9 May 2025

In a nationwide landslide, Labor was caught by surprise in Bean. How? Why?

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
17

Independent Jessie Price ran an effective and high-profile campaign for the seat of Bean. Photo: Region

It was barely two days out from polling day before the electorate of Bean even appeared on the radar at Labor campaign headquarters as a seat the Federal Government could lose.

ALP national secretary and campaign director Paul Erickson suddenly wanted to know about the contest in Canberra’s southern suburbs where there were only four candidates on the ballot, one of them backed by Climate 200, and none of them directing second preferences to Labor.

Why no one within the party’s campaign strategy team thought this was something they needed to worry about was the burning question.

Sources within the ALP have told Region the party never saw the threat coming from independent Jessie Price until it was too late.

A 12.9 per cent margin is rated a ‘very safe seat’ and in Labor-loving Canberra, the consensus was ‘nothing to see here’.

That thought was only bolstered by the national mood turning increasingly towards Labor and internal polling strongly suggesting the government was well on track for re-election.

Except for David Pocock in the Senate race, Labor thought there was nothing to fear in the ACT.

Why would the national campaign think Bean was at risk when its incumbent member didn’t?

Labor’s David Smith was safe – he thought that and the party thought that, if the party thought about it at all.

But the electorate, tired of being neglected and taken for granted, and now being offered a credible alternative, had different thoughts.

By the time that reality dawned on the ALP, early voting at pre-polling centres was well underway.

READ ALSO In an election fought on integrity, it seems there’s Bean some dirty tactics at play

Just days before the 3 May actual election date, it became ‘Desperation Central’ for Labor regarding the seat of Bean.

Flyers printed in green and urging Greens voters to give Labor their second preference were not only handed out near some booths on election day, but were even mysteriously attached to some Greens corflutes.

The Australian Electoral Commission is now ‘examining’ these incidents after receiving official complaints from both the Greens and the Price camp.

The AEC itself was caught flat-footed over Bean even on election night.

Its two-candidate-preferred projections began the night showing the Labor-Liberal contest only, before realising it was on the wrong track.

With the realisation that the Liberals’ David Lamerton was trailing too far behind to be in contention, those projections were subsequently removed from the AEC’s online tally room, with nothing to replace them for quite some time.

That initial false assumption, which would have only been encouraged by the ABC’s Antony Green having predicted throughout the campaign that Bean would be retained by Labor, effectively delayed the count’s progress from being properly updated.

Since election night, the fortunes of both Smith and Price have ebbed and flowed as counting continued, with Ms Price in front by almost 200 votes and sitting on 50.1 per cent of the two-candidate-preferred as counting completed on all pre-poll and election day ballots.

READ ALSO Days of political entitlement are gone forever, even in the ACT

There are still a few thousand postal votes to be received and counted, which could further delay the result for some days.

Ms Price fronted all the media on Thursday (8 May) while Mr Smith spoke to only one friendly outlet.

Both expressed their nervousness over the wait for the final tally, which will almost certainly be subject to a recount.

As it stands, Bean remains too close to call and, after a thumping national victory for the Federal Government, sticks out as an embarrassment for the ALP.

“I am optimistic, but there are still some outstanding votes to count, and it is very possible there will need to be a recount,” Ms Price said.

“We need to hang in there for a bit longer and let the wonderful AEC do their job.

“No matter the outcome, the community of Bean has won. Bean had a 12.9 per cent margin and was considered one of the safest Labor seats in the country.

“After a positive and enthusiastic campaign driven by our brilliant team of volunteers, we have come incredibly close – and we may still win.

“I could not be more proud of what we have achieved together. We have put Bean on the map and made our community and electorate a force to be reckoned with.”

Join the conversation

17
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Bruce McCourt8:22 pm 09 May 25

There is a very significant lesson to be learned by anyone seeking public office – complacency in any elective is an extremely dangerous position to take. Communities demand their elected representatives to perform strongly. Learn some lessons from Senator Pocock over the last three years.

I just saw a report that Senator Matt Canavan has announced plans to challenge David Littleproud for the leadership of the Nats.

Wow, now that’d be a great combination – Angus Taylor in charge of the Libs, and Matt Canavan in charge of the Nats.

This is after CLP (traditionally sit with the Nats) Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price said she would move to the Liberal party room and possibly have a tilt at the Libs deputy leader position.

I wonder if some in the Nats party room are not seeing it as their gain and the Libs loss? 🤔

With that trio of “Trumpophiles” on offer to the electorate, it’s highly likely, Albo would be hoping for a ‘double dissolution trigger’ sooner rather than later.

