15 August 2025

Student safety not under threat by latest round of proposed job cuts, ANU says

| By Claire Fenwicke
Join the conversation
3

The Renew ANU process has been repeatedly slammed at campus protests. Photo: James Coleman.

The Australian National University has insisted that staff and student safety won’t be compromised by proposed changes to the Campus Environment division.

The latest change management plan (CMP) puts 16 occupied roles on the chopping block. Another eight vacant positions will be “disestablished”, along with 10 positions already vacated through the voluntary separation scheme (VSS) process. 18 new positions have been proposed.

According to the proposal, the VSS initiative will result in an estimated annual salary saving of $1,400,308.19, while the reduction in vacant and occupied staff positions will deliver a further $1,129,597.44 in salary and “on-costs”.

The division had previously been targeted in October 2024, which delivered annualised savings of $1.52 million, including $1.18 million in salary savings.

According to the CMP document, this latest stage was proposed to “address current deficiencies in contract management expertise” and increase efficiency through a “streamlined structure that enhances contract management and will result in improved service delivery”.

Chief Campus Environment Officer Jeremy Matthew told staff this next CMP would disestablish the Infrastructure and Planning, and Corporate portfolios, and expand the Operations portfolio (to include capital works, procurement, contract management and WHS).

“What we’re proposing here is a much more refined, simplified structure, clearly delineating between delivery functions and planning, strategy and revenue functions,” he said.

“We’re still going to need to cross-collaborate, we’ll never get away from that in our division, but I feel that the proposal that we’ve put forward will strengthen those connections.”

Under the proposal, building maintenance, landscape and conservation, WHS, and remote sites roles will be realigned into a new Assets and Maintenance Team within Operations.

Mr Matthew said the new team was off the back of about four years’ work to reduce the number of contracts for delivery services.

“What we’re proposing in here … [as] it’s always been a vendor-based setup, is to strengthen the contract management capability within that team,” he said.

READ ALSO ANU executives’ alleged conflicts of interest aired at Senate inquiry

A new Commercial, Planning and Strategy Portfolio would bring together environmental sustainability, engineering, estate systems and space planning, and revenue teams.

The currently closed University House would remain unchanged for now as a business case is currently being developed for its future operating model.

Among the jobs “at risk of being declared surplus” are the occupied SM2 security manager, three 05 UniSafe administration assistants and control officers, and the 06/07 WHS HAZMAT officer.

The ANU does have a contract with security provider MSS (valued at about $4.3 million per year) for 24/7 security services.

Chief Operating Officer Jonathan Churchill sent an email to all staff after the CMP was released.

“[This proposal contains changes to] operations group, including facilities colleagues currently working in colleges joining the CE Division, and completing the consolidation of the division’s organisational structure,” he said.

“The university can absolutely confirm that this change proposal will not impact student and staff safety at the university.”

NTEU ACT branch president Millan Pintos-Lopez said the ANU wasn’t just responsible for the physical safety of staff, who were already “overworked and undervalued”.

“[This proposal] relies heavily on ‘spill and fill’ change management, forcing colleagues to compete against each other for their livelihoods,” he said.

“This approach to change has long-term impacts on the workplace culture and mental well-being of staff, well beyond the change.

“In light of the recent Senate inquiry, it’s yet another example of poor executive leadership that the first all-staff email since [the hearings] is announcing further job cuts.”

National Tertiary Education Union (NTEU) division secretary Dr Lachlan Clohesy added: “The jobs that should be going are those of the Chancellor and Vice Chancellor.”

READ ALSO Chancellor Julie Bishop allegedly stopped university council from holding vote to pause Renew ANU

The latest news comes days after ACT independent Senator David Pocock called for Chancellor Julie Bishop to stand aside, and for his ACT Labor colleagues to do more.

ACT Labor Senator Katy Gallagher told the ABC she had been having a number of meetings with both ANU executives and concerned parties and that she was doing everything she “should be doing as a Senator”.

“I choose not to play that out in the media, because I’m choosing to try and get outcomes on this,” she said.

