26 November 2025

Plan to roll out streetlight EV chargers hits 'engineering challenges'

| By James Coleman
Join the conversation
79
EV charger

A user spotted the EV charger hanging from its internal cables. Photo: Canberra Notice Board Group, Facebook.

The ACT Government’s plan to mount electric vehicle chargers on streetlight poles has hit a hurdle, after the city’s only trial charger was found broken off and dangling by its cables over the weekend.

The device – initially installed on Eastlake Parade at Kingston Foreshore in mid-2024 as part of a six-month pilot program – was spotted hanging precariously on Saturday afternoon (15 November).

A local EV owner posted a photo to the Canberra Notice Board Group, saying she “never knew they had street charging ports on Eastlake Pde. A bit dodgy, so reported to Access Canberra”.

While commenters quickly blamed vandalism, the ACT Government said that wasn’t the cause.

READ ALSO Ice sports developers want to build a new facility, but they don’t want it in Tuggeranong

In response to questions from Region, a spokesperson confirmed the charger was damaged at about 2 pm and repaired roughly an hour later.

“The damage does not appear to have been caused by vandalism, rather unintentional misuse and/or a faulty door locking mechanism,” the spokesperson said.

Charger

The charger – as it’s meant to appear. Photo: James Coleman.

The Kingston Foreshore charger was designed to test whether Canberra’s existing streetlight network could support public EV charging – an approach increasingly adopted in major cities overseas, including London, Los Angeles and Hamburg, and here in Australia in Melbourne.

The ACT’s trial aimed to gauge the charger’s power draw, test the reliability of connecting charging infrastructure to streetlight wiring, and examine how well the system worked given that many poles aren’t powered during daylight hours.

Despite the weekend’s mishap, the government says usage to date has been “consistent” and user feedback “positive”.

EV charger

As part of the trial, the charger is free to use. Photo: James Coleman.

The Kingston pole had been selected because it sat near residential buildings and commercial traders; the adjacent two-hour parking space became EV-only during the trial.

At the time of installation, Minister for City Services Tara Cheyne said using existing poles would be “a convenient option for motorists and a great way to increase EV charging options without the need for additional infrastructure”.

The concept is said to eliminate earthworks, reduce visual clutter and take advantage of locations already well lit and adjacent to the kerb.

The ACT Government says it remains interested in wider use of streetlight chargers, given the “extensive footprint” of the lighting network, but acknowledges the technology is not ready for a city-wide rollout.

“There are some engineering challenges that will need to be addressed prior to widespread adoption of streetlight chargers,” the spokesperson said.

Chief among these are mechanical issues such as those seen on Saturday, as well as technical ones – ensuring the local energy grid can handle the extra demand and streetlights can be energised during the day (not all of them are).

EV charging

The charger is back up and running. Photo: Canberra Notice Board Group, Facebook.

The government is working with local electricity provider Evoenergy to finalise assessment of the charger’s performance.

A full report on the trial is expected later this year, which will inform whether additional streetlight-mounted chargers are proposed across town centres or higher-density suburbs.

“The power draw from the electrical network is a critical element that will need to be considered to determine the viability of a larger rollout,” the ACT Government told Region earlier this year.

Given the weekend’s incident, the government says it will also consider additional measures to protect chargers in public spaces if the technology proceeds.

“The placement of EV streetlight chargers in public spaces with high levels of passive surveillance and CCTV cameras nearby are steps that may be taken to reduce the risk of vandalism,” the spokesperson said this week.

For now, the Kingston charger is back in operation along Eastlake Parade and free to use for EV owners.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

79
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Capital Retro5:35 pm 26 Nov 25

“Generic” is the new buzzword for our resident leftie intellectuals.

Hey, I’ve made you a “generic” script for your selective googling and AI assistance. It will surely save you some time having to type the same thing each day.

“Hey Google, why is *insert generic renewable technology* the worst? Give me a list of their horrible problems to copy and paste.”

It’s only three syllables CR so it’s manageable.

“Renewables” is four syllables and they really start to struggle at that point.

Capital Retro1:53 pm 27 Nov 25

That is one of the worst comeback attempts ever from you.

You have actually attempted to lower yourself to my level which is a capitulation of industrial size.

Dr Phil would be impressed.

Pretty sure Penzero was always below you CR, so not sure how he would attempt to lower himself to your level.

Anyway, good luck with the selective AI googling, you never need think independently.

Its not a charger. Its EVSE.

