19 December 2025

Massive buy-back scheme coming to "get more guns off our streets"

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
69
Some of the many firearms surrendered during the 2017 amnesty. Photo: ACT Policing.

Prime Minister Anthony Albanese has announced the biggest gun buy-back scheme since 1996. Photo: ACT Policing.

Australia will get its biggest gun buy-back scheme since John Howard launched his government’s initiative post the Port Arthur massacre in 1996.

Anthony Albanese said the Federal Government’s approach will be consistent with that of 1996 and will aim to get “more guns off our streets” in the wake of Sunday’s Bondi mass shootings (14 December).

The Prime Minister said the buy-back scheme will target surplus supply of guns in the community as well as recover illegal and newly banned firearms.

“We know that one of these terrorists held a firearm licence and had six guns, in spite of living in the middle of Sydney’s suburbs,” Mr Albanese said.

“There’s no reason why someone in that situation needed that many guns.”

Mr Albanese said there were now more than 4 million firearms in Australia, which is more than at the time of the Port Arthur massacre, and is a situation that can no longer be tolerated.

State and territory governments will be charged with administering the buyback, with the costs to be shared on a 50-50 basis between them and the Commonwealth.

READ ALSO PM acts on hate speech laws, conceding he could have done more sooner

“We expect hundreds of thousands of firearms will be collected and destroyed through this scheme,” the Prime Minister said.

“Consistent with the approach that was taken in 1996, the government is proposing that states and territories will be responsible for the collection, processing, and payment to individuals for surrendered firearms.

“The Australian federal police will then be responsible for the destruction of these firearms.

“The national gun buyback scheme is on top of the work that was agreed by National Cabinet on Monday, limiting the number of firearms to be held by any one individual.

“Limiting open-ended firearms licensing and the types of guns that are legal, making Australian citizenship a condition of holding a firearm licence, accelerating work on standing up the National Firearms Register, and allowing the additional use of criminal intelligence to underpin firearms licensing.”

The PM said he would not be recalling Federal Parliament before Christmas to pass urgent legislation – as is being requested by Opposition Leader Sussan Ley – because it was not practical and legislation had to be prepared carefully so as to withstand any possible High Court challenges.

“We want to make sure that the laws are right. We want to make sure as well that there is broad support for it across the board. We will engage constructively,” he said.

“We’re going to make sure that these laws don’t get passed and then get knocked over.

“We have seen in High Court decisions in areas relating to migration and other issues related to that national space.”

READ ALSO All eyes on PM and his response to gun laws, antisemitism after Bondi terror attack

Mr Albanese praised Mr Howard’s 1996 initiative and delivered a message to those gun owners who are not willing to surrender their firearms.

“My message is that, in 1996, the then-Howard government did the right thing,” he said.

“Intervened to have a scheme which Australians have been rightly proud of. We need to go further…

“If a bloke in Bonnyrigg needs six high-powered rifles and is able to get them under existing licensing schemes, then there’s something wrong. I think Australians can see that.”

The Prime Minister has also designated this coming Sunday – a week after the Bondi shootings – as a national day of reflection.

The New South Wales Government will introduce a new gun laws bill to the state parliament on Monday, saying they will be the “toughest gun laws in the country” and impose a cap of four firearms per individual and completely ban certain types of firearms.

“The New South Wales Government will also introduce legislation to ban ISIS flags in New South Wales to ensure that they’re not used as part of a demented terrorist organisation propaganda,” Premier Chris Minns said.

“These are extraordinary measures. I want to make it clear they’re not the end of the measures.”

It comes as seven men were arrested following dramatic vehicle stops by police in Sydney on Thursday night.

While it has been described as a precautionary measure, authorities have also confirmed that one of those men was under ASIO investigation.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

69
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

An attack on Australia by two terrorists and the pm wants us non terrorists to hand in firearms !

