9 December 2025

Light rail faces another test in the 'Valley of the Shadow of Death' on Adelaide Avenue

| By James Coleman
Join the conversation
118
light rail render

The proposed new light rail stop at Hopetoun Circuit, Deakin. Image: ACT Government.

Light rail may face its fiercest opposition in the Valley of the Shadow of Death on Adelaide Avenue between two suburbs “not enamoured” of the project at all.

Already, the ACT Government has had to go back to the drawing board on the location of a ‘Traction Power Station’, a huge 40-by-6-by-10-metre box designed to convert AC power into the DC power needed by light rail vehicles.

It has to be placed within 200 metres of the track, so initially an empty green space on the Yarralumla side of Adelaide Avenue looked perfect – at least until the Yarralumla Residents Association (YRA) launched a petition against it.

Man standing on grass

The Yarralumla Residents Association’s Robert Herrick led a campaign earlier this year to save this green area from a light rail power station. Photo: James Coleman.

Lead Robert Herrick argued it would not only destroy habitat for threatened species like the Golden Sun Moth and Diamond Firetail, but also remove a much-loved recreational site and one that carries a once-in-100-year flood risk.

“Imagine three of those B-double trailers parked side by side, and that’s going to be put on this open parkland,” he told Region earlier this year.

“There are lots of risks we’re all concerned about.”

This week, Deakin residents have been letterbox-dropped with a proposal to place the power station next to a carpark off Denison Street, near the Royal Bhutanese Embassy, instead.

And so far, early reactions from residents suggest it will go ahead – if only because it’s the least of their concerns when it comes to Stage 2B of light rail.

“The original proposal on the Yarralumla side was just plain ridiculous – goodness knows whoever dreamt that up,” Deakin Residents Association (DRA) president George Wilson says.

He says residents are broadly okay with the new proposed site, but it will be more of a question for local businesses.

The government maintains the open-air carpark will remain open, except for partial closures during the early stages of construction.

“It’s not close to a residential area, which it was before [in Yarralumla] … but it will be how it affects those businesses adjacent to it, and the whole amenity of the area that’s the problem.”

It’s also the tip of the iceberg.

READ ALSO What could the future of Wakefield Gardens hold for Ainslie?

Residents on both sides of Adelaide Avenue are preparing for years of traffic disruption as light rail journeys along State Circle and onto Adelaide Avenue, on its path to Woden, for what they perceive as very little return.

“The disruption will be massive for Stage 2B,” DRA vice-president John Bell adds.

“Deakin residents are not enamoured with light rail … and Yarralumla residents are even less enamoured. The thing is, most residents won’t benefit from this at all. The idea that someone will walk from the back of Deakin all the way down to Adelaide Avenue to catch light rail is just stupid and isn’t going to happen.”

light rail map

The proposed new site for the Traction Power Station in Deakin. Photo: ACT Government.

Both Wilson and Bell are also concerned about all of the bridges that will need to be rebuilt along Adelaide Avenue and Yarra Glen, because light rail will need to run straight down the middle of the median strip – where many of the original supports stand.

They also mention the biodiversity at risk on the State Circle side of the development, including a proposal to install a new set of traffic lights at the Adelaide Avenue intersection and “cut down a whole lot of trees” at the bottom of Melbourne Avenue.

“The real reason we’re concerned about light rail is the cost,” says Bell, who has done his own cost analysis of the project.

“We’ve worked with a team of engineers who have costed this at over $5 billion … and the government is pushing the rates up as fast as they can to get away with it.”

READ ALSO Canberrans can rid homes of coloured play sand under new ministerial order

In the last ACT Budget, rates increased on average by 3.75 per cent across the ACT, with Inner South suburbs bearing a far higher burden.

Units in Deakin rose by 6 per cent, and houses by 8 per cent. In Yarralumla, the average rate increases were 6 per cent for units and 10 per cent for houses. Only Forrest and Red Hill saw larger increases – 18 and 11 per cent for houses, respectively. Deakin house owners are now paying an average $7425 in rates per year, while those in Yarralumla are paying $8664.

Bell expects rates to double by 2031.

“There have been some big increases, and we’re not happy about this,” he says.