Michael Pless5:09 pm 26 Nov 25

Interesting comment in the article: “…rather unintentional misuse and/or a faulty door locking mechanism,” from a “spokesman. Given that you plug one end of a cable into it, it’s hard to see how it could be “unintentional misuse.”

As a regular visitor to Hamburg, I can attest to the success of public EV charging infrastructure there. Just driving down suburban laneways you’ll see post-mounted chargers frequently. Germans (and Europeans generally) have really taken to EVs and as a result chargers can be found at most branded petrol stations in towns across the country.
The last two times I’ve flown into Hamburg, while I’d booked a small ICE hire car they’d re-allocated me an Ora Cat (a full EV) – which I’ve been very happy with as it was very cheap to drive.

Capital Retro9:18 am 26 Nov 25

AI Overview agrees with you 100%:

“Problems with street EV charging in Hamburg include charger availability, reliability issues like faulty or damaged stations, slow charging speeds, and complex payment systems often requiring multiple apps. There can also be issues with cable management and poor internet connectivity affecting charger functionality.”

I don’t rely on an AI query to make my comments – I speak from personal experience. But thanks for your input…

Trust CR to post about things he has no idea about, using an approach that is far from reliable.

You just love to post utter nonsense don’t you? What generic drivel that AI threw out anyway.

Haha, the selective Googling King CR strikes again.

Look how easy it is to shift the AI Overview:

“The benefits of the Hamburg street EV chargers include convenience for residents in urban areas, cost savings on fuel, and a contribution to the city’s eco-friendly development goals. Hamburg’s focus on increasing its EV infrastructure, including free parking for EVs in the city center, makes it a model for sustainable urban mobility.”

Lol Capital Retro disputes someone’s lived experience with a generic language modelling response and zero personal experience. It’s been almost 20 years since Bill Burr made the joke that people arguing on the internet will always refer to “reasons why I am right dot com” and yet the concept still hasn’t caught on.

Gregg Heldon12:29 pm 26 Nov 25

Service station forecourts in the UK, StuartM are being used overnight by people charging using the chargers available.
If we lived in Europe or the UK, we’d probably only have one car and it’d probably be an EV.

You’re not alone Stuart, most of the renewable champions here never do any research before commenting.

Penfold thinks “freedom of speech” means “lying for convenience”, as he does.

Wrong article Axon. This is the topic where we’d expect the mind numbing “renewables are cheaper”.

How about that 37% electricity price rises 🤕

Penfold, I think either you had a typo there or you misinterpreted something. Stuart is not against EVs, chargers or renewables in his comment (at least not outwardly, it seems the opposite). The one lacking research is your buddy CR who is opposed to said things. So how in this case has anyone besides CR not done any research before commenting? Also no one mentioned renewables besides you.

Well TG EVs and renewables are like siblings aren’t they, all part of the climate zeitgeist.

CR just seemed to be validating this article’s pov on some of the problems EV chargers are having and copped a little sledge for it.

But if you’d prefer a more topical comment perhaps it might be that the European manufacturers who said they’d stop making ICE cars are backtracking those claims rather quickly. Do you think this is one reason why ?

Pengold thinks “research” is reading The Australian and right wing blogs each day.

Got to unthinkingly regurgitate the daily Groupthink talking points.

👨‍🦯

Capital Retro4:03 pm 26 Nov 25

I regularly visit Queanbeyan and I have never seen any of the numerous EV charging bays behind the Q and the general area being used.

The service station at Chisholm shops has several EV charging bays and once again, I have never seen them in use.

I speak from personal experience too but you can bet Seano will make the usual comment of “none of the above is true”.

Funny how I constantly get bagged for living in the past and not having the intellect to adopt and understand new technology isn’t it.

After all, AI is an acronym for Aggregated Information, right?

How about the 37% rise in in the price of tea, Penfold? Any other irrelevant comments?

Irrelevant also to the fact renewables are proven cheaper for electricity generation.

No denial of my point of course.

If you had a point Axon it wasn’t expressed particularly well.

But you should spare a thought for working Australians before dismissing the 37% electricity hike. How could this happen if err …. “renewables are cheaper” ?

Axon, I heard Kool aid has risen by 50%

Low and behold Axon, you’ve actually made a comment about renewables which has a semblance of truth about it. Yes, there are times when renewables provide cheaper generation of electricity. That is a fact.

But of course that doesn’t deliver that cheap little electron anywhere for consumption. That takes transmission, greedy renewable generators, wholesalers and retailers. And that’s when prices start skyrocketing. But well done for stumbling over a fact.

