25 July 2025

Inside the plans for new light rail tunnel

| By James Coleman
Join the conversation
50

The tunnel will be lit by sensor-activated lights to “reduce visual impact”. Photo: ACT Government.

We’ve heard about the new bridge that must be constructed to take light rail across Lake Burley Griffin, but recently released documents reveal another major engineering project stands between the lake and Woden.

A short “covered section” – or tunnel – nearly at the foot of Parliament House looks set to be the solution to what’s considered a tricky tight turn from Commonwealth Avenue onto State Circle.

Infrastructure Canberra, the ACT Government agency in charge of large building projects, has submitted a draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) to both the Australian and ACT governments for approval.

It details exactly what’s involved in the construction of Stage 2B of light rail, from where Stage 2A ends at Commonwealth Park all the way to a new Woden Public Transport Interchange.

There are two options for the first section of this through the Parliamentary Triangle, dubbed State Circle East and National Triangle Barton.

State Circle East is the government’s preferred – and more direct – option and has light rail extended along the whole length of Commonwealth Avenue, before turning onto State Circle nearly at Parliament House and onto Adelaide Avenue via a new bridge.

National Triangle Barton would turn off Commonwealth Avenue along King George Terrace, Macquarie Street, Bligh Street, National Circuit and finally Sydney Avenue.

Light rail map

The State Circle East alignment option for light rail Stage 2B. Photo: ACT Government.

“State Circle East is the ACT government’s preferred alignment, however the scale of the project requires a thorough assessment of available route options,” the EIS reads.

Plans for the first option have light rail entering a tunnel where the ramp up to Parliament House begins and emerging about 125 metres later onto State Circle.

“This covered section would allow the light rail to pass underneath southbound Commonwealth Avenue traffic lanes through to State Circle, both northbound and southbound.”

READ ALSO Plans to heritage-list Tuggeranong Skatepark ‘a mistake’

As for how this tunnel will be built, there are two options, depending on “ground conditions and traffic management”.

“A ‘cut and cover’ construction method is proposed for construction of this covered section, which could involve one of two construction methods: bottom-up; or top-down,” the statement reads.

“Bottom-up would involve cutting out the tunnel’s path from above ground, installing the walls, floor and tracks, before putting the roof on and reinstating the road overhead.

“For this option, reopening State Circle to traffic would only be possible once construction of the covered section is complete.”

Light-rail tunnel from Commonwealth Avenue to State Circle. Photo: ACT Government.

Meanwhile, the top-down method would put the tunnel’s walls and roof in place first and finish the road above before the excavation works start to dig it out – cutting the time traffic is impacted.

The government admits the tunnel, as well as a new bridge between State Circle and Adelaide Avenue, “would constitute some of the largest changes in this precinct”.

“However, these elements would be consistent with the existing character of the precinct, where curving connecting roads between avenues are a common feature, particularly within and around Capital Hill,” it continues.

“Other key aesthetic and perceptual elements of the precinct would be retained and protected, including road corridors framed by tree planting.”

The covered section would also be fitted with sensor-activated lighting that only comes on as a light rail vehicle approaches to “reduce visual impact and discourage unwanted access by pedestrians or vehicles”.

From here, stops would be added along Kings Avenue, Sydney Avenue and Melbourne Avenue.

Further along at the Woden end, today’s sprawling Yarra Glen roundabout would be replaced by a new signalised intersection, with light rail passing through the centre and across a new bridge over the Yarralumla Creek.

A wider, two-lane slipway will continue to take southbound traffic directly through onto Yamba Drive (eventually past the Canberra Hospital), but traffic heading into Woden itself will have to wait at a new set of traffic lights.

Yarra Glen intersection

The proposed Yarra Glen intersection. Photo: ACT Government.

Northbound traffic from Yamba Drive will need to stop at the same intersection to continue onto Yarra Glen.

Other modifications include improved lighting, a new pedestrian bridge and relocated “active travel path” near the Phillip Oval stop.

The ACT Government is hiring a consultant to estimate the total construction cost of Stage 2B – including the two routes through the Parliamentary Triangle – but it’s unlikely the figure will be released so as “not to impact contract negotiations and future procurement”.

The project still needs to go through the Territory Planning Authority, National Capital Authority and both Houses of Parliament for final approval.

The draft EIS is available for public feedback on the ACT Government website.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

50
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Deciding between the two routes is challenging. Apart from its neat tunnel, the State Circle East route gives speed, which helps those living along or further on the line. But National Circuit route gives a great deal of functionality and “nodality” – the parliamentary triangle work and living space becomes more of destination, rather than just providing a few en route stops, and the number of workers using the links could be high this route. I’m not sure who in the world has the answer based on evidence of the trade off between Woden-Civic speed, and the greater integration and vivification that would come with this route. Any thoughts?

