2 March 2025

Light rail is here to stay, so get on board and make it work

| Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
232

One of the new light rail vehicles at Alinga Street in the city. Light rail is just one component of a modern public transport network. Photo: Amy Jelacic/X.

After three elections, one would expect the light rail haters would move on to something else, but like zombies that keep coming no matter what, they won’t be deterred.

By now the light rail argument should be about delivery, not about how it will be the end of Canberra as we know it or that it won’t really fix the city’s transport issues or that buses are better.

Yet the Canberra Liberals have not been able to bring themselves to accept that the people have spoken and that they should be focusing on making sure it is delivered on time and on budget, not dodging questions about whether the light rail wars are over.

Given that the entire network will take decades to complete, the chances are that if they get their act together, they will return to government at some point and have to oversee its development.

Not that they have been that vocal recently. That’s been left to others convinced they are fighting the good fight.

The construction of the extension to Commonwealth Park, finally getting under way, has stirred it all up again.

READ ALSO Qatar gets green light to buy into Virgin Australia

The business owners along London Circuit don’t welcome the disruption, especially in the current hospitality downturn, but they realise that the connectivity light rail will bring to that side of the city will be a good thing and good for business.

For example, New Acton – one of the city’s most amenable precincts – will no longer feel so isolated from the rest of the CBD.

The government overuses the word, but the light rail extension will be transformative, particularly in the context of the development going on around it on the law courts car park, the old clover leaf block and the Acton waterfront.

Light rail will bring change to more of Canberra’s suburbs, being a catalyst for new housing along transport corridors, but the trend towards medium density infill has other drivers and is well in train already.

London Circuit light rail construction signs

London Circuit east will be a construction zone for the next couple of years. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

As much as it might seem desirable to maintain the aesthetic of Canberra’s leafy, garden city (and wealthy) suburbs, what that means is locking less wealthy, younger people out and forcing them to live further away from employment and recreation.

The other driver is the sheer prohibitive price of property – to buy or rent. Some will blame the ACT Government’s land release and tax policies, but it was the Howard government that opened the housing casino with its capital gains tax changes that favoured investors and sent prices skywards.

It is no surprise that for many an apartment or a townhouse is all they can afford these days.

That may be a shame when families need and would prefer a house, but unless you’re prepared to cop a collapse in property prices, don’t expect young people to be forced into exile.

Light rail is not meant to operate in isolation, but as part of a multi-model network of it, including buses and active travel. It is preferred because it can move lots of people far more efficiently than buses, which also contribute to congestion on the city’s main arteries.

Almost all of Australia’s capital cities have some sort of rail network.

If Canberra is not to be choked by cars, LA style, it will need a workable public transport network that gets buses off main roads and can handle the morning and evening peaks.

When thousands of Commonwealth public servants take up roles in Barton in coming years, light rail will be needed, which is why it will attract Federal funding no matter who is in government.

READ ALSO ANU opens voluntary redundancy scheme as union persists with vote of no confidence

It is a visionary project and one that will leave a legacy for those who come after us. Putting one’s head in the sand now and finding all kinds of excuses to not build the network while the corridors are available is just plain short-sighted.

It is costly, but not doing it will also incur costs, and little thanks from generations hence, who would be left to deal with the mess.

Canberra was never going to stay a city of a few hundred thousand public servants enjoying cheap housing, lavish gardens and the wonderful planning of the Griffins. It is not a museum.

The job now is to make sure that there is well-designed and sited development, that the current light rail projects are built properly and that planning is under way for future lines, particularly between the Airport, the city and Belconnen.

By all means keep watch over the project and government to ensure accountability and rigour of process, but stop the ‘Can the Tram’ hysteria.