Was the statement intentional ?

Michael Pless5:05 pm 26 Nov 25

I’ve used the ones behind the Q – when they haven’t been ICE’d by some cretin in his lumbering behemoth, or someone who is just too lazy to park in the multitude of other spaces in the car park. The latest I saw was someone in their Kluger (Canberra registration). I’ve never seen the ones at Canberra Central other than full. The good news is that soon there will be a lot more for you to go and inspect around the QPRC as part of Council’s plan on their website. There’s even some up in Googong! Here’s a tip: usually people use them and then leave.

Capital Retro6:11 pm 26 Nov 25

Tea was half-price in most supermarkets last week.

We will never get half-price renewable power.

Penzero says:
“renewables provide cheaper generation of electricity. That is a fact.”

Finally some truth in one of your statements.

Was it intentional or just a slip?

Capital Retro6:45 am 27 Nov 25

Thanks JS9, CR is trustworthy.

Renewable energy isn’t.

“We will never get half-price renewable power.”

How often do you get half price coal power Capital? You do say some silly things. BTW Renewables still cheapest form of energy and renewables investment is the only thing keeping a lid on your power bill.
https://www.afr.com/policy/energy-and-climate/renewables-growth-pushing-down-power-prices-aemo-20251029-p5n69s

Capital Retro8:26 am 27 Nov 25

Another bedtime story by Seano.

Speaking of silly comments, your article states wholesale electricity prices fell “27% compared to the same quarter last year”.

Yet CPI yesterday reported electricity prices rose 37% in 12 months.

Perhaps you could explain how that’s possible. Using mathematics, preferably.

Penfold, you are catching on to the fact that generation is around 30%-40% of costs, so costs can go up even where generation cost goes down, as it has.

Yet the rise in CPI cost for electricity is consequent on none of those things, as a little reading would tell you (albeit you would close your eyes). It is a direct function of the withdrawal of government subsidies. The underlying electricity price actually fell a fraction of a percent.

You also appear to imagine that no more electricity transmission should ever be built, yet the country is expanding, with greater demand, especially as some functions are newly electrified. Your arguments with wholesalers and retailers are a different matter, nothing to do with generation where renewables are constantly proven cheaper.

Dribble dribble dribble. CR full of it like normal. Just because your anecdotal evidence suggests one thing, doesn’t make it true. I am regularly in Queanbeyan as part of work, and regularly see the charging infrastructure in use – never flat chat, but rarely are there not at least a couple of chargers in use. Do you drive around and whinge when a fuel station isn’t being used?

Speaking of lies, damn lies and Penfold’s abuse of statistics…

Penfold claims ‘ …your article states wholesale electricity prices fell “27% compared to the same quarter last year”’

But what the actual quote form the article says without Penfold’s mis-editing is: “Wholesale electricity prices in Australia’s east coast grid fell by 27 per cent compared to the same quarter last year”.

You’ve deliberately cut the quote to misrepresent what it was saying.

Contemptible and exactly why all of your commentary can be immediately dismissed Penfold

Wonderful to hear Axon. So perhaps we can move to stage 2 – capital costs and variable costs. Because sadly that’s where the dreamy “renewables are cheaper” line falls flatter than a wind turbine in a South Australian storm. The cost of even building the wind turbine, both in $ and carbon footprint is enormous.

But now you’re onto something else – those government subsidies. Let’s start at the beginning – why would a government feel the need to subsidise electricity in the first place ? Because the price was coming down by $275 we were told. So why subsidise ? More renewables, cheaper power immediately we were told. How did prices instead rise around $1,000 ? The sun didn’t even send a bill, so what went so horribly wrong ?

Reality is what happened. Blackout Bowen didn’t factor in that little electron having to be transported from Lake George or what used to be a nice rainforest to someone’s house. Not just transported, but in a timely and efficient manner too. That meant more costs to build and to “firm”. Which is a nice way of saying, to make that electron fit for consumption. And that process is very expensive.

So to try and hide this from we voters they spent billions of our money pretending energy prices weren’t exploding. It got them through an election, plus a pack of lies about nuclear, but now reality has come to bite. And they’ve fooled you so much that you’d laughingly tell us that the reason prices have exploded is the subsidies have been removed. Welcome to reality Axon. The sun won’t send you a bill but the power company sure will.

Thanks seano, asking you to explain the power price explosion, using mathematics, was always going to be bridge too far.

