30 September 2025

If public servants deserted the PM, then his UK speech was definitely a political one

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
42
Anthony Albanese and Keir Starmer

Anthony Albanese and Keir Starmer at Number 10. Photo: Anthony Albanese Facebook.

The Federal Opposition says Anthony Albanese crossed a line in addressing the Labour Party conference in the United Kingdom, but the Federal Government says it was all a good use of the Prime Minister’s time.

The truth lies somewhere in between, as the PM did tend to a lot of other business while on his extended overseas trip, including a string of useful meetings in the UK.

However, the fact that public servants were not with the PM at the Liverpool conference is a fairly good indicator that that leg of the tour was party-political.

That Mr Albanese all but endorsed British Prime Minister Keir Starmer on stage and gave a rallying call to his party is another stark clue that this was a partisan appearance.

Public servants – usually hordes of them – always accompany a Prime Minister on international business.

There were plenty to be seen (or not seen, if they’re good at what they do) in New York for the United Nations General Assembly; en route to Scotland for an audience with the King; and on hand at various meetings with political leaders over the past week.

But they weren’t there for the Labour conference in Liverpool, and that’s how it should be.

The question is, should the Australian PM himself have even been there? Should he have addressed the crowd?

READ ALSO Albo looming large on world stage, but no more talk of republic while he’s PM

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley says it’s a definite “no” to that question.

“Australians are rightly disappointed in the Prime Minister today,” she said on Monday (29 September).

“The Prime Minister crossed a line by attending a UK Labour Party conference.

“In fact, he didn’t just cross a line; he flew to the other side of the world to give a partisan political speech on behalf of a political party in another country. That is totally unacceptable.

“We have no problem with the Prime Minister meeting the King, the Prime Minister of the UK, and other UK leaders, but giving a speech backing a political party in another country, that really does cross the line, and I know Australians would be disappointed in their Prime Minister for doing just that.

“In fact, his excuse is in shreds because the public service deserted that leg of his trip, completely underlining the fact that it was partisan and political in nature.”

Shadow finance minister James Paterson, who is also shadow minister for the public service, was just as scathing in his critique of the PM’s Labour Party appearance.

He called a victory lap.

“I’m not aware of any precedent of a Prime Minister travelling overseas to speak at a party political conference, a partisan political conference,” Senator Paterson said.

“I think that the Prime Minister had legitimate business in New York. He had legitimate businesses in the UK, including his meetings with the government. But this side trip to a political conference is inappropriate.

“And frankly, I think the Labor Party should be picking up the tab for that, not taxpayers, because it starts to look like this is a taxpayer-funded victory lap for a Prime Minister on a partisan basis.

“I think that is reckless for our foreign policy and not a fair and proper use of taxpayers’ money.”

Fellow Opposition frontbencher Maria Kovacic called it an “exercise in vanity”.

READ ALSO Trump’s pharma tariffs a source of confusion for the Federal Government

Federal Treasurer Jim Chalmers, however, defended his boss, saying international leaders often fill the guest spot on the Labour conference agenda.

And besides, the PM met with “both sides of politics” and the head of state while in the UK.

By the end of the day, the Prime Minister himself was asked about the whole saga while giving a media conference in Abu Dhabi.

He essentially stated that he was in a position to accept the invitation extended to him.

“I was really able to take up the invitation of Prime Minister Starmer, and I met with all of the senior ministers in his government, including the Deputy Prime Minister, the Defence Minister, the Foreign Minister, the Health Minister,” he said.

“We were able to pursue discussions about AUKUS as well … It is in Australia’s interest to be engaged with the world.

“I have been engaged with the world, and including in that, of course, I met with the Leader of the Opposition and some of her key people, including the shadow education minister and others as well.”

It is certainly in Australia’s interest for its Prime Minister to be engaged in world affairs.

But it is in the Prime Minister’s interest and that of his party to endorse a like-minded fellow traveller from the same political movement as his own.

And so publicly taking sides in the politics of another country isn’t really the done thing.

The PM knows that. The Opposition knows that. And so do the public servants who left Albo to his own devices in Liverpool.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

42
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Why do people care about this?

Am looking forward to Chris’ article soon on today’s Essential poll where:

* Albo’s approval rating collapse
* One Nations polling surge
* Aussie scepticism (> 2/3rds) on the chances of hitting the wild 2035 ERT numbers
* most Aussies think the country is heading in the wrong direction

Poor Penfold. As noted by franky22, he just can’t get over the last election.

Albo’s approval rating has wobbled around 45% give or take a bit for the last two years. Currently it is 44%. Penfold always has trouble with numbers.

One Nation’s support has risen since the last Federal election, to 13%, probably owing to the Liberal Party’s losses, yet 58% of people in the poll did not want Australia to be more like America, so that offers nothing to the right for the next election.

