5 March 2025

In this era of 'woke' mudslinging, does Canberra still value the fair go?

| Genevieve Jacobs
Join the conversation
28
diversity representation

Australians like people to be rewarded for hard work and talent, but we want everyone to have a fair go. Image: Nebasim.

It’s one of our most prized values. We talk about ourselves as the land of the fair go. But how true is that in 2025?

A while ago, the newly appointed CEO of Community Foundations Australia asked me what really made Australians tick.

He’s Canadian and played field hockey at two Olympics. He thought we’d all be like the Kookaburras, charging down the field with no fear and no brakes. Instead, he was a little puzzled to find a nation of rule followers.

My answer was fundamentally, Australians believe we’re all equal. We like people to be rewarded for hard work and talent, but we want everyone to have a fair go.

We don’t worship the individual, or equate extreme financial success with being a decent human being.

READ ALSO Cross-directorate task force aims to make Dickson shops safer and more vibrant

Nobody matters more because of the family they were born into, their job title or the school they attended. The test of leadership in this country is often your willingness to muck in with everyone else and never suggest you’re too important to do the washing up.

In fact, being born with a silver spoon in your mouth becomes a bit of a political handicap for our leaders who are far more inclined to downplay family wealth and education because it wins you no brownie points with ordinary voters.

Malcolm Turnbull frequently pointed out he was raised by a single father despite the Sydney Grammar School education and Point Piper address. Anthony Albanese has made a great deal of political capital out of his Housing Commission childhood.

I’ve always thought this focus on the fair go is particularly true in Canberra, a city founded by people who brought their brains and their energy, rather than their inheritances, to build this new community.

Sagas like the endless Brindabella Christian College epic or the startling CIT scandal get up our noses because the people involved appear to think they’re above the law and beyond the community’s interests.

But when the notion of diversity and inclusion is being challenged and everyone’s favourite criticism is to shriek “woke” at things that scare them, could we be losing touch with the fair go?

I reckon the whole point of diversity is giving talented people a chance to succeed. It’s box ticking when it’s done badly, but missing someone’s talents because they don’t look like you is also a failure.

We shouldn’t choose unqualified or underqualified employees to meet a quota. But nobody should pass over smart, capable people because they challenge your ideas about the right fit for your organisation.

Why would you limit access to all that intellectual capital? Why wouldn’t you want those brains and energy?

We’re all the poorer if we quarantine our talent pool to people who make us feel comfortable. The “woke” excuse is often a lazy reason to stay in our lanes.

READ ALSO Dozens unpaid: Brindabella pursuing ‘alternative funding’ to pay teachers, FWC told

This week I interviewed Governor-General Sam Mostyn and Kamilaroi woman Michelle Steele, who is Chief First Nations Officer for the Paul Ramsay Foundation.

There’s a small but growing cohort of Aboriginal women leaders in the APS, like Michelle, or the ACT Supreme Court’s Justice Louise Taylor, who are intellectually brilliant and highly capable. Let’s not pretend these women would have had a magically smooth path to leadership 30 or 40 years ago.

Let’s not pretend that the Canberra-born daughter of an army officer would have become the Governor-General back then either. Giving people opportunities ensures the cream rises to the top.

Conversely, people on the front lines in the charity world will tell you that anyone can fall into poverty, acquire a brain injury, become a victim of crime or give birth to a disabled child. And when that happens, they’ll deserve equity and inclusion too.

Canberra works because we all brought our gifts and talents and built a great community. During the Canberra Day Appeal we’re asking you to give where you live to create a better and fairer Canberra for everyone.

Let’s keep this a place where we look everyone squarely in the eye, no matter who they are, and tell them they deserve – and will get – a fair go.

Genevieve Jacobs is the CEO of Hands Across Canberra.

Join the conversation

28
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Clear reply Garfield BUT the playing field is not equal and until it is we will need positive discrimination to overcome bias. Overcome bias that you clearly do not see so pls look for it, look at the data…

Incidental Tourist12:42 pm 06 Mar 25

If you want true talented people to succeed (regardless of any non-work related qualities) then you must remove “entitlements”, “priorities”, “inclusion quotas”, “eligibility criteria”, “balance criteria” leaving only your talent being sole and only criteria to get better job.

“Woke” is not about equality of treatment, but about swinging the pendulum past the point of equality creating new inequalities moving forward. Fortunately a growing number of Australians seem to be realising that positive discrimination has had it’s day and we need to get back to treating everyone the same.

For example, the referendum if passed would have given Australians of one ethnicity additional access to parliament enshrined in the constitution. A fundamentally unfair position in the long term. Most Australians have no problems with programs to address disadvantage, but they should be regularly reviewed and repealed once no longer necessary.

Look at the gender pay gap. Women make up about 47% of the workforce and of those in the workforce, on average work fewer hours than men. Logic dictates that more men than women should make it to the higher pay brackets due to, on average, more experience. Yet some segments of the political spectrum are happy to savage a business as discriminating against women if there is a gender pay gap.

A case study in wokeness is women on government boards. We already have 54% of positions held by women and the current federal government wants to drive it higher. Unless someone believes women are inherently more capable than men, that’s obvious discrimination against men given the gender participation in the workforce. By the way, if someone does believe that women are inherently more capable than men, then that’s misandry which should be held to be just as contemptible as misogyny.

If the federal government changes at this election, some of it will be due to ordinary Australians pushing back against what they see as an overly woke government pushing higher priority every day concerns into second place. If some Canberrans are concerned at the prospect of a Dutton government, look to what the Labor government has done to drive people away in the outer suburbs of our major cities. There’s a very old saying that oppositions don’t win elections, governments lose them.

If diversity policies worked the way you seem to pretend they do, far less people would have an issue with them. The fact is that quotas for certain people are in place shows that your argument on this is dishonest.

woke but certainly not awake.
Prior to divisive identity politics – which, incidentally, was unleashed onto the public after the 2008 Global Financial Crisis, which saw Left and Right unite in a truly grass roots dissident movement known as Occupy Wall St – everyone was given a fair go.

Was it perfect? No. And yet only a complete %^&8$ ^&*$%# *&@#% ^%$%& @#$!@# would let the perfect spoil the good and then try and create a massive problem where really there wasn’t one, turning equal opportunity to equality of outcome, and then crying that they’re oppressed when the opposite is true.

The hatred woke gets is indescribably deserved, and everybody is now waiting for Canberra to catch up

“…would let the perfect spoil the good…”

I neglected to say good only in the eyes of those still mesmerised by the teenage angst-like impudence of enlightenment era thinking

@Vasily M
“The hatred woke gets …”
Given the true meaning of “woke”, the haters are the vocal rascist rednecks.

“impudence of enlightenment era thinking”
The Enlightenment being 300 years ago, Hume, Voltaire et al must have seriously upset your apple cart.

Stephen Saunders8:54 am 06 Mar 25

Sure, there’s still much to like, but it is nonsense, that “nobody matters more” because of family.

The Australian model is increasingly sectarian, with massive migration, regressive school funding, world-level housing un-affordability, and the Bank of Mum and Dad.

Let’s be honest Gen, if Dutton wins, the Canberra elite will be appalled and angry, blaming “stupid” voters.

Gregg Heldon8:02 am 06 Mar 25

Does Canberra still work, though? I agreed with everything the author said, up to that point. I honestly think it’s a yes and no answer and that it would be the answer for a great deal of people if they really think about it.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.