“I think there are significant problems with the way that Renew ANU is going, and I’ve raised those directly with the Vice Chancellor, and I’ve raised them directly with the [Federal Education] Minister, as have all of my federal colleagues … Governments have to be very careful about how they involve themselves in interfering with universities, and there’s been a lot of good reasons why that’s the case.

“I’m not going to call for anyone’s head right now, which is what some people want, whether it’s the Chancellor or the Vice Chancellor.”

Senator Gallagher did say she felt the Vice Chancellor and her executive needed to think about how the Renew ANU process was being undertaken, and that the Chancellor had to respond to the issues raised.

Feedback on the Campus Environment CMP is open until 28 August, with an implementation plan expected by 18 September.

Free Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? We package the most-read Canberra stories and send them to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.
Loading
By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.

Join the conversation

3
All Comments
  • All Comments
  • Website Comments
LatestOldest
davidmaywald7:35 pm 15 Aug 25

ANU’s standing has slipped across both research & teaching. And the uni’s relative position has fallen across major global tables, as well as in public perception. In Times Higher Education 2025 it sits at 73rd, while QS shows a slide from 19th (2016) to 30th (2025) and further to 37th (2026); Scimago 2025 also places ANU behind several Australian peers. These are signals of relative decline amid a fast-moving, more competitive sector…

The bottom line is that ANU’s fall in rankings and stature is multi-factor: pandemic and disaster shocks → fiscal stress; policy/visa turbulence → softer demand; governance and culture findings → brand damage; methodology shifts and intensifying domestic competition → relative rank loss… Renew ANU may stabilise finances. But restoring reputation, research intensity, and student experience (especially post-Nixon) will determine whether ANU regains momentum.

The primary causes interacted with each other:
1. Financial shock + structural deficit. COVID border closures, the January-2020 hailstorm and bushfires produced a hit of about $225 million; since 2019 expenses have risen faster than revenue, leading to large operating deficits. The University’s Renew ANU program (colleges being cut from 7 to 6, centralised hiring, tighter controls) is a response to restore solvency.
2. Heavy reliance on international students plus policy uncertainty. National caps and visa directions (Ministerial Directions 107 and 111) as well as stalled legislation on student caps have reduced commencements severely impacted planning certainty, dampening demand for Australian study, especially at research-intensive institutions most exposed to international revenue.
3. Culture and governance blows to the brand. The Nixon Review (May 2025) found entrenched bullying and sexism in the former College of Health & Medicine, ANU has accepted the recommendations. The 2018 cyber-breach exposed decades of personal data. Both damaged trust and recruitment appeal.
4. Sector-wide reputation dip, and methodology shifts. Australian universities’ reputational scores slipped in QS 2026; Times Higher Education 2024/25 and QS 2024/25 methodology changes lifted the weights for research quality as well as industry and graduate outcomes – areas where scale and medical research intensity favour ANU’s larger east-coast rivals.
5. Staff cuts and morale. Multi-year savings effort (reported at $250 million per annum by 2025, but some estimates target $300 million per annum by 2027) plus job losses and pay restraint have weighed on research capacity and student experience.

These inter-related factors have had negative impacts on research & teaching:
• Relative research output has declined, with visibility lag. While ANU still produces high-quality work, peers grew faster in volume and citations. This is reflected in Scimago 2025 (ANU 8th in Australia) and with Times Higher Education research-quality metrics contributing to the rank slide.
• Weighing down on student demand, and pressure for much better student experience. National QILT results show many Go8 universities below the overall satisfaction average. ANU’s own reports highlight cost controls and service rationalisation, which degrades the on-campus experience.

How many other business, large and small, are going through redundancies at the moment? Why does the ANU get a news article every time? Hundreds if not thousands of lives are impacted by business changes – can we please get off the “poor me” ANU stories

Daily Digest

Want the best Canberra news delivered daily? Every day we package the most popular Region Canberra stories and send them straight to your inbox. Sign-up now for trusted local news that will never be behind a paywall.

By submitting your email address you are agreeing to Region Group's terms and conditions and privacy policy.