18 November 2025

Heritage, size concerns over three townhouses proposed for key Forrest corner block

| By Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
13

An artist’s impression of the Forrest townhouse project. Image: TT Architecture.

A Demonstration Housing project that aims to build three large townhouses on a key corner in the heritage suburb of Forrest has the local community council worried about its implications for the area.

A development application has been submitted for the $2.6 million project, pitched at ageing in place and the missing middle.

It will convert a single residence in blue-ribbon RZ1 Forrest into three terraced four-bedroom townhouses. Similar townhouses in the area have been selling between $3.5 million and $4 million.

The property at 38 Empire Circuit sits on a 1973 square metre block at the corner with Tasmania Circuit, next to Manning Clark House, and is part of the Blandfordia 4 heritage precinct.

The current owners have lived in the 1950s house since 1997, when they bought it for $540,000. Its estimated value now is about $4 million, but it is in poor condition, expensive to maintain and heat.

LJ Hooker agent Keenan Veraar, who is listed on the DA, said they were now in their 70s and planned to downsize into one of the townhouses, which will be built to the Gold Level of the Liveable Housing Design.

“They are at a point in their lives where they want to stay in the same neighbourhood and would like a well-designed smaller home with less maintenance and [that was] more environmentally friendly,” he said.

READ ALSO Capital Property Group lodges application for latest CBD building

Inner South Canberra Community Council spokesperson Richard Johnston said that, despite the ACT Heritage Council waving it through with some conditions, there were concerns about setbacks and the number of protected trees to be removed.

“We’re a bit alarmed that ACT Heritage doesn’t seem to have treated their own guidelines seriously,” he said.

Mr Johnston said the council also questioned just what the project was demonstrating other than how to max out the block.

He said this was an example of what could happen if density controls were relaxed in RZ1 generally.

“We’re really concerned about what’s likely to happen if the missing middle stuff goes through,” Mr Johnston said.

“This is supposed to be a demonstration of how to do redevelopment in sensitive areas appropriately, and we don’t think it’s a good example at all.”

But Mr Veraar said the Demonstration House process had been running for seven years.

He said there had been extensive consultation, including two publicly advertised on-site sessions, with the National Capital Design Review Panel, the Planning Authority, the Heritage Section, the Demonstration Housing team, the Planning Minister’s office, government-appointed external planning consultants, the Tree Protection Unit, local community groups and Manning Clark House representatives.

“The project is subject to the same rules as standalone houses, so the built form is of no further impact than if the block was purchased to plonk a McMansion on it,” he said.

“In fact, this project is below the minimum requirement in terms of site coverage and plot ratio. Current planning allows for a plot ratio not greater than 50 per cent. This project outcome is essentially underdeveloped, coming in at 42 per cent – [it’s] responsible urban infill.”

Designed by TT Architecture, the project’s three homes are connected by a central roof on the eastern boundary of the property, creating the illusion of a single building from the street.

A shared asphalt driveway with a neighbour to the north-eastern side of the block on Empire Circuit will provide access for all three units.

Ground floor garages separate the accessible two-storey homes, which have a bathroom and ensuite, and lifts for occupants as they age or are disabled.

site map

Site map of the proposed development. Image: TT Architecture.

The existing main entry is to be removed and replaced with a matching hedge that will also serve to shield the homes from the street. The brick and cladding project’s gross floor area is 835.78 square metres, which provides a plot ratio of 42.36 per cent.

On the block itself, there are 15 trees of various sizes and heights, and eight of them are slated for removal. Three regulated trees will stay. There are seven outside the block, and four of these are also to go. The tree report says some have dieback.

Mr Johnston said the heritage guidelines were a bit woolly about trees, but there would be an impact on the streetscape and neighbouring No. 36, along which the driveway will be built.

He said smaller townhouses, or just two, with a different layout, would protect more of the trees.

A major departure from the guidelines was the size and arrangement of the setbacks.