Denison Street car park

The entrance to the Denison Street carpark. Photo: Google Maps.

The ACT Government’s draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on light rail Stage 2B, on public exhibition between July and September, did admit impacts to flora and fauna along the route would be “significant”, mostly around Parliament House and Yarra Glen.

The government’s development agency, Infrastructure Canberra, says all feedback will be taken on board to develop a revised, final EIS for submission to the Australian and ACT governments in 2026.

It says the proposed Denison Street site “would offer reduced impacts on the habitat of threatened species and improved integration with the surrounding environment” compared to Yarralumla.

It’s now accepting feedback via email (lightrailtowoden@act.gov.au) and at two community pop-up information sessions. These will be held at the Denison Street carpark on Wednesday, 10 December, from 4:30 to 6 pm, and on Thursday, 11 December, from 8 am to 9:30 am.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

118
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Capital Retro5:32 pm 20 Dec 25

No further comment needed. ACT Government has been there, done that and is doubling down:

https://www.abc.net.au/news/2025-12-20/passenger-numbers-fall-short-on-parramatta-light-rail/106157050

What the Deakin and Yarralumla residents really hate about the tram is it will bring in thousands of new homes along the route and people. I’m sure the Deakin businesses are looking forward to people being able to get their easily without driving.

NIMBY much?
People that crossed Northbourne avenue had suffered for years from delays during the light rail construction, with many Belconnen residents getting 0 benefit from the light rail itself. But for inner south residents it’s suddenly unacceptable?

Strictly speaking, the benefit to Belconnen was low during the construction of Stage 1 but when Stage 3 happens, Belconnen will get a disproportionate + benefit, because residents will have the advantages of their own line plus it’s additional access to two others.

The idea that Yarralumla is short on green space is a bit much. Bring on the tram – those of us in Woden will save a fortune.

There’s oodles of space up and down Adelaide Ave. Oodles of space. Whatever issues exist, I’m sure they can be overcome with relative ease.

HiddenDragon9:15 pm 09 Dec 25

The issues raised in this piece, along with the even more bracing challenges of getting across the Lake and through the Parliamentary Triangle, are all ultimately secondary matters compared to the overriding problem of how to pay for it all.

One way or another, it’s about as clear as it can be that light rail to Woden can only happen with substantial federal funding.

The announcement yesterday that there will be no more billions for energy bill subsidies, and the strong hint that further unpopular decisions will come in next week’s MYEFO and next May’s annual Budget, is not a good sign at all for the requisite federal funding for light rail and for the assumed ever-growing employment and population base in Canberra which is claimed to necessitate light rail.

Unless federal cabinet decides that billions for a nice-to-have for the three electorates of the ACT is a higher priority than the needs of the 91 other electorates they represent, token announceables designed to keep faith with the light rail true believers might be it once Stage 2A is done.

What never seems to be considered is the issue of road safety.

Urban road transport evolved to encompass standing passengers when distances were mostly both short and speeds were low. We now have urban buses guided by a human mixing it at as much as 80kph with general traffic.

We are being exhorted on TV to ensure we belt up in coaches because they can travel at 80kph! . Accepting that as sensible, then it seems that the present frequently cited Woden – City travel times for urban buses are actually only achieved by travel at unsafe speeds.

On the other hand trams don’t need human steering, travel at slightly slower speeds and are mostly separated from other traffic.

Logically, for standing passengers the tram is the safer option.

A bit of a desperate attempt to justify the slow speed and expense of LR.

It is true that TC buses are driven by humans, and that standing is permitted. Mostly, passengers have access to seats, and standing is limited to peak hour services on R services. It should be noted that public buses do mix it with the general traffic, however mostly travel in dedicated Bus Lanes.

Yes, coaches passengers are required to wear seat-belts and standing is not permitted. There are some significant differences between coaches and suburban commuter buses. Coaches are generally long-haul travel. At commuter may be standing for 20 minutes, whereas on a coach, the journey could last 3 or 4 hours or longer. Coaches can travel quicker than 80kph and mix it with general traffic at speeds of up to 110kph, including semi-trailers. Highway travel is a significantly different mode of transport, than suburban or inter-town services.