Join the conversation

232
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

As everybody knows, is doesn’t actually work very well for Gungahlin residents either.
Only 8% of Gungahlin residents live within 400m of the rail corridor. More than 80 % of us have to catch a bus before waiting for a tram.
My commute time to Dickson went from 22 minutes to 38 minutes because I now have to catch two services.
My return time has increased between 38 and 45 minutes!
Only 1 billion dollars for all these benefits too.
This is a sad article written by someone who either;
a) doesn’t catch public transport (and probably never will)
b) doesn’t live in Gungahlin
c) lives on Flemington Road

There are so many things wrong with this article, I don’t know where to start.
I suggest you google Lyle Lanley.

ChrisinTurner10:57 am 05 Mar 25

At the present rate of construction no one currently alive will see the completion of the light rail network.

Summary – Let’s throw good money after bad. Maybe buy a monorail too? The Chief’s little vanity project goes from A to B. Let’s buy some electric buses to do the rest of the alphabet. If it’s not vanity, it’s ‘look at me, I’m a real boy, we’ve got a ‘choo choo too!’ There’s no need to spend all this money – ooops, there is no money, it’s all on credit.

Incidental Tourist8:03 pm 04 Mar 25

Indeed it will leave its lasting legacies.

First, is improved commuting from North to Civic. Drive from Gunghalin to civic 15 years was slow. Today it is much better even though Gunghalin has dramatically increased population.

Second, it will leave its huge debt burden on ACT. There are also ongoing costs legacy as operational and maintenance costs exceed tickets revenue. So tram is also lasting cost of living legacy we leave to kids. (do I have to mention MyWay+ costs?)

Third, tram is “infill” enabler. High density apartment blocks promote tram and vice versa. Tram in, “Bush capital” is out.

Forth, tram is the dividing legacy. Tram is not shared benefit but it is lasting shared burden. One Canberra will keep benefiting from tram and another will not.

GrumpyGrandpa7:23 pm 04 Mar 25

Just because a government is elected, or re-elected (again and again), doesn’t mean that every policy is wonderful.
That’d be akin to saying the electorate voted for health cost overruns and budget deficits.
I like trains, however, LR City to Woden will be slower than the existing bus service, so for me, that makes it a poor policy and one that shouldn’t be supported, just because the government has been re-elected.

Suspect the grand plan is to densify housing alongside, rather than provide public transport. More ratepayers to add to the Government coffers, which sorely need it.

Jamie Griffin2:15 pm 04 Mar 25

To get more people using the tram, they should have gone out to Belconnen for Stage 2. Peel off at the Macarthur Ave intersection and head up that on to Barry Drive and then on to Benjamin Way. It’s shorter and probably a lot cheaper to build. Now you have 2 towns using it and you’re generating money to pay for the enormous task of getting down to Woden.

Ben Richards8:28 pm 05 Mar 25

If Stage 1A required significant earthworks so the tram could climb from Alinga St to Commonwealth Park how do you expect it to climb up Macarthur Ave? Unfortunately it’s never going to run Belco, City, Russell, airport like the initial
vision proposed.

The questions still need to be asked as to why it is the most expensive per km track in the world? The answer would lie in the cushy involvement of the CFMEU on the works who still have veto rights over any government decision. Whilst the rest of Australian governments have moved away from the CFMEU and their bullying tactics, it seems that the local. Government and the CFMEU have become even cosier. One wonders why that is so?

Leon Arundell10:35 am 04 Mar 25

Adelaide Avenue’s transit lanes have for decades made bus and car travel faster. They have cut traffic congestion by encouraging people to switch out of car driver seats and into passenger seats in cars and buses.
They can accommodate expected public transport growth until at least 2046.
Now Paris is emulating Canberra, with a trial of transit lanes on its notoriously congested ring road.
Meanwhile the ACT Government plans to spent $905 million to increase traffic congestion (and reduce public transport patronage by 5%) by replacing Adelaide Avenue’s transit lanes with slow light rail.

HiddenDragon10:12 pm 03 Mar 25

“When thousands of Commonwealth public servants take up roles in Barton in coming years, light rail will be needed, which is why it will attract Federal funding no matter who is in government.”

