15 September 2026

No Big Splash this summer, so Steel commissions a study

| By Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
72
Big Splash pool with graffiti.

Big Splash’s main pool was meant to reopen on 1 November, but the government believes that won’t happen. Photo: John Lomnicki.

The ACT Government will try to flush out a buyer for the Big Splash site after its recent failed sale and the realisation that the lessee won’t be able to reopen the site as required by 1 November, or any time over the summer.

The government will now commission, at taxpayers’ expense, an options study for the Macquarie site to provide information that may attract a buyer looking to set up a commercially viable operation, including an aquatic centre.

The year-long study will cover the practical costs of delivering various facilities, including slides, reopening pools and other amenities, as well as land value. It will analyse viable models for operating commercial aquatic facilities.

It will enable interested parties, including potential owner/operators, to come forward with ideas and plans about a future aquatic facility.

READ ALSO Big Splash kerfuffle prompts Crown lease rethink

Planning and Sustainable Development Minister Chris Steel said the report would also give the community a voice in future plans for Big Splash and inform the government’s aquatic study that was underway.

He said the government’s preference remained for a private operator to acquire the site, ruling out, for now at least, calls for a government takeover.

The government also had to be mindful of the current commercial arrangements which preclude it from constructing and/or operating new swimming pools, sporting or leisure venues within 5 km of the CISAC pool in Belconnen.

Mr Steel would not elaborate but said Access Canberra, as the regulator acting on behalf of the Territory Planning Authority, may also be considering action against the lessee for not meeting the 1 November opening requirement and the lease conditions.

He said the option study could help the lessee, which is the mortgagee and therefore with no interest in operating a pool or any other enterprise on the site, find a buyer.

Planning Minister Chris Steel said it’s important to know the actual costs. Photo: Ian Bushnell.

Several other parties had expressed interest in the site, including the Canberra Southern Cross Club and the previous owners.

“It’s really important that as we consider the options for the future of Big Splash that we understand what the costs are,” he said.

“What are the costs of bringing the existing 50 metre pool back into operation? What are the costs of delivering new slide facilities, bringing back the amenities, and even delivering new facilities that weren’t provided there before?

“This report will give us those answers and enable, hopefully, the market and a potential operator to come in and run this as a successful and viable business, bringing it back as an aquatic facility.”

Mr Steel said interested parties could present their plans as part of the options analysis.

He committed to publishing the report so everyone could be clear about what was required to bring the site online as soon as possible.

But Mr Steel ruled out changing the site’s zoning from restricted access recreation zone PRZ2 to allow residential development.

“This is about looking at what’s possible within the current zoning,” he said.

“The range of different aquatic facilities that the community wants to see back on the site, looking at what the costs are of operating those and, potentially, delivering new facilities and what mix of facilities would make this commercially viable for an owner-operator to purchase the site and bring it back into operation.”

Asked about other possible recreational uses, Mr Steel said the community’s clear preference was for an aquatic centre.

The study will be funded from the City and Environment Directorate’s existing resources.

Asked if he was just throwing good money after bad, Mr Steel said the community wanted to have its say on the site’s future, and the government would provide that opportunity through this consultancy.

The expression of interest sales process run by Colliers concluded on 22 July without an outcome. The site attracted a lot of interest, but its “complexity” was an issue.

READ ALSO Steel 'on the hook' for Big Splash reopening by 1 November, say Libs

Canberra Liberals Member for Ginninderra Peter Cain said Mr Steel should examine all the possible ways Big Splash could reopen, including withdrawing the lease, but another report was not the way.

“Three weeks ago he told me that it should reopen by 1 November. Now he is commissioning another report. That is not enforcement. That is kicking the can down the road,” Mr Cain said.

“If he knew it could not reopen when he wrote to me on 25 August, he gave Belconnen false hope. If he didn’t, what was his guarantee worth?

“Enough reports. Enough threats. Take the lease back and secure Big Splash for Belconnen.”

