15 January 2026

Kevin Rudd could have been regarded as a Labor hero, but some in the party still loathe him

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
37

Former Prime Minister Kevin Rudd’s portrait by Ralph Heimans is part of the Parliament House Art Collection, yet some ALP homes won’t hang up a poster of him. Photo: Department of Parliamentary Services.

There is one current Labor MP I know (who shall remain unnamed), whose impressive home is adorned with large, framed and autographed picture-posters of former Labor prime ministers.

Most were in office sometime during the course of this MP’s life and all were known to them personally, even if some only casually.

Whitlam’s there, as is Keating and Hawke. Gillard too.

The signed posters take pride of place in this staunch ALP home, given prominence over more traditional artwork that more conventional homes might have on display.

I happened to visit this home once and was somewhat bemused by how ‘in-your-face’ these pictures were, adorned around the most visible walls of this house, and how much this family was made up of ‘true believers’.

Others might relegate such ‘art’ to the pool room, perhaps.

Not this household, and fair enough. The Australian Labor Party is their life.

Then it dawned on me during this brief visit – there was no autographed poster of Kevin Rudd.

There was no picture of him at all on these walls. And he was PM twice.

So I dared to ask the question on my way out the front door.

“No Rudd poster?”

“Nope,” came the swift response.

“He f@#*ed up our party.”

As entertaining as that little exchange was for me, it confirmed an undeniable truth of which we can all easily find constant reminders.

Kevin Rudd was a divisive figure and no more so than within his own party.

His portrait hangs in the halls of Parliament House, yet his image is banned from the walls of some ALP homes.

READ ALSO Gotta zip! Kevin Rudd to finish up as Ambassador to the US in March

Swept to power on a wave of popularity in the Kevin-07 federal election campaign, the hostility towards him inside the ALP was obvious from the earliest months of 2008.

His controlling, erratic and disrespectful conduct towards his own earned him too many powerful enemies.

That’s not to say he was a terrible Prime Minister. He wasn’t.

Rudd skilfully guided Australia through the global financial crisis; and his sorry speech to the Stolen Generations stands today as one of this nation’s greatest political addresses.

His intellect is beyond question. His judgement, however, has often been open for discussion.

After its 2007 election landslide victory, Labor should have been in office for at least a decade. But it was an opportunity squandered.

Once accounts of Rudd’s temper tantrums and his lambasting of MPs and public servants began to leak, and when the polls began to fade, his caucus turned on him to insist he didn’t see out his first term in office.

That’s all history now, as is the fact that when his successor Julia Gillard’s polling eventually plummeted too, Rudd was recruited back to help save some of the furniture Tony Abbott was intent on nabbing for the Liberals.

Through all this, however, one Anthony Albanese remained faithful to ‘the K-Rudd’.

While he was publicly a genuine and loyal soldier for PM Gillard, Albo loathed the manner in which the mantle was ‘stolen’ from Rudd.

In the rematch Rudd-Gillard leadership tussle in 2013, Albanese voted for Rudd (again) and briefly became his and Australia’s Deputy Prime Minister.

So it was no surprise when in 2023, Prime Minister Albanese appointed the former Labor PM as Australia’s Ambassador to the United States.

READ ALSO Commonwealth royal commission into Bondi was the only choice

In 2016, now a two-time former PM and a former Foreign Minister, Rudd had lobbied for Australia to nominate him for the role of United Nations Secretary-General.

He was denied by then Liberal Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull.

Rudd’s knowledge of global affairs is untouchable, his work ethic unquestionable, his network unmatchable, and his diplomatic skills un… well … almost unfailing.

It is beyond question that Rudd has served Australia well in Washington D.C. and is widely regarded. He got things done.

But it’s those old, occasional lapses of judgement that will highlight his tenure.

It’s those blunt and disparaging (albeit truthful) criticisms of Donald Trump that Rudd shared on social media – before Rudd was appointed Ambassador and before Trump was elected the second time – that came back to haunt him in office, and which were never going to serve Australia’s interests in the long run.

PM Albanese has gone to great lengths to praise Ambassador Rudd in announcing his imminent departure from the role.

The Prime Minister insists there was no pressure from the Trump Administration and that it was a decision made purely by the outgoing Ambassador to embrace a new role leading the highly-regarded Asia Society think tank.

Yet Australia’s current Prime Minister, as loyal as he is to his good mate K-Rudd, must be quietly breathing a sigh of relief that Australia’s relationship with the United States will no longer be clouded by those ill-judged social media outbursts from years ago.

Albo has no doubt earned himself a spot sometime on the aforementioned Labor MP’s walls.

Yet despite all the good work since his times in the Lodge, the now Dr Rudd will perhaps never really be forgiven by some Labor loyalists for the way in which he “f@#*ed up” their party.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

37
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

I’d argue that there hasn’t been a Prime Minister in the last 20 plus years (on either side of the Chamber), that could be looked upon as a hero within their party, but more importantly, as a hero to the broader Australian public.

