4 November 2025

New powers coming to kick troublemakers off Canberra buses

| By James Coleman
Join the conversation
35
Bus at bus stop

Applications for the new transit officers have closed. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Act up on a Canberra bus and you might soon find yourself walking.

Transport Canberra and ACT Policing have been given new powers to remove unruly passengers from buses or interchanges under a law designed to curb a spike in violence against drivers.

The Road Transport (Public Passenger Services) Amendment Bill allows officers to direct anyone displaying “aggressive or menacing behaviour” to leave the area around a bus, bus stop or interchange.

The change follows a series of assaults that saw bus drivers call a snap strike last year.

READ ALSO Voluntary assisted dying is here – but there’s an issue that needs solving

One driver had a bucket of fish heads poured over them. Another was showered in glass after a passenger headbutted the safety screen.

“We’re talking drivers getting beaten up, having cans of Coke thrown at them, being spat on, even receiving death threats – you name it, it happens,” Transport Workers Union ACT secretary Klaus Pinkas said in late 2024.

There are now about 40 reported cases of violence against Canberra bus drivers every month.

The latest ACT Budget has set aside $37.4 million for public transport safety upgrades (as well as 30 new electric buses), including larger driver safety screens, de-escalation training for drivers, and the new team of Transit Officers.

Transport Canberra is now finalising the recruitment process after applications closed last month.

Transport Minister Chris Steel said the new laws “draw a powerful line in the sand that makes it absolutely clear that anti-social and violent behaviour is not acceptable”.

“Everyone has the right to be safe at work, and our passengers have the right to be safe when using this critical service,” he said.

“Authorised officers will help deter violent behaviour and de-escalate situations before they become serious.”

READ ALSO Two years since the ACT decriminalised drugs – here’s what we’ve learnt

Transit officers won’t be allowed to use force; instead, they must call the police if things turn violent.

“Once appropriately trained, authorised persons will be able to act as a measure between bus drivers and the police, helping to deter violent behaviour and de-escalate situations before they become serious,” Mr Steel said.

“The new laws also allow the police to remove a person if that person is failing to comply with the move-on direction.”

The Public Transport Association of Canberra (PTCBR) backed that approach, saying restraint was the right call.

“It’s a balancing act,” PTCBR chair Amy Jelacic told Region.

“Putting heavily uniformed – and potentially armed – officers onto a public transport vehicle or platform can have a powerful deterrent effect and encourage good behaviour, but it can also make people feel really uncomfortable and nervous to even use the system.”

She said most trips in Canberra were safe and uneventful.

“I know people have had bad experiences on public transport, including our drivers – which is horrible – but statistically, public transport in Canberra is super safe,” she said.

“It would be a bit bizarre in this city to see heavily armed officers, and it would send the wrong message to the thousands of people who are using public transport here every day with no incident whatsoever.”

Even so, Ms Jelacic urged the government to track whether the new measures actually work.

“We trust the government will monitor what effect these positions are having. We need that data to answer: is this worth it? Is it having the intended effect?”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

35
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Wait so before police had no powers? That explains why once I was in a bus and someone was playing loud music with his feet in seats looking aggressive and no one did anything.

Having relied on the bus for more than 10 years, with the experiences I’ve had and things I’ve witnessed this is hardly surprising. But to hear that drivers are targeted, that’s different. It sounds like things have escalated but what can you do about the wacka-doodles that catch the bus?

Much sympathy for the drivers. However screening the driver leaves other passengers, including the elderly and school children, at the mercy of people with aggressive behaviour.

Dilkera,

I truly understand your concern. I have family who have been bus drivers, so I have some understanding of the issues.

The issue of extended screens for the drivers is about making the work place a safer environment. It’s a Work Health & Safety obligation.

In the event of passengers who are acting agressively, all the driver can do is open the doors, to allow an escape option, and radio for support from supervisors or the police.

Drivers are not authorised to leave their seat and engage with aggressive passengers. A driver could lose their job under these circumstances.

Some years ago, Supervisors would ride the buses monitoring behaviour, and the payment of fares. The government however removed them.

As an older passenger, I’ve often felt very uncomfortable with the conduct of some passengers, and we all have the right to expect safety while on public transport, however, dealing with aggressive passengers is beyond the responsibility and pay grade of a bus driver.

Sadly, while the initiative of moving people on is positive, it’s only moving people on from interchanges to avoid them boarding. That said moving them 20 metres, is a bit weak if you ask me.

