decision cheered on by dozens of his supporters. This showed them to be both thin-skinned and hypocritical.

Conservatives are forever carrying on about ‘cancel culture’ and the ‘snowflakes’ on the ‘woke left’ who can’t take a joke and want to shut down free speech.

We’ve seen them push back against activists who try to take down statues of historical figures alleged to have been racist or sexist.

The right of the Liberal Party has argued against making hate speech a crime.

Conservatives defended comedian Trevor Noah when lefties wanted his Australian tour boycotted over disparaging comments he’d made years previously about Aboriginal women.

But it seems many right-wingers behave the same as their political opposites when the culture war boot is on the other foot.

“A display in a Wagga Wagga storefront window showing me in a Nazi-like uniform has been reported to Police,” Mr McCormack posted on Facebook.

“This is beyond disgraceful… The Nazis were pure evil. To be depicted as one of them is as insulting as it is vile.”

The vast majority of the 2400-plus comments on the post supported him.

“Truly disgraceful. Those responsible should be prosecuted,” said one comment liked 114 times that was typical of many.

Mr McCormack has every right to call the mural “disgraceful”. The artwork was offensive to him and many others, who believe any references to Nazi Germany should be off-limits. The prominent politician cleverly used his huge platform to strike back at the graphic designer.

But this was not a criminal matter. Do we really expect our boys and girls in blue – overwhelmed with tackling domestic violence and street crime – to also be trying to take down satire? What would be the offence – grievous feelings harm?

Thankfully, NSW Police confirmed the mural broke no law.

The display, however, was quickly hidden by counter-protesters who put up the sign “blessed are the cheesemakers” to cover it, a quote from a scene in the movie Life of Brian, where Jesus Christ’s sermon on the mount was misheard.

sign over window

The Blessed are the Cheesemakers sign hid the original artwork. Photo: Supplied.

I half-expected the lactose intolerant to protest the new sign, but that didn’t happen. The satire art war sparked the type of vibrant political debate that is often lacking in regional towns. Some felt the original mural crossed the lines, while others felt it was a parody that made a fair point.

This is the sort of discourse we need in our increasingly polarised world, and both sides should take note.

There’s no doubt the Left can also be hypocritical on this topic, too. Many praised the graphic designer Michael Agzarian’s mural and his right to free speech. But would they also do the same when people like Israel Folau, Margaret Court or, indeed, Michael McCormack expressed views they found repulsive?

READ ALSO Residents of ‘the forgotten suburb of Canberra’ have had enough – they say it’s time to fix Oaks Estate

When he was a newspaper editor, the now Riverina MP was never afraid to offend or provoke debate with his opinion pieces. Nor should he have been.

Satire is also an important form of free speech that should always be protected.

True leaders defend it even when their political opponents offend them. Only snowflakes call for art to be banned.

Join the conversation

80
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Let’s face it, lefties generally have no sense of humour at all. They seek to be offended at anything and everything. The comedy industry has been decimated by them.

The audience may leave by the normal exits. Reality is still present outside the specimen display room.

HiddenDragon9:30 pm 10 Apr 25

If this really was meant to be (or is retrospectively being explained as) a reprise/redress of the 2013 Daily Telegraph front page which depicted Rudd, Albanese and Thomson as characters from Hogan’s Heroes, it might have helped if one of the four had been depicted as Hogan and if, like the Telly, they had used uniforms from the 1960s show, not actual Nazi/SS uniforms with charming little details like the Totenkopf on Palmer’s collar.

All of that, along with the “Toss this Dick out of Dickson” and the “FUK AUKUS” stickers makes this look like another example of something that both ends of the political spectrum are too often guilty of – righteous outrage and conceited posturing of truly adolescent proportions dressed up as humour.

In a very dismal election campaign, real humour would be a welcome distraction.

There is a big difference between making fun of the wealthy and powerful and having a go at the marginalised and downtrodden. Michael McCormack clearly missed that point.

The cat did it5:59 pm 10 Apr 25

Offensive? Maybe it would have been if Advision had used historic images of actual Nazi officers, but Hogan’s Heroes? The German military portrayed in HH were a bunch of incompetent fools with Right-wing tendencies. I’d suggest portraying this bunch in such a matter is dead accurate.

Herbert Schmitzenkrunch4:38 pm 10 Apr 25

It is offensive and funny.

GrumpyGrandpa1:33 pm 10 Apr 25

When I first saw the image, I didn’t immediately think of Hogan’s Heros. I just saw Clive Palmer, Gina Rynehart, Peter Dutton and Michael McCormack dressed in Nazi uniforms.

Michael McCormack had every right to demand it to be removed.

How is it that the Nazi swastika and salute seen as offensive, and yet during an election campaign, an image of conservative Australians dressed in Nazi uniforms ok?

Because one is promoting hate & intolerance and the other is satire.