Once they get handed in they will have to be valued, I cant see the police doing it, what skills do they have in that area, so that leaves maybe a couple of guys at the gun shops and in 6 months time or so how many shops will still be open ! and if they only give us 10 cents in the dollar what can we do. The sooner this crooked government is out the happier I’ll be.

Albanese trying to channel the great John Howard. It’s not what you could call a fair comparison, mountain v minnow.

Lol no one is surprised that alongside your fan boy poster of Bibi is one of John Howard. A man that has done more damage to Australia’s modern position in the world than any other prime minister.

There’s that Christmas spirit again. Must have irked when Howard received a standing ovation in Bondi and the minnow currently occupying the Lodge was run out of the Eastern Suburbs.

Howard’s comments following the government’s gun announcement were spot on – what hollowness and ignorance to think the issue here was guns. Everyone knows a Royal Commission must be called – presumably Albanese is petrified of the amount of blame he’ll receive both as a government and personally.

His behaviour towards Israel and Jewish Australians in the past two years has been appalling. No wonder Australians are turning on him.

The biggest issue with firearms relates to hand guns, not rifles. There are far more hand guns per person now than there was after Port Arthur. And I know what can be done to a hand gun to achieve fully automatic capability. 15 rounds fired in 2 to 3 seconds! Magazine capacity maybe limited for long arms, but not for handguns!

Honestly, this is great but it’s a knee jerk reaction and a bandaid fix to a deeper and more serious security problem.

Yep knee jerk reaction, if we ban guns everything is fixed , the whole multicultural thing just doesn’t work ,

Do you really think that people in Bankstown and Lakemba are going to hand in their AK47s and stolen/illegally imported pistols

Capital Retro4:13 pm 22 Dec 25

My info is that they have variants of the AK-47 which are compatible with W.308 ammunition that can be purchased in any quantity at any dealer by a licensed .308 owner.

No stolen pistols, plenty of brand new Glocks imported. Doesn’t everyone have an AK or SKS under the bed? Once upon a time you could buy them at Kmart in the sporting goods section. Secondhand Chinese SKS $250! Survived one buyback I’m sure it will survive another.

No stolen pistols, plenty of brand new Glocks imported. Doesn’t everyone have an AK or SKS under the bed? Once upon a time you could buy them at Kmart in the sporting goods section. Secondhand Chinese SKS $250. Buy back? What buy back!

Do you really think that many people in Bankstown and Lakemba own and can afford to own AK47’s?

Karl Herzog – look up MEOC – Middle Eastern Organised Crime. Driving Mercs, Audis and BMW. Yes, a highly prized automatic weapon is chump change to this lot

Ha Ha! yes there must be hundreds maybe thousands of them SKS and SKK’s still out there, many were hidden after Port Arthur , many years back I bought a rifle from the old David Jones shop in Canberra city. also a barber shop in the city sold guns. guns were everywhere back then and hardly any gun crime.

So true. Perhaps we should be looking into the reasons why gun crime has increased. I grew up in a time hunters would come into our little town with rifles slung over their backs and they would gather supplies while in town before leaving. No one battered an eye lid when they walked into a store with rifle on their back.

I believe the government paid decent money to people to hand in. Certainly a
lot
More than $250!

SKS was $250-$450 SKK was $400-$600

Gun buyback, and here comes a new tax.

Buy back will be a failure. A new tax to cover the cost wont be needed.

I hope its a failure, I dont want to see 6 of mine turned into scrap, I fail to see the reasoning behind this 4 gun limit, 2 of mine I’ve owned for 50 years.

It’s not as if you can fire 6 at a time. And really what’s the difference between having 4 or 6? Those 2 additional will have no impact on anything sinister occurring

By owning 4 – 6 firearms you can team up and arm 4 – 6 people and go on a shooting spree…like at the Bondi incident.

One semi automatic will take down more victims than 4 to 6 guns. And a semi auto with a bump stock will take on an army!