If that (guaranteed federal funding, regardless of who is in power) was really the case, what would be the point of an article which is ostensibly about shaming the ACT Liberals into presenting a united front on light rail?

The answer to that question is, of course, that there would be no point – but a government which is consistently economical with nothing but the truth, and which is finally confronting the consequences of that, would no doubt welcome a belated burst of bipartisanship on light rail so that it could (try to) share the blame for the next wave of revenue-gouging which is clearly coming the way of Canberra households and businesses.

Ian better provide his incredible insight and analysis on the benefits and costs of Light Rail in Canberra to the ACT Auditor General, Infrastructure Australia and the Central departments who do the budget funding.

These organisations have previously highlighted concerns with the cost benefits of the project, low return on investment and that there are more effective public transport solutions.

Buses can move as many people as light rail. Buses were preferred over light rail for the new Brisbane Metro. These buses can carry 170 passengers and utilise existing infrastructure as much as possible. It was deemed more effective, quicker to introduce, easier to integrate into existing systems and far cheaper than light rail. Should be noted that the Gold Coast tram extension to Coolangatta has been put on permanent hold.

As has the Newcastle light rail, with the NSW Government identifying a number of potential future alignments but not progressing at present due to economic assessments.

In a key lesson that the ACT Government could learn, they will use increased bus usage to fill the gap until higher capacity modes are required.

David Watson2:55 pm 03 Mar 25

“Donald Trump is here to stay, so get on board and accept it” – nice philosophy it you agree with it.

Putin’s President Trump is not a piece of public infrastructure. He’s a politician and political careers in a free and fair democracy should always have an expiry date.

“Stop the Tram” is not a public transport policy, having already repeatedly lost elections on this issue, for the Canberra Liberals to go another without a policy that offered a better public transport delivery for Canberra including the tram was almost as big a self own as having the unlikeable Jeremy Hanson fronting the campaign.

And no lessons have been learnt because the rusted ons are still banging on about the tram incessantly, no segue is too obscure to drag the tram into a conversation and, Jez is back in the leadership group because apparently Canberrans can’t reject this bloke enough.

How about having a plebiscite/referendum on continuing the tram. Barr won’t do that as he knows the outcome.

Elections are rarely decided over one issue, and to indicate that they are is disingenuous.

Barr is lucky that there are too many Labor rusted ons.

Nope.

You don’t get to set the rules after losing multiple elections.

How about the Canberra Liberal and their boosters grow up, put on their big boy/girl pants and accept that community has spoken.

If the Canberra Liberals are a serious political party (they’re not) they’d be coming out with a public transport policy which includes the tram and explains how they could deliver it better. Instead they and their boosters are still re-litigating elections they’re lost multiple times.

As for the rusted on comment lol. I know thinking is a challenge so it’s easy to dismiss support for the tram as just the “rusted ons” but TWO independents got up at the last election (and I personally voted for one of them). There were seats up for grabs but the genius Canberra Liberals and their supporters couldn’t get out of their own way on a issue the electorate has already voted on.

Yes, Logic is hard for some but at the last election it was Tram or Stop the Tram…only one of those is a public transport policy. The Liberals couldn’t articulate an alternative, they deserved to get beat and they deserve to get beat again.

Visionary? Only if you’re looking backwards to the last century and before.

It’s not buses we need to get off the roads, but cars containing one person, especially the big gas guzzling cars and the trucks that dominate our roads.

Faster, more regular and better designed bus services could achieve that across all of Canberra, rather than just along a central spine away from where most people live. It is harder for older, busier and more vulnerable Canberrans to get out and about than it used to be with the distance between stops so great that many cannot use public transport any more.

Leon Arundell10:39 am 04 Mar 25

Good points. Transit lanes are the best way to get single-occupant cars off roads. Unlike light rail, bus rapid transit or bus lanes, they encourage car drivers to become passengers in multi-occupant cars.

