21 January 2026

Late Senate vote passes hate laws, despite a divided Opposition

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
25
Sussan Ley and Julian Leeser

Opposition Leader Sussan Ley and Julian Leeser MP yesterday: the gun reform and hate speech bills have exposed divisions between the Liberal and National parties. Photo: Sussan Ley Facebook.

Labor’s hate speech laws drafted in response to the Bondi terror attack passed the Senate late on Tuesday night (20 January), with support from the Liberal Party but not the Nationals.

The Federal Government had watered down its bill considerably to secure the Opposition’s vote, but the bill still split the Coalition.

In the House of Representatives earlier in the day, where Labor has the numbers in its own right, the Nationals abstained from voting on the bill.

But at around 11 pm in the Senate, and with Nationals leader David Littleproud watching his senators from the chamber, the Coalition’s junior party ultimately voted against it after trying and failing to move a number of amendments.

The Nationals were joined by Liberal Senator Alex Antic, who crossed the floor to also oppose the bill.

Greens senators, along with One Nation and independent senators David Pocock, Fatima Payman, Ralph Babet and Tammy Tyrrell, also united to vote against the hate laws.

The bill passed 38 votes to 22 and will allow the government to ban extremist groups that promote hate and violence, apply tough penalties for religious hate preachers, and have greater powers to cancel visas.

READ ALSO Gun laws head to the Senate after passing the House of Reps

Before the final vote, Mr Littleproud issued a statement saying his party could not support the bill, adding that this did not mean the Coalition was divided.

“Labor’s legislation has been a mess. They did not consult. They played politics. They over-reached,” he said.

“Our priority is keeping Australians safe against Islamic extremism. We support legislative measures that protect against this threat.

“The Nationals support the intent of the legislation, but we must get it right … This decision does not reflect on the relationship within the Coalition.

“The Coalition has secured significant improvements to the legislation, but the Nationals’ party room has concluded that more time is required to more fully examine and test the bill before it is finalised.”

Earlier in the day, before the bill passed in the Lower House, Opposition Leader Sussan Ley claimed the Liberal Party had “stepped up to fix legislation that the Albanese government badly mishandled” and successfully narrowed its scope and focus.

But with the Libs and Nats unable to reach a common position, the state of Coalition unity and shadow cabinet solidarity is again in the spotlight.

Pressure is already on Ms Ley to sack the senior Nationals shadow ministers from her front bench for voting against the bill in the Senate and breaching shadow cabinet rules.

Earlier in the evening, the Opposition voted against gun reform when that bill reached the Senate, but it passed with the support of the Greens.

READ ALSO Crunch time for federal politicians over guns and hate speech reforms

Speaking on Radio National Wednesday morning, Greens justice spokesperson David Shoebridge said the party could not agree to the hate speech laws as they were.

“I think it would have been beyond reckless,” he said.

“It would have been a sort of betrayal of basic sense of democracy to ram through legislation last night with such broad-ranging impacts when every legal expert we spoke to said it was reckless and dangerous and they didn’t know the scope of it.”

Racial vilification elements of the original bill were abandoned before the legislation was introduced, due to the government being unable to secure agreement from the Coalition or the Greens.

Also speaking on Radio National Wednesday morning, Home Affairs Minister Tony Burke said while he would have liked to have seen the stronger version of the legislation get up, there is no doubt the Jewish community is safer because of the new laws that did pass.

“Part of delivering safety is doing something about bigotry. The laws that have gone through do give us more tools to effectively be able to combat antisemitism,” the minister said.

“They don’t give us as many tools as the government would have liked, but we have to deal with the parliament that we have.

“And there’s no doubt that we now have the strongest protections Australia has ever had.”

Senator Pocock, who voted for the gun reform bills but against the hate speech laws, issued a statement saying he was reflecting the will of his constituency.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

25
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Pengold on Albanese last week:

“Or he can go and find some Youtube leadership lessons, swallow his pride and learn to act like a leader. Most likely outcome is not the latter. It would involve talking to the opposition. What a headache.”

Albanese then negotiates the passage of both gun and hate laws with opposition and minor parties.

Penzero:

“So the headline about the “divided Opposition” seems to completely ignore the government’s backdown and the egg on Albo’s face.”

Last month Pengold says Albanese needs to enact the recommendations of the Segal review in full.

Now apparently those recommendations should never have been included in the legislation in the first place.

This is fun, another Penzero meltdown in full swing, where he argues against his own points 😂

But what can we expect when there is zero independent thought, simply a regurgitation of the daily Groupthink talking points.

And now the entire Nationals front-bench has quit.

😂😂😂

Penfold should take his comedy show on the road. It would be a big hit.

it appears one of the main reasons for the collapse of the Coalition (if one can do so from an already prone position) is One Nation cutting the Nationals’ lunch. Historically it is the NP and rural Libs who suffer most from the rise in ON support, not the ALP, and the Libs now have negligible support in cities anyway.

Antony Green has an article on it here: https://antonygreen.com.au/the-coalition-split-and-the-re-emergence-of-one-nation/

Trevor Willis4:57 pm 21 Jan 26

It is not only the Jews that have to be aware of Islamic terrorists, it is the whole population. These terrorists should never be allowed into Australia and those that are here now, need to be deported immediately and without any recourse of objection.

Capital Retro10:48 am 22 Jan 26

Good luck with that Trevor.

Define “these terrorists”. Do you mean ones who have already committed an act of terror, or the ones who are identified for deportation and deported, or is your agenda for immigration explicitly sectarian or racist?

That Capital Retro might one who would wish you luck with it is no surprise.

Capital Retro2:09 pm 22 Jan 26

People like this: https: //www.abc.net.au/news/2026-01-22/sepehr-saryazdi-faces-court-on-terror-charge-australia-day-csiro/106256410

Good news, Capital Retro, that a person was identified and will be treated in accord with the law including whether they are a citizen.

When and on what basis should that person not have been allowed into Australia, assuming they were not born here?

Your nostrums are silly. More likely you are trying to provide cover for Trevor Willis’ barely concealed wish to act on a sectarian or racial basis.

Why are the nats joined with the liberals.

They should be advertising their services.

Ley is so low in the polls she can not continue.

The Nats and the Libs have been joined for the last 103 years because being in coalition is the only chance either of them have to getting close to being in government. Neither of them stands a chance without the other and at the moment neither of them stands a chance WITH the other either.

The day the Liberals sold their souls.

Well Chris that’s one version of events, but let’s step back a few days:

The original bill – guns and speech (you call it “hate”, a nasty word) – was so bad neither the Opposition or Greens would support it so it was thrown out
It was then split into guns and speech
Speech was highly contentious with even the Jewish, Muslim, Sikh and Buddhist religions demanding changes (as well as the Opposition)
The government made multiple changes to the original bill, because of the Oppositions and others demands

So the headline about the “divided Opposition” seems to completely ignore the government’s backdown and the egg on Albo’s face.

In fact Chris, you even wrote about it a few days ago:

https://region.com.au/coalition-and-greens-both-saying-no-to-passing-labors-hate-laws/934968/

You really are obsessed with putting links that nobody reads in your posts.

Anyhow Albo has made a hash of things but he’s been saved by the opposition who look like the Benny Hill Show.

Well franky it’s entirely up to you whether to read posts, links or even the articles. But it might help in being able to create a sensible and relevant comment. But don’t worry, you’re hardly alone.

Though your comment about Albanese and the Coalition is accurate. 👨‍🎓

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.