ACT bus drivers are the best. Always polite and friendly. It’s a shame they have to tolerate the scum as the drivers deserve respect. As yet I haven’t come across any scum on the buses I have caught. However if that does occur I won’t stand back and do nothing.

During my 10 years of catching the buses I cam across a lot of those kinds of people. One night while catching a bus home I was stuck having to hear a very racist, religiously fanatical Russian lady. It wasn’t life threatening but it wasn’t ‘comfortable’ either. After that experience I realised ‘I seem to get a lot of this catching the bus’. I didn’t want to stretch my luck so I brought a car as soon as I could. LOL

As a former driver I can say 80% of problems are made worst by the driver. Normally the local scum give a phoney excuse for not having a fare. It’s simpler to let them on for free not make the situation worse and get a punch in the head while you’re sitting down. Sometimes this upsets Neville Public Servant and they become enraged at the driver and become a problem too. Normally saying, well you get the money out of him settles them down because taking on the scum is a bit different to taking on a seated driver, and they don’t want that. Likewise cyclists who are always on a mission of getting to wherever in record time don’t like sharing the left hand side of the road. Apparently they think a bus should not overtake them and then stop at a stop forcing not only cars who seem to accept the slight inconvenience but the cyclist themselves to have to wait the few precious seconds. Something about wearing Lycra gives them the balls of a magpie in October but all year round and through tears and profanities are often the main danger to the physical well being of the driver. Since cameras were put on buses, complaints from cyclists have dropped nearly 100% because now there is evidence often in contrast to their truth of what happened.

Heywood Smith3:34 pm 04 Nov 25

@Elf, thanks for your honestly. Fair to say 80% of bus drivers need more driving lessons too. Ive posted many dashcam vids on the Transport ACT Facebook page of dangerous driving, buses speeding, running red lights, they get deleted pretty quickly. Yes, people driving cars are guilty of the same offences, no excuses, but i dare say a bus would cause more damage if involved in a similar accident scenario as said vehicles.

“Normally the local scum “…..who describes a person they’ve never met and don’t know as “scum”?

If this is the way you view your fellow Canberrans without any actual idea of who they are, what they have been through then you really are not worth listening to at all…Shameful.

Scum are those that abuse bus drivers and fellow passengers. Even the word scum is too good for them

I understand your point but what kind of ‘fellow Canberran’ would smash their head through the screen of the drivers section on the bus? I understand some people are ‘going through’ a bad experience in life, I’ve had plenty but it’s not an excuse to inflict that kind of suffering onto someone else.

He wasn’t describing people who committed abuse he was describing people who couldn’t pay a fare determining them as “scum” and “phoney” without any actual knowledge. A completely contemptible attitude.

It’s the same people day after day, week after week, year after year. They might disappear for a few months, probably in the AMC or similar but then they return. They are the scum of society and I’m sure in your green utopia, they don’t exist. If you had daily dealings with them then your smug attitude might change!

Sure Elf, you’re judging people you don’t know based on your first interaction, I’m sure you really gave them a fair go after that.

And of course you have to go to the puerile nonsense of “green utopia”, as cover for the contemptible attitude that battling people, are according to you “scum”. Shameful.

Sounds fine to me, but as for people on the far-Left, it would be making them nervous about upsetting the delinquent, not considering their circumstances enough, etc.

That aside, I’d say that you just have to bite the bullet and allow the officer to be armed, otherwise you’re putting them in the situation of confronting delinquents who’ll most certainly will be carrying at least a knife, and that’s not right, regardless of how infrequently disturbances arise.

Either that or you do away with the idea altogether, and allow the delinquents to get away with what they want

“Sounds fine to me, but as for people on the far-Left, it would be making them nervous about upsetting the delinquent, not considering their circumstances enough, etc.”

Exactly who feels this way? Be specific. As for the rest of the word salad, as nonsensical as ever.

So far left people react to delinquents differently – are you just making this stuff up ??

“it would be making them nervous about upsetting the delinquent”

So Vasily is happy just to shoot them instead. I wonder from what Manichaean belief set that thinking arises?

I don’t totally like what you say but you got a very good point.

Does it come with extra police?

How much of that safety funding will end up paying for myway fixes.

‘We need to update the app for safety’

You were literally demanding a 2nd green bin on the tax payer the other day. Unbelievable.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.