I do not agree with this buyback, there are competition shooters,hunters,landowners and collectors that have antique/historic firearms (some in non working order) that will end up as scrap metal because of this idiotic new law (these guns are not on the street) they are locked up in safes, I have 2 that my late father owned now registered to me ,I remember him buying them when I was a kid now they might end up as scrap, I understand many folks dont like guns fair enough but why penalise the people that had nothing to do with Bondi ? Turning into scrap these firearms will do nothing to stop the bad guys shooting up the place. I know of a couple of unregistered rifles that I could buy and legally register them but they will remain unregistered because of this new law (no I do not have unregistered guns in my possession) the gov should give this a bit more thought, sleep on it for a while.

Come up with a valid reason to have them. Join a shooting club

Capital Retro3:43 pm 22 Dec 25

Good comment, bantam hen.

Having a similar upbringing to you, I agree that responsible firearm owner/users are being grouped with people with a culture driven mindset to kill others who do not agree with them and as a result, the former group is being unfairly penalized.

The current firearm licensing laws need review definitely, but not to limit the number of weapons rather to screen out the people who could have a future reason to murder others.

Currently, the granting of a firearm license in most states and territories is held for 30 days at which time the applicant is checked to see that he/she has not been charged or convicted in the previous 30 days of a (mainly) family violence offence. I have no problem with that but it doesn’t go far enough.

Politicians should give the proposed changes a lot more thought.

Yes shooting clubs are a great pastime, a person can learn a lot from fellow members etc but there might still be a 4 gun limit, who will be doing the compensation value of these buybacks I wonder, I’m sure they will go of ‘book value’ for any given firearm but thats no good for the owner thats just spent 800 bucks on a new barrel and 500 on a custom stock .

Especially if that stock is a ‘bump stock’!

Politicians and thought in the same sentence. If only.

That’s actually a good point.

The government has already said that farmers will not be subject to a 4 gun limit, and wait and see what the legislation states you may find that Vintage guns get some kind of exemption. The other option is to give up 2 of your none vintage guns. The legislation seems to make a lot of sence to me.

There are folks out there that are members of more than 1 gun club maybe 2 or 3 clubs and need more than 4 guns to participate in competition events, why should these folks have to hand back some of there guns?

Are they going to cover the reloading gear, projectiles, powder, dies etc etc

The only upside to the buy back is it will limit the amount of weapons that can be stolen from farms. If you really want a rifle, target a farm. It’s been happening for years and it’s no secret.

The last buy back was targeted at semi automatic weapons as the laws were changing in regards to ownership of these weapons. The new legislation will limit the number of weapons someone can own. It won’t change the number of people who own them. You can only shoot one weapon at a time. It will have no impact. Removing semi automatic weapons may not have changed the number of people owning guns however it did remove the being able to kill many people in the space of seconds. With some many holes in our borders criminals will always have access to semi auto and automatic weapons. Extremists are likely to have the same access. Ask yourself this, if someone can ship over a tonne of illicit drugs into the country then they can do similar with prohibited weapons. Knee jerk reaction by the government because they feel the need to show they are doing something. How about actioning a solution that leads to real life outcomes?

That’s also a really good point. The question is…why aren’t drug smugglers also importing restricted firearms? If anything you’d think Bikey Gangsters would be on top of this. 🤔

You are assuming that the gun buyback will be the only part of reform to happen. It is clear there will be other elements to what changes – it has been flagged for instance that effective ‘in perpetuity’ gun licenses will disappear. I agree that the direct impact of a buyback is likely to be limited – but as part of a suite of measures, I don’t see what the massive issue is.

The real issue is extremism. Extremism of any faith and religion.

Yes it is John. But polling suggests a strong view that people would like to see stronger gun control too.

The bad guys will always have access to illegal firearms be they smuggled or locally made, those are the guns we need of the street ,unfortunally nothing can be done about it.

I’m all for gun control. However hand guns are a bigger issue than long arms. I’m not for penalising responsible owners of either. Strengthening border controls is what’s needed. We don’t manufacture hand guns in this country which means they are all imported. Far more crime involves the use of hand guns than rifles.