“The appearance of the proposal would be a much greater amount of building to both street frontages and including to the rear, adjacent to Manning Clark House,” Mr Johnston said.

He said the existing building was set back a minimum of about 8 metres from the Empire Circuit frontage and angled away from it, and about 10 metres from Tasmania Circle (also angled away).

The site and landscaping showed a minimum setback of 8.176 metres from Empire Circuit, but generally parallel to it, and 5.57 metres from Tasmania Circle.

“It just seems to be a demonstration of how to maximise development and not worry too much about saving trees and protecting the streetscape character,” Mr Johnston said.

READ ALSO Slice of the inner south has been carefully updated for the times

Mr Veraar said the project also had to meet the heritage requirements for the area, which allows a footprint of 30 per cent of the block.

The large hedges and some mature trees would be retained, with a further 20 trees to be planted.

The private open space was 60 per cent of the block, and the planting area was over 40 per cent. None of the neighbours would be overshadowed, Mr Veraar said.

The National Capital Design Review Panel supported the project, which has been redesigned in response to its feedback.

The ACT Government’s Demonstration Housing Project aims to showcase innovative housing models, informing policy and potential planning changes to enhance housing choice.

The proposal aligns with the government’s policy to encourage missing middle development in established suburbs, including townhouses, row houses, terraces, and low-rise apartments.

Comments on the DA close on 1 December.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

13
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Incidental Tourist5:01 pm 19 Nov 25

It’s good for budget because this development will attract several LVRs, plus stamp duty and triple rates take from the same block. Moreover the outcome is affordable housing used by downsizing retirees.

“Expensive to .. heat” … hmmm .. It’s fancy! I kind’a thought that someone who pays $18,000 in rates sitting on $4M Forrest property does not build new home because of more than average winter heating bill. Such bill cannot come anywhere close to the rates they pay – in any season really. And it looks like by the time new townhouse is complete the rates increase will greatly out-price their entire heating bill anyway. This sounds as fancy as a person buying new Rolls-Royce justifying purchase by saving on petrol..

This proposal will add to the character of the area. What is wrong with people wanting to stay in the area they’ve been a part of for many years? I understand the ACT Govt and Heritage people have been involved in this for seven years, no wonder nothing ever gets done. And to top things off, you have the Inner South Canberra Community Council scrambling for some sort of relevance. Give me a break!!

chrisjeanemery2:23 pm 18 Nov 25

Townhouses don’t usually have a lift.

The only thing wrong with this proposal is the ridiculous amount of expensive make-work consultation the proponent and taxpayer-funded agencies went through to replace a shabby environmentally unsound 4-bedroom dwelling of little architectural merit with three 3-bedroom homes in the middle of Canberra. These type of projects, in this case driven by the owner-occupier who wants to age in place, will become increasingly common. It’s time the self-appointed Inner South Canberra Community Council retired.

Correction: existing house is being replaced by three 4-bedroom houses.

Pretty modest development really, with the need to density important and the ongoing housing shortage. Design looks ready good.

Capital Retro9:22 am 18 Nov 25

Are the proposed lifts large enough to accommodate an ambulance stretcher?

This is essential in planning old age living at home.

Heywood Smith1:16 pm 18 Nov 25

@CR – slippery slide from the windows not a sufficient alternative?

Capital Retro2:54 pm 22 Nov 25

I recently had a “help” phone call from an elderly neighbour who had fallen in her kitchen. I went over the fence and found her in great pain with indications she had broken her hip.

When an ambulance arrived (30 minutes) the paramedics could only sedate her for pain relief because there was no room to lift her onto a gurney. They called Fire and Rescue who needed six men, blankets and expert knowledge to remove her safely so the paramedics could get her to ED. The house was a 30 y.o. guvvie – hardly room to swing a cat.

It may be fun for you and your peers to make jokes about old people now Heywood so I hope you remember this post on the day in the future when you are on your way to ED in an EA (Electric Ambulance) and the battery goes flat.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.