If there was any genuine concern

With respect, Roger, you talk nonsense.

If there was any safety issue of concern associated with standing passengers on TC buses, the government would have legislated to disallow it.

Comparisons with coaches who require seat belts to be worn is ridiculous. Much of TC trips at 80kph are on dedicated bus lanes and where a passenger may be forced to stand, it may only be for 20 minutes.

Coaches passengers travel 3-4 hours and longer, on national highways mixing it with car, trucks and semi-trailers some travelling at 110kph is ridiculous.

Sure LR travels at a slower pace and is runs along a set track. Saying that LR doesn’t rely on a human for steering is a bit of a cop out. LR still relies on a human for critical safety issues like being aware of side traffic, braking, accelerating and stopping for red lights.

Deakin and Yarralumla residents make a good point. There is no point having it stop near their suburbs. Firstly, they would never walk on the streets to get to the stop (walking is for plebs). Secondly they would never catch public transport as that’s where poor people are. Thirdly, they don’t need public transport when they can have their driver pick them up. And fourth point, having a stop means poor people can get off and enter their suburb.

Yeah that’s right TG, all Deakin and Yarralumla residents have chauffers. The snarliness is strong on that post. 👃

Those bleating on about the cost are missing a couple of massive points. Yes, it is expensive, but it is nonsense to think a bus network alone will be enough for future population growth. The longer we put this off, the more expensive it will become. If you think future generations are going to be hurt by the current expense, imagine how they are going to react to it being even more expensive because we were too scared to act now.

Two big problems the critics are failing to address is how Civic interchange was at capacity, with nowhere to expand to, before the Gunghalin and some inter city suburbs lost their direct buses to Civic. As the population rises, and more suburbs come on line, there will be an even greater need for buses accessing this interchange. The Gungahlin tram has extended the time before a massive redesign of Civic is needed (and whatever way that is done, it aint gunna be cheap).

The second problem is the car parking around Civic and the town centres is disappearing. There needs to be a way of transporting large numbers or the population between the town centres to take pressure of this dwindling facility.

“Yes, it is expensive, but it is nonsense to think a bus network alone will be enough for future population growth.”

Based on what? The government’s own evidence shows that we could meet the transport requirements with a bus system for many decades and that the current proposals for the whole of Stage 2, makes public transport usage and travel times worse, not better.

The government is also attempting to redevelop large areas along the routes to justify the expenditure on light rail, which is completely backwards planning. Its a solution looking for a problem.

“The longer we put this off, the more expensive it will become”

Once again this isnt correct, there is huge opportunity cost for early construction and there is nothing stopping the government from doing the early planning work to protect alignments for future construction/upgrades when required.

Your two “big” problems have easy answers.

Civic bus interchange isnt overloaded and never was, the assumption that light rail “fixed” it, doesn’t stack up, there are plenty of ways that the same result could have been achieved without light rail.

Which is the entire point, no one is suggesting that public transport upgrades aren’t required now and over the longer term, it’s the assumption that light rail is the only/best solution that is at question. Something that the government has steadfastly refused to even investigate at a network level. And an issue for which their previous work on Stage 1 showed that a bus solution would have provided almost the same benefits for a fraction of the cost.

Ask yourself why despite all of this work and expenditure on light rail, public transport usage overall has gone backwards as a percentage of total trips in the last decade?

And what system level options are available to improve this for all residents, rather than one route per decade, which is the current light rail schedule.

Oh chewy “don’t mention the tram” 14 is still at it and that little voice in my head keeps telling me “just don’t bother, these lunatics just don’t listen despite all of the facts”. Chewy14 in his constant and hysterical opposition to the tram, flip flopping around and misrepresenting those who support it while silent on tackling the ACT’s future transport needs while promoting a failed bus system that nobody wants to use. His constant reliance on pre-light-rail data to make a point while ignoring facts and figures pointing to its success.

Ignoring the benefits and success of other cities who have introduced light rail to their networks which have reduced congestion and brought long term social and environmental benefits. Sydney, Brisbane, Gold Coast, Melbourne and Adelaide which have seen these benefits and are expanding their networks.