Comment was sought from Save Big Splash.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

72
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

What a waste of space is this government. It was obvious the owners weren’t going to do anything. Finally the penny drops. The government should take ownership of the site and just make it happen. Find a private sector partner if required. A “study” is a waste of money.

Reasonable Opinion1:35 pm 17 Sep 26

it’s all a bit silly. maybe the options paper could explore viability of building an ice-rink there too, while we’re exploring ways to spend $$ the territory doesn’t have? wait I know – acquire the land, change the lease, then build a dragway there! Some people liked the slides but it was never much chop as a pool and none of that means government should take over an unviable private business (the silliest of the suggestions) – especially when we apparently don’t even have the money to keep public libraries open on weekends.

Daoine R Amadanach10:09 am 17 Sep 26

Is anyone else surprised by this?

CISAC already provides slides and olympic pool. Just close down Big Splash and not waste Tax Payer’s money further

I was under the impression there was a 5 kilometre “as the crow flies” distance limit between aquatic? centres.

In any other circumstance, a penalty like a bank guarantee would ensure the public would not be out of pocket… but not ‘Steel by name, weak as water by nature’. Let’s have a meeting to decide what we should do in a meeting. Steel clearly trained by watching episodes of Utopia… what a useless bunch of clowns are running the circus! Surely we can do better than this?

Need to get tough on lease breaches.

Amazing no one gave a sh!t about it for decades and now continue to waste tax dollars paying Steel to conduct a “study”. Sell the sh!t hole to GeoCon and let it die already.

Elvis Gunners11:57 am 16 Sep 26

Knock it down. Enough is enough. Stop wasting our money on more studies. Hard to believe the Minister hasn’t managed to schedule an overseas tour of water parks.

A Government too paralysed to do anything.
Commercial owners failing to adhere to lease terms seems to be common in Canberra.
Governments need to be far more assertive & terminate leases when this happens.

Incidental Tourist9:59 am 16 Sep 26

Before taxpayers are asked to subsidise another dead in the water bureaucratic ritual, we should ask how much this tired Labour ACT government itself contributed to making local businesses unviable by gradually imposing more and more red tape and taxing ever vibrant Canberra’s businesses to oblivion.

Its going to be a lot of money and effort to reopen big splash for a few years before it just degrades etc and closes in 2030…

Let it close, and get the ACT government to put in some facility elsewhere.

Seems at the moment they want to waste our money navel gazing.

What has Chris Steel actually achieved?

Hopefully, proponents of reopening Big Splash will engage constructively with the study’s findings, and it is positive that the ACT Government is establishing objective baseline facts.
Operating the park in 2026 presents commercial realities fundamentally different from decades past: historically nominal land acquisition costs and vastly lower wage structures no longer exist. Today, rough financial estimates highlight steep hurdles:

CapEx & Debt: Re-acquiring the site lease (which last transferred for ~$7.5M in 2021 before entering mortgagee in possession) and repairing degraded infrastructure carries a conservative ~$12.5M upfront cost—requiring ~$1.41M annually in commercial debt servicing.

Operating Overheads: Mandatory staffing under the Fitness Industry Award costs ~$866K per season. Combined with soaring utilities and high-risk commercial public liability insurance, baseline operating costs reach ~$2.56M annually.

The Visitor Hurdle: At a blended rate ($25 slides / $10 laps), breaking even requires ~124,000 visits per season—averaging ~830 paying patrons daily over a 150-day window, regardless of weather.

When filtered for children with basic swim competency (Royal Life Saving Australia data shows roughly half of Year 6 students now miss basic benchmarks), families managing cost-of-living pressures, and lap swimmers using nearer local pools, the target market contracts significantly. The remaining pool of Canberra families would need to visit 6 to 8 times every summer to meet targets.

While hot January weekends hit capacity, Canberra’s short summer, rain, and cool shoulder months make averaging 830+ daily visitors unrealistic. The government’s study should bring welcome clarity to these metrics and determine if the site’s zoning remains appropriate.

Who would have guessed, those blood sucking vultures from the club industry are circling.