Capital Retro9:29 pm 20 Dec 25

This proposal is crazy.

Murder by stabbing is far deadlier than mass shootings in Australia. How many were killed by one person in the Bondi shopping centre massacre and at single house in north Queensland a few years ago 8 children were stabbed to death by one woman.

The are are fatal stabbings being reported almost daily.

Yet, on my kitchen bench there are six large knives in a wooden block and about a dozen more smaller knives for other purposes in nearby drawers. This would be the case in most homes in Australia.

Are they licensed? No. Are to locked in a safe every night? No, however people under 18 are prevented from buying them at retailers which is a sick joke, surely.

You’ve got to laugh at the mental gymnastics required to compare the danger from knives to guns.

Hilarious stuff as usual CR.

Capital Retro7:38 am 23 Dec 25

Glad to make you laugh as always chewy, but:

“According to data from the Australian Institute of Criminology (AIC) and other sources:
Knives were used in approximately 34% to 38% of homicide incidents. Knives or other sharp implements remain the most frequently used weapon in Australian homicides, a pattern observed since at least 1989–90.
Firearms were used in approximately 11% to 12% of homicide incidents. The proportion of homicides committed with a firearm has declined significantly since the introduction of stricter gun laws in the 1990s.”

Thanks for unwittingly proving my point CR.

Well done.

Looking at this logically, the only reason why knives seem deadlier is because they are a mundane and widespread item therefore freely available to use with a malicious purpose. But knives are a range weapon, you need to be up close. Guns however, you can injure or kill someone within meters. But guns are limited and restricted to what type of gun you can own. Therefore, more knife attacks than with guns.

Another day, another loopy Capital Retro viewpoint.

I’m sure you are all for a national knife buyback are you, given you see them as a far greater risk? National Knife Ownership register perhaps?

And how is preventing young people from buying knives a ‘sick joke’?

As has been so often demonstrated CR, left-leaners struggle to understand the issues that glare directly at them. And this is why Australia is on this situation – people whose moral compasses are unable to distinguish right from wrong are making the rules in Canberra and have been since October 7.

Normal Australian values didn’t pull these triggers – anti-Semitic attitudes did. The same anti-Semitism supported by Albanese, Wong, Burke and others for over two years now. Sadly it appears the same sentiments and ignorance are shared by JS9 et al. They just don’t understand the issues and clearly never will.

One could speculate on the reasons for this, but no amount of rationale or logic could ever explain it.

Typical Penfold. Takes 1 and 1 and gets 365. You sprout pure hate from your heart on a daily basis.

Please do tell where I can find these claimed ‘Australian values’ written down for instance. And how do ‘values’ pull triggers’. People pull triggers, not ‘values’.

You can’t understand percentages. Anyone thinking you understand complex issues would have rocks in their head.

Yet here you are spraying that people are ‘antisemitic’ on no basis. How did questions about knife crime conflate into me being anti-semitic.

You are on a slippery slope with that.

Capital Retro12:31 pm 23 Dec 25

Well, the inept Victoria even recognises that machetes are a problem JS9.

The sick joke is that 50 years ago just about every kid on the block could buy a knife including boy-scout style pocket knives which are now banned.

Not that your current generation would even know how to peel an orange or a spud with one.

Your turn to answer this one, chewy.

Capital Retro12:35 pm 23 Dec 25

If Franco was still alive he would see the fifth column emerging but as you correctly state, left-leaners struggle to understand the issues that glare directly at them. And this is why Australia is on this situation.

There is a big differnce between guns and knives. Kives are used to cut meat and vegitables guns are manufactured to kill. We hear the same argument about cars killing. Well maybe we treat gun ownership the same way. Before you get a licence you have to answer questions on safe use of guns, get a learning permit with 120 hours supervised use. Add to that a psyc test at your expence. And each gun you own has its own licence.

That you’d demand that Australian values need to be written down JS9 makes it very clear you’re in little danger of ever being confronted by one.