Building work is currently underway in Barton and Parkes with an expected 5,000 new employees drawn to the precinct after construction is complete. Employment which will bring enormous pressures on our roads and public transport system. But chewy and his fellow travellers who infest these sites are silent on how our government should tackle these needs.

Jack D,
You mention “facts” but then go off on another of your completely baseless rants, blatantly lying about the evidence.

I’ve repeatedly provided you with the data including both post and pre light rail stage 1.

You however provide no data, just meaningless and emotional platitudes devoid of any substance. The standard from partisan and unthinking Hacks.

Other, much larger and denser cities have light rail? Who cares, it’s meaningless to its viability in Canberra. The Gold Coast and Newcastle have also shelved future stages of light rail because they didn’t stack up economically. By your logic that makes Light Rail a poor decision.

Light Rail Stage 1 in Canberra still has not achieved the stated patronage figures for 2021 that underpinned the government’s business case.

The government’s own information showed the same benefits could be achieved for a fraction of the cost.

The government has not even bothered to consider alternatives for future stages.

The government’s own released business case for Stage 2 showed that costs outweighed benefits, that public transport usage and travel times would increase. Costs have significantly increased since then, making the equation even worse.

These are facts.

These are what sensible people would assess to make a proper planning and public transport decision.

Your wishful thinking about intangible, transformative and unquantified benefits are, on the other hand, complete emotional drivel.

No chewy, there have been absolutely no plans for the NSW government to shelve future light rail in Newcastle with current proposals to extend it further, with 17 corridors identified. The city’s LR network has proven very popular with the existing rail credited to reshaping the city centre and driving urban renewal. There is also a petition currently doing the rounds calling on the government to get a move on and get the city’s LR network extended.

The newly elected Queensland Liberal state government has been criticised for shelving the extension of the Gold Coast LR network, playing on people’s prejudices and setting it up to fail, because that is what Liberal governments do!

Felix the Cat7:50 pm 09 Dec 25

The public transport patronage figures are rubbery because a lot of people don’t bother to swipe their MyWay cards, therefore these figures are artificially low

Jack D, isn’t that the security precinct? How many of them will catch the bus?

Thank you Felix the Cat but those deliberate non-payers are not the only problem. A ticketing system way below standard, on-board ticket readers constantly out of order, passengers able to tap on but not being able to tap off and all of those many other “gliches”. All problems that have financial and statistical consequences and ongoing frustrations for the travelling public.

Not to mention those on-board visual display screens and others at bus interchanges often out of order with confused passengers wondering where and when buses are to arrive or where to get off.

It is an ongoing problem and it is about time these problems were fixed!

Felix the Cat,
The patronage figures come from the years prior to the new Myway+ implementation so the issue you describe isn’t correct and would have existed similarly for previous buses.

“No chewy, there have been absolutely no plans for the NSW government to shelve future light rail in Newcastle with current proposals to extend it further”

More mistruths from Hack D, the New South Wales Government have chosen not to progress future stages of the Newcastle light rail because it’s currently not economically viable.

Instead, they’ve chosen to plan ahead and protect the future transit corridors for when and if higher capacity transport modes are viable in the future.

You know, the exact type of forward planning i promoted the ACT Government doing in my first comment? That’s what sensible planning looks like.

https://www.transport.nsw.gov.au/projects/current-projects/newcastle-future-transit-corridor

“There is also a petition currently doing the rounds calling on the government to get a move on and get the city’s LR network extended.”

And you’ve even unwittingly agreed with me. Why would they need to petition the government if the project wasn’t going to be on hold? Likely for over a decade based on the metrics put forward by the NSW government.

Also thanks for agreeing with me that the future stages of the Gold Coast light rail have been shelved.

Strange that you avoided the rest of the facts around the Canberra light rail, particularly when I’ve repeatedly said that the (un)viability of interstate light rail is meaningless to our local context.

As usual emotional platitudes are no substitute for evidence based planning.

Which is all I’ve ever promoted on this issue, proper consideration of alternatives and investment decisions being made from objective and robust business cases. Plans that consider the system level public transport needs of the city as a whole for both the short and long term, delivered as efficiently as possible.