Classic Penfold. You get caught in a deliberate lie and then try to cover with smugness. Historically when you’ve cornered yourself the emojis won’t be too far behind.

You lose debate after debate on this forum because your ideas are so bad that you have to cheat to try to make an argument and it begs the question what rational person would do misrepresent a quote so deliberately to try to create an argument?

Surely a rational person would consider that if they have to make things up to make their ideas work then maybe the should re-examine their ideas.

Penzero repeating the Groupthink talking points ad nauseum even when he’s been presented the direct evidence showing he’s wrong repeatedly.

The bad faith arguments and inability to move behind his extreme black and white worldview.

Another day ending in Why?

Capital Retro1:47 pm 27 Nov 25

Fossil fuel stations pay their own way, Seano. No need to whinge about that.

Conversely, EV chargers are heavily subsidized by the taxpayer.

You also had a rant on another thread that “electricity by coal was never half price”. Well, 50 years ago when Australia had very cheap and 100% reliable coal-fired electricity generators, the retail price of electricity did vary according to fluctuation in the price of coal.

I know that from personal experience so don’t call me a liar again.

False, Penfold.

Surprise.

Why have you not picked up on the small decrease in underlying electricity prices in the last month? Why have you not agreed with the AFR, as quoted by Seano, that east coast wholesale prices are 27% lower than the same quarter last year? All you could do in reply to his demolition of your position was try an abusive lie in exactly the province where you are demonstrated to fail consistently.

Not only have the above wholesale generation costs fallen 27% year on year but they fell at least 30% from the previous quarter, and in the futures market are projected to fall further. This is simply a surge in renewables production. The driver of high retail prices is spot market gas. Annual offers will always show less volatility than underlying short term costs, in this or any field.

The AEMO/Gencost report costs transmission infrastructure and firming, costs which are borne as investments by the electricity companies. This feeds into their price. The result across all potential forms of new generation is that renewables are cheaper.

Your supposed “stage 2” is a lie to the extent you purport it is not included in total cost of new generation. Renewables are proven cheaper. Companies and countries recognise it and are acting accordingly.

Axon perhaps the ABS numbers and commentary are worth a read. This from yesterday:

“Annual Goods inflation was 3.8 per cent, up from 3.7 per cent in the 12 months to September 2025. The main contributor was electricity (37.1 per cent). “

“Electricity costs rose 37.1 per cent in the 12 months to October 2025.”

https://www.abs.gov.au/statistics/economy/price-indexes-and-inflation/consumer-price-index-australia/latest-release

If you have more accurate numbers you’d better inform the Bureau of Stats who produce many of our national economic statistics. Sounds like you’re in denial.

It might also be worth reading about the tens of billions renewables receive in government subsidies. If they’re cheaper, why do they need subsidisation ? It’s a question you’ve never answered, and we all know why.

Al Gore called it an inconvenient truth.

“Fossil fuel stations pay their own way, Seano. No need to whinge about that.”

This is a strawman argument Capital. Try harder.
“You also had a rant on another thread that “electricity by coal was never half price”.”

No….that’s not what happened…you are getting forgetful….I pointed out the ludicrousness of you complaining about not getting half priced renewable energy when you don’t get half priced fossil fuel energy.

I also reminded you that the cost of renewable energy which have been shown to you repeatedly is cheaper than fossil fuel energy.

“Well, 50 years ago when Australia had very cheap and 100% reliable coal-fired electricity generators, the retail price of electricity did vary according to fluctuation in the price of coal.”

What are you talking about? You do realise that 50 years ago most of our energy was generated by state owned power companies.

And it really, really doesn’t matter what the situation was 50 years ago anyway….the issue today is a) our coal fleet is aging and it is slow and expensive to replace b) coal process emissions (plus airborne pollution) which are doing huge harm to the environment and c) renewables with firming technology ..in this century….now…today…in 2025…are cheaper & quicker to build.

“I know that from personal experience so don’t call me a liar again.”

How did I call you a liar about your claims about what the situation was 50 years go before you made the claims? That’s quite a trick.

Regardless, you need to come into this century and at least try to understand the situation we’re dealing with now if you want to contribute sensibly on energy.

“We will never get half-price renewable power.”

Funnily enough for CR, The cost of renewable energy is less than half the cost of what it was just 10 years ago with prices continuing to drop as technology matures and manufacturing expands at scale.

Making it already cheaper than your precious coal and becoming more so every year.

https://www.visualcapitalist.com/the-plummeting-cost-of-renewable-energy/

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.