1 October 2026

Mainstreaming pornography through marketing isn't glamorous, and it's hurting our children

| By Genevieve Jacobs
Join the conversation
34
Pornstar Martini sign

Why didn’t someone in the bar have the decency to choose something else for public display? Photo: Region.

Walking down the street in a busy inner-south shopping centre last week, I was pretty shocked to see a large sign outside a local bar advertising the cocktail of the week.

A ‘pornstar martini’.

Obviously, lurid (and stupid) cocktail names are nothing new. But surely that should be inside the bar on the menu, rather than a busy corner frequented by children from at least three local schools?

Increasingly, though, that’s not the case. Pornography is presented as a glamorous part of the mainstream, no matter what age you are.

READ ALSO Sex ed in schools needed to combat dangers of easily accessible pornography: study

Let me be clear about this: in the ACT, we’ve been pioneers in making sex work of all kinds safe, clearly delineating where it can happen and ensuring those workers are protected from exploitation and abuse.

I’m not talking about what happens behind closed doors in Fyshwick where people mind their own business.

My problem is with what activist (and Canberra local) Melinda Tankard Reist of Collective Shout calls the “pornification” of our culture: the increasing normalisation of pornography and consequent access to it at younger and younger ages.

In shopping arcades, lingerie shops openly reference bondage themes in their window displays. Swimwear advertising aimed at teenage girls depicts them with legs spread, faces averted.

In the UK, students are campaigning to ban the use of school uniforms in adult entertainment. They argue the sexualisation of school uniforms directly correlates with harassment of children in the street. More than 30 per cent of girls report receiving unwanted sexual attention while wearing their school uniforms.

The problem isn’t that sexual content exists, it’s that we’ve allowed it to be mainstreamed via social media and advertising, creating a world where content made by and designed for consenting adults is becoming the first experience many young people have.

That’s deeply problematic. There is rising concern about sexual choking, a practice almost unheard of outside adult films 20 years ago. Choking is always unsafe and potentially fatal, but up to 60 per cent of teenage girls now report being choked during sexual activity.

Mild to moderate pressure can cause unconsciousness, stroke or brain injury, but sexual choking has become so normalised that many teenagers expect it to happen without consent.

READ ALSO Defence member wrote abuse 'fantasy' partly based on stepchild into work email

Charities working with teenage girls, like Canberra’s Fearless Women, report rapidly rising rates of intense anxiety among girls who feel pressured to participate in sexual activity they may not want or feel ready for. These expectations are only enhanced by “manosphere” content suggesting real men are aggressive about getting what they want sexually and boys are wimps if they don’t take charge.

We’ve worked hard to educate children clearly about sex, breaking down shame about our bodies and how they function, and that’s a good thing. The old world where people grew up in ignorance was often deeply harmful.

But commercial pornography should not be setting the norm for teenagers and young people. These performances have nothing to do with the intimacy, uncertainty, tenderness and shared exploration that should characterise first sexual relationships.

Just as sex workers deserve safe working conditions, children also deserve protection from a commercial sexual culture they aren’t ready for.

In Australia, we’re taking on the challenge of engagement-driven algorithms and tackling children’s access to social media. But this isn’t just the government’s role to manage.

Commercial marketers can and should think more deeply about mainstreaming pornographic references for products aimed at young people. Keeping children safe and healthy is everyone’s responsibility.

A street sign and a silly name for a cocktail might seem minor. But I wondered why someone in the bar didn’t have the decency to choose something else instead for public display – and perhaps think about protecting their own children as they did so.

Genevieve Jacobs is the CEO of Hands Across Canberra, the ACT’s community foundation.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

34
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Daoine R Amadanach8:31 am 02 Oct 26

I’m sorry but this article seems a bit overly sensitive, especially in regard to the name of that cocktail. It also reminds me how we still think of sex as a “sin!” I sometimes wonder how many of these problems would be redundant if we improved the way we view sex. BUT at the same time this article makes me think ‘I need to get out more, maybe there’s something to this article.’ As for exposing porn to kids I was hoping there’d be more security barriers against that now…?

The point is that it shouldn’t be outside the building on the street side because it’s for adults, not for children. So move the poster inside the bar. D’uh, pretty simple solution right?

Peter Stanley2:03 pm 01 Oct 26

I can’t believe how puerile most of these comments are. ‘Cocktails aren’t intended for children’ so there’s no harm? “Mummy, what’s a pornstar?” Ms Jacobs is right to notice the presence and prevalence of porn in our lives now, and it is hurting young men and especially women. It’s not wowserism to seek to protect the vulnerable.

Paul Johanson8:18 am 02 Oct 26

Exactly, clearly the moronic posters of puerile comments dont have daughters, or sisters, or mothers, or relationships with any women!!!!!

Daoine R Amadanach9:13 am 02 Oct 26

LOL The ad does make for an awkward conversation but I think it should be the least of a parents worry compared to ‘stranger danger.’ As for the “presence and prevalance of porn in or lives…” I can’t say I’ve noticed. For me it’s one of those things that’s only present if you go looking for it.

The pornstar martini was named UK’s favourite cocktail in 2018, did you drop in to try one?

It’s traditionally served with a chilled shot glass of champaign, and the ingredients are –
4 cl (4 parts) vanilla vodka
1 cl (1 part) Passoã (a passion fruit liqueur)
2 cl (2 parts) passion fruit puree
2 bar spoons (or teaspoons) homemade vanilla sugar (vanilla pods blended with caster sugar)

The wokerati successfully campaigned in the UK to change the name to “passion star martini”.

Daoine R Amadanach9:08 am 02 Oct 26

Yeah, good point. Pornstar Martini sounds better. Wait…there’s a Vanilla Vodka!?

Where was the reference to Drag Queens reading to kids in libraries? Have you seen some of their stage names?

Daoine R Amadanach9:05 am 02 Oct 26

Yeah, I got nothing against Drag Queens but why specifically have Drag Queens reading stories to kids?

You may not be aware of the history behind this Darien, but there is a long tradition stretching back to Britain of what are now called drag queens appearing in pantomime. They were live comedy shows for families, performed in most parts of England, with the story peppered with double entendres, which the grown-ups understood, but not the little kids. So they were traditionally viewed as harmless fun. The kids just saw men who were dressed up in colourful costumes playing funny characters. Today’s library performances are a similar genre, the kids love it and obviously the performances in the library where they are reading kids’ stories, are not the same as what they would perform in an evening adults-only cabaret. It was sad to see the bullying of the morally outraged over this as, if they’d bother watching, they’d realise there was no need for pearl-clutching.

Next stop for the thought police will be to ban anyone under 16 from visiting Fyshwick.

Gregg Heldon7:48 am 01 Oct 26

Did you walk into the bar and ask them to either remove the sign or move it inside? The article didn’t state. If not, why not? If you did, what was the outcome? The concerns that you have, would feel more genuine if you had.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.