Penfold quite accidentally forgot to mention that 61% of responders thought the emissions target for 2035 was about right or not ambitious enough. Emissions reduction is thus supported despite worries about whether we can achieve it. Did Penfold notice this morning’s news that the Gladstone power station will now be shut down in 2029 rather than 2035? Uneconomic compared with renewables.

The “right direction” question has wobbled around its current level for a couple of years now, with 50% thinking it is wrong. Despite that only 44% are pessimistic about the future.

Penfold’s usual beat-up. That last election must really hurt.

Impressive Axon, you were able to quote a poll number close to accurately. But what you neglected is his approval rating just slumped 5 points in a month and his disapproval jumped too. Now net negative.

Chris J was rather upbeat about Albo “cementing his popularity with Australian voters” a few weeks ago, so though it worth mentioning that the cement is more porous than expected. And all this after his “triumphant” UN and overseas visits. Maybe his carbon footprint is on the nose.

https://region.com.au/albos-approval-rating-up-but-voters-unsure-about-recognising-palestine/896007/

Now you’re correct about the 2035 ERT was supported, but again you failed to mention that 2/3rds of Aussies think we’re not getting anywhere near meeting the target. Roughly equivalent to all Labor voters. Frankly 100% of Aussies should be worried based on how far away from the 2030 target we are.

As for the last election well we’re well past that now. Though i’m loving how Labor supporters are gloating at one of the lowest Labor primary voted in history – barely 1/3rd of Aussies. It’s what one might call a very “soft” 94 seats. Pauline Hanson must be over the moon today and the Greens must be running around thinking denial is a river in Egypt.

You might want to review those “right direction” stats. Only 34% (that Labor vote again) think we’re on the right track.

And let’s face it – when an Essential (Greens, TAI, Guardian) poll has such bad polling numbers for a hard-left socialist government – it’s pretty bad news for … errr …. “progress”.

I look forward to Chris’ article.

Hilarious to see Penfold still so distraught over the election result.

Don’t worry buddy, it’ll get better for you if you just stop getting so worked up.

“Impressive Axon, you were able to quote a poll number close to accurately. But what you neglected is his approval rating just slumped 5 points in a month and his disapproval jumped too. Now net negative.”

Wow, Albo’s approval rating dropped. To pretty much the same level its been consistently since the start of 2024, after getting the typical post election honeymoon bump that winners usually get.

His approval rating was 41% in Jan 2024 and has floated between 40-45% for most of the last 2 years. Amazing analysis Pengold.

Susan Ley seems to be on the nose as well, with her disapproval rating going up 6% points in 2 months.

Australians also think that your boy Trump is doing a woeful job by the numbers, the Liberals would do well to steer clear of his policy direction.

And good to see you admit that the vast majority of Australians think the emissions reduction target is about right or should be higher.

The numbers also show that Australians are worried about not being able to achieve it, so this gives good support for the government to do more in the policy space to achieve the goal.

Thanks for highlighting those points, it shows your claims over the rejection of net zero dont match what Australians actually want.

😀😂😂👨‍🦯👨‍🦯👨‍🦯

“Australians also think that your boy Trump is doing a woeful job by the numbers, the Liberals would do well to steer clear of his policy direction.”

As Americans fight to save their democracy from the tiny but powerful minority pushing it toward a white nationalist Christian theocracy I do not believe that young earth creationist Hastie is going to be the winning choice Penfold and others on the far right believe it is.

The difference being that whilst both Australians and Americans in the majority don’t want this stuff Australians vote.

Oh gosh Penfold! You mean Albanese’s approval rating slumped after it jumped? So what? I did say it wobbled about and has stayed much the same in the last two years, to which chewy14 has added numbers.

Only you care about these trivial changes. Albo must haunt your dreams and nightmares.

“you failed to mention” Oh but I did mention it Penfold. Did you not notice “despite worries about whether we can achieve it”. Why are you ignoring that people approve the direction but are a little anxious about achieving it, implying more action is desired? Why are you ignoring that while 50% claim to think we are on the “wrong track” (not enough renewable energy fast enough?) only 44% are pessimistic? Didn’t the most recent polls on the subject put the preferential voting estimate anywhere from 55% to 59% ALP, with the same approximate approval ratings for the incumbent PM? Do keep up.

It must be quite a sweatshop trying to get those Sky / Advance Australia talking points out, or wherever you source your fatuities.

Any comments on the early coal plant closure? Ones that make any sort of sense, I mean.

But Axon, Albo had such a triumphant and successful overseas trip. He charmed an empty UN chamber with his brilliant $1.3 trillion unachievable climate policy. He wowed Prince Charles by discussing a Republic, he preached to the UK Labour faithful and even found time for a selfie with Donny 🤳

How is it possible that eight out of 100 Aussies thought less of him as a result ? 🤔

As for the Gladstone power plant, well don’t get too excited Axon, it’s a maybe. But it sounds like you’d welcome all the job losses in the local aluminium and cement industries. Not very nice there buddy.

“his brilliant $1.3 trillion unachievable climate policy”…you don’t even bother parsing the nonsensical talking points before regurgitating them…$1.3 trillion…lol ok.