Hawke was probably the last, and maybe Howard, (until he gained control of both Houses, and introduced Work Choices).

The sad thing is that the current PM is probably only there, because of the absence of a genuine alternative, and before him, Morrison was only re-elected because of those who ran against him.

Over the past year or so, we have seen a pseudo-hero arise. Pauline Hanson stands for a lot of what middle Australia stands for. Her stance on issues has been unwavering and people like what she brings. They know where she stands on issues. Her popularity however is probably more about the deficiencies, and lack of trust in both the ALP and LNP.

If we think back through history, we could have had Mark Latham as PM, we could have had Chris Bowen as Treasurer, we could have had Peter Dutton as PM.

As we look to the future, would Josh Frydenburg make a good PM, if he were to return to politics? I’m inclined to think he might. If the NSW Premier, Chris Minns, were to move into Federal politics, maybe he would? He’s certainly a good communicator.

Locally, can we see a day where Chris Steele becomes the ACT Chief Minister? Hmmm. Fuel up those pigs.

Prime Ministers etc, need good communication skills and an ability to send a message that people hear and understand, even if they don’t agree.

Political heros aren’t that common.

HiddenDragon9:36 pm 15 Jan 26

The issues which manifested themselves during his time as PM should not have been a complete surprise to those who installed Rudd as leader ahead of Gillard – particularly given the senior roles he had held in government in Queensland – but they made a choice driven by the prospects of electoral success.

On the latter point, Labor emerged from the 2007 election with 52.7% of the 2PP vote – emphatic (as Howard described it on the night of that election), but much less than the high 50s, and even low 60s, figures recorded earlier in 2007, and close enough to raise genuine doubts about whether Howard might once again have survived had Gillard been leader.

For all the lingering scars that Labor survivors of that era might bear, and now conveniently blame solely on Rudd, an honest reflection would consider the near-existential (as some were suggesting at the time) crisis that Labor would have confronted had it faced a fifth consecutive term in opposition.

Similar reflections might also be relevant to current debates about a leadership style which is almost the polar opposite (apparently) of Rudd’s, but which could eventually produce similar outcomes – albeit in very slow motion.

Peter Strong10:37 am 15 Jan 26

I recall being told that Mark Latham was elected leader that time as people didn’t want Rudd.
Good article but who will be the next Ambassador? Another friend of the PM or a professional experienced bureaucrat?

Guarantee Rudds replacement will be another Ex politician. Nepotism and jobs for the boys is ripe in politics.

I agree except for the sentence “His intellect is beyond question”. He apparently knows a lot about a few things, but so what? Intellect includes judgement and a human factor. He was not effective as PM. Albanese is, even though not intellectually showy.

Good read Chris Johnson an article which unsurprisingly, has given vent to the usual suspects below. I am not sure Penfold would get past his confusion to quite understand your response!

I am pining for the past and the good old days when we had politicians of calibre who gave us a bit of the Mongrel! A bit of the Whitlam, Hawke, Keating and yes, KRudd as well! Not like the current crop with old jellyback Albo who was barely audible after the Bondi shooting, fronting the media and stating the obvious after another disaster telling us how terrible it was but then going silent, leaving it up to Jim Chalmers to face the media as they chased him around the country!

Oh the good old days!

Hero …….Nah.
He was a thin skinned egomaniac who had no empathy & couldnt concentrate on anything for more than 10 minutes.

He was also arrogant & bore a grudge.
One of our worst PMs.

So no picture of Kevvie at Katy’s house Chris. She’s right that he stuffed up the party, but then the party stuffed up itself by returning him as PM, albeit temporarily. Tony Abbott said thanks.

Let’s face it, Kev was always about Kev, much like Turnbull on the Libs side. The lesson both parties should take is the party should always be bigger than the individual.

Chris Johnson4:58 pm 14 Jan 26

Nice try Penfold. Love your ‘work’.

Thank goodness for that Chris, she’s become Rudd-level toxic since the ringleader role in the Higgins affair and the rather fallicious claims made in parliament about it.

I shan’t bother speculating further on your buddy other than to wonder whether there’s a painting of Albo adorning the same walls. Oh, can i take that back …. maybe your reference is to a residence on National Circuit ….

Chris Johnson11:25 am 15 Jan 26

I saw a framed pic of Malcolm Fraser in a Liberal MP’s home I was once in … now that’s got to be a rare thing.

Lol, Fraser wasn’t a bad PM but he lost it after politics. Seemed to be triggered when he accidentally lost the trousers in Memphis, so perhaps it was a CIA plot. 🤣

Capital Retro11:46 am 15 Jan 26

Indeed Chris, homes owned by Liberal MPs are becoming rare.

Sshhh CR, you’ll get Chris all excited about record ALP majorities and “devastating losses” again.

Bill Gemmell7:15 pm 15 Jan 26

I met Malcolm and Tammy (introduced as Mr and Mrs Fraser)in the home of a Liberal Senator once. Had no idea or interest in who he was, but the Senator’s daughter sure was intriguing.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.