25 November 2025

Stark new numbers show just how hard buying a house has become

| By Ian Bushnell
Join the conversation
15
Real estate signs

Canberra’s two-tier housing market is complicating the affordability story. Photo: Michelle Kroll.

It’s become marginally easier to buy your own home in Canberra in recent years, but only because of the post-pandemic downturn after the record high prices of 2022 and the apartment boom.

Cotality’s latest Housing Affordability Report, compiled with the ANU, shows national dwelling prices, particularly for standalone houses, continue to rise further out of the reach of many Australians and that the share of income needed to pay a mortgage has nearly doubled.

Three of the four key national indicators – the price-to-income ratio, years required to save a deposit, and the share of income needed to rent – all hit record highs in 2025, signalling that both buying and renting have reached unsustainable levels for many Australians.

READ ALSO The old building standard that’s caught up with at least one Gungahlin homeowner

Despite recent rate dips, the cost of servicing a new loan is stubbornly high, requiring 45 per cent of the median household income.

Saving a standard 20 per cent deposit nationally takes nearly 12 years, and now over a decade in four major capital cities, Sydney, Adelaide, Brisbane, and Perth.

Affordability has deteriorated most sharply for houses. The median house value is now 8.9 times the average income, up from 6.6 five years ago, and it takes almost 12 years to save a deposit, 34.6 per cent longer than five years ago.

Things are only marginally better in Canberra, where it takes 9.5 years to save a deposit for a house and 38.8 per cent of household income to service the mortgage. In 2020, it was just 25 per cent.

The median house value is 7.1 times the median income, down from 7.7 in September 2022.

Overall, the median dwelling value is 6.2 times the median income, down from 6.8; it takes 8.2 years to save a deposit, and the mortgage repayments chew up about a third of household income (33.5%).

The data shows the two-tier nature of the Canberra market, with the median unit value 4.2 times the median income, requiring 5.6 years to save a deposit and needing 22.9 per cent of income to service the mortgage.

The oversupply of much cheaper units and the ACT’s higher incomes are skewing the Canberra data, but in a market again on the rise due to interest rate cuts and the Commonwealth’s first home buyer changes, affordability is likely to worsen in the long term.

Housing affordability metrics by house and unit, September 2025

While the first home buyer changes – a 5 per cent deposit and no lenders mortgage insurance – will reduce saving times, borrowers will still have to be able to service the mortgage.

Most industry commentators say the scheme will peter out as property values, particularly for houses, are driven up to reach or exceed the $1 million cap in Canberra.

Cotality Head of Research, Eliza Owen, said over the year to date, Canberra values had risen 3.3 per cent.

“What this data tells us is that a housing market downturn is not a sustainable solution to housing affordability, because we get to a point where supply or falling home values is basically a signal to the market to restrict supply,” she said.

Ms Owen said the market could again stall next year due to rising inflation, which could change the interest rate trajectory, but that was not a solution to housing affordability, just part of the market cycle.

“If you want real, lasting structural change that has to come from things like tax reform, changes to housing supply and [buyer] incentives,” she said.

Ms Owen indicated that, with the current stock in Canberra, house prices were unlikely to moderate enough to become more affordable.

She said there had been an average of 67 house approvals a month over the past six months, well below the decade-average of 95 houses a month.

“So from the dwelling approvals data, it looks like there is that restriction of supply happening,” Ms Owen said.

“The fact that you have a median house value of over a million dollars, the fact that the housing affordability metrics for Canberra houses are quite high, that probably tells you that no, there’s not enough [stock] to make houses comfortably affordable.”

READ ALSO Will Jacka’s second stage go ahead? SLA head admits its future uncertain

Ms Owen said the affordability impacts were being seen higher up the income ladder, and that there were many adverse consequences from a lack of adequate, affordable housing.

She said some would look to higher-density housing, cities could lose their young people to the regions or overseas, and more pressure would come on the bank of mum and dad or inheritances, reinforcing the wealth gap and the haves and the have-nots of property ownership.

“You have people who get stuck in the rental market, which can also have consequences for people later in life if they’re retired and they still have rental costs,” Ms Owen said.

The numbers would only worsen without meaningful reform on both the supply and demand side, she said.

Canberra’s rental affordability is actually better than the other capitals, with 26.5 per cent of income required to pay house rent, and 21.9 per cent for a unit.

