30 June 2025

Light Rail Stage 2B costing to start soon, plus help to decide final route

| By Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
11

Light Rail Stage 2B will require a new bridge across Lake Burley Griffin. Image: ACT Government.

The crucial work of estimating how much Light Rail Stage 2B will cost, which will help decide the project’s final route, is in train, with the ACT Government seeking a consultant to advise it.

But the successful consultant’s calculations will remain secret so as not to impact contract negotiations and future procurement.

Construction of Light Rail Stage 2B is timed to begin once the 2A extension from Alinga Street to Commonwealth Park is completed and up and running in 2028.

It will extend the line from Commonwealth Park across Lake Burley Griffin through the Parliamentary Triangle and down Adelaide Avenue to the new Woden interchange.

READ ALSO Pokies regulator not adequately monitoring licensee compliance: audit report

The project is the most ambitious and costly of the light rail roll-out, involving new bridges across the Lake and on Adelaide Avenue, 10 km of track, nine new stops and other infrastructure.

It will also include substations and upgrades to the existing Mitchell Depot site to house additional light rail vehicles, staff and storage.

There are two route options through the Parliamentary Triangle still on the table – State Circle east, from Commonwealth Avenue along State Circle to Adelaide Avenue; and National Triangle-Barton, from Commonwealth Avenue along King George Terrace, Macquarie Street, Bligh Street, National Circuit, and Sydney Avenue before connecting with State Circle.

The cost of each route option will be a significant factor in the government’s final decision and the consultant will provide a cost comparison for the government.

The consultant will have to take into account the findings of the draft Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) being developed as part of the approvals process.

The draft EIS submitted last year will be assessed by agencies and placed on public exhibition later this year. A final, revised EIS that includes the chosen route would then be submitted to regulators, with approval expected in 2026.

The project needs to be approved by the Territory Planning Authority, National Capital Authority and both Houses of Parliament.

There are two potential route options through the Parliamentary Triangle. Image: ACT Government

There are two potential route options through the Parliamentary Triangle. Image: ACT Government

Both routes face challenges that could inflate costs.

In 2023, the government revealed that the initially favoured direct route to State Circle had hit an engineering obstacle where the line transitions from Commonwealth Avenue to State Circle.

Last year, it proposed a short tunnel, known as a cut and cover, as a potential solution. This would mean the tracks on the Commonwealth Avenue median would descend on the approach to Parliament, going under Commonwealth Avenue and popping out on the State Circle median.

The route through Parkes and Barton has always been considered more complex and costly because of the number of environmental and heritage hurdles.

The so-called dogleg also defeats the idea of the north-south spine and would increase the journey time.

The cost estimates will inform the Business Case. But the public won’t get to see them because they will be considered commercial in confidence, and any release would impact future tenders and contract negotiations. They would also be part of future Cabinet deliberations and decision making.

The tender document says the consultant will provide expert advice on costs, cost planning, budgeting and risk analysis.

The consultant will also act as Infrastructure Canberra’s independent cost estimating adviser for the project and may have to estimate the cost of subsidiary projects as well as early and enabling works.

READ ALSO New caretakers investigating ways to show off Albert Hall’s strong history

The tender document says the consultant must use labour and material base rates valid at the actual time of its calculations and adjust material rates if there are any changes.

The consultant will also assess the impact of the project schedule on costs.

Any escalation of costs should only be applied for works forecast for financial years after the agreed base date.

All estimates are to be finalised with a list of assumptions, allowances, exclusions and qualifications.

The tender closes on 22 July.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

11
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
GrumpyGrandpa10:21 am 01 Jul 25

Astonishingly arrogant, in my opinion. The government is broke. They are having to hit property owners to fund the health system, and yet Light Rail will proceed regardless of it’s cost.

Capital Retro10:20 am 01 Jul 25

This is what he said 2 years ago:

https://region.com.au/steel-vows-no-retreat-on-light-rail-stage-2b-after-route-doubts-emerge/681176/

The Feds have Chris Bowen, we have Steel.

David Flannery10:17 am 01 Jul 25

The Barton route, although longer and clearly more costly, should be the chosen option. The Barton route will capture a much larger passenger base… think all the offices, apartments and hotels along (and near to) National Circuit and Sydney Avenue, the National Institutions in the Parliamentary Zone, plus about 300m to Manuka Oval. Very few passengers will seek to embark or alight down in the state Circle cutting. The route to Woden was NEVER only about delivering Woden passengers to Civic in the fastest possible time as some continue to claim. The claim of “heritage issues” is a myth. There numerous examples of light rail running past old and historic buildings without impact… including past our former National Parliament building in Spring St Melbourne.

The problem with the longer route is that it may capture a “potential” larger passenger base, that may not actually translate into actual passengers because the travel times are so much more excessive than the alternatives.

Next week in the city we are going to have a money burning ceremony.

Stage 2B delivering a tourist tram from city into massive debt.

Why, they want to make transport slower for half of Canberra so it makes it less practical to use.

You’d think that Australia has the skills to put in their own tram system. We can’t even support Australian made. Why is bar going to a trade expo to showcase what we can do.

What’s the budget to have the consultant approve it regardless. If the first doesn’t they’ll find one that will. Steele needs to be investigated for his spending and not internally.

So the ACT government is committing to billions of dollars we don’t have without even so much as a business case. Just astonishing.

Just to show how obviously bad this is from a governance perspective, even Penfold gets it.

And that’s speaks volumes.

Where does the article say that? It says “The cost estimates will inform the Business Case” and that the consultant will consider all relevant matters relating to the project and advise.
Perhaps you should read it again?

Stuart the business case comes before anything. It informs the decision whether to proceed or not.

They’re already building bridges over Parkes Way so the decision has already been made. The business case will just rubber stamp the route. Just reckless. So bad even chewy gets it 🤣

Stuart M,
Where has the government suggested any new information provided in the investigations would change their position on delivering the project?

The project has been so infected with political rhetoric that considered infrastructure planning and decision making has long been thrown out the windows.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.