29 May 2025

North West Shelf gas approval 'cements a legacy of climate harm for generations': Pocock

| Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
36
Bald man in conversation with woman.

Senator David Pocock says the second-term Labor government has betrayed future generations of Australians. Photo: Thomas Lucraft.

Independent ACT Senator David Pocock has severely criticised the Federal Government, saying it has betrayed future generations of Australians by approving the extension of the North West Shelf gas project.

He accused Anthony Albanese of allowing one of his first acts as a newly re-elected Prime Minister to be one of “abrogating any responsibility” to the health and well-being of generations to come.

Senator Pocock said in approving the extension of what will be the most significant fossil fuel project in Australia’s history, the PM has condemned future Australians to an existence beset by worsened impacts from climate change.

“It is devastating that the first act of a re-elected Albanese Labor government is to approve the biggest fossil fuel project in our history,” Senator Pocock said.

“This decision cements a legacy of climate harm for generations to come due to the major parties’ lack of moral courage on climate.

“Announcing the approval of a fossil fuel project of this scale while people on the Mid North coast are recovering from a once-in-500-year flood, and South Australia is in drought, is hard to understand.

“The North West Shelf expansion will pump out 4.4 billion tonnes of carbon emissions over the life of the project, equivalent to 10 times Australia’s total current domestic emissions.

“It’s time to stop pretending gas is the future. It’s cooking our present, and we’re running out of time to prevent even more catastrophic impacts from climate change than we’re already witnessing.”

Environment Minister Murray Watt approved the extension on Wednesday (28 May) to 2070.

READ ALSO Dodson asks PM to revisit Indigenous affairs policy during this new term in office

The Woodside Energy project’s extension to its West Australian gas facility has been under assessment for six years awaiting the green light.

The approval is Senator Watt’s first major act as the new Environment Minister.

“Following the consideration of rigorous scientific and other advice including submissions from a wide cross-section of the community, I have today made a proposed decision to approve this development, subject to strict conditions, particularly relating to the impact of air emissions levels from the operation of an expanded on-shore Karratha gas plant,” Senator Watt said in a statement.

The move was welcomed by the Coalition and fiercely opposed by the Greens.

Senator Pocock stands with the Greens in condemning the government’s decision.

“Labor was elected in 2022 on a promise of stronger climate action and reforming our broken environmental laws, and re-elected while committing to finally deliver this change,” he said.

“Approving this project before meeting that commitment is a betrayal of their promise to the Australian people.”

Unions backed the government decision, saying it prioritises the future and security of jobs.

Paul Farrow, national secretary of the Australian Workers’ Union, described it as a victory for common sense.

“Minister Watt’s announcement correctly prioritises and secures the future of well-paid union jobs in WA and secures the supply of a crucial transition fuel we need as more renewable energy sources like wind and solar come online,” he said.

“Today’s decision to maintain a stable, operational project employing well over a thousand hydrocarbon workers in well-paid jobs is a victory for common sense and allows our members to continue their important work for years to come.”

READ ALSO Pacific leaders link Australia’s bid to co-host COP31 to North West gas project decision

Greenpeace said the approval was environmentally irresponsible.

“This is a terrible decision that brings Woodside’s destructive gas drills one step closer to Scott Reef, a magnificent marine ecosystem that is home to threatened species like pygmy blue whales and green sea turtles,” Greenpeace Australia CEO David Ritter said.

“The North West Shelf facility is one of Australia’s dirtiest and most polluting fossil fuel projects.

“This approval brings Woodside’s toxic gas plans closer to Scott Reef, holds back the clean energy transition underway in WA, and fuels growing climate damage in Australia and around the world.”

Earlier in the week, Pacific Island leaders banded together to call on Mr Albanese to reject the extension of the gas project in order to be “worthy” of co-hosting the COP31 climate change conference in the region.

“Pacific leaders have made it clear: there is no future for our nations if fossil fuel expansion continues,” Tuvalu’s Climate Change and Environment Minister Maina Talia said.

“The North West Shelf extension would lock in emissions until 2070, threatening our survival and violating the spirit of the Pacific-Australia climate partnership.

“If Australia wants to host COP31 with us, it must uphold the trust we placed in it by permanently rejecting this project.

“This goes beyond politics. It is about the moral clarity to stand with those most affected by climate change.”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

36
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest

Does anyone know how much we as the Australian people actually get out of this new project? How much royalties and tax will be paid of this? Or will all profits go to the shareholders and owners as usual when our natural resources are tapped, and the population is stuck with the climate issues and cleanup.
Unfortunately none of the newspapers seem to cover that angle

I’m sometimes unsure if something is Labor policy, or Liberal policy, but it doesn’t matter whether the cat is black or white, as long as it catches the mouse. The mouse in this case being rational policy in the national interest. Green cats don’t catch mice, just hiss, spit, yowl and caterwaul to attract attention.

The perfect example of a hypocrite. Mr Rugby player was quite happy to fly all over the world to have his head buried in a rugby pitch, and also quite happy to jump on a pollie special after savouring the delights of the Chairman’s lounge. I’m alright Jack, he says on his huge salary. I wonder what the poor people are doing battling energy poverty he wonders

Stephen Saunders10:24 am 29 May 25

“Cementing a legacy of climate harm for generations”. For a former Wallabies open side flanker, Dave sure does talk flowery fancy eh.

In woke Canberra, this sort of moral speechifying is regarded as perfectly-normal United Nations virtue-signalling. I don’t know that I’d try it on at a pub in Mullewa or Moree.

Capital Retro9:47 am 29 May 25

How about you go and chain yourself in protest to a coral reef in the Pacific, Mr Pocock because coral and sand from Pacific Islands are being extracted and sold to the building industry.
This practice, particularly dredging of coral reefs and coastal mining of sand and aggregates, is common in many Pacific Island nations for use as building materials, landfill, and in cement manufacturing.

CR are you talking about that nasty CO2 polluting cement, which is used to build homes, hospitals, schools and keeps wind turbines from falling over ? Well most of the time at least.

Capital Retro12:23 pm 29 May 25

Is that why everything has gone quiet, then?

I was going to add “just like bird blenders do when the wind stops blowing and the lights go out” but that might stir a few others up so I will make no further comment.

Well it’s not often I agree with the unions but here the AWU is 100% correct. A victory for common sense.

What specifically is Pocock complaining about ? Is it Australia exporting gas to earn revenue and lift standards of living in gas importing countries ?

Is it that those countries are using nice, reliable, clean gas rather than coal to power their economies ?

Is it that more gas means lower prices and less chance of local blackouts ?

According to Tuvalu “there is no future for our nations if fossil fuel expansion continues”. Any science to back that up Minister ?

Here’s some science refuting it:

https://islandtimes.org/pacific-nation-tuvalu-has-grown-by-73-hectares-over-40-years/

Is it that gas is a dispatchable power generation source that marries nicely with the ongoing transition to cheaper and cleaner renewables, compared to expensive nuclear or coal?

Gas is an important fuel, but also as a raw ingredient into manufacturing.

Labor saw they got voted in with a small vote and preferences.

As opposed to the LNP with an even smaller vote with fewer preferences.

Yes, I think that is how democracy works.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.