Of course the light rail haters keep coming because so many Canberrans gain no benefit from it, whilst paying dearly for the cost through rates, taxes and reduced bus services, worse health and education services.

Despite so many years in power, this government has never had the courage to conduct a proper referendum on light rail, nor to publish the costs in a timely manner, as they know that people would have baulked at it. Instead they claim a mandate that does not exist, increasing our rates and badly reducing our essential services as if they have our support.

The inequality of the services of light rail which serve only a few, whilst disadvantaging many is the reason you keep hearing from dissatisfied disenfranchised people. Why should they shut up as if they’re happy? We need to stop spending on it and use taxpayer funds in a more equitable and useful way.

It is absolute arrant nonsense to claim that because Labor was re-elected it is an endorsement of light rail. This is a Labor town and the Keystone Cops Liberals were never going to get elected. Kate Carnell years ago was only elected with the support of the sensible Michael Moore and two other hopeless independents. If you were to have a referendum today just on the extension of light rail to the South, I guarantee the vote would be 70% against. It is an outrageous waste of our taxes and I don’t know anyone who thinks it’s a good idea – maybe I’m moving in the wrong circles. Electric buses are the answer, giving significantly more flexibility and capacity at a fraction of the cost.

Your premises are that only Labor will be elected and that Labor will continue with the light rail. Therefore you have just agreed with Ian Bushnell.

Electric buses might be the answer in respect of emissions and climate targets. They also might be a little smoother in accelerating/slowing, but a likely to be rougher riding over uneven surfaces and harder on road wear due to their higher tare weight. Comparing, Transport Canberra’s newest Scania diesel bus holds 45 seated + 20 standing, and has a tare 11720kg and gross vehicle mass of 19100kg, whereas the Yutong electric bus seats 44 + 20 standing, and has a higher tare of 12700kg and a lower GVM of 18000kg. A bus is just that, a bus. Not a magic solution to public transport woes.

Ian-you need to get yourself up to date. We do not need the gross, unconsciable expense of this project and must go for electric-BRT, trackless trams etc. We are in such deep brown stuff we will never get out of it and all our publicly funded needs are going to be under much more pressure with so much less funds. $1.4B just for 1.3km to Commonwealth Park, and $4B to Woden. Why would you do that? The Business case does not support light rail in any shape or form. As to whether Canberra voted for it, there are no other options-Liberals? hmm, Greens-they’re to blame for this mess. We could have E-buses within six months as my son in Oxford arranged. The Govt can director encourage builders to build and I note they are not doing so for the most vulnerable-so that is a Big Fail you are supporting. Not a good look!

I’m not against the light rail, but I am quite annoyed by the poor deal-making that governments in Australia tend to do. The quoted price of this was obviously way over estimated. The companies building it obviously know how to squeeze every last drop out of government tenders. A better negotiator would have gotten them to do this for a quarter of the price.

The people have spoken. Really. If Barr, and yourself really believe that, let’s have a plebiscite on it. I know why you would be against that.

I’m totally in support of an improved public transport system. However, the tram is ridiculously and has one point of a failure – an accident or breakdown and the whole system shuts down.

Also the business case only stands up if there is greenspace infill along the routes. It’s ridiculous.

Yes really, how many elections do you want to lose on this issue?

Interesting that several Australian cities that ripped up their tramlines in the 50s and 60s are now turning to trams for their busiest transport corridors. The Gungahlin-City-Woden-Tuggeranong axis is a busy transport corridor. Buses and other transport modes feed into the corridor. The Belconnen region had an opportunity with the busway proposal that would have reduced cars into the city along Belconnen Way/Barry Drive but it was rejected, perhaps foolishly – too expensive, not enough benefit, apparently. Perhaps all those advocates for buses ought to reflect. Some random thoughts, yes the trams are expensive …

Love the light rail. Wish I lived near it so I could be a regular user.

