19 June 2025

Productivity reform also means tax reform, Treasurer suggests

| By Chris Johnson
Join the conversation
11
Jim Chalmers, Treasurer of Australia

Treasurer Jim Chalmers wants tax reform to be discussed at this year’s productivity roundtable . Photo: Michelle Kroll.

Treasurer Jim Chalmers has declared productivity to be the Federal Government’s first priority, saying Australia has to get on top of its two-decade old productivity problem.

Speaking at the National Press Club this week (18 June), Dr Chalmers said he was open to new ideas and fresh approaches; looking forward to hosting the productivity roundtable in August, which the Prime Minister announced last week.

The Treasurer doesn’t want to be constrained by tired formulas, and tax reform will definitely be on the table for discussion.

“Productivity is our primary focus,” he said.

“Too often it’s seen as a cold, almost soulless, concept – when it’s really the best way of making people better off over time, creating more opportunities, making our economy and our society more dynamic.

“By now our shortage of productivity growth is well known and broadly understood.

“Almost every comparable country has the same challenge.

“Our own productivity problem hasn’t been with us for a couple of years, it’s been with us for a couple of decades.”

The Treasurer said in the 10 years before the pandemic, productivity grew only half as fast as it had two decades earlier.

He said the 2022 federal election coincided with the largest quarterly fall in productivity growth in almost half a century.

His incoming government brief received from Treasury last month identified four key reasons why.

READ ALSO Two tiers of government vow to work together to prioritise Canberra projects

“Firstly, our economy is not dynamic or innovative enough,” Dr Chalmers said.

“Secondly, private investment has picked up, but not by enough to make our capital deep enough.

“Thirdly, skills aren’t abundant enough or matched well enough to business needs.

“Finally, our changing industrial base and the growth in services – where productivity is harder to find, and where traditional measures don’t account well for quality…

“We’ve encouraged a broader approach to productivity that goes beyond the old, tired and formulaic fights.”

Along with productivity, the other top priorities for the government are budget sustainability and resilience in the face of global volatility.

For the Treasurer, that all adds up to placing tax reform on the table when the roundtable is convened.

“No sensible progress can be made on productivity, resilience or budget sustainability without proper consideration of more tax reform,” he said.

“I don’t just accept that, I welcome it. Tax is one of many ways our three primary economic challenges are related and reinforcing [that] in each case we know what the problems are.

“We’ve made good progress, with more work already underway, we know we need to do more, and now is the best time to work out the next steps.”

Accountancy umbrella group Chartered Accountants ANZ welcomed that news, with its CEO Ainslie van Onselen saying tax reform was an important part of boosting productivity.

“And it’s the right step forward to have it on the table,” Ms van Onselen said.

“I’m glad to see the Treasurer acknowledged this in his address today, and we look forward to seeing tax reform firmly on the agenda at the productivity roundtable.

“Our system is over-reliant on personal income tax, and that is unfairly punishing Australians also facing cost of living and housing pressures.

“We agree, we need to move beyond calling for tax reform, and actually do it.”

READ ALSO PM says it’s understandable Trump stood him up (but he did meet other world leaders)

The productivity roundtable will be held over three days from 19 August and kicked off by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese.

It will be convened in the Cabinet room at Parliament House, which only seats about 25 people.

That means not everyone wanting an invitation will be getting one.

The Opposition, for one, isn’t likely to get a seat at the table, but the Treasurer assures there will be a mix of government, business, union and civil society representatives and experts.

“Ahead of the discussions we will publish the agenda, key issues and attendees,” Dr Chalmers said.

“There’s a lot of interest in being a part of it and I’m encouraged by that.

“But I assure everyone the roundtable won’t be the only opportunity to feed in ideas.

“We will ensure everyone has the ability to contribute both before and after these discussions and Ministers will play a key role here too.

“Soon we’ll call for targeted submissions, which can be submitted through a dedicated Treasury channel.”

Contributions will have to meet three preconditions.

“First, ideas should be put forward in the national interest, not through the prism of sectoral, state or vested interests,” the Treasurer said.

“Second, ideas or packages of ideas should be budget neutral at a minimum but preferably budget positive overall, taking into account the necessary trade‑offs.

“And third, ideas should be specific and practical not abstract or unrealistic.

“In return I give everyone this commitment – we won’t come at this from an ideological point of view but from the practical, pragmatic and problem‑solving middle ground we’re most comfortable on.