Choosing between the two routes is easy – neither. The ACT Labor & Greens parties have run the budget into the ground. We’ve gone from paying less tax than the average Australian to paying the most, while at the same time accumulating unsustainable levels of debt. Despite claiming to value the ACT’s former AAA credit rating, Andrew Barr has never delivered a single surplus and we’re certain to get another downgrade given the worsening state of the budget. The new so called health levy is actually an interest levy. Spending on health is set to be slightly lower than last year, while interest payments are going up 25%. The thought that we can add more debt to build stage 2B, which will lengthen public transport journeys and encourage more people into their cars is pie in the sky.

If “speed” is an issue then neither route. The current Rapid bus service (in a dedicated bus lane) is already 6 minutes quicker than both routes. But it will be cancelled, as the Rapid in Gungahln was cancelled, so that tram must be used.

Hopefully some spending on Health in among the other costs. New North Canberra hospital – sometime. It’s unclear whether the Government have yet paid the Catholics the agreed sum for Calvary Hospital.

Just to be clear, are you saying that there shouldn’t be a budget for transport? That money should only be spent on health? Then look at it this way – public transport improves public health outcomes. So there will be less money needed for hospital beds.

Not saying that, of course. This Government is fiscally irresponsible, and hasn’t allocated enough for other, equally important, costs such as health, education. Slapping an $11 fee on volunteers (now removed) was a sign of a desperate Treasurer. Joins a list of equally hapless Treasurers.

Option 1 increase taxes to canberrans. Lucky we are all rich in government eyes.

Option 2 run down all other infrastructure and leave it to the next ACT leader and taxpayers to pick up the Tab

Option 3 scrap the whole project and replace the government with a financially responsibly person.

Option 4 spend ever last cent then go bankrupt

Money spent wisely saves money. For example reducing climate emissions and encouraging public transport improves public health outcomes, which reduces the load on Health budgets.

PlainView, stage 2B has a massive negative cost benefit. The benefit the community accrues will be less than the government spends to build it. It will lengthen public transport journeys from Woden and Tuggeranong to the city, encouraging commuters to use their cars. We can’t afford the interest on the debt we’ve already accrued through Labor’s reckless spending. It’s been proven by a former Labor Chief Minister that ACT Health has suffered as a result of the government’s poor budgetary management. You should seek to understand the full picture before hitting the keyboard.

If “speed” is an issue then neither route. The current Rapid bus service (in a dedicated bus lane) is already 6 minutes quicker than both routes. But it will be cancelled, as the Rapid in Gungahln was cancelled, so that tram must be used.

The never ending sh!t fight that will never go away. Anyone in power will spend whatever they want don’t think a different party outcome will be any better. I’m sure the great great grand kids will enjoy the Woden tram when its running to the dumbass City Stadium people want. The future looks great

Mr Barr was on the radio the other day justifying the rail by stating “we have an election every 4 years on this issue and the public have spoken.”
He forgot to mention that several elections ago, the Labor Govt went into the election with a “no light rail” policy. They tied with the Libs 9 – 9 and then were blackmailed by the one Green elected (Rattenbury) to help them to form Govt provided they did what he wanted.

Key word there being ‘several’. Things change.

JS9,
The Liberals went to the 2020 election with a policy of supporting light rail after completing a robust business case.

They lost votes at that election.

The idea that the electorate does (or should) vote on individual infrastructure projects at an election is ridiculous.

Billions of dollars on a light rail we never needed instead of funding important and necessary things like the ACT health system, where they increase rates to get Canberrans to convert their accounting incompetence. Cancel the million dollar a meter light rail and spend the taxes on something useful. Why Canberran keep voting these idiots back in has me bewildered.

This trope is tiring, there is literally a big new building at Canberra hospital and a new northside hospital on the way

RJ so the same old trope about supporting the light rail. great to have a new big building and a northside hospital at some stage but who is going to work in them? the health system is a disgrace and unless youve been into the hospital lately all you can see or hear is the same old BS that the pollies put out there.

New staff were recruited for the expansion.

We need a spread of expenditures. Not spending on transport is like getting fit at home, taking out a gym membership, playing sport, eating special foods, and not spending money on transport to work to pay for it.