Justifying the light rail system on the grounds that Canberra needs to be serviced by a modern public transport system is an incomplete argument. Of course Canberra needs public transport but there are better ways to do it! A system of modern electric buses could provide the same result and the buses would not require the roads to be ripped up and made into an archaic tramway. Plus, electric buses can operate on different routes to meet changing needs or service special events. And a bus system could already be in operation across Canberra – instead of waiting until 2050 for the full light rail system.

Our light rail is like AUKUS for Canberra, slow expensive and not meeting the needs of the population now, instead depriving us of funds for essential services to meet the agendas of vested interests with some vague promise of a benefit that most will never see.

Leon Arundell10:14 am 03 Mar 25

Light rail stage 2 will INCREASE traffic congestion. The Business Case for Stage 2A says that in 2046, with light rail to Woden 2 we will drive 33,743 kilometres more and travel 67,238 kilometres less each day by public transport, compared with not having stage 2.

Buses – electric or otherwise – won’t move people as efficiently. Tramways are no more archaic than buses. Tram routes are fixed – so they give confidence to developers. Bus routes don’t. Yes, there is inconvenience while lines are built but it is temporary: you have to take the long view. Have you ridden a Canberra bus lately? The tram is a far more pleasant ride and it is popular.

Please explain how light rail increases traffic congestion.

Leon Arundell1:41 pm 04 Mar 25

Soupot,, please ask the government why it expects light rail to increase traffic congestion. Buses can travel between Civic and Woden in 18 minutes. Light rail would take 27 to 32.5 minutes.

Leon Arundell1:48 pm 04 Mar 25

Soupot, Adelaide Avenue’s transit lanes can move 28,000 people per day. Stage 1 of light rail has averaged less than 7,500. Stage 2 is expected to move only 19,000 people per day in 2036, and only 23,000 in 2046. Light rail gives confidence to developers that they should not invest in places that aren’t on light routes.

No thanks. Public transport is for poors.

It is a curious thing, your desperation.

Tom Worthington9:29 am 03 Mar 25

I like light rail, but it is not for everywhere. Technology now allows for battery powered virtual bendy busses. This does away with the need for overhead wires, rails & coupled rail cars. A driver can operate one battery powered bus. When more capacity is needed, a second & third driverless bus can follow along. At off peak times the second and third busses can park themselves and recharge. As Canberra’s town centers densify, trams can be expanded to them, with the battery busses used on less busy routes.

Ah, another Bushnell piece providing fact free support for Light Rail, fully of weasel words and offering no tangible evidence.

“Visionary”, “Trasformative”, “multi model (sic)”. It’s all too funny at this stage.

If anything in this article was true, it could be included in robust options assessments and a business case to outline the supposed value.

The supposed benefits of land development and densification in the article dont actually require light rail and should be compared against alternatives.

The emotional attachment shown in the article about what should be a dispassionate assessment of technical, social and economic factors is exactly the problem with this project from the start.

We could have improved city wide public transport for a fraction of the cost of light rail, preparing the city for when/if higher capacity options are required but instead we are apparently to be locked in to delivering an improvement for one single route per decade if they can work out how to fund it (eg. Getting the Feds to pay for our wasteful expenditure).

It’s truly unbelievable that the recent budget updates haven’t finally stirred the local compliant media into asking some hard questions around government choices on expenditure.

But of course they have been captured by government for far too long to ever think about going against the grain.

It’s now an ideological article of faith that cannot be questioned. And we all are suffering for it.

Improved bus routes don’t leave the stain of Barrs ego permanently on Canberra.

Ken M,
And that’s exactly the issue

Good planning would be to allow for future transport mode upgrades when/if they are required.

But that doesn’t allow politicians the theatre of cutting ribbons or turning a sod of dirt like we saw the other week in an attempt to forge a legacy.

The light rail will have some kind of benefit but in terms of cost benefit – it’s undoubtedly a disaster. Its looks and feels like old technology and is now just a burden on the ACT ratepayer.

The last line of this article is hilarious. How can we keep the Govt accountable when they have been less than transparent on the costs and benefits of light rail?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.