“A related point, and because the group will be small and focused – finding consensus will be everyone’s responsibility.

“We want to encourage participants to build broad coalitions on changes that cross the aisle, in the parliament and outside as well.”

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

11
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
Incidental Tourist5:08 pm 20 Jun 25

I bet this productivity discussion will end up with more taxes on real estate. And given that states already control majority of real estate taxes (such as land tax, Stamp Duty, rates, Development approvals, division fees etc.) the only federal source of revenue remaining is attack on negative gearing (NG) and capital gains taxes (CGT). Both NG and CGT are closely linked to personal income. So any change in NG or CGT mean more income tax, and hence punishing productivity.

The “innovative” source of revenue is “taxing wealth”. Tax on wealth sounds as good as communist manifesto. We have already seen tax on super balances above $3M. While it seems like large amount today, this cap is not indexed. So in decade or two many super balances of those who are in their 20s today will catch up to it because of inflation. They will have to pay far above 15% tax of super meaning again more income tax. But there are many scenarios when assets in super lack liquidity and indivisible. For example if farmers own their farm in their self-managed super fund, how are they going to pay tax on “wealth”? This farm will reach the $3M threshold because of inflation. So tax on wealth means tax on inflation. Another “wealth tax” scenario is home owners whose “wealth” is locked in their house. So it’s interesting to see how people end up paying their fair share of “wealth tax”? Will “wealth tax” mean another form of land tax/rates payable to both states and ATO?

The only way to increase productivity is to cut through regulations and red tapes. It also means reduction of welfare. The amount of welfare we have is not sustainable going forward. We need frank and fair conversation around entitlements. You can start with public housing. I’ve seen too many those young in their 20s or 30s who are busy to persuade everybody they can’t work and they should have a public house. The main scenario in the past for young to get public housing was serious physical disability. Today disability definition is far too wide. Today we have people “unfit for work” yet they are quite fit for regular overseas holidays. How can you improve productivity if you encourage young to stay out of work? How can you encourage work participation if public housing is “set up for life” entitlement?

Investment in housing is inherently unproductive and taxing it is far more efficient than other areas like income tax so it does make a good area for increased taxation, despite your rent seeking.

Pouring ever higher amounts of capital into housing actively hurts the ability to improve prodictivity.

Incidental Tourist9:56 pm 20 Jun 25

If you haven’t noticed yet, the more tax slapped on houses the less affordable they are. But this is half of the problem. The second half is wasting these taxpayer money on welfare which is fundamentally broken. It discourages people from work rather than encourages them to return to productive life.

“If you haven’t noticed yet, the more tax slapped on houses the less affordable they are.”

No, i haven’t noticed that because it isn’t true and placing higher land taxes is far more efficient than taxing peoples income, which discourages people from working more/harder.

The drain unproductive housing investment has on the rest of the economy significantly holds us back.

And just how do you suggest we improve productivity in sectors such as education and aged care? How do you even measure it in these areas? You could remove the mountains of extra administrative work that teachers have to do, and see if kid’s education actually improves. But in aged care?? I suspect that the so called increase will just be making sure that carers are paid as little as possible.

Stephen Saunders7:36 am 20 Jun 25

Dr Jim Chalmers [PhD in Keating] is passionate about “increasing productivity”. Everything’s on the table.

Provided always, that we start from UN “net zero”, open borders, the government/care economy, third-world resource giveaways, absurd levels of “export education”, and highly-incentivised real-estate speculation.

HiddenDragon8:18 pm 19 Jun 25

“We want to encourage participants to build broad coalitions on changes that cross the aisle, in the parliament and outside as well.”

In other words – fiscal reality has caught up with us, and now that the election is in the rear vision mirror, we want to share the blame for the pain that will ensue from findings ways to pay for all the votes we bought.

Incidental Tourist5:58 pm 19 Jun 25

A most direct impediment to productivity is red tape, burden of regulations and compliance. Real estate is good example of honey pot taxing and excessive regulation resulting in housing crisis. There is no appetite to reduce red tape or tax burden. And therefore unfortunately with increasing tax burden productivity is doomed to go backward.

Here’s another tip Jimbo. Get rid of this renewables rubbish. It’s intermittent and too expensive. Last year electricity increased by 13% and this year by 10%. You’ve had record bankruptcies since you took.over and now want to have another meeting about productivity. Yeah that’ll fix the problem.

Here’s a tip Jim – the bigger the government, the lower productivity growth is going to be. Get out of the way of business.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.