The bus stop at Melrose St and Launceston st is busy but the light rail (lr) stops will be at Woden or along Yamba drive. This will be prohibitively far to walk so we will need to catch a bus to Woden to get to the lr to Civic. My local bus runs every 2 hours on the weekend which really means that I will need a lift to Woden. In other words the lr will result in INCREASED reliance on the car. Pre lr the busses were great in Franklin to pick up my great nephews, post lr the busses disappeared, the kids were too young to walk the distances so we had to be picked-up by car or cab. HOW are people going to get to any lr stops along Adelaide Ave/Yarra Glen?? Will we get courtesy busses to take us the km from the lr stop to the supermarkets in Woden?

Same problem for me.
I live in Palmerston. The bus to the City was cancelled when the tram started up. I have to catch a bus “backwards” to the Marketplace before walking to the tram depot to wait for a tram.
My commute time went from 22 minutes to 38 minutes.

Hi Marise, I really feel your pain about how they have messed up the Western side of Woden for public transport access. This was a combined effort by the Government, TWU, Pedal Power and Woden Community Council. The Murrumbidgee MLAs just sat on their hands as it happened. Absolute disgrace!

Yes, the #58. Much missed.

Remember the survey while transport changes were looming? “How far are you willing to walk to reach a bus stop?” Replies noted, then disregarded.

Adam Newsead4:06 pm 13 Jul 25

That proposed intersection at Woden is a mess. Why not design a grade separation to future proof the alignment? No sooner will they have built the thing, they’ll need to turn around and just build a bridge over or a tunnel under anyway, because the traffic has gotten too bad because the intersection is too congested.

HiddenDragon10:35 pm 12 Jul 25

Fortunately, the ACT government is renowned for its flawless delivery of every project it undertakes, so there is no risk at all of State Circle being out of action for a very long time due to a stuff-up like this –

https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/2025/jun/29/could-the-m6-be-sydneys-unbuildable-motorway-due-to-sinkholes-and-a-reverse-fault

That we should even be considering 2A and or 2B is totally objectionable from a cost and need point of view. If it aint broke etc…WA has just approved Trackless Trams which will utilise existing roads in the same way as Brisbane Metro has (in this case) built a dedicated busway using standard road base, all at a fraction of the cost of LR-collective stages including all the extras-tunnels, lifting Comm Ave, building a new bridge etc, electrification etc, expected to come in around $6B. We could do a lot better with that money! By all means buy BRT, TT, or large electric buses NOT Light rail which is a huge residents financial burden but a huge win for industry and Unions!

Why not just round your fantasy estimate up to $10B and call it “rounding”?

No, WA has not just approved trackless trams. Moreover, in May 2025 there was a news report “Two elections packed with promises and cash splashes have now come and gone since the City of Stirling released its business case for a $860 million trackless tram project, but the initiative has failed to secure any financial backing.” Let’s stay with the facts.

I have never seen such a polarising project as the light rail to Woden. I think a see a correlation between advanced years and opposition. Maybe a topic for a psychology thesis

Maybe an example of more life experience and a greater understanding of the value of money leading to a rational analysis vs an emotional response.

This tram extension seems to be designed to benefit primarily those who work at the Parliamentary triangle. The Commonwealth gov should therefore fund the whole of Stage 2B entirely.

Buses already serve the triangle. In fact there used to be a Red Rapid bus that ran from Gungahlin Marketplace through the City to Russell Offices and then on to Barton.
Sadly this very useful service was cancelled when the tram arrived so that load factors on the tram can look positive.
The same will happen if Stage 2B happens. The Rapid Service from Woden to the City will be cancelled (otherwise nobody would catch the tram) and the time for the journey to the City will increase by more than 25% (their proposed timing figures, not mine).

Its going to be a really sad day when they remove the historical rocks with the fault lines in them.
This has all the pre-cursors of doing damage to the National Triangle.

Why not install a subway. It’s just the next price tier up

Martin Silsby7:25 pm 12 Jul 25

Oh absolutely. Most European cities mix light rail with underground sections. Best bet would be do so something similar to the network in Hamburg tho. A light ‘metro’ service travelling above and below ground.

As the saying goes, why do something right, when you can do it again?

Leon Arundell2:17 pm 12 Jul 25

No doubt the Public Transport Association of Canberra will endorse this extra cost, for an already uneconomic project that the government expects will reduce Canberra’s public transport travel by 5% (see Figure 7-7 of the City to Woden Light Rail: Stage 2A City to Commonwealth Park Business Case).

chewy14 and Leon Arundell will be having apoplexy over this!

Jack D,
No, just rational and evidenced based opposition to a project that is not viable for Canberra now.

No doubt you’ll wave through any cost for the project because you like the new shiny thing and dont understand the impacts it has on the overall budget nor delivery of government services.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.