But the 11th annual National Shelter-SGS Economics and Planning Rental Affordability Index shows that Canberra’s high incomes mask the situation for those on low and fixed incomes.

The index found that people receiving JobSeeker and pensioners face ‘Severely’ to ‘Critically’ unaffordable rents in the ACT.

A hospitality worker would need to spend 40 per cent of their income on rent, while a minimum-wage couple faces a rent burden of 31 per cent of their combined income, placing both households in rental stress.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

15
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
richard stone2:18 pm 25 Nov 25

Keep on bringing ’em in Albo! Many will be living in tents soon.

Bringing who in?

Immigration is trending down. Australia’s housing market issues will not be fixed by closing the border, but the huge raft of unintended consequences with an aging population and a declining birth rate would do significant harm to the economy which would flow on to the property market. Simplistic solutions rarely solve complex problems.

devils_advocate1:22 pm 25 Nov 25

The government must urgently:

1. Further increase all lease variation charges on urban infill projects

2. Increase the amount of time taken to assess merit track assessments

3. Introduce new restrictions on who is able to finance, plan or coordinate any development projects, and rigidly apply additional capital adequacy assessments, per the developer licensing scheme.

These are the only certain means of preventing new unregulated “cowboys” from entering the new development market and achieving scale to compete with incumbents.

Neither major party will do anything about this issue because the moment they do they’ll get wedged by the other and we’ll all fall for it like we usually do (another reason I only vote for sensible independents).

I would love to see someone at least try to make it easier for people to downsize and/or move houses when properties no longer meet their needs. Stamp duty is a killer.

Capital Retro8:36 am 25 Nov 25

Tell them to forego their social lives, get second jobs and save some extra money.

We baby-boomers did it. I didn’t even have a car.

Unfortunately it’s so bad, that doesn’t work. I knew Babyboomer who point this out to me and that was echoed by couples and single people I meet who still can’t buy a home.

Ah yes, despite all the clear metrics showing how much harder it is to purchase a property today, all a Boomer needs to ignore the evidence is a “back in my day” anecdote.

Instantly disproves the mountains of data showing the opposite. 🤦‍♂️

Capital Retro11:16 am 25 Nov 25

You are “full of it”, as usual chewy.

“back in my day” the deposit was a regulated one third. Today first home buyers can do it on 5% deposit and no stamp duty. Some of these future sub-prime mortgages must be written with hydraulic oil (boomers will know what I mean) so no deposit is paid at all. The mortgages are under water from day one. Some renters were never meant to buy homes.

There are plenty of opportunities for young people to earn extra money. Even overpaid public servants can.

People with higher than average intellects may be challenged though.

Capital Retro,
Thanks for outlining my exact point perfectly.

Your point about deposit requirements actually supports my argument, not yours. When you consider the overall cost of housing that is further boosted by reduced deposit requirements.

You even admit it yourself by calling them “sub-prime” “underwater from day 1” etc.

The overall financial requirements to purchase housing is significantly more difficult than the period you talk about, as every metric shows.

Second paragraph is just a repeat of your original “work harder” ignorance.

People with “higher than average intellects” don’t ignore the actual evidence, so understandably, they would be challenged by your continued drivel.

My adults kids have given up on the idea of buying a house.

Capital Retro8:34 am 25 Nov 25

Tell them to forego their social lives, get second jobs and save some extra money.

We baby-boomers did it. I didn’t even have a car.

Years ago I had $10k in the bank, single, worked two jobs, did HOURS of overtime…but still couldn’t afford to buy a home.

I mentioned this before but it’s worth repeating, in these times that doesn’t work.

Do not be so utterly blind to the facts of affordability Capital Retro.

There is no credit in your supposed endeavours when the reality is that house price to income ratios were far more favourable last century.

Capital Retro1:31 pm 25 Nov 25

Actually, it was because borrowing to buy anything was regulated and having to have one third deposit on your home purchase meant that the borrowers would rarely have their house repossessed. Lots of homes being repossessed now but you won’t hear anything about it because it is actively suppressed by vested interests.

There were no taxpayer funded schemes to assist first home buyers back then. No one got a free lunch. People expected it would be tough but they put their shoulder to the wheel.

These days, young people expect it all to be handed to them. A lot of the people who contradict me wouldn’t know what hard work is. They are the ones looking forward to a 4 day week.

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.