Just because you didn’t get the Hogan’s Heroes reference doesn’t mean it wasn’t there.

It was certainly there when the Telegraph did the same thing to Kevin Rudd in 2013, which I bet you didn’t say boo about at the time.

Of course none it is particularly funny, it was distasteful in 2013 it’s distasteful now.

Equally distasteful is the faux outrage of right wing codgers who claim they can’t see difference between promoting Nazi ideology and an attempt, albeit a poor one to take the piss.

Glad I could help.

GrumpyGrandpa4:01 pm 12 Apr 25

Sorry Seano,

However, you were of no help at all.

Calling something S
satire, doesn’t make something offensive, ok.

I see nothing funny is denigrating anyone, whether it be these 4 or Kevin Rudd in 2013.

“However, you were of no help at all.”…yeah I was champ, it’s not my fault you’re being deliberately obtuse.

Firstly I never said it was funny, in fact if you read my posts I said it wasn’t funny in 2013 when it was done to Rudd and it’s not funny now.

Secondly you need to look up the word satire “the use of humour, irony, exaggeration, or ridicule to expose and criticize”… the fact that you don’t find it funny or you find it offensive are entirely irrelevant to whether or not it is satire.

But using satire is not the same as promoting Nazi hate and ideology just because people you like are being satirised, but your suggestion that they are the same thing, now that is actually offensive.

Glad I could help.

PS. “I see nothing funny is denigrating anyone, “…big fan of Trump though I’ll bet.

Have to say, I’m with McCormack on this one.

Anyone who willingly associates with Nazi culture is an abomination. I have seen no evidence to even suggest that McCormack embraces in anyway that culture.

This is not ‘political advertising’ or even satire, it’s (arguably) tantamount to libel, and McCormack has every right to feel affronted at being depicted, as associated with Nazi culture.

“The sad decline of the right”, lol. Tell that to Trump, the Italians, Finns, Hungarians, Croatia’s and Czechs.

“Tell that to Trump”…it’s going super well for Trump champ. Tanked the American economy with his kinda, maybe, on again, off again tariffs, and made it so long term they’ll never regain their economic dominance because America is unstable and can’t be trusted.

Genius stuff.

Trump is doing what China wanted to do in decreasing reliance on the US dollar. He’s destroyed America’s reputation and the desire for former allies to support them by treating friends as enemies.

He could have made his points (some of which are valid) in a much less destructive way. His actions have been cruel, heartless and ruthless as well as unnecessary. He is harming so many people who’re already struggling and worried about their futures in a way that is absolutely pointless. He doesn’t understand the value of soft diplomacy.

I object to right wingers being referred to as conservatives. They are simply right wingers and serve only to give the godforsaken left something to spar with – the whole thing given a false legitimacy with the use of terms like free speech, in pursuit of some imaginary hyper-enlightened future, which can only end in the kind of divided mess we’re living through now, thanks to erroneous foundations they rest on, which are violent and therefore only ever lead to *violence.

For instance, if free speech is truly the principle, then how could we know it without correct speech first? As such, correct speech is the principle and free speech might only come in some place after. And yet, instead of acknowledging this reality – which I couldn’t explain any clearer – both left and right will stay wedded to free speech, because the ‘truth is somewhere out there in the future’….even though you need the truth right now to know what you’re saying is true…and so the violence against reality is complete, and will always betray the liberal (left and right) despite vain posturing.

*consider, for instance, how no era has come close to spilling more blood than the modern one: including world wars 1 and 2 and communism in Russia and China, especially – all of these being related in some way to the liberal thinking of the enlightenment, which was meant to have put a stop to all the blood shed. The conclusion to draw from this hard data is that, while other and much better systems might also have their faults, they’re merely bugs in those systems and not features like with liberalism – the coherency of those better systems being the key.

Class dismissed

Class dismissed….lol who do you think you’re lecturing?

Your first paragraph is close to gibberish, right and left wing are terms in political science and the conservatives sit on the right. Those are just facts.

It gets more nonsensical from there, you don’t define “correct speech” which apparently we all should be worried about, IDK why but I pretty sure I wouldn’t care if I did…once I got to “which I couldn’t explain any clearer”…I laughed and gave up. Complete nonsense.

Go for a walk mate, seriously.

The first and second world wars were direct outcomes of self indulgent acquisitiveness and rejection of change in obsolete monarchies, followed by the apotheosis of the anti-semitism which was then widespread in Britain and Europe.. The leaderships of “communist” Russia and China were and are wholly authoritarian.

Adjusted for population, WW 1 & 2 are neither the bloodiest. Try Three Kingdoms war, Mongol conquest, An Lushan, or for localisation of population the American Civil war, Paraguayan war or just the Albigensian massacre. Reality is, death from war and interpersonal violence have all fallen as the world has erratically progressed from authoritarian beliefs.

Vasily M’s “correct” speech is, what? Religious authority? That goes well.