The lease should be taken back but I do have to question Peter Cain calling for the government to do so after his vociferous criticisms of its acquisition of the Calvary Hospital. What does the party stand for? Easy to snipe from the sidelines but what do the Canberra Liberals have to offer citizens under Mark Parton, not to mention the legalities in moving this saga forward.

hypocrisy in the extreme!

No comparison; Calvary was meeting its lease conditions, as far as anyone can tell. Property rights work both ways.

Jack D,
Wondering why community organisations would be interested in the provision of community facilities.

Yes, it has really come to that.

And whilst Jack is out on that limb, he can’t understand the difference of forcibly acquiring a site where the leasees were fully complying with their lease versus one that isn’t.

Considering the gutter content of his now moderated comment on another thread, one would suggest Jack think about the content of his partisan rants…..

There is a first time for everything after all.

Matt Watts and chewy14, are both claiming that the Calvary hospital was complying with lease conditions despite it not, with the facility being funded by taxpayers and the operators allowing the hospital site to become so run-down, providing discriminatory health services focused on a religious doctrine that denied the delivery of medical procedures to the detriment of women.

chewy is again exhibiting the usual sensitivities he always does to criticisms of the club industry.

Unbelievably he is also defending Big Splash which has become a waste ground, an eyesore and a public safety hazard. A site that has such limited potential as a pool and will never again see its former glory. A pool that is only open for a few months of the year and located just around the corner from two international aquatic centres within a kilometre of it. The site has such limited potential it can’t even be sold.

Let’s hope the govt sees reason and it is repossessed and redeveloped into much needed housing rather than the little used facility it has become like the Phillip pool.

Gregg Heldon11:23 am 16 Sep 26

Not hypocrisy Jack and I’m not here to argue, just here me out.
Peter Cain questioned the acquisition of Calvary Hospital, as did a lot of people. Fine. The Government acquires it.
The question that Cain then, quite rightly asks is, “if you can acquire Calvary, why can’t you acquire The Big Splash and, by extension the Hawker Tennis Club? Rezone them, restore them, sell them, but you can’t you do that?”
It’s not an unreasonable question. I don’t think it’s unreasonable for anyone to answer that question.
For mine, a Government shouldn’t cherrypick on what private assets it thinks it should acquire. Is a private hospital more important than a (once) well patronised sporting facility? Some may say not, but for some, that’s the sticking point.
For my own point of view, I think both sporting facilities should be acquired, The Big Splash turned into that much needed Ice Sports centre and Hawker turned into community facilities, whilst retaining a tennis court.
I don’t want every disused sporting facility turned into housing. Some can be justified, but, hopefully, not these two.

Discrimination? Canberra Hospital also didn’t provide those services you like so much. If that’s your crutch, so be it.

I’m not arguing in favour of the pool per se, but your backflips and twists in defence of ACT Government actions are worthy of it reopening!

Yeah No Canberra3:33 pm 16 Sep 26

Peter Cain’s position on Big Splash bears no resemblance to what happened with Calvary. This is a ridiculous statement on your part.

Jack D making up strawman arguments again, because his own position is so weak, constantly changing to back in the woeful performance of the ACT Government no matter what.

brucewantstobecool6:46 pm 15 Sep 26

So much criticism on the socials about yet another study, but let’s be realistic – what other way can the Government legitimately seek broad expressions of interest to use the site in other ways while not developing residential apartments and maintaining an aquatic facility of some description? I think the days of this site being solely a pool are gone (CISAC and the AIS are around the corner, as is Lake Ginninderra), but surely there is another mixed use proposition that works for the community while also providing investors a return.

Gregg Heldon7:51 pm 15 Sep 26

I saw somewhere else someone suggest that the ice rink could go in there.

That should buy another ten years of distraction and shore up some votes at the next election.

Elvis Gunners12:01 pm 16 Sep 26

You’d need more space for parking than is available at that location.

Gregg Heldon5:03 pm 16 Sep 26

Multi story?

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.