T-Shirt Weather!

Watson said :

…………..IE: Ignore the trolls, don’t grumble about them.

I am a slow learner… Discussing the climate change or carbon tax with Mr G would be like trying to teach a hamster metaphysics. Only more painful.
I apologise if my analysis of the weather record sounds like I am working for Juliar Gillard by advocating her case that “climate change is real” and thereby prompts you to put me on ignore, but I assure you I am not pursuing her agenda. I am merely reporting the fact that we are getting temperature trends that continue to show a deteriorating trend, and you can’t get much more obvious than the ever-earlier 20°C days in August over the past 20–30 years I am seeing.

dtc said :

20.6 at 2.30pm

That counts as 21

21.3° at 2:20pm according to BOM. Lovely jogging weather around the lake at lunchtime.

qbngeek said :

Mr Gillespie said :

Also, how do you suppose a carbon tax would stop these temperatures in these situations from going up any further??

I am not against a carbon tax, I am against it being used to provide concessions to people to cancel it out and it therefore changes nothing. I would be happy to pay the extra $10 a week if it was going to researching decent renewable energy.

On the other hand I would be willing to stump up for RA premium membership if it meant I didn’t have to read comments by Mr G…..is that possible JB??

“Still a man hears what he wants to hear and disregards the rest”
– Paul Simon, 1969.

20.6 at 2.30pm

That counts as 21

Hide the stouts.
Crack open a lager.

Got it.

Skidbladnir said :

qbngeek said :

On the other hand I would be willing to stump up for RA premium membership if it meant I didn’t have to read comments by Mr G…..is that possible JB??

Those of use with Premium packages get to blacklist folk and add others as friends (as well as cleaning up when it comes to prize giveaways due to unreasonably small selection pools).
But if I blacklist Mr G, then when the rest of you grumble about him I have to go back and find out what he’d said… 🙁

IE: Ignore the trolls, don’t grumble about them.

Unless people quote him?

Skidbladnir said :

qbngeek said :

On the other hand I would be willing to stump up for RA premium membership if it meant I didn’t have to read comments by Mr G…..is that possible JB??

Those of use with Premium packages get to blacklist folk and add others as friends (as well as cleaning up when it comes to prize giveaways due to unreasonably small selection pools).
But if I blacklist Mr G, then when the rest of you grumble about him I have to go back and find out what he’d said… 🙁

IE: Ignore the trolls, don’t grumble about them.

I am a slow learner… Discussing the climate change or carbon tax with Mr G would be like trying to teach a hamster metaphysics. Only more painful.

qbngeek said :

On the other hand I would be willing to stump up for RA premium membership if it meant I didn’t have to read comments by Mr G…..is that possible JB??

Those of use with Premium packages get to blacklist folk and add others as friends (as well as cleaning up when it comes to prize giveaways due to unreasonably small selection pools).
But if I blacklist Mr G, then when the rest of you grumble about him I have to go back and find out what he’d said… 🙁

IE: Ignore the trolls, don’t grumble about them.

johnboy said :

qbngeek said :

Mr Gillespie said :

Also, how do you suppose a carbon tax would stop these temperatures in these situations from going up any further??

I am not against a carbon tax, I am against it being used to provide concessions to people to cancel it out and it therefore changes nothing. I would be happy to pay the extra $10 a week if it was going to researching decent renewable energy.

On the other hand I would be willing to stump up for RA premium membership if it meant I didn’t have to read comments by Mr G…..is that possible JB??

Already part of the package.

Awesome, wheres my wallet….

qbngeek said :

Mr Gillespie said :

Also, how do you suppose a carbon tax would stop these temperatures in these situations from going up any further??

I am not against a carbon tax, I am against it being used to provide concessions to people to cancel it out and it therefore changes nothing. I would be happy to pay the extra $10 a week if it was going to researching decent renewable energy.

On the other hand I would be willing to stump up for RA premium membership if it meant I didn’t have to read comments by Mr G…..is that possible JB??

Already part of the package.