GrumpyGrandpa8:09 pm 09 May 25

Hello JustSaying,
I can’t see Angus Taylor and Matt Canavan becoming the leaders of the Libs & Nats. Both either bring baggage or controversy with them.
As for Senator Jacinta Nampijinpa Price, politically, I think that she is probably one of only a few potential shining lights on that side of the chamber.

Don’t forget the ACT Labor history, more have been parachuted into positions than any that actually earned them and so began the leaching off the obscene salary teet.

Kirsten Anker3:06 pm 09 May 25

It must be difficult for a Labor backbencher to be an outstanding representative: the requirement to conform to the party platform doesn’t leave much room to respond to the calls from Canberrans for stronger action on many issues.

Looking at the results to date, the success of the independent seems to be partially a result of the deliberate Liberal attacks on Canberra and protest votes that have sat with the Greens (with limited other options) but leaked to the independent this year.

The ALP primary vote has only gone backwards slightly but with only 4 candidates and the woeful Liberal offering, there was no real place for those other votes to land with preferencing.

The ALP only got such a significant 2 party margin last election when the Greens were elimated and Greens voters had to preference ALP or LIB.

Not The Mama2:20 pm 09 May 25

@chewy14 – I agree that what you have said is what the distribution of votes in Bean suggests. But folk down here have voted Liberal (Zed Seseldja, Garry Humphreys) in the past – and that was clearly not an option this year. Bean (Tuggeranong Valley) is sick of being ignored by both ACT and Federal Labour, and we are desperately looking for worthy candidates to vote for. David Smith has been virtually invisible in the electorate, and I think that the only reason that his primary vote remained intact is that the electorate was too scared that a vote for anyone other than the labour candidate would be a vote for the Liberals – Everyone was predicting a close result, after all. All of this analysis denies Jessie of credit for the result. She ran a brilliant campaign and worked harder for the seat in the last few weeks than David has in the last 3 years.

Peter Strong11:43 am 09 May 25

No doubt the ALP took Bean for granted. I think Chris Johnson predicted this happening? He was one of the few who could Bean count.

David Smith was one of the most invisible candidates ever. Took the electorate for granted.

Let’s hope Price provides somewhat more integrity and transparency than the rest of the Climate 200 party members.

But how funny was it watching the video of Zoe Daniels dancing and celebrating wildly on Saturday night. Isn’t reality a bugger.

“Let’s hope Price provides somewhat more integrity and transparency than the rest of the Climate 200 party members.”

Another cooked Penfold comment based on nothing. No wonder the bad guys lost.

As for the fantasy about Zoe Daniels, I must have missed it as I was waiting for the” pre-poll numbers” with James McGrath.

Price could be a cardboard cut out & would still be more effective than Smith

Not The Mama2:36 pm 09 May 25

I’m going to start referring to Labor as Union Backed Labor, and the Liberals as Gina Rineheart’s Liberals. Region Canberra, I’m criticising you too!

At least the Independents have been transparent enough for us to know who provides their campaign funding.

It surprises no one who lives in Bean that this has happened. David has been missing in action since he was gifted the seat by ALP bosses in order to step aside for Katy to re-enter the senate. Having lived on the same street as his office for years I have never once seen him or heard him outside of the 4 weeks before an election. His contribution to the lives of those who live in his electorate has been absolutely zero and the voters have returned the favour.

Not The Mama2:31 pm 09 May 25

I agree about David – It did surprise me that Katy’s primary vote was also down. David Pockock has been a good Independent Senator, but Katy has been an advocate for the public service, women, the ACT in general, and is a half decent finance minister.

@Not The Mama
While I am an openly unabashed Pocock supporter, I wasn’t surprised to see he out-polled Gallagher on first preferences – both personal and above the line.

As an independent, Pocock was free to pursue his “ACT first agenda”, plus he was actively involved in suggesting amendments to a number of pieces of legislation – for which he got a lot of coverage. Whereas Gallagher was always constrained by the archaic Labor rule of voting on party lines and therefore could only ‘effectively represent the ACT’ in the Caucus/Ministry behind closed doors – and usually, only what ‘the party’ wants us to know, gets leaked from behind those doors.

However, the issue for Pocock now, is that it looks like he will have less voting influence in this new parliament, where it’s expected, Labor will only need the support of the Greens, to pass legislation in the Senate. So, potentially much less publicity for Pocock – and as we know publicity is a politician’s life’s blood. Mind you, I could be cheeky, and say Seselja got away with no voting influence at all, yet managed to win 3 Senate elections – but that would be unkind.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.