Vasily M is clueless.

Okay, now that I’ve read the article…how old was the person who typed this? The term Russian Empire makes me think of the Russian Monarchy which fell after WW1. Also this reminds me of the quote “It’s important in the fight against monsters we don’t become them.” – Nietzsche. Unfortunately this is lost on too many people.

The problem with the left is they’re quite happy to lampoon conservatives, but outraged when the reverse applies. Take Pope in the CT for example – he’s quite happy to disparage Dutton. But look at the outrage Bill Leak received several years ago when he drew a cartoon of an Aboriginal father.

Yeah, the problem with the modern right (besides having no moral or ethical integrity or consistency, and yet some how still super insistent on lecturing everyone else despite that hypocrisy) is they don’t think anything is funny unless it’s punching down, which is probably why so many of them enjoy a lame joke backed by a racist cartoon.

On the contrary Seano, every post you make is humorous. Especially some of the wildly inaccurate statements made claiming they’re facts !

You mean the ones with the links you don’t read?

Who needs the links ? Love it when you tell us there’s GST on fruit and vegetables. The teals voted with ScoMo. The ACT consumes 100 renewables. It’s better than reading a joke book. 🥳

“GST on fruit and vegetables”…I didn’t.

“The teals voted with ScoMo”…they did.

“The ACT consumes 100 renewables”…I didn’t say consumes, only idiots think it’s important where each individual electron comes from.

You’re not a smart as you think you are Penfold and to my shame I gave you far more credit that you deserve with your latest comment a reminder as to why that was a mistake.

The teals were first elected in 2022, the election where ScoMo was removed. Do you get anything right ? 🤣

Leak’s cartoon was tough but brilliant. It spoke to the reality of many Aboriginal lives instead of the fantasy.

Zali Steggall…the first “teal” was elected in 2019. She like all the independents guaranteed supply to the Scott Morrison Liberal government which ran until 2022.

“Steggall has been described as the pioneer of the Climate 200-backed teal independent movement”
https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2022/may/23/teal-independents-who-are-they-how-did-they-upend-australia-election

You can apologise any time you like. You won’t clueless and toxic tend to go hand in hand.

She’s wasn’t a teal ! This article is about righties and humour, thanks for the continuing laugh.

Btw what on earth did your last sentence mean ?

none of those things are true Franky.

@Seano
*tip my hat to you*
I must admit, I was thinking ‘Let it go, I believe he is right.’

Well played, sir 👏

It very conveniently ignored all the white men who create children but don’t father them. It discriminated against aboriginal men, suggesting they were worse fathers than other men. There is no evidence that this is true. That cartoon was a nasty attack that played into racist stereotypes promoted by racist people who denigrate aboriginal people. Leak displayed his own prejudice.

Unfortunately @JustSaying

Penfold refuses to accept when he’s found out. Instead sputters this porkie “She’s wasn’t a teal ! ” which is literally proven wrong in the post he’s replying to. He then seeks to immediately redirect the conversation back to the original topic as if he wasn’t the one who derailed it in the first place with his attempt at snide insults.

No, honour and no class but I’m not surprised.

“Well played, sir 👏”

Thankyou.

psycho – at the time there was significant reporting of issues of juvenile crime in the Aboriginal community which is why Leak drew it. Not much seems to have changed.

LOL I got to admit, I just looked at the picture and thought it was very clever and funny! In regards to any complaints about it “if I don’t laugh I’ll cry.”

Even though I think Australia would be better off if all four of these people disappeared from public life, I don’t like this and I didn’t like it when Newscorp did it to Kevin Rudd.

It’s unsavoury and unnecessary and diminishes a serious issue Australia has with far right extremism and N#zis.

But there has to be a place for unsavoury opinion as well if we want to live in a free society.

It’s hilarious however double standards abound.
These days John Cleese would be arrested for his Fawlty Towers Nazi episode.

And yet the Fawlty Towers episode plays on syndication and is available on streaming services, as is Hogan’s Heroes, sound like you’re making it up mate.

The difference is Hogan’s Heros is a fictional plot with fictional characters. The mural depicts real people who never identified as or have never been linked to Nazism – until now. Were my image depicted, I would certainly sue for defamation and slander.

These are public figures with incredible wealth & power who are being portrayed as fascists, whatever the uniform. Being a politician invites public attacks not appropriate for private citizens. They would lose a defamation case, as no-one is realistically suggesting that they’re actually Nazis, just that they’re trying to dictate how we live to suit their own beliefs even if they are not very credible in the way they do it.

Given you’d have to prove significant damage to your reputation so you’d be very unlikely win.

The real problem is how boring it is. People today don’t seem to know anything other than superficial knowledge of Nazis and Harry Potter. Why not Dutton as Nero? Or Rinehart as Jay Gould? There is so much more human history with more pertinent parallels to today.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.