Strange that you’re so vehemently opposed to proper infrastructure and transport planning because you’d already made your mind up about the shiny new thing.

Lets not forget we don’t have 5 billion. We have to borrow to get it. At the same time our credit rating dives as followed by other debts now needing higher interest.

This is not for transport because its slower, but so the residents who live nearby cant afford the rates they are forced to sell to developers who put in apartments.

If its the developers who are profiting off government spending, why are they not paying for it? Ita basically a developer tax and those locals are forced to move.

At least we are forward planning with mass transit for new suburbs…

5 billion what?

The irony to all of this is we’re the nations capital and according to our anthem we have “wealth for toil.” So really we shouldn’t have these problems. But the reality…

Just stupid is the best part of the article. Still yet to hear anyone say “can’t wait to take the tram”. We are just being robbed now. The debacle needs to end asap

Prob as it’s called Light Rail…
Where do you live? Just wondering as the LIGHT RAIL is standing room only from 6:45 onwards everyday

Most likely as it’s not a tram…
Where do you live? The LIGHT RAIL is standing room only from 6:45am onwards it’s a great service and saves many Canberrans from having to catch multiple services a day.
The ride is always smooth and on time

Gantz,
Standing room only, one way and only in peak hours.

Shame about the other 18-20hrs of the day.

Also causes people to have to catch multiple services from what used to be direct routes.

I’d say “I can’t wait to take the tram” but it’s a safe bet it won’t run past my street.

I work near the LR Station at Gunghalin and often see it drive by with enough passengers. But I live in a suburb in Tuggeranong, the LR doesn’t exactly go by my house.

It’s convenient for people who live in Gunghalin or North Canberra. But if I was to catch the LR I’d either drive and fight traffic, deal with road works, find a parking spot (which costs a fortune) or wait for a long time for a bus from my street, go to Tuggeranong Bus Interchange, wait for a long time (and feel like a sitting duck) then catch a crowded bus to Civic.

Of course, we don’t know whether those who “can’t wait to catch the tram” are people who actually catch public transport?

Personally, I’ve jumped LR from the City to Dickson and Gunners, on a few ocassions, and yes, I’d prefer the LR trip to catching a bus for those journeys. It’s comfortable and LR gets the benefits of traffic lights sequencing. If I were living in the suburbs and needing to catch a bus to a LR platform, that previously may have taken me into the City, I might not have been as keen.

Would I prefer to catch LR from the Woden into the City? Heck No. It might be convenient for those who will live in yet to be built apartments along the rail line, however for anyone else, it will be a slower trip, which kinda defeats the primary function of public transport which is to move people quickly and cheaply.

For anyone starting at Woden, particularly those who have commuted to Woden from Tuggeranong, Weston Creek, Lanyon etc, on other services, the travel time becomes a serious issue. Not only is the Woden to City leg slower than an existing R4 or R5, commuters also need to factor into their travel time, the need to change services. Back some years ago Transport Canberra determined that one of the biggest deteriment to attracting passengers onto its buses, was the need to change services. Anyone remember services such as the 312, 313, 314 & 315? Those services replaced suburban routes that looped into interchanges where passengers boarded the 333. The current R services operate the same. Passengers hate changing, yet LR Woden to the City time-warps them back to the days of the 333 and looped suburban services. The ACT Government tried unsuccessfully to revive looped services when LR first started. In Tuggeranong, suburban trips no longer travelled to Woden, they looped back to Tuggeranong and pushed people onto an R4. The government eventually reinstated those services to Woden due to passenger outrage. The hated suburban loops will be coming back with LR.

So yeah, I question the genuineness of those eager to ride LR from Woden to the City. No one wants to change services and no one wants a slow service.

Then we have the cost…..an exhorbinant cost possibly could be justified if we were getting an express service, if the line resulted in a shorter trip, however there factors don’t exist. LR simply runs along where the buses currently travel; just slower.

Part of me thinks ‘stop being whinging b*tches’ but then again from what I’ve seen of the LR route it makes me think ‘why did the make this so complicated?’ The acronym KISS (Keep It Stupidly Simple) needs to be more widely embraced.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.