“The sick joke is that 50 years ago just about every kid on the block could buy a knife including boy-scout style pocket knives which are now banned.”

Oh, so there are already limits on specific types of knives, with bans in place for those that create more risk.

Almost like you can look at separate issues that have differently risk profiles individually, particularly for far more dangerous items like firearms.

You and Pengold scrounging around weakly attempting to find anything to back your predetermined ideological position, another day ending in y.

https://www.homeaffairs.gov.au/about-us/our-portfolios/social-cohesion/australian-values

Strange that for all the rabbiting on about “Australian Values” he does, Penzero doesn’t know they are actually written down by the Government.

Unfortunately though, they don’t actually support most of his usual partisan drivel, which makes sense that he doesn’t know they exist.

How about that CR, it took 30 minutes of googling to discover what most of us have simply learned and practiced before and after growing up.

Mutual respect and tolerance are some of the key Aussie values, though sadly many left-leaners demonstrate daily an incapacity to learn or practice either.

The good news is though that the Life in Australia booklet comes in around 40 different languages so most people have the chance to learn Aussie characteristics they are missing. Including this:

“Australia values the principles of mutual respect and tolerance. This means listening to others and respecting their views and opinions, even when they are different from your own. People should be tolerant of each other where they find that they disagree.”

The booklet even includes a Swahili translation, so there’s little excuse not to understand it.

Capital Retro4:41 pm 23 Dec 25

clarklea, in some cultures, knives are used to slit throats of animals too.

Animals include infidels.

Well even though the government has helped write down an outline of Australian Values for people like Pengold, who didn’t know they exist, unfortunately reading and understanding them is beyond their power.

Unfortunately the government was unable to produce a Life in Australia booklet in a 41st language that Pengold would understand.

That of his native tongue, Gibberish.

Lol Penfool preaching tolerance…. ha ha ha ha ha.

What a joke.

All these questionable “solutions”, yet none of them would have prevented the shooters from obtaining a gun license in the first place…

The problem I have with this is that they were both on the ASIO watch list. You’d think that would come up during a gun license application. 🤔

You would think ASIO would be aware of the license too if investigating them. Or perhaps they were aware and made a call it was ok. No need to revoke license or remove weapons.
Don’t want them to know we are watching them. And that’s fine, but don’t ever take your eyes off them ASIO if making that call regardless of whatever threat level you view them as. I think they knew and didn’t want to risk making them alert they were being watched. Because not knowing about the license and weapons is incompetence. They’re not incompetent.

Do they *really* think that the types of people who commit crimes would just hand over their guns? No. The only people who would are those who don’t commit crimes anyway.

This sounds more like using the recent tragedy as an excuse to disarm more of the population so they have more control.

I have mixed feelings about this. Firstly, I support the concept of removing guns, where there isn’t a genuine need to have them.
Reducing the number someone can hold to 4….well, is that still too many in most situations?
Growing up on a farm, dad always had some rifles and a shotgun. There were legitimate reasons to have firearms, particularly with the threat of snakes and badly injured livestock etc. My cousin, also a farmer, also had a collection of more specialised firearms – he was a representative clay pigeon shooter. These sort of people have genuine needs.
There are significantly tighter laws in respect to storage of guns, than when I was a kid and tighter licencing requirements, and yet these men legitimately had guns.
In Victoria, they have had their machetti bins, and a substantial number of these weapons have been surrendered. I was beyond belief that that many weapons even existed.
My concern with this buy-back is not so much about the intent, it’s about the effectiveness. The vast number of gun issues in our society relate to illegal activities, criminal and so on. My question is will the buy-back remove guns from criminals, gangs, drug dealers and those who are engaged in terror related activities?
I know that a gun-buyback won’t be the only initiative that governments make, I just feel that it might be seen as something that takes away from honest law abiding people, and not make a difference in reducing crime or protecting our society from repeats of what happened in Bondi.
The issues are significantly greater than guns themselves.

I think you pretty much summed everything up. 👍

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.