“How is it possible that eight out of 100 Aussies thought less of him as a result ? 🤔”

Oh no, bahahahahaha, Pengold making simplistic mathematical errors again.

Havent you learnt yet not to play with percentages (or actually go anywhere near numbers) after your previous embarrassments.

8.

😂😂😂😂👨‍🦯👨‍🦯👨‍🦯

As sheer absurdity goes, this is one of Penfold’s funniest.

Albanese lives rent-free in his head.

And you were doing so well to mount an actual argument Axon. Now reverted back to silliness. Oh well.

Nice of you to admit by implication I was right, Penfold.

Don’t worry Pengold,
No one will ever accuse you of reverting to silliness, its your permanent setting.

8 😂

It’s even simpler than that thank goodness Axon, I told you earlier how correct you were on quoting the Essential poll. But sadly you’ve strayed back into that familiar territory occupied by a couple of your mates – the nothingness.

Btw it looks like Chris is going to disappoint us, no article about the poll. 😪

Bennett Bennett8:13 am 01 Oct 25

Not a good look. And why would you publicly support Keir Starmer. England is being governed by some pretty disingenuous people.

HiddenDragon9:07 pm 30 Sep 25

The speech was very much more about links and parallels between British Labour and the ALP than it was about broader links between Britain and Australia – it could hardly have been more party political –

https://www.pm.gov.au/media/address-uk-labour-conference

The really interesting stuff comes towards the end where it is claimed that the labor/labour movement chose democracy over “protest” (someone needs to send a copy of the speech to the CFMEU et.al.) and, without naming them, attempts to delegitimise the likes of Reform UK, MAGA and their counterparts in other countries, including in Australia by presenting them as outside the acceptable bounds of “democracy” (as defined by Albanese, of course).

If the Liberals can’t make hay with this, and the many other half-truths and reality denying platitudes in the speech, then they really do deserve to be in opposition for a long time.

The liberals aren’t going to “make hay” with this because it’s a nothing burger. Your average Aussie doesn’t give a rats.

“and, without naming them, attempts to delegitimise the likes of Reform UK, MAGA and their counterparts in other countries, including in Australia by presenting them as outside the acceptable bounds of “democracy” (as defined by Albanese, of course)”

Explain to me what’s inbounds about authoritarian white nationalism?

My my, how short our memories are. And outside each other’s election campaign at that! What about Morrison, or Howard popping across the ditch or over to the States to talk up their counterparts there?
That he accepted an in invitation to attend on his way from the UK to the UAE added no additional time or expense to his itinerary and would have occurred in the weeks leading up to the UN GA (anyone backgrounding the Conference would see his name wasn’t on any of the advertising until just last week, and that was just for those confirmed attendees).
Sussan whinging only tells you how unable she is to unite the LNP on real issues. That Patterson weighed in from a Finance Minister perspective demonstrates how desperate they are to take the focus off their own infighting.
Can we just have an LNP who provide a real opposition rather than a distraction?
Do better, be better.

Stephen Saunders4:33 pm 30 Sep 25

How dare he posture, of “defending democracy”, there’s nothing he hates more. He smeared the anti-Voice majority as racists, the low-migration majority as neo-nazis. Having failed with his misinformation bill, now comes his Stasi social media ban.

He wants young Australians to get all their “information” from their lying government, their woke schools, and the woke ABC. It’s not about their welfare at all.

The mental gymnastics taken for views like this must be exhausting. But well done from dribbling in some ‘woke’ references into your ramblings – fits it well.

Go and take some tablets and have a good lie down.

None of that is true in the real world.

But anything to say about actual avowed Neo-Nazis being involved with the organisation and leading the March “for” Australia…with many of these people leading racist, white supremist chants and some even engaging with alleged assaults on peaceful indigenous women and elderly folk Stephen?

That’s something that happened in the real word for which this documentary evidence. Any thoughts at all?

Lots of decent people marched too just like lots of decent people marched for Palestine partially organised by a bunch of racists!

The main scoop is what he was endorsing.
The Fabian Socialists over there are even worse than those here, and now we all know for sure that the head of those here is in synch with them over there.
I’m sure this will be front page news by tomorrow

Lol…no it won’t.

Can we open the doors to reform party at home? Or is labor going to block their visas?

What does that even mean Henry?

Beside that far right wing populism is very well catered to by the variety of racists, grifters and kooks on the far right fringe of Australian politics what is stopping any of these dopes from visiting Australia? Please be specific.

Of course convicted felons might have a problem coming to Australia….oh I see your problem.

What a national embarrassment Albanese’s entire carbon footprint fuelled overseas trip was.

But on the Labour party speech and its inappropriateness – imagine the outcry if ScoMo had delivered a speech to the Republican Party. 🤔

Penfold I see you are still fantasising about Dutton being the new PM.
Haven’t got over the last election have you ?

Its hard to see Sussan doing anything, including making it to the next election.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.